Dr. Keith Baar, UC Davis โ€” Simple Exercises That Can Repair Tendons (Tennis Elbow, etc.), Collagen Fact vs. Fiction, Isometrics vs. Eccentrics, JAK Inhibitors, Growth Hormone vs. IGF-1, The Anti-RICE Protocol, and How to Use Load as an Anti-Inflammatory (#797)

Dr. Keith Baar is a professor at the University of California, Davis, in the Department of Physiology and Membrane Biology.

During his PhD studies, his research revealed that mechanical strain on muscle fibers activates the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway, a crucial regulator of muscular hypertrophy. 

Subsequently, he studied the molecular dynamics of skeletal muscle adaptation to endurance training under the guidance of Dr. John Holloszy, a legend in the field of exercise physiology, considered the father of modern exercise biochemistry.

Building on all of this experience, he conducted research into tendon health and the potential for engineering ligaments, which could have implications for treatment and recovery from injuries.

Dr. Baar now runs the Functional Molecular Biology Lab at UC Davis. His labโ€™s work ranges from studying molecular changes in our cells to conducting studies to effect real-world improvements in peopleโ€™s health, longevity, and quality of life.

Please enjoy!

Listen to the episode onย Apple Podcasts,ย Spotify,ย Overcast,ย Podcast Addict,ย Pocket Casts,ย Castbox,ย YouTube Music,ย Amazon Music,ย Audible, or on your favorite podcast platform. The transcript of this episodeย can be found here. Transcripts of all episodesย can be found here.

This episode is brought to you by Cresset prestigious family office for CEOs, founders, and entrepreneurs; AG1 all-in-one nutritional supplement; and Shopify global commerce platform, providing tools to start, grow, market, and manage a retail business.

[podcast-player id=”d7be84b6-bee9-4ffe-82a2-be20d9a3a52c” src=”https://rss.art19.com/episodes/d7be84b6-bee9-4ffe-82a2-be20d9a3a52c.mp3″ title=”Dr. Keith Baar, UC Davis โ€” Simple Exercises That Can Repair Tendons (Tennis Elbow, etc.), Collagen Fact vs. Fiction, Isometrics vs. Eccentrics, JAK Inhibitors, Growth Hormone vs. IGF-1, The Anti-RICE Protocol, and How to Use Load as an Anti-Inflammatory”]

This episode is brought to you by Cresset Family Office! Listeners have heard me talk about โ€œmaking before you manageโ€ for years. And for meโ€”as a writer and entrepreneurโ€”I definitely gravitate toward making. So itโ€™s important that I find the right people who are great at managing. Thatโ€™s why I trust this episodeโ€™s sponsor, Cresset Family Office

Cresset is a prestigious family office for CEOs, founders, and entrepreneurs. They handle the complex financial planning, uncertain tax strategies, timely exit planning, bill pay and wires, and all the other parts of wealth management that would otherwise pull me away from doing what I love most: making things, mastering skills, and spending time with the people I care about.ย  Experience the freedom of focusing on what matters to you with the support of a top wealth management team. Schedule a call today at cressetcapital.com/Tim to see how Cresset can help streamline your financial plans and grow your wealth.

Iโ€™m a client of Cresset. There are no material conflicts other than this paid testimonial. All investing involves risk, including loss of principal.


This episode is brought to you by ShopifyShopify is one of my favorite platforms and one of my favorite companies. Shopify is designed for anyone to sell anywhere, giving entrepreneurs the resources once reserved for big business. In no time flat, you can have a great-looking online store that brings your ideas to life, and you can have the tools to manage your day-to-day and drive sales. No coding or design experience required.

Go toย shopify.com/Timย to sign up for a one-dollar-per-month trial period. Itโ€™s a great deal for a great service, so I encourage you to check it out. Take your business to the next level today by visitingย shopify.com/Tim.


This episode is brought to you byย AG1!ย I get asked all the time, โ€œIf you could use only one supplement, what would it be?โ€ My answer is usuallyย AG1, my all-in-one nutritional insurance. I recommended it inย The 4-Hour Bodyย in 2010 and did not get paid to do so. I do my best with nutrient-dense meals, of course, butย AG1ย further covers my bases with vitamins, minerals, and whole-food-sourced micronutrients that support gut health and the immune system.ย 

I have always admired AG1โ€™s commitment to improving one product over many years, which is why I am excited about their latest upgrade:ย AG1 Next Gen. Itโ€™s the sameโ€”but improvedโ€”single-scoop, once-a-day product to support your mental clarity, immune health, and energy.ย Right now, youโ€™ll get a 1-year supply of Vitamin D free with your first subscription purchaseโ€”a vital nutrient for a strong immune system and strong bones.ย Visitย DrinkAG1.com/Timย to claim this special offer today and receive your 1-year supply of Vitamin D (and 5 free AG1 travel packs) with your first subscription purchase!ย Thatโ€™s up to a one-year supply of Vitamin D as added value when you try their delicious and comprehensive daily, foundational nutrition supplement that supports whole-body health.


Want to hear another episode that explores the possibilities of rapamycin? Have a listen to the conversation I had with Peter Attia, David M. Sabatini, and Navdeep S. Chandel at the source of this miraculous compound: Easter Island. Here, we discuss how one of the most important discoveries of medical science was almost lost, why metabolism (along with longevity) research is key to treating a long list of diseases, intermittent dosing of rapamycin, parenting advice from scientists on confidence and conflict, the necessary failures of good science, good fonts versus bad fonts, โ€œnon-potatoโ€ relationships, and much more.


What was your favorite quote or lesson from this episode? Please let me know in the comments.

Continue reading “Dr. Keith Baar, UC Davis โ€” Simple Exercises That Can Repair Tendons (Tennis Elbow, etc.), Collagen Fact vs. Fiction, Isometrics vs. Eccentrics, JAK Inhibitors, Growth Hormone vs. IGF-1, The Anti-RICE Protocol, and How to Use Load as an Anti-Inflammatory (#797)”

The Tim Ferriss Show Transcripts: L.A. Paul โ€” On Becoming a Vampire, Whether or Not to Have Kids, Getting Incredible Mentorship for $250, Transformative Experiences, and More (#796)

Please enjoy this transcript of my interview with L. A. Paul (lapaul.org). Paul is the Millstone Family Professor of Philosophy and Professor of Cognitive Science at Yale University, where she leads the Self and Society Initiative for the Wu Tsai Institute. Her research explores questions about the nature of the self and decision-making and the metaphysics and cognitive science of time, cause, and experience.

She is the recipient of fellowships from the Guggenheim Foundation, the National Humanities Center, and the Australian National University. She is the author of Transformative Experience and coauthor of Causation: A Userโ€™s Guide, which was awarded the American Philosophical Association Sanders Book Prize. Her work on transformative experience has been covered by The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Guardian, NPR, and the BBC, among others. And in 2024, she was profiled by The New Yorker

She is currently working on a book, under contract with Farrar, Straus and Giroux, about self-construction, transformative experience, humility, and fear of mental corruption.

Transcripts may contain a few typos. With many episodes lasting 2+ hours, it can be difficult to catch minor errors. Enjoy!

Listen to the episode on Apple PodcastsSpotifyOvercastPodcast AddictPocket CastsCastboxYouTube MusicAmazon MusicAudible, or on your favorite podcast platform.

[podcast-player id=”e6b8e87f-8823-4d6f-8b6e-4e8f8955cb59″ src=”https://rss.art19.com/episodes/e6b8e87f-8823-4d6f-8b6e-4e8f8955cb59.mp3″ title=”#796: L.A. Paul โ€” On Becoming a Vampire, Whether or Not to Have Kids, Getting Incredible Mentorship for $250, Transformative Experiences, and More (#796)”]

DUE TO SOME HEADACHES IN THE PAST, PLEASE NOTE LEGAL CONDITIONS:

Tim Ferriss owns the copyright in and to all content in and transcripts of The Tim Ferriss Show podcast, with all rights reserved, as well as his right of publicity.

WHAT YOUโ€™RE WELCOME TO DO: You are welcome to share the below transcript (up to 500 words but not more) in media articles (e.g., The New York Times, LA Times, The Guardian), on your personal website, in a non-commercial article or blog post (e.g., Medium), and/or on a personal social media account for non-commercial purposes, provided that you include attribution to โ€œThe Tim Ferriss Showโ€ and link back to the tim.blog/podcast URL. For the sake of clarity, media outlets with advertising models are permitted to use excerpts from the transcript per the above.

WHAT IS NOT ALLOWED: No one is authorized to copy any portion of the podcast content or use Tim Ferrissโ€™ name, image or likeness for any commercial purpose or use, including without limitation inclusion in any books, e-books, book summaries or synopses, or on a commercial website or social media site (e.g., Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc.) that offers or promotes your or anotherโ€™s products or services. For the sake of clarity, media outlets are permitted to use photos of Tim Ferriss from the media room on tim.blog or (obviously) license photos of Tim Ferriss from Getty Images, etc.


Tim Ferriss: So I am very interested in someone by the name of Quentin Smith and the role that he played in your life. How did that connection happen and what was the result of that connection?

L. A. Paul: I was at Antioch College. I had gotten my undergraduate degree, I think, or I was close to finishing. I can’t quite remember exactly when I met him, but I was already thinking I wanted to study philosophy, but wasn’t sure how to go about it, because I don’t have an undergraduate degree in philosophy. In fact, I tried twice to take philosophy classes and each time it was a huge disaster. And I realized about three or four weeks into the class, it just wasn’t working with me, so I dropped out. I never managed to take a single philosophy class when I was in college.

And yet, don’t ask me to explain this, I have no idea, I was convinced that philosophy was probably the thing that would be most meaningful for me to study and explore. I don’t know what to tell you about that other than I can be a reasonably stubborn individual in various ways, as my husband will be happy to elaborate on.

Okay, so I thought, “I really want to study philosophy. I don’t know how to do this or what the best way is,” and there are lots of different kinds of philosophy, I’ll just add. So you can do kind of Western philosophy, Eastern philosophy. These are rough categories, so Eastern might be Buddhism or related sorts of faith-based philosophical views. And then within Western style philosophy, so it’s continental philosophy and analytic-style philosophy, which is what I do.

Anyway, so I didn’t even have a grasp of these distinctions, but I was committed. So I needed to earn some money because that’s why I’d graduated, and I was just sort of hanging out with friends of trying to figure out what my next step would be. And so I worked for the college, driving back and forth to the airport to pick up invited speakers, and Quentin Smith was an invited speaker. So, I drive to the airport and I pick him up. I don’t think I knew anything about him. It wasn’t like I thought, “Oh, a philosopher, I want to meet this person.” It’s just some random invitation. He gets in the car โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: A pickup.

L. A. Paul: Yeah, some random pickup. Right, I picked him up, and he gets in the car, and we started talking. It’s a long drive. I think it was like โ€” I don’t remember. I think he came into Cincinnati, so we had like an hour and a half and he asked me about myself, and I asked him about him, and I discovered he’s a philosopher, and then we start talking and I say, “Oh, I really would love philosophy and I really want to do it, but I don’t really know how and I don’t know if the things I’m interested in are really philosophical.” And he said, “Well, tell me about it.” And I said, “Well, I really care about how to understand who we are in the world, and I think a lot about time and I’m trying to make sense of what it’s like to have a point of view.”

And so I started just blabbing basically as I’m โ€” I don’t know how old I was, like 22 or something. And he said as we’re driving, he’s like, “You should study philosophy. You’re exactly the kind of person who would be interested in doing philosophy.” And I said, “Well, what should I study?” And he said, “Well, you should read Martin Heidegger’s Being and Time to start, because that’s all about the nature of the self and time.” And I said, “Okay.” And then we kept going and we kept talking and I said, “Okay, I’m going to read this book.” And then he said, “Well, I think you should read the book.” And then he said, “And I think you also should study with me.” It was after like an hour, because I told him I studied โ€” I studied chemistry, and I really loved problem solving, so I loved organic chemistry. And that’s what I was really into when I was in college, and I was good at it. It was my thing. I could have become a chemist.

I also drove him back from his talk and I thought, “Okay, wow.” So, he goes off to have his visit and I immediately go to the library, dig out Being and Time, and start reading it. And I was like, “This is fantastic.” Confusing, but really interesting. So then I drive him back and I tell him what I’ve gotten out of the first, I don’t know, of 10 pages I had read. It’s very dense. It took me forever to read it, but I managed to get through 10 pages, and he said, “You should study with me. Here are my details. Let’s figure this out,” and so that was how it started. I didn’t know anything about him, but he was so great to talk to and so responsive, and he understood the intellectual problems that I wanted to explore, because he explores those intellectual problems. And I had never met anybody who had any understanding of this weird orientation that I had. I could tell you more, but that’s how it happened. It was completely random.

Tim Ferriss: So I’m going to come back to Quentin Smith, but I want to call back to something that you said a few minutes ago, which was you took some philosophy classes, I’m paraphrasing here, and they were disasters. Why were those classes disasters? What didn’t work?

L. A. Paul: Nothing worked. Okay, so they were a combination of things, and some of it was me, and some of it was certainly the teachers, and also some of it was analytic philosophy can be extremely inaccessible, okay?

It’s a beautiful way of thinking and it involves a very rigorous concepts-oriented approach to thinking about almost anything that you want to pick out in the world around us or how we think and how we make sense of the world, but it’s not very accessible in the sense that it doesn’t feel very natural. And so the first thing was I was both immature, very impressed with myself in the sense of like, “Well, I’ll just do this. I do mathematics, I can do chemistry, I do physics. Well, of course I can do this.” And I think I underestimated things, but also the teaching wasn’t very good. I put myself through college and I started at a big state school and the class was huge and the professor wasn’t really into the teaching and I had some TA, and so she would stand down there.

It was this huge โ€” there must’ve been 300 students in the lecture hall, and she would stand down on this blackboard and scribbled things on the blackboard, and I could barely see it, and I didn’t understand, really, what she was doing. I would do the readings and work really hard to understand the readings. The TA wasn’t especially into his job either. And then there was the first assignment, I worked incredibly hard on it, incredibly hard, and I had taken other classes, like writing classes and stuff like that, and the TA hated it, and I was so angry that I just dropped the class.

I was like, “I’m sorry, but this is bullshit,” so I dropped the class. That was the first time. And part of it was like the class wasn’t really designed โ€” it was designed, “Oh, these are the things you should know if you are going to think about philosophy as like a one-on-one,” and she started out with some history, but no one seemed to really care about how to take these abstract ideas and connect them to things that were meaningful in a certain way.

I care very much about the nature of how we live our lives, the kinds of struggles that individual people have. I’m fascinated by the fact that all of us have these internal worlds, and then there’s some way in which we all have these internal worlds, and then these internal worlds have to kind of coexist with the external world, and we have to try to make sense of everything, and try to understand other people. These are deep puzzles for me, and it’s not that analytical philosophy doesn’t address this, but it doesn’t address it in a straightforward way. And so, I didn’t understand why I was supposed to work through some abstract โ€” 

It was actually sad. It was Descartes that really she started with, and Descartes talks about the mind-body problem, but she didn’t make any connection to these sorts of questions. It was just like, “Oh, the mind is different from the body and here are these questions, and here’s an analysis of what Descartes was saying and what the problem was,” and so it wasn’t a good experience.

And then the second time I took a more applied class, and this was a philosophy of law class, and I tried this and this also didn’t go well. And there’s another thing, which is that I may have mentioned I was a stubborn person. Well, I have views and I was committed to trying to argue something that was kind of creative. Also with the first paper, actually, I wanted to give my own perspective, and I’m sure that it was raw and not especially good in various ways, but it wasn’t stupid. Do you know what I mean? And I got treated as though I was making a mistake by trying to really engage in a very open and creative way, as opposed to just vomit back what I was being told, okay? Now, I’m not going to mention the schools I was at. I mean, I put myself through school, I had to apply โ€” so it was a mix of things that made it go badly, and blame can be spread all around. Anyway, that’s what happened.

Tim Ferriss: All right, thank you for answering that. Part of the reason I wanted to ask this is that many people listening will not know how philosophy applies to their lives, or they have had similar experiences. They take a philosophy class and it’s an hour and a half of trying to define what is is, and they’re like, “I don’t know how this is relevant to my life. I am out.”

L. A. Paul: Right.

Tim Ferriss: I would like to think of myself as a curious person, but I’ve had these experiences where it’s like, “Okay, I’m interested in the limits of our language and the limits of our world. Let me get into Wittgenstein. And I’m like, “Wow, cool family, but I cannot decipher this guy any which way from Sunday.” And then I’ve had a few experiences though that have brought things home. I won’t make this into a soliloquy, but I remember taking a freshman class when I was undergrad at Princeton with Gideon Rosen, and I believe it was Introduction to Epistemology, something like that, which in and of itself โ€” 

L. A. Paul: That sounds right.

Tim Ferriss: โ€” as a course title, none of us knew how to make any sense of, but he was so good at weaving stories together with the concepts that it was very compelling and very, very memorable to the extent that here I am, whatever it is, 25+ years later, and I still remember the impact of that class. And I just want to give credit where credit is due to a lovely Austrian woman who’s now at HBS, Harvard Business School, who gave me a copy of your book, Transformative Experience, and that was my personal experience of reading some of the examples in that, which we’ll get to, whether it be the cochlear implants or some of the other thought experiments that we’ll certainly get into.

I was like, “Okay, I can connect this to some real hypothetical lived experience that I’ve had or might have,” and that made at least all the difference for me. So I wanted to learn about the early failures, because a lot of people listening are going to go, “Oh, God, conversation with a philosopher. This is going to turn into a bunch of intellectual masturbation. I’m not going to know what to do with it,” so anyway.

L. A. Paul: No, completely legit. Yes, you’ll discover that the sentence “Snow is white” is true, and only if snow is white. I mean, come on. I mean, that’s actually very important, but it’s not โ€” no. I’m just going to give you a bit of background. So, I went to Princeton for my PhD. Amazingly, they let me in as this crazy person, and then we can talk about that, but they let me in and I was a TA or teaching fellow for Gideon for that class.

Tim Ferriss: Oh, no kidding? Wow, small world.

L. A. Paul: Yeah, exactly. So I know exactly what you’re talking about. Gideon is an amazing teacher. He’s actually one of the best people to talk to, to get a sense of an idea and get it framed, and you can just see immediately what the main idea is, why it’s important, and what the problems are as well.

Tim Ferriss: Unbelievable teacher. I mean, the lectures were unreal.

L. A. Paul: No, totally fantastic.

Tim Ferriss: Just unbelievably good.

L. A. Paul: And so I think the teaching does really matter, and very few people are lucky enough to be introduced to philosophy by Gideon, but I think it’s also the case, independently of teaching ability or teaching focus, that philosophy is โ€” there’s a sense in which, well, it’s not unfair to call it a kind of intellectual masturbation in certain contexts, or it can seem like that or can descend into that. I’m not going to deny it at all, and I’m not going to deny that I might also fall into that in various kinds of contexts when I’m hanging out with the right sorts of people, but I think it’s also really important โ€” you might have to cut that if I say I’m doing intellectual masturbation!

Tim Ferriss: Masturbation is not always a bad thing.

L. A. Paul: Exactly, it can be very rewarding, okay? Geez. You don’t have to cut it, but I do think that because in a quest for clarity and precision, sometimes if that’s the priority, and I respect that as a priority, it can be easy to leave other things aside, but my approach is different. I mean, I do technical work on causation, I do collaborative work with computational cognitive scientists. There’s plenty of stuff that’s maybe a little bit less accessible than the Transformative Experience work. But with there, because with that book and with the work I’ve been doing subsequently, I was returning to my roots, I was there wanting to do โ€” I wanted to approach the topics that made me go into philosophy and that I find deeply meaningful. And I thought, “Well, I have to pair the search for rigor with accessibility.” And maybe some of it comes from my father, because my father โ€” see, you’re getting personal stuff now. I can’t believe I’m telling you about my father. It’s like you’re my philosophy therapist.

Tim Ferriss: That’s my side hustle.

L. A. Paul: Whatever it takes. He liked to read pop science, and he always felt like it was really important that people learned about the kind of intellectual activities that people did. He was fascinated by astronomy in particular, and the nature of the universe, and physics generally. And so there was a part of me that thought, “Well, I have to pair a search for precision with a way of developing the ideas that would capture the content in an intuitive way.” And partly it’s because when you’re trying to do something new, and I am trying to do something new and I was trying to do something new, you have to be guided by a kind of gut instinct and understanding that it’s right, because I think if you haven’t got that gut instinct, it’s really easy to lose track of things.

So the thought is, “Well, if I’m going to do this, approach this topic, I have to approach it in a way that follows that I deeply, intuitively grasp, and that especially when I’m confused, I can kind of reach back to that. And if it’s really right, I should be able to explain it to somebody without a technical apparatus, but then I should also be able to embed it in that technical apparatus and use that to draw the consequences in an especially precise and interesting and rewarding way, and then take it back to the intuition,” and that is what I have tried to do. I’m happy with my results. I’m not going to promote myself, but I think if that’s been my goal, that is my goal and incredibly hard.

Tim Ferriss: I mean, you are on a podcast.

L. A. Paul: Yeah, exactly. Well, that’s true. I guess that’s what people do. No, but it’s incredibly hard to do that, try to capture these ideas, so that’s the take, and I think I’ve been so happy because people seem to get it. It seems to be โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: It resonates.

L. A. Paul: Yeah, it resonates, and I looked at some of my philosophical heroes, which would be Thomas Nagel and Saul Kripke, because these are people in the field who have really managed to develop things, and also never mind my early failure to appreciate Descartes. Later on, Descartes and Hume, all of these philosophers, there’s a way to understand their work using very simple examples that brings out the heart of it. Actually, Gideon was really good at that, like teaching Hume, for example. He just really could bring that out. So I was like, “Okay, this is what I can do. This is what I’m going to do, or at least I’m going to try.”

Tim Ferriss: So I promised I would come back to Quentin, and I feel like this is a decent enough place as any to try to figure out how you have landed where you are, and also how you think about different decisions. So, I’m going to read something from the New Yorker profile, and then I want to unpack it a little bit, so this won’t take too, too long. It’s just a few lines.

“Smith suggested that Paul read widely and reach out to philosophers whose work intrigued her. Perhaps, he said, they would agree to correspond with her for a modest sum. A letter writing campaign resulted in a sort of pedagogical supervision by mail with three of them. Paul offered to each a $250 personal check and asked if they would reply to letters about her work, as well as comment on a paper of her own. They agreed to correspond with her. She now suspects, ‘Not quite knowing what they were signing up for.’ Every two weeks, for many months, Paul mailed at least 20 typewritten pages to each philosopher attempting to dissect their arguments one by one.” They responded to all of your letters, and by the end of the experiment, you felt more sure of yourself. I’m paraphrasing the last few lines. There’s so much here in this paragraph.

I’ll throw these out and then you can answer them in any particular order you’d like. One is, did they actually take your check or did you make the offer and then they not take the check, but correspond with you? The second is, how did you choose the people you reached out to? What drove the selection?

L. A. Paul: I offered to pay them, and they all said yes. And then at the end I said, “Okay, I’m going to send you the check,” and only one person took it, and I don’t want to out that person.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, of course.

L. A. Paul: Because that person was also very supportive to me in my later career, and they earned their $250.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, it’s also a deal is a deal. There’s nothing wrong with taking it.

L. A. Paul: Yeah, I had no problem with it. I was surprised that the other two didn’t.

Tim Ferriss: Like their per hour labor on that one was probably pretty low.

L. A. Paul: I know, exactly. I mean, and I took out student loans to do all this, and I had earmarked that money. It was all fine. I didn’t object. I paid Antioch College much more, or Antioch University at the time, much more than that amount simply for the privilege of โ€” that degree was like, I just basically โ€” I paid them money so that it was official, but the people who really did the work didn’t make โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: How did you choose those particular people to write to, and how many did you write to get the three to actually bite?

L. A. Paul: Oh, everybody said yes.

Tim Ferriss: Everybody said yes?

L. A. Paul: I have a science background. I was very interested in the nature of time, and I had been working with Quentin on the philosophy of time. So Quentin primarily was a very unusual philosopher in terms of his training and his intellectual discipline. He worked on a variety of things. He definitely did not fit into the mainstream philosophy. And that was actually great for me, because I didn’t fit in either, but he was open to that and he helped me. And then I got to Princeton and there’s definitely stuff to say there, but โ€” where was I?

Tim Ferriss: The different folks you selected.

L. A. Paul: Okay, that’s right. So I talked to Quentin, he said, “Well…” The idea was to get โ€” I needed some kind of degree in philosophy and some kind of paper to apply to PhD programs. So the thought was โ€” Antioch College had this basically a degree by mail where you could get an individualized master of arts. You pay the university some enormous amount, it wasn’t that much, but it seemed a lot to me, and then you had to do your own thing, and as long as you did your own thing, you would get this master’s degree.

Tim Ferriss: Pretty sweet business model.

L. A. Paul: Okay, sign me up. Yeah, exactly. I mean, there were a few other things. A professor had to sign off or whatever, but Quentin signed off on everything. So he said, “Well, okay, you want to do some course equivalents? Why don’t you do something, philosophy of time? I have this friend, he does philosophy of time. He’d work with you, he’d be great.” And I said, “Great,” so that was straightforward. And then I said, “Well, I want to choose some female philosophers, hardly any. I’d like to work with some women.” And so, I went to the bookstore and looked at the philosophy section, and I found two recent books by female philosophers, one in philosophy of mind and one in philosophy of science. And I said, “What about these two?” And he said, “Okay, great. Write to them.” And I wrote to another person as well who did logic, and I was going to work with her as well, but I did not have the background.

It became clear, because logic requires โ€” she was a very sophisticated logician, and she would want me to do something at the graduate level for this, and I’d never even taken basic logic, so that was kind of a no-go, but it didn’t matter. But the other two immediately said, yes, and the plan was for me โ€” and all of them had recent books, so I just worked through their books chapter by chapter, and just worked like crazy.

Tim Ferriss: It just strikes me as a very deliberately or accidentally smart way to approach things by going through someone’s book. I mean, on one hand you’re kind of flattering them by going through it so seriously, and then secondly, benefiting from getting their clarification, stress testing your own interpretations, and maybe criticisms.

L. A. Paul: Oh, yeah. Well, I would read a chapter and I’d be like, “But what about this? And this seems wrong to me and I can’t understand this, and I don’t know why you did that.” And I’m not sure, I mean, I don’t have any of that material anymore, I’m sure some of it was kind of was raw, kind of dumb question material, but I think some of it was not bad. I mean, I did think it through really, really carefully, and I’m reasonably intelligent. And so I think I was able to come up with an interesting kind of challenging 20-page discussion of their chapter. So they would write back to me, and their letters back to me were always very long, at least 10 pages, sometimes more.

Tim Ferriss: It’s incredible.

L. A. Paul: They were great.

Tim Ferriss: What is the role of philosophy in our modern times?

L. A. Paul: I’m just going to use this moment to do the shout-out to Agnes Callard, who you should absolutely interview, who has a new book on this.

Tim Ferriss: Oh, I have questions about her as well. Yeah.

L. A. Paul: I mean, I think there are lots of roles for philosophy, and the question is what is it in general, and then what part of it am I interested in particular in my career? I mean, I think philosophy plays a lot of different roles. In particular, Its most basic role is really to teach you how to think about things. And that involves, this goes back to analytics philosophy’s weirdness. You can’t think about something unless you have some conceptual framework for it. You’ve got to be able to provide some structure to your thoughts in order to โ€” okay, what are you going to take as fundamental? What do you take the framework to be here? What does this apply to? What do my terms mean? And even just doing that can teach you an awful lot about something. So I wanted to think about the nature of time and how the mind embeds itself in the world, and how we understand ourselves as selves in time.

And to do that in a productive way, I absolutely had to learn a bunch of stuff about, “What does identity through time mean? What even is time? What do you mean by a point of view? What’s so important about the way that we experience ourselves in time?” Lots of stuff.
And so the primary goal, I think, of philosophy is to teach you how to think about these things. But there are lots of other important things, like I teach a class here at Yale that I think of as, it’s sort of philosophy of mind for computer scientists, cognitive scientists, neuroscientists, as well as philosophy majors. Because it’s all about showing how really interesting philosophical concepts are coming up all the time now with artificial intelligence and all the questions about what it means for a โ€” could a machine be intelligent? Do LLMs have any knowledge?

What is chain of thought reasoning? Why is this helpful? All kinds of things that really actually, if it’s framed the right way, people see are super relevant to the work that they’re doing. Even engineers who don’t tend to be especially philosophically inclined as a group. No shade on engineers. It’s just like, people have their preferences. I mean, I think that’s the most basic thing. I also think the role of philosophy is to uncover or discover some of the most fundamental truths about both human beings and about the nature of the world. And that’s a beautiful thing to be able to study. It’s so incredible to be able to spend my time thinking about these things.


Tim Ferriss: Vampires. How do vampires fit into your life, and why do they fit into your writing?

L. A. Paul: Oh, vampires. I love vampires. So many ways they fit in. So my favorite thought experiment involves vampires because I like to use it to illustrate the concept of transformative experience. Maybe just because I like vampires so much, I think it’s an especially good way to illustrate the concept. And also because it’s not a real life. I don’t think vampires are real. And the beautiful thing about a thought experiment is you can design it the way that you want to illustrate the structure of a concept. But then I also think that the structure of that concept then fits to real life cases. Right. So my example, I’m just going to tell you.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, let’s do it.

L. A. Paul: All right. Right. So the way that I think about this is I imagine, or you imagine, I ask you to imagine traveling through some part of โ€” on your summer vacation, traveling through some part of Europe, and you decide to explore a castle. You’re in Romania, let’s say, and you go down to the dungeons and Dracula comes to you and he says, “I want to make you one of my own. I’m going to give you a one time only chance. You could become one of my followers. It’ll be painless, right? You’ll enjoy it, in fact. But this is a one time only chance and it’s irreversible.” And then he says, “Go back to your Airbnb and think about it until midnight. And if you choose to accept my offer, leave your window open. And if you choose to decline it, leave your window shut and leave and never come back.” So I see this as a really interesting possibility because vampires are sexy. They look great in black, they have amazing powers.

Tim Ferriss: Immortal.

L. A. Paul: They probably have different kinds of sense perception. Yeah. Well, virtually. I mean, as long as they stay away from villagers with stakes and things like that.

Tim Ferriss: Virtually, virtually. They have some things they have to check off. Yeah.

L. A. Paul: Yeah, exactly. There’s certain obstacles, but in general, for all intents and purposes, immortal. And so this seems pretty cool, but they’re not human. You’d have to exit the human race. You have to sleep in a coffin. You can’t enjoy the sunshine anymore, and you have to drink blood, right? And I try to separate out some of the ethical questions. So let’s say it’s artificial blood or the blood of humanely raised farm animals or something like that, still right now as a human I think it’s something โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: Coffin, it’s pretty cozy. It’s got some memory foam in it.

L. A. Paul: Yeah. I mean, reasonable, I don’t know. I mean, I don’t know. Okay, it’s lined with satin, but it still might be a bit hard for my mattress preferences. But the idea is that these things, while they seem interesting, they also seem alien, right? And I think in particular, not only will you have to drink blood, but you’ll love the taste of it, like you will thirst for it, right? And even ethical vampires have to keep themselves from sucking the blood of their human compatriots. So that’s quite alien.

And I wanted to bring out how the possibility of becoming another individual can seem incredibly alien. Because obviously, I take it that most of us don’t enjoy or thirst after the taste of blood, or think about the different varietals like it’d be some fancy wine. But if you became a vampire, you would, okay? So, the way that I think about it then is I continue the story and it’s like, okay, so you rush back to your Airbnb and you start calling people or texting them, telling them about what happened to you, and you find out that a bunch of your friends have already become vampires.

So then you immediately want to find out, “Well, wait. Tell me about what it’s like. What’s it like to be a vampire? Do you like it? Should I do it?” And they tell you that they love it and it’s fabulous, and it’s totally incredible. But they also tell you, you can’t possibly understand what it’s like to be a vampire as a mere human. They say life has meaning. It has a purpose that is exquisite. But until you become a vampire, you can’t possibly understand it, right? You just don’t. You lack the capacity. So you’re like, “Okay, thanks. So what do I do?”

Because if you can’t possibly understand what it’s like to be a vampire, then you either have to do it just because all of your friends do it and they say, it’s great, and they tell you they think it would be great for you, but there’s no way you can actually conceive of what it would be like to do that. And I’m sure it hasn’t escaped your thought. It certainly didn’t escape my imaginings that, “Well, maybe there’s something about being a vampire that makes you really happy to be a vampire,” right? So maybe when you become this other species, there’s some biological evolutionary thing that makes you really glad that you’re a vampire.

Tim Ferriss: Correct.

L. A. Paul: So, it’s not even clear where their testimony applies. Okay. So that’s my example. And my favorite application is to becoming a parent, because speaking as someone who wasn’t quite clear about whether they wanted to have children. I have two children and I love them very much, and I’m very happy. But there’s something about becoming a parent that makes you producing the child that you actually produce that makes you very โ€” I love my children. I wouldn’t exchange them for anything else in the world. If I’d gotten pregnant a month later, I would’ve loved that child too. But there’s no way that I would exchange my current child for the child I could have had. You just get incredibly attached to these children in a completely legitimate way, and you wouldn’t do anything โ€” you would never change what you’ve done. And that’s awfully like the testimony that you get from vampires.

Okay, so I think vampires also, you stay up a lot at night, right? There are many similarities. Vampires illustrate the possibility of undergoing a transformative experience, something that’s life-changing, but also where you change the mind you have in a certain way, or what you care about most in a certain way. That means that you would make yourself into an alien version of yourself. Like someone who’s alien to you now, and who you might not even want to be now. Even if once you become that person or that version of yourself, you’re super happy. If I had some modal scope and I could look at my future self, I could have looked at my future self before I decided I wanted to have kids. I got up at 4:00 a.m. every day for years to write before my children woke up.

I mean, no one ever told me that that was something I would want to do. And if they had told me, I would’ve denied it strenuously because I could barely get up before noon when I was a graduate student. And I did it willingly. Something happened, I was clearly the victim of some kind of Stockholm syndrome. So the thought is that when you face a certain experience, and I don’t think it’s just having a child, I think deciding to go to war or maybe moving to an entirely different country, or if you’re diagnosed with some disease and getting some radically experimental treatment, there are lots of things that can count as transformative.

But if you don’t know what it’s going to be like on the other side of that experience, and you know it’s going to make you into a version of yourself that right now you find alien, I don’t think that there’s a clear โ€” I don’t know how we’re supposed to make that decision if it’s up to us. We can’t use the ordinary models that we use for rational decision making because those assume that you can see through the options to assign them value and model them for yourself and choose in a way that’s going to, as we say, in a technical way, maximize your expected value. And if you can’t assign value and you can’t really understand what it’s like to be this kind of a self, then that procedure just doesn’t work.

Tim Ferriss: Tell me if I’m off base here, but also fundamentally, even if you’re trying to calculate or maximize your expected value and assign these different values, you’re doing it from the perspective of your current version of yourself and your current preferences. And after you become a vampire or after you have a kid, you may be a different person with different preferences. So do you make the decision based on the preferences of your current self or the preferences of your expected future self?

L. A. Paul: So there’s a way of capturing the puzzle, just as you said. So given the fact that certain kinds of very foundational, these are new kinds of experiences, so a kind of experience you’ve never had before and I compare this to Mary growing up in a black and white room and seeing color for the first time or Thomas Nagel talking about how foreign it would be, you can’t understand for a bat what it’s like for a bat to be a bat.

Tim Ferriss: Be a bat.

L. A. Paul: Yeah, exactly. So there are these new kinds of experiences that are just very different from any kind of experience you’ve had before. And so that means there’s just a sense in which we can’t, from the inside, kind of imagine what they’re like even if someone can describe, try to describe to me what it’s like to see red and you see the problem right away. We just don’t, language just kind of gives up if I haven’t seen red before, if I have no color vision. Okay, so there’s a sense in which we kind of can’t see through a certain kind of veil and across that veil, the self that we’re going to be, the kind of person that you’re going to realize is just really different. So you can’t just assume you’re going to be basically the same.

This puts us into the situation where you’re making a choice for your future self and that future self might have preferences that are super different from your current self and by definition, and this breaks, so now here’s a little technical bit. So we talked about the intuitive idea and again, I find it easy to understand when I think about someone who maybe doesn’t want to have a child or really is unsure and they know that if they choose to have a child, they’re going to be super happy with that result, but they don’t trust the fact that in virtue of becoming a parent, it’s going to kind of rewire them in their preferences in a certain way. So they’re sure I’ll be really happy, but I don’t know if I want to be that self right now given who I am now and I know I can’t understand in a really deep way what it’s going to be like to have that child. So I have to leap over the abyss or leap into the abyss, I guess, if I want to do it.

So if you find yourself in that situation, what you’re confronting involves what I describe as a violation of act-state independence. Okay? So here’s where the technical part comes. You’ve got the intuitive idea. Act-state independence involves very roughly a distinction between the act that you’re performing and the state that you’re in, or that’s how I’m going to interpret it here. There are different ways to interpret it, but this is the way to do it here. And so normally when you’re confronted with, “Oh, do I want to do something, do I want to try this kind of ice cream or do I want to have this cup of coffee,” you don’t change in the process of trying it. So after you do it, you can kind of assess, “Oh, I liked it. Oh, it was good.” And that’s meaningful to you beforehand because you know that you are going to stay constant through the change in your circumstances like tasting the new kind of ice cream.

But in this case, having the experience, let’s say tasting the new kind of ice cream, was going to rework your preference profile, your flavor profile so that you would just like a whole bunch of different things after that. Well, that changes the state that you’re in at the same time, and so your act and your state are not independent. And if you break that, that’s actually a foundational, that’s an axiom for rational choice theory, that has to be a foundational element of the model to make straightforward inferences. There are all kinds of fancy things you have to do if that breaks and these cases of transformative experience and decision making are precisely cases in which that breaks.

Tim Ferriss: So I want to make a few references and read something here. The first is I have to say if this philosophy thing doesn’t work out for you, you should be a copywriter for Madison Avenue because the Transformative Experience grew out of, as I understand it, a working paper titled, “What You Can’t Expect When You’re Expecting.” That’s pretty clever, I have to give you that. That is very, very clever. And I want to read just a paragraph from Alice Gregory. This is again from the New Yorker piece, which I think underscores a lot of angst that modern, well-educated folks have, particularly women, I would think, but men also.

And here we go. All right, this is from the piece. “When I approached Paul about the possibility of a profile, it was in the spirit of self-help. I was 31 and obsessed with whether or not I should have a child. The question felt huge and opaque, like one that neither data nor anecdote could solve. I thought about it all the time though. ‘Thinking’ is probably too precise a verb. It was more like a constant buzz scoring the background of daily life and a tone that registered somewhere between urgency and tedium.”

She’s a very good writer.

L. A. Paul: Yeah, she’s really good.

Tim Ferriss: “The bad parts were easy to picture, less time, less sleep, less money. The awesome parts, expelling a new person out of my own body say, were quite literally inconceivable. The dilemma felt impossible, as if I were attempting to convert dollars into the currency of a country that didn’t yet exist.” 

So I think that really does a brilliant job of putting into words what a lot of people feel. So if you can’t, as one of my friends, I don’t want to name him, but a very, very successful chess competitor said, “You can’t always calculate to mate,” meaning โ€” 

L. A. Paul: That’s right. That’s right.

Tim Ferriss: You try to make a plan โ€” 

L. A. Paul: Yeah, no, I get it. You can’t โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: You try to make a plan from move one, yeah โ€” 

L. A. Paul: That’s right. That’s right.

Tim Ferriss: โ€” from move one to the end of the game and then in your opponent’s third move, they do something unexpected. This whole calculate to mate doesn’t work. Now there are some situations perhaps in which you can do that. You can reverse-engineer and plot out step-by-step how you might achieve something and kind of execute to plan, but then you have these transformative experiences. I suppose I’m wondering, and God you must get sick of people asking this, but what do you do given the difficulty and the different nature of these types of decisions, how do you approach it? Because in some of the reading I’ve done, because I don’t have kids, I would like to have kids, I would like to hit some pre-reqs first before I do that โ€” 

L. A. Paul: Yeah.

Tim Ferriss: But there are some things, say moving to a different country, which in most instances are going to be reversible. So yes, it could be transformative, but you could move back to your country of origin. Having a kid, less so. And I am curious what advice you give to people when they come to you wringing their hands and say, “Well, how do I do it, then?” Because you could make the argument that you can ascribe a value to the learning and transformation itself of leaping into the abyss with a transformative experience, but then it strikes me that you would always, you’d be at the risk of always being biased towards action, doing the thing that could potentially be transformative and then what do you do?

L. A. Paul: Oh, yeah.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah.

L. A. Paul: Well, things are not always good when transformation does not entail. There’s a kind of popular conception of transformative experience involving a kind of epiphany and that kind of thing and that can happen, for sure. But the way I’m talking about transformative experience, it’s not always like that. Remember that whole thing about like you suffer, you kind of don’t mind it, but you certainly suffer.

Okay, this is an aside. So โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: I specialize in asides. Please.

L. A. Paul: I live partly, I live part of my time in New York and part of my time in New Haven and in New York, the neighborhood I live in, is kind of a funky neighborhood and I’ve toyed with the possibility of on Sundays hanging out my shingle and being like, “I specialize in transformative experiences, big life choices. You could book time with me to discuss your philosophical life choice if you’d like.” Maybe not the copy โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: I feel like you need a desk โ€” 

L. A. Paul: โ€” give the copy of your โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: โ€” in Prospect Park.

L. A. Paul: Exactly. In the neighborhood I live in, this would not be an unusual type of thing, Brooklyn, you know. And that’s by way of thinking and I thought about it and I thought, “Well, I’m not going to be able to give people any answers. I’ll just be able to talk to them about the conceptual framework for their choice.” And if that’s of interest, not clear to me that would be of interest, then maybe I have a possible side gig. So really what I’m saying is that all right, I’m much better at raising questions than answering them. I do have a view. I don’t think very many people like my view, but I’m going to tell you my view. I still like my view. Well, I don’t like my view, I just think it’s like I haven’t come across anything better, which isn’t exactly the space you want to be in.

So what I really think is that it’s a special class of experiences. It’s not like every experience is transformative. I really don’t think we could talk about the reason why that’s the case. I think there’s a fairly well-defined class of certain kinds of life experiences that can count as transformative, not for everyone, but for many people that undergo them. And I think what’s really important is to recognize how problematic they are, that they don’t fit the ordinary framework because people, like Alice talks about, she agonized, I agonized, and for me I was really annoyed because I agonized and I didn’t get anywhere and then I had a baby and I was like, “Oh, none of the things I was reading, which is why ‘What You Can’t Expect When You’re Expecting’ was so satisfying” because I hated What [to] Expect When You’re Expecting. It was the worst book ever. It answered no questions for me whatsoever. None of it addressed what I wanted to know. And so it was like an insult on top of everything else.

Okay. I’m sorry. I apologize preemptively to everyone who found that book a wonderful book. It wasn’t for me, but it was like โ€” yeah, Alice talked about in the article how there was this moment when I was starting to go into labor and I was like, “Oh, my God, this enormous thing has to come out of me. How’s that going to happen?” I knew theoretically that that was going to happen, but it’s presented to you in a very personal way, in a very intimate way when you go into labor. And I just discovered the reality of it in a special way. So what I’m trying to say is that I want my work to help people realize that this kind of agonizing is actually completely reasonable because there isn’t any easy answer and we don’t have a framework. And when there’s something almost inconceivable that’s happening, then it’s a bit like, as I said earlier, you step off the ledge into the deep and flailing might be the only response. 

And I also think this is part of what is to live a life and to be human. And it’s perfectly legitimate to pass on transformative experiences, but part of living a life and being open to possibilities involves choosing some of them for most people. And also, things happen to us that are like this, that we don’t choose, like, terrible accidents for example. There’s a philosopher named Paul Sagar who’s been writing a Substack on, he was a climber and he had a catastrophic accident. And his writing is beautiful and he talks about, he’s paraplegic now, no he’s quadriplegic, and the life change that that involves is clearly transformative and clearly horrible and he wouldn’t have chosen it and that makes sense. But he has to now discover this new way of being an agent basically because he lacks so much agency in so many ways.

I articulate in the conceptual framework that’s involved and diagnosing why there’s a kind of incoherence in having to try to make this choice where you’re supposed to know what you’re doing is part of the solution. Maybe it’s just something that we have to accept. Now, in my book, here’s my unpopular solution, my unpopular solution is to say, well, maybe we can reframe the choice so that when we’re making a choice, so this presumes that we have enough information to know that there’s at least a very high chance that it’s going to be at least pretty good as opposed to a very high chance it’s going to be terrible or bad or whatever.

We use evidence in all kinds of reasonable ways to know that kind of thing. But when we’re confronted with something like do I want to go to war, do I want to immigrate to another country, or do I want to have a child, or pick your favorite case, do I want my child to have a cochlear implant, we talked about, you alluded to that earlier, you’re not going to be able to know what it’s like and you are going to change who you are. And so then the question is, do you want to discover that new way of living? And if you do, with all the pluses and minuses, all the suffering, because I think transformative experiences almost always involve suffering of some sort, then you go for it. And if you don’t, which I think is also perfectly reasonable, then you don’t.

And because I don’t think it’s a matter of rationality, so I think just because some people have children and they’re super-happy that they did, it doesn’t mean that that’s just true for everyone even if it would be the case that for almost everyone, they would reform themselves so they would be happy with their choice. That is not, there’s no inference to the best explanation there, just because many people, many vampires testify to being happy that they’ve become vampires does not mean that everyone should become a vampire, especially somebody who just finds that way of being alien.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. In the case of having kids specifically, I remember a friend of mine, he has three kids now and he was kind of ambivalent I guess. His wife really wanted kids and he was in the fortunate position of being able to provide and they wouldn’t have struggles on that level. But he said, “Well, look,” he said, “At some point when you get old enough, to have meaning you have to either find God or have kids” and he’s like, “Having kids is easier.” So I said, “Yeah, kids.” And he said it in jest. But I’ve thought about the comment because to what extent is the reforming of oneself after kids actually very time-tested and conforming to millennia plus of evolutionary pressure where it’s like the basis of instincts. And in so being, this is going to sound like a really naive question, but sort of a safer bet with respect to transformative experience than some of the others, going to war or otherwise.

Now, I also know people who have had kids and in some cases, they were very clear that they did not want kids, they weren’t ambivalent and their partner really wanted kids and that I’ve not seen always turn out very well. So it’s not a guarantee, but are there different species of transformative experiences within the category of transformative experience? Do you think about, say, kids, differently than you’d think of some of the others?

L. A. Paul: Well, that’s interesting. So I’m sure there are different species of transformative experiences. So what I heard you asking me, part of that question involved, well, look, maybe we can rely on biology in a certain way. This is a time-tested solution. So you can pick transformative experience one, transformative experience two, transformative experience three. Behind door one is having a child. Behind door two is traversing, traveling the world, seeing all the wonders, whatever, exploring, having lots of money to spend on travel and satisfaction, that kind of thing. Behind door three is pursuing your intellectual passion, let’s say, to the fullest degree, devoting all of your time to that. I could go on, but there’s three options there.

And I do think that choosing one of those involves trade-offs on the others. As much as some people might say, “I’ll do it all, I’ll have a child and we’ll cross the plains of Siberia together,” and it very rarely works out that way. And if you do cross the plains with the baby, you’re slower. So when the wolves follow you, all right, I won’t go there. You might say, well, these are different risky choices and if you want to maximize your expected utility in some sense, maybe you should choose door one because people say that’s โ€” and I may actually think that seems kind of reasonable to me in a certain way if you’re truly indifferent between these different options. I think people rarely are indifferent, but the further problem is they’re not indifferent and yet there’s a sense in which they don’t really know what they’re choosing between. That’s the further complication.

So again, going back to what I was saying, is it’s more like which life do I want to find out about, which one feels more appealing to me? I don’t know in many of the most salient ways what any of these lives could be. I don’t even know how it’s going to fill out because there’s so many chance-y things about each of those. You could have a child that’s disabled โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: Sure.

L. A. Paul: โ€” and that could be a beautiful thing, but it could also be a very time-consuming, very painful thing. I don’t know, you could pursue your intellectual passion and it could fall flat or it could just turn into this amazing opportunity. So there’s just a lot of chance involved in any of these choices. I don’t think you either have children or find God because I think there’s so many other really interesting things people can do with their lives. And I try to look at the person who I would’ve been or become if I had not had children. That person is very different from who I am now along some dimensions and very much the same with who I am. But I can’t really get into her head. I don’t know, I don’t really know what she would’ve been like, but I’m also sure she would’ve lived a super fun, interesting life.

Tim Ferriss: So let me ask if, I’m going to turn this into, I’m going to make you the philosophical therapist for a second here.

L. A. Paul: You already were. You already asked me!

Tim Ferriss: I know, I know, I know. The toothpaste is out of the toothpaste tube, but if you could, and maybe you put it back on, but if you take off the philosophy professor hat for a second and just reflect on your personal experience, two things. Was the decision to have a child hard for you? Did you go back and forth and vacillate or was it pretty straightforward?

And then secondly, if there was some back and forth, how much of that was having or not having a child, what that experience would be like versus for instance, for me, I feel very confident that I would enjoy being a parent and that I’d be pretty good at it. I’m sure I’d fuck up every which way you can imagine, but above average, I think I’d have a pretty good go of it. But then the concern for me has always been, well, if things don’t work out with the partner, what does that look like? So it’s more of a possible separation after having kids that has been the concern for me, not so much the parenting, which has a bunch of embedded assumptions. But what was that decision like for you personally?

L. A. Paul: It was complicated because on the one hand, it’s funny, when I was younger, I never wanted children and then when I hit my twenties, I think I thought, “Oh, yeah, that’s a real possibility. I would love to be happily married and have a family.” But it seemed a bit remote too. I thought that seems like an option for me and it would be a good option. But then I thought, but I also really want to study philosophy and spend as much of my time as possible doing philosophy. This is the kid, I guess I was still a kid then, reading people’s books and writing basically 60 to 70 pages of material over every two weeks and sending it. This took a lot of time. I had to read it. I didn’t have any training and I would write all this stuff and I was just obsessed. I was also doing other things at the same time like I was still reading Being and Time, so I spent all of my time doing philosophy and I didn’t want to change that.

So on the one hand, I had a desire to have children, not a โ€” some people just feel like their life wouldn’t have meaning without, I never felt that way. I just thought this would be one interesting, good way to live one’s life. But then, I had this desire to spend my time doing philosophy. And also philosophy is a male-dominated field, and it certainly was back in the ’90s. And there was definitely a professional cost to having a child and I think there still is, it’s not as bad as it used to be, but sometimes I don’t think people think you’re less serious now, although they think they used to think that, but you still have less time and you have less money. And there are clearly professional implications, maybe for women in particular, but I think everybody. You’re not solely devoted to your projects anymore. Somebody else is more important. So there was the kind of ambivalence.

And so I thought, well, being a rational thinker, I’m going to evaluate it. I’m going to think about what it’s going to be like, I’m going to make my choices. And that was where it all fell apart. That was where I was betrayed by What to Expect When You’re Expecting and so many other parenting things that I looked for. I didn’t immediately, I tried to do it, I couldn’t do it, but I didn’t know I couldn’t do it until I actually had the children. And then I was like, “Oh, this is nothing like what I was going to expect.” And then that was when I had this before my son was born when I was like, “Wait a minute.” Actually, my daughter was only very young. I was like, “Wait…” This actually was really when after I’d recovered from giving birth and started getting enough sleep so I could think clearly again. I was like, “Wait. This was an utterly bizarre, strange metaphysical experience.”

And I mean metaphysics not in the aura shaping way, but metaphysics like I do, the nature of reality seemed to change for me in certain ways and also epistemologically change so much about how I experience and represent the world. This is just so foundational. But philosophers never talk about this. No philosophers talked about this, at least not in my tradition. And I thought I have to talk about this, which by the way, and I think Alice talked about this, was very scary because I’d built up this reputation as being a serious philosopher talking about the nature of causation and time. And then I was going to talk about babies, so I had to steel myself. So yeah, so to answer your question, there was a lot of ambivalence, but then my husband at the time wanted to have children, so that sort of tipped the balance. I’m not sure what I would’ve done if he had been equally ambivalent.

Tim Ferriss: So many different directions that we can go. I want to ask you, and I know you said earlier don’t ask me to explain it or that you’d have trouble explaining it, but I’m still curious about this move from chemistry and this maybe the so-called hard sciences to philosophy and that you knew you wanted to do that. Now you jokingly said you may not want to drop acid and explore some of these other questions. I’m just wondering what precipitated this itch that you had to scratch with philosophy? There’s got to be something. It didn’t just โ€” I can’t imagine there’s nothing as far as inputs that affected that.

L. A. Paul: Okay. I honestly don’t know where I formed the idea that this was going to be the thing for me. I love to read and when I was in high school, I read Hermann Hesse, The Glass Bead Game. I read other kinds of interesting books. I remember I read Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s work, and these are philosophical texts in maybe not classic, not analytic philosophy, but there’s a lot of philosophy in there. And so I do think that I must have done, I think this reading and other things I read led me to realize that a certain kind of quasi-philosophical take on the world was congenial to me. When I say quasi-philosophical, it was truly philosophical, but at the time I wasn’t able to recognize it as such. I just knew I had this yearning to try to understand things and philosophy seemed like the right way to go. But I really can’t really give you more than that.

My parents really wanted me to be a doctor. I went on med school visits, I took the MCAT, I did everything. I didn’t fail out of philosophy classes, I just failed to progress in philosophy classes. All the signs were pointing away from philosophy and I still did it โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: Well, I guess โ€” 

L. A. Paul: โ€” I’ve just no explanation.

Tim Ferriss: You know โ€” 

L. A. Paul: Well, okay, you don’t believe me, I know โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: โ€” I need to push a little. No, I’m going to push a little bit, I’m going to push. No, because I would just say maybe there were, one way to frame it would be what drew you to philosophy. Another one, another angle would be what didn’t satisfy you of โ€” 

L. A. Paul: That’s fair.

Tim Ferriss: โ€” the explorations of chemistry, et cetera, et cetera.

L. A. Paul: That’s right. Yeah, yeah.

Tim Ferriss: So maybe you could take a stab at the latter.

L. A. Paul: Well, first of all, okay, so here it comes for the naivete. I was extremely good at the theoretical side of chemistry and extremely terrible at the lab side of chemistry. So I thought well, maybe I want to be a chemist, I loved solving problems in organic chemistry. I loved it. But then we had to take, part of my major I had to take a class called gravimetric analysis, I think it was called. And this consists of an entire semester doing incredibly minute measurements and cooking, there were little clay pots we had to cook at high temperatures that were filled with the compound that we were analyzing and we were supposed to, you could cook it and you would measure these tiny things and you spent the entire semester on one project. And it was the kind of thing where if you touched it, oil from your finger would get onto the clay pot and would destroy all of your work.

So what happened after a semester, towards the end, it was probably the last three weeks of hours and hours in the lab, and then I brushed, because I’m physically just, I brushed the side of the pot and it’s gone, all of my work. I was โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: Now we’re getting somewhere. Okay.

L. A. Paul: Okay. So I went into an existential crisis basically and I was like, “I cannot do chemistry. I can’t do it. So, no, it’s not for me.”

Now, if I were more sophisticated, I would have learned, oh, no, you can run the lab, and other people do that part, if you’re physically inept in certain ways. But I didn’t know that, and I didn’t realize how many more options there would be, and I was destroyed.

But it wasn’t just that, but I never enjoyed lab. I wasn’t good at it. It wasn’t my thing. And I felt that natural science, it does require a certain โ€” you run a lab even if you’re doing highly theoretical work, and so that side โ€” I needed something a little bit more pure. I think that combined with, like I said, being drawn to some of these literature and art that had this conceptual dimension that involved the role of experience, again, and understanding who you are.

When I moved out of my parents’ house and moved to Chicago, just I found myself immersed in art and literature. And my friend โ€” I was working at a bar, and a lot of the people working at the bar were doing theater or were artists. It was just a whole new way of being that I loved. So I knew there was something out there, yeah, that my natural science education wasn’t connecting with.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. Okay. That makes perfect sense to me. Thank you for doing the digging. I appreciate it. I love that story. Oh, the finger oil in the lab.

L. A. Paul: I couldn’t even now. Oh, the pain. Sorry.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, brutal. You mentioned, I think, semi-philosophical works, and you mentioned Herman Hesse. My next question is, for someone who is, on some deep level, interested in the types of questions that attracted you to philosophy, but they have had some trepidation or maybe mild allergic reaction around philosophy, as such, when they’ve tried to dig into it โ€” maybe they went to a philosophy section at a bookstore and picked up three books, and they’re like, “Wow, I’m too dumb to understand this,” or, “This is just too impenetrable. I don’t know what to do with this.” What entry points might you suggest if you wanted to get โ€” if you had 100 undergrads, fresh blank slates, and you’re like, “Okay, I want to have the highest conversion rate as possible, meaning I want to get as many of these people deeply interested in any aspect of philosophy,” are there certain books that you might recommend?

L. A. Paul: What โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: They don’t have to be philosophical texts as such, if that makes sense.

L. A. Paul: I have to think about this for a second. I will say one. Quentin Smith wrote this very weird book called The Felt Meanings of the World, which I always loved. It’s weird, but it’s written in a way that I think โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: The Felt Meanings of the World?

L. A. Paul: Yeah, The Felt Meanings of the World. It captures something for me, even when I was just trying to approach philosophy. I have to think for a second.

Tim Ferriss: Take your time. We have all the time in the world.

L. A. Paul: I would say, so I think a lot of fiction can be very philosophical. I read Ted Chiang. He’s really, really good.

Tim Ferriss: Ah, so good, so good. Everybody should read Ted Chiang.

L. A. Paul: Everybody should. I mean, a lot of his work is just deeply philosophical, and explicitly so. I mean, he’s interested in counterfactuals and in metaphysics in particular, in these really beautiful ways. And the nature of time.

Tim Ferriss: Just because that term has come up a few times, could you just take a sidebar and โ€” 

L. A. Paul: Define it? Yes.

Tim Ferriss: โ€” define counterfactuals?

L. A. Paul: Yes. Counterfactuals involve, so even the word tells you, counter to fact things. If I say, “If I had wings, I would fly across my office.” Now, I don’t have wings, so I can’t fly across my office, but if I did have wings, I certainly would because that would be super cool. And we can understand them. You can understand counterfactuals in terms of other possible worlds. So, in a world where I have wings, I would fly across the room. And counterfactuals play a role like โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: What if the Third Reich dominated the world after World War II?

L. A. Paul: Exactly.

Tim Ferriss: Something like that.

L. A. Paul: Exactly. Exactly.

It turns out, like counterfactuals can be, you need what’s called a preferred semantics for them, like a rule book for understanding how to interpret them. And my supervisor, David Lewis at Princeton, was the person who developed the primary rule book for that, which is what the foundation of much of his work involved.

But they play a role in natural science. So when people are doing tests, let’s say, of some new kind of treatment, you want to find out whether or not a new drug will cure a disease or something like that. So what you want to do is you want to treat a population and see what happens, and then you compare it to the counterfactual, well, what if they hadn’t been treated?

Now the complication is in these kinds of contexts, you can’t move to a possible world, but you can establish a control group which is basically supposed to be matched to that treatment population. And then you see how the control group evolves without the treatment and compare it to the treated population who gets the medicine. So the role of a counterfactual can sometimes be to identify ways the world could be, and also ways the world could have been if you hadn’t changed it, something like that.

Tim Ferriss: Ted Chiang is good at weaving counterfactual scenarios.

L. A. Paul: Exactly. He’s good at exploring other possible worlds in some ways. And when I start talking about other possible worlds, the way that it relates to my work is I think about other possible selves. So if I had chosen differently and not chosen to have a child, well, there’s another possible world out there where I don’t have any children.

So then the question is, well, how do I make sense of that other possible world? And one thing I can’t do, as I said to you before, because the real world involved me transforming myself into a parent, it means there’s a lack of understanding across that barrier. I can’t really understand who I would have become.

And Chiang exploits that kind of notion all the time, like, “Well, what if time were different?” or, “What if aliens came to us, and we had to interpret what they were saying, and the process of interpreting what they were saying changed our conception of how time worked and what we could understand?”

Tim Ferriss: Ah, so good.

L. A. Paul: Super cool, all kinds of stuff.

Tim Ferriss: If people want a light lift, and it is different from the short story upon which it’s based, but watch the movie Arrival.

L. A. Paul: Exactly.

Tim Ferriss: And as a linguistics nerd also, my god, that really is an unbelievably good movie. I think it’s 95 plus percent on Rotten Tomatoes. And then he has collections of short stories. It’s always hard for me to remember the first one. It’s like Stories of [Your Life] and Other[s] โ€” 

L. A. Paul: Yes, that’s right.

Tim Ferriss: Something like that.

L. A. Paul: Yep, that’s right.

Tim Ferriss: And then his second collection came out, Exhalation, and I was like, “Ah, there’s no way it can match the first collection.” And lo and behold, I was like, “Okay, you win, Ted Chiang.”

L. A. Paul: Yep, yep.

Tim Ferriss: So good. All right, any other fiction that comes to mind? I mean โ€” 

L. A. Paul: Borges, also. Yeah, I just love Borges. I mean, I just feel like he’s always exploring.

Tim Ferriss: Oh, Borges is amazing. Yeah.

L. A. Paul: Yes, yes. So, reading, I mean, I think โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: Where would you suggest people start with Jorge Luis Borges? Any favorites? What’s the name?

L. A. Paul: Yeah, Forking, I mean โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: Short story where he meets his self on a park bench, what is that short story?

L. A. Paul: Oh, on a short โ€” I can’t remember. Hang on, just to think. The Garden of Forking Paths is an excellent one. If we’re talking about possibilities, The Garden of Forking Paths, it’s a beautiful one. The Aleph, I would suggest. Those are ones that โ€” I don’t know. I actually think The Garden of Forking Paths, and I think it’s The Aleph, are two really excellent things to read.

These are incredibly philosophical texts, okay.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah.

L. A. Paul: What I love about them is you can get the intuitive idea without having to go through all the philosophy. But to extract it precisely, you get it, it’s beautiful the way they express these ideas, but if you want to extract it with precision in a way that you can then take the idea and use it in other ways, that’s what you โ€” you need the analytic philosophy to do that, in my view. It’s just literature, it doesn’t lend itself to getting some precise thing extracted from it in a straightforward way. That’s just not what it’s for.

Tim Ferriss: This is going to sound like a dumb question. Maybe it is a dumb question. But to develop the chops with analytic philosophy seems to require a lot, right?

L. A. Paul: Mm-hmm.

Tim Ferriss: It doesn’t seem to be a light lift.

L. A. Paul: No.

Tim Ferriss: For somebody who’s listening, who doesn’t have any exposure to it, is the juice worth the squeeze? And if so, what is the juice that makes it worth the squeeze?

L. A. Paul: I mean, well, look, I devoted my life to it, so obviously I think the juice is worth the squeeze.

Tim Ferriss: No, I know. It’s โ€” 

L. A. Paul: But yeah, no, no, I mean โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: Well, but just like if you’re going to study material science to develop new surgical techniques as an orthopedic surgeon, doing that deep dive could very well be worth it for that person. But if someone hasn’t โ€” 

L. A. Paul: For sure.

Tim Ferriss: โ€” gone to medical school, maybe not. Right?

L. A. Paul: Right.

Tim Ferriss: I’m just curious to what extent you’d recommend a lay listener try to develop the toolkit of analytic philosophy.

L. A. Paul: I think, for some people, they’re fine with literature, a sci-fi or reading, or I think you can get a lot of philosophy through listening to Bach, or reading Darwin’s biography, or doing mathematics. So, I think the first question is, if you engage with the philosophical ideas in a non-technical way, if that satisfies you, then you’re good. But if it leaves you wanting more, if you start asking questions, “Well, wait a minute. How does this work?” or you watch a time travel film, I recommend Primer or La Jetรฉe or 12 Monkeys.

Tim Ferriss: Ooh, hold on. I’m going to write these down.

L. A. Paul: Okay. All right.

Tim Ferriss: Ooh, 12 Monkeys is a great one. Okay, Primer โ€” 

L. A. Paul: Yeah. Yeah. Oh, wait.

Tim Ferriss: โ€” something in โ€” 

L. A. Paul: Okay.

Tim Ferriss: โ€” French that I didn’t catch.

L. A. Paul: Oh, if you love 12 Monkeys, dude, you need to watch La Jetรฉe because 12 Monkeys just plagiarized La Jetรฉe.

Tim Ferriss: Oh, okay. Well, then I’ll watch the original.

L. A. Paul: Oh, it’s like 35 minutes long.

Tim Ferriss: How do you spell this?

L. A. Paul: You could โ€” it means “The Jetty” in French, L-A, la-

Tim Ferriss: L โ€” 

L. A. Paul: โ€” and then jetee, J-E-T-E-E.

Tim Ferriss: Okay. All right.

L. A. Paul: You can watch it online. There’s a YouTube โ€” it’s a beautiful film. Actually, it’s a kind of artwork film. It’s very artsy, and the story that it tells was retold by 12 Monkeys. It’s the same.

Tim Ferriss: Wait.

L. A. Paul: It’s the same thing.

Tim Ferriss: It’s French and artsy? No, I’m kidding.

L. A. Paul: Oh, what do you mean?

Tim Ferriss: Gee.

L. A. Paul: Yeah, how could it be?

Tim Ferriss: Yeah.

L. A. Paul: Yeah, exactly. But what’s great about it is it’s entirely consistent. And Primer is consistent except until the end, they got a little carried away at this โ€” I forgive them the last five or 10 minutes of the film. And Primer is a beautiful, super cool film, cult classic type of movie.

Anyway, if you watch these things, and you feel like, “Well, wait a minute,” or if you watch Back to the Future and you’re like, “Well, wait a minute. How can you change the past? Seems like that might be โ€” there’s some kind of logical problem there.” Well, then, my friend, you are a philosopher at heart in various ways, and you should put the time in to learn more. It’s worth it. If you really work out some of these questions, you can use them for other things. And if nothing else, forcing yourself to work through some of these puzzles, I think, just sharpens your reasoning capacities, generally.

I’m not saying it’s easy. Remember that bit about suffering. There’s definitely some suffering, but it can pay off. There’s a kind of joy just in problem solving or puzzle solving that I feel like I get out of thinking through these things. Lewis Carroll, another excellent thing to read.

Tim Ferriss: Oh, yeah, Lewis Carroll, what a master. I have some collector’s editions of old copies of Alice in Wonderland, not exactly that title, but Lewis Carroll. Man, also, just the bio on that guy was wild.

L. A. Paul: Yeah. Yeah.

Tim Ferriss: Okay. So, if somebody was willing โ€” they watch, well, whatever it might be, Primer or another, I mean, Back to the Future, they start asking questions. You’re like, “Hey, you might be a philosopher,” and they say, “Okay. Given that, I want to pick up the ABCs of analytic philosophy, but in terms of suffering, I don’t want my face ripped off, more like a mild sunburn.” Where would you suggest they start?

L. A. Paul: Oh. Yeah, good question. I mean, I’m struggling with this part because I started with Being and Time, which isn’t really what normal people would start with.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. You’re like, “I like hiking. Let me start with Everest.” Yeah.

L. A. Paul: Yeah, exactly. I mean, well, you can read my book. There you go. That’s โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: Sure.

L. A. Paul: This is the podcast thing.

Tim Ferriss: That’s fine. Yeah, yeah, yeah.

L. A. Paul: The book, Transformative Experience, was not written for non-philosophers. I go over arguments more than once. I mean, so I am picking it apart in a way because I was aiming the book towards professional philosophers.

But the first hundred pages of the book is not technical, and then the first chapter is only four pages long. And I wrote the first chapter thinking, “Look, people might put it down. But maybe if they just read the first four pages, they’ll at least see what the idea is.” So, yeah, you could look at my book.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, mission accomplished.

L. A. Paul: And read the first four pages and see what you think. Yeah.

Tim Ferriss: And then if you’re like, “Wow, I can digest more technical aspects,” then you can dig into the footnotes too, especially after the first hundred pages.

L. A. Paul: Exactly. The second half of the book switches into much more technical argumentation. And then a great resource, also, it’s written for other professional philosophers, but also really good for โ€” it’s the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. It’s online. It’s free. All the entries are written by professional philosophers. It’s not written to be accessible to non-philosophers, but it’s absolutely fantastic. You can get a sense of it. Take an entry, run it through ChatGPT for the highlights, whatever, and get a sense of things.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. Can you translate this from the Latin of the high priesthood into something I can understand, please?

L. A. Paul: Exactly. Exactly. Yeah, write it for โ€” tell me this from a twelve-year-old’s perspective. I think you would get something interesting. There are also various epistemology, a very short introduction. I think Jennifer Nagel wrote that really like โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: Could you define that term, also, for folks?

L. A. Paul: Oh.

Tim Ferriss: Epistemology.

L. A. Paul: Epistemology is the theory of knowledge. So if I use the word epistemic, like an epistemic transformation, what I mean is it’s changing what you know or how you conceptualize or make sense of the world.

Tim Ferriss: Mm-hmm. Okay. So, I interrupted your train of thought โ€” 

L. A. Paul: Yes,

Tim Ferriss: โ€” that you were saying, for epistemology, you might start with โ€” 

L. A. Paul: Oh. There’s a series of very short introductions. It’s Oxford. And they’re written by experts in the field. They’re just really nicely done. Again, they’re not written to be entertaining, but they’re written to be clear and accessible. So, if you’re willing to put in a little bit of work, you’ll get something out of it, for sure. Mm-hmm.

Tim Ferriss: Let’s just say you’re advising a student. Could be undergrad, grad. They come to you. This is within the context of philosophy department. They’re feeling kind of lost, maybe a little apathetic, nihilistic, although nihilism, we could probably define more precisely, but in the modern pop culture sense. Are there any recommendations for reading or self-inquiry or anything like that that you would recommend to them? It could also just be general life advice, but I’m curious how you might tackle a situation like that.

L. A. Paul: First, read interviews with Borges where he goes through this kind of process, especially, he has a book where he talks about going blind.

You see, it’s not like I wasn’t that kid. Okay. The problem is, the reason why I’m not coming up with things for you is because I was that kid in lots of ways. And I’m fascinated by philosophy, and I knew there were questions that I wanted to ask, but I wasn’t finding anything in the literature.

The reason why I started out with causation, as a graduate student, was partly because I found a deep close intellectual friend in David Lewis. We just really hit it off intellectually. We could talk to each other in ways that were talking about the โ€” I mean, always metaphysics, but we just understood each other’s minds in a way that I didn’t connect with really anyone else when I was doing my Ph.D.

But I felt that the tools of philosophy were beautiful tools. I could see that in the history, the what little I knew of the history of philosophy, deep, basic questions had been asked, but they were solved in very different ways, especially because often God played a role at that time, and that really wasn’t for me. I’m not a religious person, although I find religious belief really interesting and fascinating in various kinds of contexts.

And this paper, called “The Paradox of Empathy,” where I talk about the divide between the atheist and the believer because there’s this kind of fear if you really open your mind to the other person, that it’s going to convert you a way that you don’t want to be converted. It’s going to change you into that alien self. Right?

Tim Ferriss: Mm-hmm.

L. A. Paul: It’s like, I think the atheist feels that way, and I think the believer feels that way. So I argue it’s actually perfectly reasonable to be โ€” nobody ever argues someone into religious belief or losing it. It’s all about occupying a different conceptual space, and that just foundationally changes the way you understand the world. Okay.

Tim Ferriss: Mm-hmm.

L. A. Paul: So I knew that philosophy had these tools, and I thought that they were excellent tools. I’m still โ€” I love solving problems, remember, in this really rigorous way in organic chemistry, exploring mechanisms. That’s what all of the exams were always about.

My goal in college was to set the curve, but I wasn’t finding what I wanted. I couldn’t find the kinds of text I wanted to address these questions, so I don’t really have a lot for you. I mean, I think Thomas Nagel’s work is really, really great. The View from Nowhere is a beautiful book. That might be a place to go. 

Tim Ferriss: I just did a little searching on the Borges piece. It looks like Jorge Luis Borges wrote and spoke about his experience with blindness in a number of different contexts. One was Seven Nights, Siete Noches, a collection of lectures that he gave in Buenos Aires in 1977 covering โ€” 

L. A. Paul: Yep, that just โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: โ€” nightmares, Buddhism, poetry, and his own progressive blindness.

L. A. Paul: Yep. Yes, exactly.

Tim Ferriss: So that might be another place to start.

L. A. Paul: Yes, I think so. Reading Proust is also good, but these are not easy reads. And they’re not going to train you in philosophy, but they will put you into contact with the ideas that I think are beautiful and worth studying, and then you have to sweat through the training of your mind to get there. It’s not like you start reading and you’re going to get sucked in. No, it’s more like training for a marathon. You have to slowly agonize and when you’re completely unfit, and you have to โ€” and it sucks, okay. It’s not like you just run a little bit, and it feels great. And then you run a little bit more, and it feels great. Then somehow you get to a 26 โ€” no, it doesn’t work that way. And anyway. So I do think there’s more work out there where people are starting to address these questions. But I’m finding myself at a little bit of a loss because it was my dissatisfaction with what I was finding that led me to start working on this topic, even though I felt like it was deeply risky.

Tim Ferriss: It makes me wonder also if the, I don’t want to say solutions, but maybe if the life rafts for someone who’s feeling those things might fall outside of philosophy. I don’t know.

Are there any particular philosophical ideas or philosophies that you find consistently misrepresented or mistranslated in modern media or by self-help, broadly speaking, things that get co-opted? I mean, I’m sure quantum physicists could have a field day answering this, right? Because their stuff gets grabbed by every woo-woo self-help book that tends to come along.

L. A. Paul: So first thing is, it’s super important to distinguish between our experience of time and time itself. So some people might not think there is any such thing as time, but it’s just really important to โ€” 

Think about it this way. The easiest way to see the difference is imagine you’re in a really boring lecture and you’re just sitting there like, oh, this is lasting forever. And you look at the clock and you realize you’re only 15 minutes in. Okay. Right there your experience of time’s passing has departed from the objective measurement of time as measured by the clock. So there’s just two different things, and I think this gets conflated all over the place, and it gets really hard and really complex to think about these two different ways of talking about time, but it’s important.

Or sometimes people talk about when they have have a car accident. This happened to me actually. I had a car accident and I remember everything seemed to be going in slow motion. It’s like I was I was fine, I didn’t actually have a car accident. My car spun out of control late one night when I was driving on Michigan Avenue because I hit a patch of ice and I went around and around on Lake Shore Drive. It’s got four lanes going each way. And I was like, whoa. But it was 3 o’clock in the morning and no one else was there. So just in slow motion I watched myself go around and around and around. And I was like, well, this is bad. Oh, but there’s no one else here. Then I was able to correct the car, come out of the spin. But it felt like it happened over two, three minutes and it was probably like 10 seconds, 20 seconds, something like that. And there it’s a very common phenomenon, the way that we perceive time just changes. It comes apart from the passing of time.

Second thing, free will, just kill me now. Every non-philosophist โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: This is a big one.

L. A. Paul: It’s a big one. And people were really fascinated with it, and I totally get it. It’s not my own favorite topic, but I think you should distrust various โ€” it’s just a favorite topic of particular neuroscientists, and they’re all going to solve free will. And often it’s just โ€” 

I mean, I respect and engage discussion of free will from a scientist if they’ve read some of the philosophy, but a lot of times they haven’t read the philosophy and it is like they don’t know what they don’t know. So that’s a killer.

Related to free will is fatalism, like thinking everything’s determined. Slightly different from free will. I love existentialism as a topic, and I love continental philosophy and phenomenology, but I think that often โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: I recognize phenomenology because I’m involved with a lot of scientific research. And with say, psychedelic compounds, the term phenomenology comes up a lot. What is continental philosophy? Is that anything to do with continental breakfasts? I don’t know. I don’t have any idea.

L. A. Paul: So it’s a disputed phrase. So I also described what I do with analytic philosophy. And there’s this rough, it’s hard, it’s not really a very good way of describing things, but it’s the best one I have. So traditions, like say, Heidegger and Foucault and Derrida come from that kind of โ€” I think Zizek might count as this. There’s a style of philosophy that originated, at least arguably, on the European continent and is very different from the class you took with Gideon Rosen at Princeton, which is classic analytic philosophy, which originated in the U.K., arguably with people like Bertrand Russell and Wittgenstein and people like that. And also, I think with the positivists who came over to the US particularly around trying to escape the Nazis in World War II.

So continental philosophy also can have strong connections with psychoanalysis, whereas analytic philosophy has many more connections to contemporary science or very empirically grounded psychology, that kind of thing. I like both traditions a lot. I don’t super like the methods of continental philosophy. I was trained as a natural scientist, at least early on, and I really liked the approach. But I love the topics, and it’s pretty hard to talk about the very deep things that philosophers talk about, like the nature of being, or who we are in some fundamental sense, or how do we understand time using analytic techniques, but that’s what I try to do.

Tim Ferriss: What are some of the ways that you think philosophers will be most important in the broader world outside of academics, outside of the journals and so on? Where do you think these philosophical explorations and toolkits will most intersect with applications in the broader world, whether it’s related to certain technologies or otherwise?

L. A. Paul: I happen to think there’s value in just โ€” when I went back before and I said when the work on Transformative Experience that I am doing tries to address this kind of situation we find ourselves at certain foundational shifts that we undergo and certain life choice points, whether we choose them or not. Actually, let’s say I’m diagnosed with early onset Alzheimer’s, confronting that and making sense of that. So I think thinking philosophically is a really good tool for living one’s life. And that’s what Agnes talks about, by the way. Agnes Callard in her new book, I think it’s called Open Socrates.

And so I do think that philosophy has a role there. But I also think it has applications, for example, important applications in bioethics, important applications with artificial intelligence in particular. Thinking about ethics questions and value alignment with machines, trying to design machines that if they don’t have human values, respect human values, and how we’re going to really be able to do that in the context of actually undergoing these scientific and conceptual revolutions where we don’t know what’s coming down the pike. Transformative in my view. I think there’s lots of application also just with the policies, and thinking about, for example, precision, in terms of how, for example, we want say, certain policies to affect people. There’s a lot of work in political philosophy and philosophy of law and ethics I think that matters. That’s not just bioethics. Bioethics is its own kind of thing, which I think their philosophers have made and should be making and continue to make really important contributions.

Tim Ferriss: So I wanted to give Agnes a shout-out here. So Agnes Callard’s newest book is Open Socrates, subtitled The Case for a Philosophical Life, which just recently came out, January 14th, 2025. And you’ve invoked her name a number of times. She also wrote Aspiration: The Agency of Becoming, in 2018. Where would you say your positions or thinking most differ, you and Agnes?

L. A. Paul: Agnes has this view that if we want to change ourselves we can aspire to change in various ways. The new book is more about living a philosophical life, and it’s written for non-philosophers so it’s very accessible. So I was thinking it was something that people could try.

The other book, Aspiration, is a technical book. She thinks, oh, well, you can just aspire to be someone different and just train yourself up into being that way. I’m simplifying radically. And I think there’s an incoherence in that, because if I find somebody being a parent or being an opera singer or something just fundamentally alien to who I am, there’s no coherent way for me to aspire to do that. So our big difference is that. And I’ve said this to her and she’s like, “Yeah, but I just think that our rationality model is broken. So I don’t mind if there’s a kind of incoherence in my view.” We’re just really different in that way, in the way that we approach these questions.

Agnes does the history of philosophy. She works on the classics and work in maybe metaethics, and I approach things very much from a philosophy science, kind of metaphysics epistemology, a more mathematical view, so we come from different perspectives that way too.

Tim Ferriss: All right. So we’ll link to Agnes’ Open Socrates book in the show notes as well for everybody.

You have written on Reddit, this was, I’m not sure exactly when this was, but that you find Aristotle’s work especially inspirational. Now, you can’t believe everything you read on the internet, so please feel free to fact check that, but if that is a true statement, why is that the case?

L. A. Paul: I said that about Aristotle?

Tim Ferriss: I mean, that’s what I have here. It’s attributed to you. This is why I’m saying โ€” 

L. A. Paul: This is the Reddit Ask Me Anything, right?

Tim Ferriss: Yes, exactly.

L. A. Paul: I have no idea. I love that AMA, it was so fun. I thought you were going to ask me about drugs because that ended up being half the conversation.

Tim Ferriss: Oh. Okay, Well, let’s go to drugs.

L. A. Paul: Let’s talk about that. I’d rather talk about drugs than Aristotle, I’m afraid. I have more expertise in there.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, I know more about drugs than I do about Aristotle, so let’s go to drugs.

L. A. Paul: Yeah. Okay. All right.

So one of the cool things is that, I’ve given a couple talks on this, the framework that I was articulating is useful when we’re thinking about things like psychedelics because the conceptual framework of a transformative experience, which opens your mind in a certain way because you have a new kind of experience, and then at least in some contexts, that epistemic shift is so profound that it changes how you understand yourself in the world. And that applies โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. Ontological shock is something they use in the literature a fair amount.

L. A. Paul: Yeah, exactly. Exactly. And, I mean, that applies to becoming a parent, I think, or a terrible thing, like becoming quadriplegic, but it also can happen when you take psychedelics for the first time. So the idea being the way that I think about it is whatever neurological changes that taking your preferred type of psychedelics induces, it changes the nature of our perceptions. And this is super interesting because in particular perceptual experience, or sensory experience, is already not amenable to description. When I said, “Hey,” if you’re color blind and I tell you, “Oh, I’m going to describe what it’s like to see red,” you just haven’t got enough to go on.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah.

L. A. Paul: And that’s something about the way that we can’t use testimony to communicate certain types of experiences. And psychedelics change the way that we experience the world through changing the character of our perceptions. And I’m fascinated by this, because I think I’m not sure exactly how I want to make sense of this philosophically, but I think it teaches something about how our minds connect with the world. We learn somehow that actually the world is in some sense a world of representation because we can now discover a different way of representing the world. And we realize, oh, when we go back to our old selves, just how much the brain was doing to contribute to everything that we’re seeing. I think that that’s one of the lessons that people can get when they take psychedelics. Let’s put it this way. That’s the lesson that I drew from it, and I do think that people can draw this in more or less technical ways.

But the other thing that this kind of experience can do is shift us epistemologically so that we change how we understand ourselves as beings in the world, I think. And it does this partly neurochemically, obviously the kind of neuroscientific, I guess, way of explaining this is to think, well, maybe for some reason there are certain different pathways that are activated in the brain, at least for a few weeks after taking various kinds of psychedelics that can especially help people with clinical depression or facing terminal illness.

But I think it’s not just like that. I think it’s actually you get this enriched sense of how here we are human beings taking in through our senses and responding and constructing a world, and it gives you a clearer understanding of how we build ourselves. And I feel like this makes us attend more to the relationship we have with the world in general, and the relationships we have with other people. And the transformative experience stuff really fits that, so it’s kind of cool. And I definitely tried psychedelics before I ever wrote about transformative experience. But it wasn’t what I was thinking about. I think you were asking me leading questions earlier when I mentioned dropping acid and not thinking about certain kinds of logical puzzles. But it wasn’t what led me to the stuff I transformed with experience. It was really having babies that was really shocking.

Tim Ferriss: Oh, I wasn’t implying that โ€” 

L. A. Paul: You weren’t suggesting that? Oh, okay.

Tim Ferriss: That the acid led to the book on transformative experience. When you kept saying, “I really can’t explain how I got into philosophy.” I was like, you just made a passing comment related to acid, and there is a non-zero chance that that could have opened Pandora’s box of all sorts of questions.

L. A. Paul: I guess it could have. I think it was more like I definitely had a lot of these experiences in college. I was like, wow, I really like thinking these different kinds of thoughts. But reading literature also did that so it didn’t feel, it wasn’t like โ€” yeah.

Tim Ferriss: Sure. Yeah. They’re not mutually exclusive.

L. A. Paul: Right.

Tim Ferriss: The experiences with, and they don’t need to be with psychedelics, but in altered states, sort of non-ordinary states of consciousness can, as you said very well, illustrate in a very felt first person way how much of our reality and how much of our conception of the self is constructed.

L. A. Paul: Exactly. That’s right.

Tim Ferriss: Then you come out of it, you’re like, “Huh. Okay.”

L. A. Paul: Right.

Tim Ferriss: Just like metaphysics is examining, in some cases, these underlying assumptions that maybe physicists take for granted.

L. A. Paul: Yes.

Tim Ferriss: When we’re walking around being our skin-encapsulated ego, there’s a lot we take for granted.

L. A. Paul: Exactly.

Tim Ferriss: And then when suddenly you’re like, “Hmm, I had this complete dissolution of the self, and yet there was still a felt experience, but there was no I. What the fuck does that mean?” Right?

L. A. Paul: Exactly. And the thing is you can read all the theory in the world, but when you experience it it gives you a different way of understanding. And that’s what I’m saying. Just like seeing red for the first time. You can hear all about red, but when you see it you’re like, whoa, wait, there’s something there that’s more. The theory, the words aren’t sufficient to express all of the content. It’s just how human ones are.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. Well, it’s like one of the cornerstones of mystical experience, at least according to the assessments from St. Johns Hopkins and so on, is ineffability, which makes it very hard to describe to someone else.

L. A. Paul: Yeah, exactly. That’s a problem. It’s like, oh, well, it’s inevitable. Well, that’s not helpful.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah.

L. A. Paul: But again, go back. This is what I was trying to capture with the vampires. When I say look, life has meaning and a sense of purpose that you can’t possibly understand as a human. I’m sorry to say that there are certain โ€” one of the interesting things about human minds is that we can discover new kinds of experience, and before we know about those new kinds of experience, they’re just ineffable. There’s just a conceptual problem there.

Tim Ferriss: So you have, I believe, a quote in your book from Conrad’s Heart of Darkness. And the quote I’m going to read, and you can, again, fact check me as needed. 

“Watching a coast as it slips by the ship is like thinking about an enigma. There it is before you, smiling, frowning, inviting, grand, mean, insipid, or savage, and always mute with an air of whispering, ‘Come and find out.'” 

“We ultimately need to ask if we’re willing to plunge into the jungle of the new self,” as you put it.

So before we go, are there any transformative experiences that you are looking forward to with trepidation, with fear or excitement, or decisions that you’ll need to make? It could just be broadly experiences like you’ve mentioned, for instance cognitive decline and so on. I’m not saying you’d look forward to that, but โ€” 

L. A. Paul: Actually no, no, that’s the one.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah.

L. A. Paul: That’s the one. So I don’t look forward, but I mean, basically I think that all of us face death and you don’t know how it’s going to come. And frankly, I’d be perfectly happy to have a heart attack in the middle of great sex. That’s obviously the best way to go. But most likely it’s going to be, I’m pretty physically healthy, it’s going to be a long, slow decline. Alzheimer’s is extremely common, or some other kind of dementia. And as an academic, especially someone who’s like, I mean, I love my intellectual project, and losing my abilities is something that I certainly fear and I need to come to grips with that. And I think it is a transformative experience, and I think like becoming quadriplegic, it needs to be grappled with.

And the solution to the extent that I have one, it relates to the Buddhist point about suffering, namely a certain kind of attachment is what causes suffering. And what I’ve been thinking about it a lot actually, and I guess I hope when the time comes, and I don’t expect it to be for a while but you never know, kind of hoping I’ve got a pretty good chunk of time, but you have to reset yourself. You have to change who you are in a certain way and find other sources of enjoyment. And I don’t mean something like sour grapes or adaptive reasoning, I think you actually have to reconfigure what you care about.

And that is in a sense what the Buddhist teaching suggests. In other words, you detach yourself from some of the passions of regular life. And in virtue of detaching yourself then you truly actually change your preference structure. It’s not that you secretly still want them, and if you could get them you would, right? That’s adaptive in various ways. It’s rather that you reconfigure what you care about. And I hope that if and when I experience cognitive decline, that I’ll learn how to make sure I retain the most basic things that I value, like joy in art and in music. Just being a consumer of music, and art, and really good food.

And I want to try to treat that as you see how I’m describing it as permission to let go of things that I value but cause me stress. What causes stress and anxiety? Obligations, things that I need to do, accomplishments I want to get to. When that’s inaccessible, like permanently gone, I want to be able to return to other basic sources of happiness and pleasure and love, like loving my children and having friends, even if they’re just everybody else in the assisted living facility or whatever. I think of it as a big senior dorm back in college, only a bunch of people who are in the 80s and 90s. And I want to be able to understand how to reconfigure myself to enjoy that. I’ve decided that is my task. I’m not sure I’m there yet, but that’s how I’m thinking about it. And I think I want to write about this a little bit, but I don’t see people approaching the issue in this way at all.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, I think it would be incredibly valuable for a lot of people for you to write about that and to explore that.

Laurie, thank you so much for the time. People can find you and all things L. A. Paul at lapaul.org, and certainly we’ll link to all of the books and everything else in the show notes. Is there anything else you would like to say to my audience? Anywhere else you would like to point them? Anything at all that you’d like to add before we land the plane?

L. A. Paul: Well, two things. One is I do have a book. It’s coming out, it’s going to be ages, it’s going to be two more years, but a lot of the themes that we’ve been talking about are going to come back, and it’s going to be written for non-philosophers. So I hope that it’ll be the kind of thing that people would turn to if they want to get a sense of some of these discussions.

No, just, I understand that philosophers are weird and that we do weird things and we can be kind of annoying, back to โ€” and maybe I just want people to forgive us for that. Sometimes we’re not very good at representing ourselves. But I think, in general, it’s a worthwhile activity for people who have a taste for it. And even if you don’t, it’s worthwhile to think about some of these questions sometimes. So maybe I’m asking for a little bit of indulgence and patience.

Tim Ferriss: And curiosity, folks. I mean, there are toolkits. And even if you can’t get to really definitive satisfying answers, there are a lot of good questions worth asking also.

L. A. Paul: Exactly. Yeah.

Tim Ferriss: And in and of themselves, maybe like a koan, they can lead to interesting places.

L. A. Paul: Exactly.

Tim Ferriss: So Laurie, thank you for the time and thank you for your work. Really, really appreciate it. And for everybody listening, we will put everything in the show notes, as per usual, at tim.blog/podcast. And until next time, be just a bit nicer than is necessary to others, but also to yourself. Thanks for tuning in.

STEP 1 โ€” THE WILSON LETTER AND BEYOND

Hi Friends,

Here is the first โ€œrealโ€ chapter of THE NO BOOK, the book I am currently writing with Neil Strauss. As youโ€™ll see, itโ€™s a STEP comprised of a few pieces of writing.

Please leave your thoughts and results in the blog comments! I deleted all social media apps from my phone, but I will read all of the blog comments here.

And if you missed the first two chapters, the introductions from both me and Neil, you can find them here.

Enjoy!

Tim


CORE CONCEPT: THE WILSON LETTER

If your compassion does not include yourself, it is incomplete.
โ€” Jack Kornfield

I can’t give you a sure-fire formula for success, but I can give you a formula for failure: try to please everybody all the time.
โ€•ย Herbert Bayard Swope, three-time Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist

Edmund Wilson, recipient of both the Presidential Medal of Freedom and the National Medal for Literature, was one of the most prominent social and literary critics of the 20th century.

His writing, honed at Vanity Fair, The New Yorker, and The New Republic, played a large role in introducing F. Scott Fitzgerald, Ernest Hemingway, and William Faulkner to the mainstream.

He realized, like most uber-productive people, that, while there were many practices needed to guarantee high output, there was one behavior guaranteed to prevent all output:

Trying to please everyone.

He had a low tolerance for distraction and shunned undue public acclaim. In response to almost all letters, he would respond with the below, putting a check mark next to whatever had been requested:

Edmund Wilson regrets that it is impossible for himโ€ฆ

โ€ฆwithout compensation to:

read manuscripts

contribute to books or periodicals

do editorial work

judge literary contests

deliver lectures

address meetings

make after-dinner speeches

broadcast.

โ€ฆunder any circumstances to:

contribute to or take part in symposiums

take part in chain-poems or other collective compositions

contribute manuscripts for sales

donate copies of his books to libraries

autograph books for strangers

supply personal information about himself

supply photographs of himself

allow his name to be used on letter-heads

receive unknown persons who have no apparent business with him.

Ahead of his time not just in his literary taste, Wilson was also a trailblazer with his auto-response. It is an example of one of the most time-saving forms of no there is: The Pre-Emptive No. And the first step in your no journey is to understand the incredible, time-saving power of answering no before a request has even been made. 

In brief, the pre-emptive no is a form of batch request processing. It involves creating iron-clad policies of what you will say no to in an automated message, whether it be a form letter, autoresponse email, voicemail, website contact page, or otherwise. This type of blanket response allows you to ignore any incoming messages that fall in the pre-announced no pile. If handled correctly, this can change how you approach your entire life.

Note that you donโ€™t have to be as accomplished as Edmund Wilson to have a pre-emptive no. Every one of us is in the process of growing out of something we used to do. For some, like Wilson, that means signing books and giving free lectures. For someone else, it might simply be going to destination weddings, taking babysitting jobs, or doing shots when a friend is buying for the table. 

Despite the length and severity of Wilsonโ€™s pre-emptive no, he was not a hermit or loner. He had a keen sense of what mattered. With good friends and good boundaries, he was able to get more done in a few years than most people get done in their lifetimes.


Okay, here is where we take a very deliberate pause:

Slow down and check in with yourself. How are you feeling after reading his letter and learning about the pre-emptive no? What is your inner voice saying, if anything? Really take a minute. 

If I suggested that you use something similar, how would you reply to me right now? Close your eyes and take stock.

Iโ€™ve found the Wilson Letter serves like a Rorschach inkblot test. Someoneโ€™s reaction to it tells me a lot, very quickly, about their comfort or resistance to this type of noโ€”and their psychology behind it.

There are two emotional responses to the Wilson auto-response that are, by far and away, most common, which Iโ€™ve seen over and over again. Broadly speaking, they are:

1) Iโ€™m not successful enough to do that.

Language like the following frequently shows up, often accompanied by resignation, dismissal, or scoffing:

โ€œMust be nice.โ€

โ€œYou canโ€™t do this if youโ€™re just starting out.โ€

โ€œIf I did that, offers would dry up. Iโ€™d stop getting opportunities.โ€

Interestingly, the โ€œnot successful enoughโ€ response has no correlation to someoneโ€™s actual wealth. Iโ€™ve heard this type of response from people making $50,000 per year, and Iโ€™ve heard the same from people making $10,000,000+ per year. 

More material abundance doesnโ€™t fix this default response, but a few new frameworks will. 

2) Iโ€™m too nice/kind to do that.

Language like the below frequently pops up, often accompanied by anger or righteous indignation:

โ€œI would/could never do something like that.โ€

โ€œHe is so rude.โ€

โ€I value kindness and generosity.โ€ 

โ€œI bet many people helped him become so successful, and now heโ€™s refusing to help anyone.โ€

For the record, I do believe it is possible to be both successful and nice. Kindness can be your companion. But it is not possible to be successful while running around trying to please everyone. 

And, if you learn anything from this book, I hope itโ€™s that being constantly accommodating when you donโ€™t want to is not being nice. Itโ€™s insincere, enabling, and manipulative. It also breeds long-term resentment. Thatโ€™s not nice; itโ€™s a time-bomb.

We all exist on a spectrum between being pure people-pleasers, who bend to everyone elseโ€™s wishes, and being complete psychopaths, who accommodate no one (e.g., Gordon Gekko). Most of us err on the side of people-pleasing, because we want to avoid the discomfort and possible consequences of them being unhappy. 

The majority of you reading this book, who say yes too often, will benefit by pushing closer to the midpoint of the spectrum through this exercise. Rather than a 100 percent overhaul of your life, all you need to consider is a ten percent shift of your default responses in the other direction. 10% more Gordon Gekko will give you a great dose of extra agency, not arrogance.


How much more could you get doneโ€”and how much happier would you beโ€”if you refused even one type of request you commonly receive? Or an infrequent request that nonetheless causes you headache or heartache?

โ€œIs it time for you to craft your own Wilson letter?โ€  

I put quotation marks around the above question, as I posed that challenge rhetorically to some readers many years ago.

Much to my surprise, a bunch of people actually did it.  Slightly edited for length, here is one fantastic example from a reader named Maggie:

Writing this out was cathartic. It was hard to stop once I got started, and the deeply-rooted sick little people-pleaser in me is scared to put it out there at all, but what a thrill:

As I am joining the exodus from Brooklyn to a quiet, productive, groovy life upstate, I would be remiss not to inform you that I will no longer be able to:

– Respond to any email including the words โ€œpick your brainโ€ or โ€œwould love to get coffee sometime.โ€

– Continue using any glitchy online service that demands more than 5 minutes to take care of a minor account change or basic function

– Have the same conversations again & again at the same next party

– Read or listen to ANYTHING about any guy you heard from on match.com

– Wait lugubriously for the F train on the weekend. HAHAHAHA! See ya!

– โ€œCatch upโ€ with you on your sketchy cell phone when you are also filling up your gas tank/in line at the deli/talking in thinly veiled code while driving home with the guy you want to break up with

– Read ANYTHING you want to publish, under any circumstances, unless the entire thing makes me nearly pee my pants laughing

– Cheerily & spontaneously offer a fully formed, bulletproof, and complimentary PR plan for you when I bump into you outside the Tea Lounge mid-afternoon & we get to chatting about your projects

– Chat about your projects

– Listen to job complaints and either bite my tongue or get my head bitten off for suggesting a change might be possible

– Listen to any sentence regarding how many calories breast feeding/your new cardio plan burns

– Somehow mysteriously spend 60 dollars the minute I walk out my door every day, sort of like I exhaled it without even knowing

Sincerely and with love,

Maggie

Go, Maggie, go! 

Let us call this type of bullet list a โ€œselfishness manifesto,โ€ which is what another reader named it. Itโ€™s the perfect flippant name for this exercise, as folks who say yes too often tend to believe itโ€™s selfish to prioritize their own needs. 

But as Arianna Huffington has said, โ€œYou have to put your own oxygen mask on first before helping others.โ€ Compassion begins with yourself. Without self-compassion, your projected compassion is a fraud. 

Drafting your own selfishness manifesto will allow you to vent, laugh, and uncover truths that wouldnโ€™t surface if you were taking things seriously. Itโ€™s a workaround.


COMFORT CHALLENGE: YOUR SELFISHNESS MANIFESTO

I was always ashamed to take. So I gave. It was not a virtue. It was a disguise.
โ€” Anaรฏs Nin

As promised, welcome to your first assignment. It may be tempting to simply read the Comfort Challenges that recur throughout this book and imagine doing them.

Donโ€™t be that person. That person wonโ€™t get anything from this book. This is a workbook. It is easier to act your way into a new way of thinking than it is to think your way into a new way of acting.

By analogy, no PhD in soccer by itself will help you play soccer. If you want skills that work under pressure (which you do), you have to get off the bench of passivity and develop a love affair with action: get on the field, kick the ball, do the drills, and play against live opponents who thwart your attempts. The little actions arenโ€™t hard, and the little actions add up surprisingly quickly.

So, letโ€™s get on the field.

Start by getting a notebook, opening your favorite notes app, or creating a new document on your computer. Title it something like: Comfort Challenges, THE NO BOOK, or if bad puns are your thing, My NO-tebook. You will be adding all future Comfort Challenges to this workbook as well, so make it something that you have easy access toโ€”and that can hold all your work in one place. 

And then begin:

  1. At the top of the page, write the words My Selfishness Manifesto as a header. This will be your new operating manual. Keep in mind that what we are calling โ€œselfishnessโ€ is really just a playful way of saying that from now on, you will be taking better care of yourself and your time. If that phrasing throws you off, make it My Self-Preservation Manifesto or My Wilson Letter.
  1. Either use Edmundโ€™s format below or write your own version of his pre-emptive no statement:

[Your name] regrets that it is impossible for him/her/pronoun โ€ฆ

โ€ฆwithout compensation to:

[LIST]

โ€ฆunder any circumstances to:

[LIST]

  1. In the spirit of the examples in this chapter, draft the most honest and direct rejection page that youโ€™ll never actually use. Have fun with it. Be brutal and 100% selfish. Unlike Edmund Wilson, there is no need for you to ever show your letter to anyone. So let loose. 

Because this is just for you, thereโ€™s no need to play nice. Consider throwing a few elbows instead. Name names, tell them how you really feel, and draw that line in the sand. Resist the impulse to soften anything. Let all the annoyance out. Thatโ€™s the whole point of the exercise.  

Also, keep in mind that this is a rough draft. Donโ€™t get bogged down with second-guessing things or considering exceptions. Just let it rip.

  1. If youโ€™re having any trouble coming up with your lines in the sand, consider working on this with a good friend over a meal or bottle of wine. This is a great team sport. Ask your friend questions like, โ€œWhat kinds of things annoys the &%$* out of me? What do I complain about?โ€ 
  1. Now that your list is complete, let your Wilson Letter be your internal compass. Read it each morning for a week. Before saying yes to a request, wait a moment. Check your list and see if the item is there. If it is, then itโ€™s a no

Donโ€™t yet be concerned with how youโ€™re going to say no. Weโ€™ll get there. Just donโ€™t say yes. Deflect. If you canโ€™t muster a clear no, say โ€œMaybe. Let me check my calendar and Iโ€™ll get back to you if I can do it.โ€ Note that this is a default no and closes the door unless you reopen it. Just donโ€™t say yes off-the-bat.

  1. Keep your Wilson Letter as a living document that grows as you do. Over the next weeks, as various texts and emails come in, you may find yourself wanting to add items you overlooked to your list. Inspiration can come from unexpected places.

NEILโ€™S STRUGGLE JOURNAL

People are frugal in guarding their personal property; but as soon as it comes to squandering time, they are most wasteful of the one thing in which it is right to be stingy.
โ€” Seneca, On the Shortness of Life

Tim assigned me this first comfort challenge, and it was an unexpected struggle for me. What I told myself is that I couldnโ€™t find the time because I was so busy. But the truth was that I wasnโ€™t making the time. Everything else seemed urgentโ€”work deadlines, time with my children, dates with random people from random apps.  Besides, I understood the general idea of the letter, so I didnโ€™t feel like I actually needed to write it all out.

Fortunately, after a conversation with a disappointed Tim, the people-pleaser in me found a good way to keep myself accountable.

Like many people on Instagram with a following of more than 23 people, I have a coaching group. Every one of my students also struggles with saying no, people pleasing, and setting boundaries. 

So I asked them if they would be open to doing these Comfort Challenges with me, and they agreed. At the beginning of each monthly session, we dove into an exercise together. This not only gave me the accountability to do the challenges myself, but the opportunity to fine tune them based on how they resonated with others with different experiences. 

After finally creating my Wilson Letter, I had a revelation that affected how I thought about everything else in this book: For me personally, there was an important category missing.

As instructed, I wrote down the behaviors I would no longer accept: 

*People I met once who text me for years after just to stay in touch *โ€Friendsโ€ who think my social media is their personal promotion service.

*And especially people who pester me about going to lunch, then, after I reluctantly accept, end the meal by inviting me to lunch again and immediately start texting to โ€œlock a date in.โ€

As I wrote all this, I realized something. In each of these cases, the problem wasnโ€™t really other people. They were just being themselves. They enjoyed staying in touch. They enjoyed going to lunch. They were completely innocent requests. The problem was me.

I was responding to them.

I was agreeing to their requests.

I was enabling the behavior that I didnโ€™t want.

So, I added an additional section to the Wilson Letter: Behaviors I will no longer accept from myself. 

They included:

  1. Feeling like I have to respond to the stay-in-touch people because theyโ€™ll be upset.
  2. Offering a social media promo when I canโ€™t do a book blurb because I feel people will be hurt and feel unsupported.
  3. Thinking I have to read someoneโ€™s book or book proposal if someone has done me a favor.
  4. Saying yes to lunch if I like someone but donโ€™t have the time for a one-on-one lunch.
  5. Working in a room with the door open and the phone next to me. Thatโ€™s just inviting interruptions.
  6. Doing someoneโ€™s podcast if I donโ€™t have a new project to discuss. I donโ€™t need to hear myself talk.
  7. My nine-year-old who is reading over my shoulder as I write this wants me to add: โ€œI will no longer play Mario Wonder with my son instead of writing this book.โ€ And heโ€™s right. 

As Tim pointed out when I shared these results with him (except for the last one), โ€œYouโ€™re directing the airplane traffic badly, then blaming it on the pilot when thereโ€™s a crash.โ€

One of Timโ€™s favorite questions, borrowed from Reboot by Jerry Colonna, is โ€œHow am I complicit in creating the conditions I say I don’t want?โ€

So if youโ€™re finding yourself complicit in your own misery, and I believe this is almost always the case to some degree, then consider adding my category to your Wilson Letter as an experiment. 

When I did this with the rest of the people in my coaching group, which Iโ€™m going to start calling a test group because Iโ€™m sure countless Wilson Letters mention something like โ€œblock any asshole who says he or she has a coaching group,โ€ not only did they find this helpful, but they discovered something powerful.

When the exercise ended, I felt like they were still waiting for some kind of conclusion or takeaway, so I asked: โ€œIf you had to estimate the amount of your total time you spend doing, resenting, or being annoyed by the things on your list, what percentage of each week would that be?โ€

The average answer was 30 percent! One person, who was in the midst of a divorce, said it was 60 percent. 

Thatโ€™s a lot of time and attention you can recover by acting on your Wilson Letter.

If youโ€™re anything like me, you may not be ready to act on all these items in your Wilson Letter. But it all starts with self-awareness. Knowledge alone might help cut these things down by 10-20 percent, and, as I learned later, the tactics for tackling the remaining 80 percent will come in future Comfort Challenges. 

So keep your letter handy.


ANATOMY OF A NO: Life Tetris

While writing this book, I invited best-selling author, coach, and Harvard-trained sociologist Martha Beck to an event. Her brief, eloquent response was an instant addition to my No Swipe File. Here is my favorite line:

โ€œI would LOVE to come and participate, but I canโ€™t make it happen in the next couple of months due to life Tetris.โ€

WHY IT WORKS: Itโ€™s short, direct, positive, and clever.  I included this because โ€œbut I canโ€™t make it happen due to life Tetrisโ€ can be used for practically anything and doesnโ€™t provide specifics someone can attempt to negotiate around.


Missed the first two chapters? Find them here.

L.A. Paul โ€” On Becoming a Vampire, Whether or Not to Have Kids, Getting Incredible Mentorship for $250, Transformative Experiences, and More (#796)

Illustration via 99designs

“You can read all the theory in the world, but when you experience it, it gives you a different way of understanding. And that’s what I’m saying. Just like seeing red for the first time. You can hear all about red, but when you see it, you’re like, whoa, wait, there’s something there that’s more. The theory, the words aren’t sufficient to express all of the content.”
โ€” L.A. Paul

L.A. Paul (lapaul.org) is the Millstone Family Professor of Philosophy and Professor of Cognitive Science at Yale University, where she leads the Self and Society Initiative for the Wu Tsai Institute. Her research explores questions about the nature of the self and decision-making and the metaphysics and cognitive science of time, cause, and experience.

She is the recipient of fellowships from the Guggenheim Foundation, the National Humanities Center, and the Australian National University. She is the author of Transformative Experience and coauthor of Causation: A Userโ€™s Guide, which was awarded the American Philosophical Association Sanders Book Prize. Her work on transformative experience has been covered by The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Guardian, NPR, and the BBC, among others. And in 2024, she was profiled by The New Yorker

She is currently working on a book, under contract with Farrar, Straus and Giroux, about self-construction, transformative experience, humility, and fear of mental corruption.

Please enjoy!

Listen to the episode on Apple PodcastsSpotifyOvercastPodcast AddictPocket CastsCastboxYouTube MusicAmazon MusicAudible, or on your favorite podcast platform. The transcript of this episode can be found here. Transcripts of all episodes can be found here.

This episode is brought to you by MUD\WTR energy-boosting coffee alternativeโ€”without the jitters; Eight Sleepโ€™s Pod 4 Ultra sleeping solution for dynamic cooling and heating; and LinkedIn Ads, the go-to tool for B2B marketers and advertisers who want to drive brand awareness and generate leads.

[podcast-player id=”e6b8e87f-8823-4d6f-8b6e-4e8f8955cb59″ src=”https://rss.art19.com/episodes/e6b8e87f-8823-4d6f-8b6e-4e8f8955cb59.mp3″ title=”#796: L.A. Paul โ€” On Becoming a Vampire, Whether or Not to Have Kids, Getting Incredible Mentorship for $250, Transformative Experiences, and More (#796)”]


This episode is brought to you by MUD\WTR! With only a fraction of the caffeine found in a cup of coffee, MUD\WTR gives me all the energy I need without the jitters or crash. Their original blend contains four different mushrooms: lionโ€™s mane for focus, cordyceps to promote energy, and both chaga and reishi to support a healthy immune system. And itโ€™s deliciousโ€”like cacao and chai had a beautiful child. I drink MUD\WTR in the morning, and Iโ€™ll also sometimes add milk and ice for a 2 p.m. iced latte pick-me-up. I also love that they make monthly donations to support psychedelic therapeutics and research, including organizations such as the Heroic Hearts Project and The UC Berkeley Center for the Science of Psychedelics (BCSP). 

Now you can get 15% off plus a free rechargeable frother and free shipping by going to mudwtr.com/Tim. Enjoy MUD\WTR and get a better morning routine.


This episode is brought to you by Eight Sleep. Temperature is one of the main causes of poor sleep, and heat is my personal nemesis. Iโ€™ve suffered for decades, tossing and turning, throwing blankets off, pulling them back on, and repeating ad nauseam. But a few years ago, I started using the Pod Cover, and it has transformed my sleep. Eight Sleep has launched their newest generation of the Pod: Pod 5 Ultra. It cools, it heats, and now it elevates, automatically. With the best temperature performance to date, Pod 5 Ultra ensures you and your partner stay cool in the heat and cozy warm in the cold. Plus, it automatically tracks your sleep time, snoring, sleep stages, and HRV, all with high precision. For example, their heart rate tracking is at an incredible 99% accuracy.

Pod 5 Ultra also introduces an adjustable Base that fits between your mattress and your bed frame to add custom positions for the best sleeping experience. It also automatically reduces your snoring when detected. Add it easily to any bed.ย And for full coverage, you can include the Blanket, which uses the same technology as the Podโ€™s Cover to extend temperature regulation over your entire body.

And now, listeners of The Tim Ferriss Show can get $350 off of the Pod 5 Ultra for a limited time! Click here to claim this deal and unlock your full potential through optimal sleep.


This episode is brought to you byย LinkedIn Ads, the go-to tool for B2B marketers and advertisers who want to drive brand awareness, generate leads, or build long-term relationships that result in real business impact.

With a community of more than 900 million professionals, LinkedIn is gigantic, but it can be hyper-specific. You have access to a diverse group of people all searching for things they need to grow professionally. LinkedIn has the marketing tools to help you target your customers with precision, right down to job title, company name, industry, etc. To redeem your free $100 LinkedIn ad credit and launch your first campaign, go to LinkedIn.com/TFS!


Want to hear an episode with someone who applies philosophy to his daily life? Listen to my most recent conversation with Derek Sivers, in which we discussed Emirati coffee, cuddly rats, Brian Eno, John Cage, practical applications of simplicity, traveling to inhabit philosophies, and much more.


What was your favorite quote or lesson from this episode? Please let me know in the comments.

Continue reading “L.A. Paul โ€” On Becoming a Vampire, Whether or Not to Have Kids, Getting Incredible Mentorship for $250, Transformative Experiences, and More (#796)”

For Less Anxiety and More Life, Treat Your To-Do List Like a Diner Menu

Several years ago, Cal Newport of Deep Work fame recommended that I read Four Thousand Weeks:ย Time Management for Mortals by Oliver Burkeman.

The first few chapters hooked me, and I devoured it over 48 hours or so, capturing hundreds of Kindle highlights in the process. Itโ€™s quite unlike anything Iโ€™ve ever read, and one of my favorite chapters is titled โ€œCosmic Insignificance Therapy,โ€ which Oliver graciously permitted me to share on the blog and on the podcast.

In August 2023, Oliver wrote a piece for his newsletter titled “Lists are menus” that stuck with me, and I have thought about it since. You can find it below.

For more Oliver, subscribe to his newsletter here. In case you missed it, also check out his newest Meditations for Mortals: Four Weeks to Embrace Your Limitations and Make Time for What Counts.

Enjoy!

Enter Oliver Burkeman

More and more, I think my issues with conventional productivity advice โ€“ indeed, with the very notion of productivity โ€“ boil down to this: Spending your days trying to get through a list of things you feel you have to do is a fundamentally joyless and soul-destroying way to live, and most productivity problems, like distraction or procrastination or a lack of motivation, can be understood as internal rebellions against a life spent so dispiritingly. And yet most of what passes for expert advice just involves organizing the list differently, or getting through the list more efficiently. Whereas the real trouble lies in the whole underlying idea of life as a matter of slogging your way through a list.

I realize, of course, that you may not be a โ€œlist personโ€ like me, with my long and somewhat ridiculous history of experimenting with lists in notebooks, digital lists, lists organized by context or project or priority, and so on (and so on and so on). But if you adopt a sufficiently broad definition of a to-do list โ€“ ie., as any set of things you feel you need to get done โ€“ then itโ€™s clear that really, lists are everywhere. Your โ€œto readโ€ pile is a list. A morning routine is a list (of things you think you need to do each morning). That nagging collection of home improvements you keep meaning to get around to? That constitutes a list, too.

Or maybe youโ€™re one of the many people who go through life with a vague sense that there are several important milestones you need to hit before you can truly deem things to be in full working order โ€“ to start exercising, find a relationship, work through your childhood issues, sort out your finances? Well, thatโ€™s a list, too, in the sense Iโ€™m using the word here: a set of tasks you believe you need to get through, in order to feel that everythingโ€™s OK.

As every productivity geek knows, thereโ€™s a certain pleasure in crossing things off lists. (Some of us have been known to add tasks weโ€™ve already completed, so as to cross those ones off, too.) But in the long run, I donโ€™t think this can make up for the basic joylessness of a life spent doing things in order to have them done โ€“ and spent, moreover, in the belief that true peace of mind can only come once theyโ€™re all out of the way. Which of course they never are.

All of which leads to a question Iโ€™ve found powerful to reflect on: what if we understood our lists as menus instead?

For many years I lived in New York โ€“ where, as anyone familiar with the city knows, thereโ€™s a kind of diner you can visit at which youโ€™ll be handed a huge menu, bound in fake leather, with perhaps eight or nine laminated pages featuring every imaginable permutation of egg-based dishes, sandwiches, burgers, waffles and salads that the kitchen is capable of conceiving. I love these menus for the sense of crazy abundance they impart. And they help clarify a critical way in which a menu differs from a to-do list: picking just one or two items from a menu is something you get to do, not something you have to do. Itโ€™s not a problem that there are so many more things you could order than youโ€™d ever be able to consume in a single visit. It isnโ€™t the case that in an ideal world youโ€™d eat them all, but because youโ€™re not efficient enough at eating youโ€™ve got to settle for just one or two of them, and feel like a failure. That would be ridiculous! The abundance is the point. And the joy is in getting to eat at the restaurant at all.

I take it you can see where this is going when it comes to to-do lists: increasingly, I find myself treating my other lists as menus, too. Your โ€œto readโ€ pile or digital equivalent, for example, is most certainly best understood as a menu โ€“ a list of things to pick from, rather than one you have to get through. But the same applies to my list of work projects. Sure, the contents of the menu is constrained by various goals and long-term deadlines. But the daily practice is just to pick something appetizing from the menu, instead of grinding through a list. 

Maybe itโ€™ll come as no surprise to learn Iโ€™ve been getting more done this way, too โ€“ not least because Iโ€™m harnessing the energy of what I feel like doing, rather than suppressing it in order to push onwards through a list.

And hereโ€™s the kicker: arenโ€™t all to-do lists really menus anyway, whether I choose to think of them that way or not? After all, if there are vastly more things I could do with any given hour or day than I actually can do โ€“ if there are a million ways to build a business, to be a better parent, spouse or citizen, live healthily, and so on, yet only time for a handful of them โ€“ then in fact weโ€™re always picking from a menu, even if we delude ourselves that what weโ€™re doing is getting through a list.

One great benefit of doing this more consciously โ€“ of facing up to the fact that lists are menus โ€“ is that it shifts the source of gratification. The reward of pleasure in your work, or a sense of meaning, no longer gets doled out stingily, in morsels, en route to some hypothetical moment of future fulfillment when the list is complete and you can finally feel fully satisfied. Instead, the real reward comes from getting to pick something from the menu โ€“ from getting to dive in to one of the vast range of possibilities the world has to offer, without any expectation of getting through them all, just like the pleasure of sitting down to a good meal. Which means you get to have the reward right now.

Oliver Burkeman is the New York Times bestselling author of Four Thousand Weeks: Time Management for Mortals (2021) and Meditations for Mortals: Four Weeks to Embrace Your Limitations and Make Time for What Counts (2024). He lives in Yorkshire in England. 

Copyright 2023 by Oliver Burkeman. Reprinted with permission.

The 4-Hour Workweek Revisited โ€” The End of Time Management (#795)

This time around, we have a bit of a different format, featuring the book that started it all for me,ย The 4-Hour Workweek.ย Readers and listeners often ask me what I would change or update, but an equally interesting question is: whatย wouldnโ€™tย I change? What stands the test of time and hasnโ€™t lost any potency?ย This episode features one of the most important chapters from the audiobook ofย The 4-Hour Workweek. It includes tools and frameworks that I use to this day, including Paretoโ€™s Law and Parkinsonโ€™s Law.ย 

The chapter is narrated by the great voice actor Ray Porter. If you are interested in checking out the rest of the audiobook, which is produced and copyrighted by Blackstone Publishing, you can find it on AudibleAppleGoogleSpotifyDownpour.com, or wherever you find your favorite audiobooks.

Please enjoy!

Listen to the episode on Apple PodcastsSpotifyOvercastPodcast AddictPocket CastsCastboxYouTube MusicAmazon MusicAudible, or on your favorite podcast platform.

This episode is brought to you by ExpressVPN high-speed, secure, and anonymous VPN service; Momentous high-quality supplements; and Helix Sleep premium mattresses.

[podcast-player id=”810af777-4e74-4baa-a8c4-514cdad1113c” src=”https://rss.art19.com/episodes/810af777-4e74-4baa-a8c4-514cdad1113c.mp3″ title=”#795: The 4-Hour Workweek Revisited โ€” The End of Time Management”]


This episode is brought to you by ExpressVPN. Iโ€™ve been using ExpressVPN to make sure that my data is secure and encrypted without slowing my Internet speed. If you ever use public Wi-Fi at, say, a hotel or a coffee shop, where I often work and as many of my listeners do, youโ€™re often sending data over an open network, meaning no encryption at all.

A great way to ensure that all of your data are encrypted and canโ€™t be easily read by hackers is by usingย ExpressVPN. All you need to do is download the ExpressVPN app on your computer or smartphone and then use the Internet just as you normally would. You click one button in the ExpressVPN app to secure 100% of your network data.ย Use my linkย ExpressVPN.com/Timย today and get an extra three months free on a one-year package!


This episode is brought to you byย Momentousย high-quality supplements!ย Momentous offers high-quality supplements and products across a broad spectrum of categories, and Iโ€™ve been testing their products for months now. Iโ€™ve been using theirย magnesium threonate,ย apigenin, andย L-theanineย daily, all of which have helped me improve the onset, quality, and duration of my sleep. Iโ€™ve also been usingย Momentous creatine, and while it certainly helps physical performance, including poundage or wattage in sports, I use it primarily for mental performance (short-term memory, etc.).

Their products are third-party tested (Informed-Sport and/or NSF certified), so you can trust that what is on the label is in the bottle and nothing else. Use code TIM at checkout and enjoy 35% off your first subscription order or 14% off your first one-time purchaseAnd not to worry, my non-US friends, Momentous ships internationally and has you covered. 


This episode is brought to you byย Helix Sleep!ย Helix was selected as the best overall mattress of 2024 byย Forbes, Fortune, and Wired magazines and many others. Withย Helix, thereโ€™s a specific mattress to meet each and every bodyโ€™s unique comfort needs. Just take their quizโ€”only two minutes to completeโ€”that matches your body type and sleep preferences to the perfect mattress for you. They have a 10-year warranty, and you get to try it out for a hundred nights, risk-free. Theyโ€™ll even pick it up from you if you donโ€™t love it.ย And now, Helix is offering 20% off all mattress orders atย HelixSleep.com/Tim.


Want to hear another episode that features content straight from The 4-Hour Workweek? Listen here for the three chapters preceding this one that cover how to get uncommon results by doing the opposite, aiming with precision, and aiming for the unrealistic.


What was your favorite quote or lesson from this episode? Please let me know in the comments.

Continue reading “The 4-Hour Workweek Revisited โ€” The End of Time Management (#795)”

The Tim Ferriss Show Transcripts: Brandon Sanderson on Building a Fiction Empire, Creating $40M+ Kickstarter Campaigns, Unbreakable Habits, The Art of World-Building, and The Science of Magic Systems (#794)

Please enjoy this transcript of my interview with Brandon Sanderson (@BrandSanderson), the #1 New York Times bestselling author of The Stormlight Archive series and the Mistborn saga; the middle-grade series Alcatraz vs. the Evil Librarians; and the young-adult novels The Rithmatist, the Reckoners trilogy, and the Skyward series. Brandon has sold more than 40 million books in 35 languages, and he is a four-time nominee for the Hugo Awards, winning in 2013 for his novella The Emperorโ€™s Soul. That same year, he was chosen to complete Robert Jordanโ€™s The Wheel of Time series, culminating in A Memory of Light.

Brandon cohosts (with fellow author Dan Wells) the popular Intentionally Blank podcast and teaches creative writing at Brigham Young University.

Transcripts may contain a few typos. With many episodes lasting 2+ hours, it can be difficult to catch minor errors. Enjoy!

Listen to the episode onย Apple Podcasts,ย Spotify,ย Overcast,ย Podcast Addict,ย Pocket Casts,ย Castbox,ย YouTube Music,ย Amazon Music,ย Audible, or on your favorite podcast platform. Watch the interview on YouTube.

[podcast-player id=”000622c1-3a74-42e1-923b-5b5349f6f85a” src=”https://rss.art19.com/episodes/000622c1-3a74-42e1-923b-5b5349f6f85a.mp3″ title=”#794: Brandon Sanderson on Building a Fiction Empire, Creating $40M+ Kickstarter Campaigns, Unbreakable Habits, The Art of World-Building, and The Science of Magic Systems”]

DUE TO SOME HEADACHES IN THE PAST, PLEASE NOTE LEGAL CONDITIONS:

Tim Ferriss owns the copyright in and to all content in and transcripts of The Tim Ferriss Show podcast, with all rights reserved, as well as his right of publicity.

WHAT YOUโ€™RE WELCOME TO DO: You are welcome to share the below transcript (up to 500 words but not more) in media articles (e.g., The New York Times, LA Times, The Guardian), on your personal website, in a non-commercial article or blog post (e.g., Medium), and/or on a personal social media account for non-commercial purposes, provided that you include attribution to โ€œThe Tim Ferriss Showโ€ and link back to the tim.blog/podcast URL. For the sake of clarity, media outlets with advertising models are permitted to use excerpts from the transcript per the above.

WHAT IS NOT ALLOWED: No one is authorized to copy any portion of the podcast content or use Tim Ferrissโ€™ name, image or likeness for any commercial purpose or use, including without limitation inclusion in any books, e-books, book summaries or synopses, or on a commercial website or social media site (e.g., Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc.) that offers or promotes your or anotherโ€™s products or services. For the sake of clarity, media outlets are permitted to use photos of Tim Ferriss from the media room on tim.blog or (obviously) license photos of Tim Ferriss from Getty Images, etc.


Tim Ferriss: So Brandon, just when we were doing sound check โ€” 

Brandon Sanderson: Yes.

Tim Ferriss: What did you do?

Brandon Sanderson: So when I was in kindergarten, I was taught the state song, right? And I have a good friend, Mary Robinette. She worked in stage for a while and we did a podcast together when podcasts were brand new, and she would always soundcheck by doing the “Jabberwock” poem, just this beautiful poetry. She had learned to memorize a poem so that they could get a soundcheck because people generally don’t talk enough for a soundcheck. And so then they come to me and I’d be like, “I’m talking, I’m talking.” You’ve seen it โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: I’ve seen it.

Brandon Sanderson: โ€” the stuff that people do.

Tim Ferriss: I’ve seen it.

Brandon Sanderson: And they’re like, “Is that enough? Is that enough?” They’re like, “Still some more,” and you’re like, “Oh, I’m talking, I’m talking.” So I thought, I need a thing, but I don’t know any poetry, but I do know what Ms. Sukup taught me in kindergarten, which is the state song, and so I just started listing off the states in alphabetical order and it became a thing. So now they soundcheck me off with a list of states.

Tim Ferriss: You made it to New Mexico. I’m not sure I could make it past California without making a mistake.

Brandon Sanderson: I still hear the song in my head, “50 Nifty United States.”

Tim Ferriss: All right. Well, let’s leap off of that. Do you have, would you say, in terms of superpowers, an unusual memory, or is there something just to the rhythm and musicality of that that made it stick?

Brandon Sanderson: No, I don’t think I have an unusual memory. Well, I have an unusual one. I don’t have an uncommonly good one. How about that?

Tim Ferriss: Mm-hmm.

Brandon Sanderson: My wife always jokes I don’t forget a story and that I don’t tend to reread books. I don’t tend to rewatch movies because I’ve seen it, I’ve read it. 20 years or so, I’ll go back and rewatch something, but stories just stick with me. I can tell you about stories that I read when I was still a teenager, but I will forget where my keys are and I will forget people’s names and I will โ€” all of that stuff. I joke that I’ve just got so much RAM and I’ve filled it all with story ideas and so everything else kind of just gets squeezed out the ears.

Tim Ferriss: Well, it seems like where we’re sitting, where we’re sitting at HQ, it seems like the design of Dragonsteel, maybe the intention behind it is to allow you to do that on some level.

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah, yeah. I mean, everything in our company is built around “Let Brandon cook, and take away from Brandon anything that he doesn’t have to think about or doesn’t strictly need to.” I actually think this is kind of a Tim Ferriss thing, right? Like my water bottle, I don’t have to worry about refilling it and having ice in the morning. I’ve set up a system where somebody does that and I just pick it up and go. The more that I can keep out of my brain that I have to track, the better, because I am always constructing narrative. I’m always working on the story, and so, yeah.

Tim Ferriss: Well, let’s give another example of productivity that I don’t want to say I vetoed, but it was a conversation โ€” 

Brandon Sanderson: Yes.

Tim Ferriss: โ€” before we started recording. How many books or book plates do you sign per year?

Brandon Sanderson: So we need between fifty thousand and a hundred thousand times my signature signed. The story is usually I’m sitting here and signing pages while I’m doing anything, because if I have to sign my name a hundred thousand times, then you know โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: I’d take up the empty space.

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah, and we actually used to. Once upon a time, we would get the books, the full books, and I would sit and sign them, and that’s just a massive undertaking. We couldn’t do that anymore. When it got over around 10,000, I’d actually listen to podcasts and go sit and sign books and sign books and sign books. Now we get the pages, like the front page, and we just give them to me in stacks. If anyone wants to see it, my podcast exists so that I can sign the pages. It’s the reverse. I started up because I need to sign these things and I’ll just sit and zip through them normally while I’m doing anything else. But today, I wanted to give you my undivided attention.

Tim Ferriss: I appreciate that. And I’m going to have a lot of super fans of yours, I’m sure, wish and petition me that I would’ve asked a different set of questions. But I’m actually going to start with Seoul, Korea because as I mentioned, I was East Asian studies major, spent formative time, completely changed my life in Japan and other places, Taiwan and mainland China also. Where does Seoul, Korea fit into your life?

Brandon Sanderson: So I’m a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. A lot of us go on two-year missions, can be anywhere. It can be local, it can be overseas. I ended up going to Korea. I got the letter saying, “Hey, this is where we’d like you,” and I’m like, “Where’s Korea?” But I loved my time there. It was really formative for me in multiple ways, one of which is kind of more amusing.

I was, at the time, a chemistry major in college, and I was so happy to be on another continent from chemistry. I had those two years away to really kind of reassess my life and kind of grow up. And most people, when they grow up, they go away from the artistic pursuits because they don’t make a lot of sense. I grew up and came back and said, “I’m going to do this,” right? “I’m going to be a writer.” But living in another culture, living where you are a minority, granted a privileged minority still, but a minority, living and seeing that the way that people’s language influences the way they think about the world, the way that their social mores impact their relationships with one another, and all of these things, was extremely formative for me in understanding how to approach writing a fantastical culture just on a fundamental basis, getting rid of some of these ideas that the way that I do things is the only way to do things.

Tim Ferriss: The Korean language, for people who haven’t been exposed, particularly the writing system โ€” 

Brandon Sanderson: Yes.

Tim Ferriss: So Hangul, if people want to learn to read Korean, you won’t be able to understand what you’re reading, but if you want to sound it out, you can learn it in a few hours.

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah. We learned it in a few hours. Do you know the story?

Tim Ferriss: Tell the story.

Brandon Sanderson: The story. You know the story.

Tim Ferriss: I do, but I think people will appreciate it.

Brandon Sanderson: Yes. This is obviously mythologized, right? But King Sejong, so King Sejong, he’s the guy on essentially the $10 bill in Korea. He is their George Washington, and Sejong the Great. And what happens, Chinese is a really fascinating writing system because it’s logographic, which means that anyone can read a Chinese character. It’s more of a hieroglyph than it is โ€” you can’t sound it out. And so because anyone can read it, it transcends language in a lot of ways. You can see the symbol for person and know it means person, whether you speak Mongolian, or whether you speak Thai, or whether you speak Japanese or Korean or Chinese, so it makes it a great kind of language for trade. But it also is extremely hard to learn because every concept must have essentially its own letter. And so to be fluent in reading it, you need to learn 2,000 to 3,000 letters.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah.

Brandon Sanderson: And so it was a really bad system for a common people to learn how to read. And King Sejong was like, “My people are illiterate. They can’t learn Chinese. We must have our own writing system that you can sound out, that you sound out Korean.” And he gathered his scholars, and the story is they together created the system that would have no deviations. It read like it sounded. And they designed it based on the movements of the mouth you make. And then King Sejong loved it so much, he wrote it on little leaves and then spread it out because the upper class did not want people to learn how to read and they were very against it. They’re like, “Oh, we don’t want the commoners to read. That’s for us.” Passing the tests in Chinese was a big โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: Like Latin for โ€” 

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah.

Tim Ferriss: โ€” the high priesthood.

Brandon Sanderson: And so Sejong wrote it on the letters and it blew through Korea and the people picked it up and it was so divinely inspired that they intrinsically knew how to read Korean. And he frustrated the attempts of the nobles from keeping people to read by giving it to people written on leaves. It’s so delightful.

Tim Ferriss: It is an amazing, amazing mythologized story. And the Korean people are very proud of this writing system for good reason. I encourage everybody to just take a few hours. I think there’s even a comic book called How to Learn to Read Korean in 15 Minutes or something like that. Slight exaggeration, it’s going to take you more than 15 minutes โ€” 

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah.

Tim Ferriss: โ€” but in 60 minutes you could definitely get the basics and figure it out.

Brandon Sanderson: Definitely gives you a false sense of your own skill. When you learn it, you’re like, “Wow, I’m reading,” and they’re like, “All right, now the actual language, what these things mean.”

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. Good news, if you do learn some Korean, you can hop reasonably easily to Japanese, and in some cases, to Chinese as well. So you might have jeonhwa for telephone, then diร nhuร  in Mandarin, and then denwa in Japanese. So there’s a lot of overlap. Or if you wanted to say “Tansan mizu o kudasai,” like, “Please give me sparkling water,” in Japanese, it’d be “Tansansu juseyo” in Korean.

Brandon Sanderson: Yep, mm-hmm.

Tim Ferriss: So anyway, if you get one, then it’s a good branch off to other things. All right, I’m going to cut my linguistics nerding short.

Brandon Sanderson: You need to create a conlang. Have you ever done it?

Tim Ferriss: It? I have actually. So you should explain what that means. But I have actually spent some time on it, and I owe you a huge debt of gratitude because I listened to probably 40 episodes of Writing Excuses.

Brandon Sanderson: Oh.

Tim Ferriss: When I was working on my first real attempt at fantasy worldbuilding a few years ago, and I wanted to incorporate language as a core piece of it. And I spent a lot of time also looking at Tolkien’s work with languages.

Brandon Sanderson: He’s the master.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah.

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah.

Tim Ferriss: Unbelievably complex. And I also, at one point, this is actually from my third book, reached out to the gentleman who designed the Na’vi language in Avatar, which in very partial measures stemmed from some of his exposure to some of these East Asian languages as well. But okay, so how would you approach and how do you think about language construction?

Brandon Sanderson: Are you sure we’re not getting too nerdy for your audience?

Tim Ferriss: Ah, you know what โ€” 

Brandon Sanderson: This is super nerdy.

Tim Ferriss: You know what? Yeah, folks, look, we’re about to go really deep in the nerd pool, so if you want to skip ahead five minutes, that’s fine, but I’d encourage you to stick around.

Brandon Sanderson: All right, so a conlang is a constructed language. Most people know of Klingon and Elvish, and George Martin has one. And the Na’

vi, you mentioned. These are just invented languages. There’s only one that’s in wide use or “wide” quote unquote, Esperanto. You could almost say that Korean is a bit one because it was actively designed rather than growing organically. But I think it’s hovering in this in-between space. So how do I approach it? I look at what Tolkien did and I say, “Wow, he basically wrote Lord of the Rings because he had these cool languages he was designing and he wanted a place to use them.”

Tim Ferriss: Including crazy scripts.

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah. And I said, “I don’t have 20 years to do that, like Grandpa Tolkien. I am really a narrative guy. I really focus on what makes a narrative work. I’m going to break it down.” People think of me as the world-building guy, but I’m not. Certainly, we can talk about this. That’s certainly the thing I’ve used as my branding and marketing. It’s the way that I’ve used to make myself easily recommendable and distinctive. But what I spend most of my time on is narrative.

So when I look at the language, I’m like, “I want to have something that is relevant that works, but I don’t want to spend 20 years.” I usually come up with a few interesting rules that I’ve come up with through my knowledge of linguistics, and I say, “Follow these rules. Whenever you need a word, go back to these rules and build it. Don’t write out the whole language. Don’t come out with how you would say every sentence. Each time you need something, go to the rules, build it up from the fundamentals, and it will all eventually then work.” But it means I end a book with 50 words and maybe a little bit of grammatical structure, not with an entire language that you could speak.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. This I ran into, which is part of the reason why I was revisiting my email exchanges with the person who created Na’vi because I had something like eight greater houses in this fantasy world that I was creating for my own entertainment more than anything else. It’s just an itch I really wanted to scratch, and the extent to which I developed languages was really just for a few exclamations, a few songs, very short, not Tolkien, like 20 minutes on audiobook. And I loved it, but I recognized how you could really trap yourself in quicksand if you tried to get too ambitious.

Brandon Sanderson: We call it worldbuilder’s disease, which sometimes you want to give yourself. It’s fun. But if you spend 20 years worldbuilding every book in today’s market, you’re probably not going to have a career as a professional writer. You might. You might get lucky and write that one book that’ll sell millions of copies and make it so you can live off of just that income. Most of us, it takes a lot more effort and we learn to worldbuild in service of story rather than write stories in service worldbuilding, but everybody gets to do what they want. You scratch your itch how you want to scratch it.

Tim Ferriss: So we’re going to talk about putting in the effort and no man’s land perhaps is one way that we could put it. But I want to ask first about David Farland, if I’m pronouncing the name correctly. So as an undergrad, at least based on the research I did, you took a creative writing class with David Farland, or a writing class. How did that affect you and what lessons might you have sort of grabbed onto that have stuck with you in any way?

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah, so I came back from Korea sophomore year of college, and I’m like, “I’m young, I’m stupid. Now’s the time to try to be a writer. This is what I really want to do.” And I suspect we’ll get into later why I really wanted to do that and things like that. But it changed my major to English because I thought that’s what you had to do later. Found out Stephen King and others recommend you major in anything but English. The reasoning being that you should study something that you’re fascinated by and then use that to inform your writing, which is generally pretty good advice. I do recommend that. The cheat code is if you major in English, you can use your writing as your homework. The assignments, you can double use your time. A lot of times you can be practicing your writing, but also turn it in, and so it’s a little easier in some ways.

Changed my major to English, and I took a whole bunch of classes from a whole bunch of professors whom they’re dear to me. I love them. Most of them have retired by now or passed on, but they knew nothing about publishing. This is just very common in the arts. They’ll talk about how to express yourself as a writer, but they won’t talk about how do you construct a sympathetic character. Never heard those terms. They’ll tell you about how to get into a MFA program, but they won’t tell you how to get a publishing deal because none of them have done it. And so again, they did teach me some valuable things, but my senior year, after going through a bunch of these workshops is what we call it, writing workshops. I heard that there was a writer coming in who actually had published something and he was teaching the low level, 200 level class.

By then. I was done taking the graduate courses, even though I wasn’t a graduate yet, and I’m like, “I should probably take this class, even though it’s kind of a step backward. It won’t fulfill any of my credit requirements, but I’m at college to learn, not to check some boxes off of a list.” And so I took his class and it was revolutionary to me. He sat down the first few days, he’s like, “All right, here’s how you actually construct a narrative. Here’s what works. Here’s what doesn’t work. Here are tools.” He really focused, and it became my focus in teaching on here’s a toolbox, because not every tool works for every writer. In fact, you’re generally going to gravitate toward one or two and the rest you’ll find useless. And he took that toolbox approach, and he said, “Some writers do it this way, some writers do it that way. Here’s how you try this. Here’s something to do.” And then he talked about publishing in this way that was mind-blowing because that was the big thing for me was hearing someone say โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: The black box.

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah. “Here’s my publishing contract,” he said. He passed it around. “Here’s my latest contract. Have a look at it, ask questions, and here’s how you go about getting one of these.” And I took his advice. Back in the early 2000s, publishing and sci-fi fantasy was still very networking focused. It’s actually moved away from that for various reasons. But back then, the best way to break in was to go to the conventions, get into the parties, meet the editors, and start chatting with them and start listening to what they were actually interested in.

The magic question was, what are you working on right now that you’re really excited by? Because this lets you learn the personalities of the various editors. It’s not networking in that none of them knew who I was, but it’s networking in then hearing from them directly what they were buying and why. Then you could go to these 50 editors and say, “All right, these five really seem like they would like my work.” Instead of sending to all 50, I target those five. I met them at a party. I say, “Hey, I met you. Sound like we hit it off. You mentioned that I could send you my work. Here it is.”

And that’s what got me an agent and an editor was doing that, just kind of the Dave Farland method of breaking in. I was the last generation that it worked for. It really doesn’t work anymore. Everyone jokes that in publishing, no one actually wants to publish any authors. No one wants to actually do any work. So any time someone sneaks in, they’re like, “Oh, how did you get into publishing? Oh, really?” And then they close that door so that no one else can get in. We all joke about things like that. It’s not actually true. Everyone actually wants to find great authors and great work, but the industry changes quickly enough that what works for one generation, by the time they’ve broken in, the industry has changed. It just doesn’t work.

Tim Ferriss: So I’m going to come back to the agent and I’ll just plant the seed. I’m going to ask how much writing you did before that happened.

Brandon Sanderson: Okay. Yeah.

Tim Ferriss: But before we get to that, I want to ask, are you still teaching the creative writing class at BYU?

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah, I am.

Tim Ferriss: Brigham Young University. What is the first class?

Brandon Sanderson: First class, so first class is some things I just told you. I get up and I say to them โ€” actually, the very first thing is I say to them, “During this class, we’re going to pretend you want to be a professional writing writer, earning a full-time living from your writing in the next 10 years. That we’re going to pretend, because most of youโ€ฆ” that’s probably not why they’re there. Most of them, they’re just curious. They may have a book of them, and we have this curious relationship with art in our society. It is, as soon as you say, “I’m going to write something,” people are like, “Oh, when will you monetize it? When will you earn money from it?” And that can be kind of destructive.

Like you mentioned you’re writing a book or you wrote one just because it was an itch. You enjoyed it. I think writing is legitimately just good for people in the same way that working out is good for people, learning to write a narrative and get those thoughts out of your head on a page, it’s just innately good. Most people, when they go play basketball, if they look like me, people aren’t going to be like, “So when are you going into the NBA?” But if you write a book, people will say, “So when are you going to publish it?” And I say to the students, “It’s okay if that’s not your goal. If you want to write just for you โ€” if you want to be on the, I spend 20 years and then produce one book route, totally fine. However, I want you to know everything you would need to shoot for the highest level, which is earning a full-time living as a writer. And everything else falls underneath that.” 

So during the class, we pretend that that’s your goal. Once you walk out of it, you can make your own goals, whatever they are. But while we’re there, we pretend that. And then the second thing I say is, “You’re going to have to learn when to ignore me.” And that is really hard to do because I’m an authority. I’m up there. Survivorship bias says who knows what I actually say is going to be relevant? Some of it hopefully, but I can’t really determine what really played a part in me being successful and what didn’t.

And I want to approach it as a toolbox, giving people all of these various tools, some of which are contradictory. Self-contradictory. I can give you examples of that if you want, but you can’t use them all. So you’re going to have to ignore some of the advice of major authors. Some of the things that Stephen King tells you will be wrong โ€” some of the things for you. Some of the things that I tell you will be wrong for you. You have to find your own way. And so I kind of start off with, “I’m going to pretend you want to be a professional writer.” And then follow it up with, “But learn when to ignore me.”

Tim Ferriss: What are some of the contradictory tools or approaches in the toolkit?

Brandon Sanderson: The one I generally use as my prime example is when I was studying this before I broke in, two authors that I admired, I read their books. I read Odd Writing by Stephen King and How to Write Sci-Fi and Fantasy by Orson Scott Card. And I read these books, and I honestly can’t tell you 100 percent if it was in those exact books or other writings of theirs on their websites and things. But Stephen King at one point said, “Do not make an outline. Do not use a writing group. These will destroy your writing.” And Scott Card is like, “I need an outline. It is fundamentally vital for me in order to build my book.” Now, Stephen King is what we generally call โ€” these are George R.R. Martin’s terms. He’s wonderful the way he speaks about fiction. If you’re really interested, anything George says is golden. He calls them gardeners. Stephen King is a gardener. For Stephen King, exploring and discovering his story is the thing that makes him excited. He wants to take a seed. He’ll often say, “I take two really interesting characters and I put them in conflict and have something go wrong, and I see where the story goes, and I just write.” And he says if he has an outline, he feels like he’s already done that process in the outline. So when he sits down to write the book, he has no motivation. He’s not exploring and discovering anymore.

The other group we call architects. Architects like to build a structure and then kind of go and take this little piece and then polish that little piece and see where it goes, and then take the next piece that they’ve already built as part of their structure and build a story around that. And most people are somewhere in between these two extremes. But those were two extremes where I realized I can’t do both of these. I can’t both not have an outline and have an outline. I can have a hybrid approach. But if you try to take both of their advice equally weighted, then you’re going to get nowhere. You can try both methods in different ways, you can try some hybrids. But a lot of things you’ll learn in writing you kind of have to choose one or the other and try it out and see how it works for you.

Tim Ferriss: What are some of the assignments that have most resonated with students or you think best served them even though they might not recognize it?

Brandon Sanderson: So what I generally do is I follow a focus on habits approach. Instead of giving them specific writing exercises, if someone comes up to me and says, “I’m having trouble with X,” I’ll give them a writing exercise to work with that. If someone comes up to me and says, “I am having a lot of trouble going back and revising my chapters over and over again, instead of writing the next one,” I’ll say, “Okay, try writing longhand.” This works for some people. You go, you take a page of paper, you write it longhand, and you tell yourself, it doesn’t have to be perfect until I put it into the computer. You start each day taking what you wrote before and putting it to the computer and then leave it alone and write your next chapter longhand, and then use that process to kind of get yourself back into the writing, but then forcing yourself to do something new. That works for some people.

If people are having trouble with dialogue, I say, “All right, go do the exercise where you sit and listen to people on campus and you just write down exactly what they say exactly as it’s said, and then take it and try to write it under different styles of dialogue.” If you’re writing like Soderbergh, how would you do it? Pick some of your favorite people, go watch their movies, write down the dialogue, and compare that to their real life, and just kind of figure out what kind of dialogue you like to do. Those are exercises.

But in general, I’m only doing that when I’m diagnosing a problem. For the class I’m saying your job, if you want to try to be a professional writer, you’re going to have to write consistently. Nine out of 10 writers that I’ve found do better with consistency. One out of 10 is a binge writer. I don’t understand binge writers as well, but I can talk about that. Those are the people who go rent a cabin, take two months, walk in without a book, come out with a book, and then they don’t write for 10 months. Most people are better served by writing a certain amount every day really consistently, or at least two or three times a week, and building a novel out of good habits. And I focus on that.

I’m like, break it down, set a goal, have a spreadsheet and try to hit your word counts, or at least your hour counts. If you’re having trouble doing this, go to a specific place every day that you do this, that you don’t do a lot of other things. Go to the coffee shop, go to a certain room in the house, turn on certain music that you only turn on when you’re writing. Build that habit so that you are very consistent. Batch your writing time. If there’s something you already do every day, if you already have built a habit to go to the gym, then try to align your life so that you go to the gym and then have an hour to write. Think about what you’re going to write at the gym, sit and write for an hour so that you are adding onto a habit that you’ve already built.

And that’s my focus in the class is to really be consistent. See if you can write, the goal is in the class to write 35,000 words. Class is around a third of the year, if you do that all year, you will end up with 100,000 words, which is your average novel.

Tim Ferriss: How many, just for people listening who aren’t in the writing biz or the writing habit, 100,000 words in a typical trade paperback, or it could be a hardcover, how many pages is that?

Brandon Sanderson: 300.

Tim Ferriss: 300?

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah, 350. The Way of Kings is 400,000 words, and we kind of cram stuff in there and we get to 1,000 pages on that. So you can kind of run that. It’s a fourth of 1,000 pages, so it’ll be 250. But here’s the thing. We use dirty tricks in publishing. If you’re reading a thriller or a young adult book, what they’ll do is they’ll put a lot fewer words on a page because they want to increase the pacing. They want to make it feel like you’re zipping through. It’s a page turner. So they’re going to want 50 percent fewer words on every page so that kid picking up that book that’s a reluctant reader is like, “Wow, this one’s really fast.” I don’t have space for that in my epic fantasies. I push the limits of what can be bound. And beyond that, we’re not expecting you to read this book in one sitting. So we can put more on a page that makes it feel dense and thick and meaty, which can be really enjoyable if you want to dig into a new world and things like that.

Tim Ferriss: So let’s hit some top line habits from Brandon. How many words per year on average would you say you put down?

Brandon Sanderson: My goal is 2,000 to 2,500 words a day. So whatever, 10 pages to 20 pages is what I’m looking at. Depends, I mean, I write in the old school manuscript format where everything’s 12 point and in Courier and it’s a holdover from the days when certain typesetting things are done that are too nerdy perhaps to talk about here. But I think in words, so I do 2,000, 2,500.

Tim Ferriss: Those are new words?

Brandon Sanderson: Those are new words. Now when I’m doing revisions, I’m not writing new words. And I would say around a third of my time is spent on revisions depending on the year. And this is the thing, some years I’ll do a lot of words. Some years I do a lot more revisions. And so it really depends. But if we’re looking at 2,000 words a week times 50 weeks, that can produce quite a lot of words. So 10,000 words a week is what that would turn into. That’s 500,000 words a year is what I could theoretically produce. Now, a third of my time’s done to revisions. So really I’m looking at around 300,000 words. A Stormlight Archive book is 18 months of work for that reason and things like that.

Tim Ferriss: All right. We might come back to that and the revision process, but just as promised, to hop back and forth between past and present tense, why did you want to become a writer?

Brandon Sanderson: So this is a fun story. I was not a writer or a reader when I was young, which is, I found, pretty odd for people who were published novelists. A lot of my friends, I’ll talk to them, they’ll be like, “Yeah, I published my first thing when I was two. I came out of the womb with a poem ready to go in my student newspaper,” and things like that. Me, I did read when I was very young. In about fourth or fifth grade, I fell out of it. And this is the era where I lived in Nebraska and there were certain books that people just really liked to read in Nebraska and they usually involved young people on farms, sometimes living in the wilderness on their own, sometimes on a ranch. They had pet dogs and the pet dogs died. And I got three of those in a row where I’m like, I don’t even have a dog, but I’m tired of the dog dying. I know what it’s like to be a kid. I don’t live on a farm, but my grandparents were all farmers and I live behind a farm.

I was in Lincoln. It’s mostly urban, but mostly urban in that Midwest way where you’re in the capital city in a brand new kind of high cost development, but there’s a cornfield in your backyard. That’s just Nebraska. That’s just how we roll. And so I knew all of that. I was not interested in it. And so I fell out of reading.

Eighth grade rolls around. I have a teacher, Ms. Reeder, she doesn’t remember me โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: Ms. Reeder?

Brandon Sanderson: Ms. Reeder.

Tim Ferriss: How appropriate.

Brandon Sanderson: Yep, yep. Ms. Reeder, she wanted to be a professor at UC Irvine. So if anyone had a Professor Reader at UC Irvine, this was the same person. But Ms. Reeder, she was my eighth grade English teacher, and I probably shouldn’t admit this, but I cheated on a book report with her. If you’re a smart kid, you realize that the back of the book, even before the internet, basically tells you the entire plot and then you can read the last chapter and you’ll know the whole plot of the book. So it’s like book report, write a summary and why you liked it, and I read the back of the book the last chapter and turned it in.

I made some mistakes and she picked me out, she sat me down and she was actually very good. She’s like, “Something’s not clicking with you with books.” And I’m like, “No, they really aren’t.” And she’s like, “So for your next book report, I just want you to read one of these books on my rack here. These are my favorite books that I have for kids to read. I just want you to actually read it and you can talk to me about it.” And I’m like, “I don’t like books.” She’s like, “Well, just try something different.” So I went to the rack and I always joke, it’s like you can tell the paperbacks have been read by 100 students, right? They got spaghetti stains on them and things like that.

I looked, leafed through and I arrived on this book called Dragonsbane by Barbara Hambly, and it really was the cover. The cover illustrator is Michael Whelan, he’s the illustrator who did The Way of Kings in The Stormlight Archive for me. I eventually got him. He just retired. The last cover was the fifth book of The Stormlight Archive, and he’s retired. But he’s done that before. So he might be back. He pulls a Miyazaki sometimes and pops in and out or a Michael Jordan, depending on the field you’re talking about.

But regardless, I picked up this book and it had a cool dragon on the cover. It was all misty and kind of awesome looking. It had a cute girl on the cover. It’s like, hey, I’m 14, maybe this will work. And I take this book. Now, this book should not have worked. This book absolutely should not have. What do you want to give a reluctant reader? You usually want to give them a book about someone their age, usually very similar to them. A reluctant reader, if it’s a young man, you hand him Harry Potter. This is a book about a middle-aged woman going through a mid-life crisis. The story is that there’s a dragon who’s come to destroy the kingdom and the last living person who’s killed a dragon is this guy, and they go hunting him. He lives up in the north because he’s now middle-aged with a family, and he’s like, “I killed a dragon when I was in my 20s. I don’t do that anymore. I’m an old dude now.” They’re like, “You’re the only one who’s ever done it.” He goes to his wife and he’s like, “I guess I’ve got to go kill this dragon. We’ve got to figure out how to do this,” and it’s told from her perspective as they go down and try to figure out how to kill a dragon as middle-aged people and be smart about it, rather than charging it with a sword.

Her story is, she has been told by her teacher she could be the greatest wizard ever. She’s got a raw natural talent, but she has divided her time between studying and having a family. Her teacher’s like, “You really should give up that family stuff. Just really focus on your magic.” But this is her crisis. Through going down, she learns about the dragon magic, and she starts to get really into that.

Not to give spoilers, but there’s an opportunity for her to just go and become what she’d always dreamed, and her crisis is, “Do I go do this right now or do I not?” I’m reading this book and it’s really cool, it’s inventive, and I realized at some point, my mother, she graduated first in her class in accounting in a year where she was the only woman in most of her accounting classes. She had been offered a really prestigious scholarship to go get her CPA, and she had decided not to.

She decided that she wanted to be home with young kids when she had young kids, which I do not think is a decision anyone should make for you, but a decision she made for herself. She later, after having kids, went on and had a really great career as an accountant, but she gave up some really important things that as I’m reading this book, I had always heard these stories. She would tell them, she wants us to know. I always thought, “Of course you did, Mom. Look at me. I’m great. This is what you should have done.”

I’m reading this book and I’m like, “Ditch the kids. Go be a wizard. Wizarding is awesome. The kids will get along, they’ll figure it out.” I get done with this book, and on one hand it’s a silly book about wizards and dragons, and I get done with this book and I understand my Mom better. This book built empathy in me for someone that, I’m a 14-year-old boy, I’m understanding a middle-aged woman in ways I’d never been able to before, and I’d had fun while doing it.

There was a magic to that, and I don’t use that word lightly as a storyteller, as a writer of fantasy, there was a magic to that author, being able to convey a life experience of someone, that just entered my brain and has never left. Just like if you went and saw a magic trick, you’re an analytical type person, you probably want to say, “How did they do it? How did they vanish that thing? What type of mirrors did they use?” I read this and said, “I need to know how this is done. I have to know.” I just started reading voraciously. I went to the card catalog, because I’m old. I’m even older than you.

Tim Ferriss: Oh, I remember those card catalogs.

Brandon Sanderson: I went and got the next book in line, just alphabetical because it started with “Dragon,” and I read everything that had dragons in it in the school library, just to figure it out. 

Something changed in me that day. I went from a C student to an A student over summer; Cs in eighth grade, As in ninth grade. Why that change? Because I discovered stories about wizards. I discovered there was something I wanted to do. There was now a reason to get good grades.

I was in Nebraska, and UNL is good for some things. I later learned that it actually has a decent writing program, but I wanted a good education and I wanted to go to BYU where my parents had gone. I realized I probably wouldn’t get into BYU because it’s a private school, you do have to have better grades than Cs generally to make it into some of these schools, and so suddenly I had a reason like, “Well, I want to go to a better school.”

Again, I was dumb. UNL is actually a really good school, but as a kid I’m like, “I need to get into this school,” and so my grades went up. I’m like, “I need to be a writer. I need a degree. I need to learn about this. Therefore, I’m going to have to go to college. Therefore, I’m going to have to learn to learn because otherwise I won’t figure out how to do this.” Having a purpose, having a reason to do well, changed my entire outlook.

I was not valedictorian. I was one grade off of it because I took a semester and moved to France, and that tanked my grades. It wasn’t a full semester, about half a semester, but I never caught up on all the stuff that I needed to do. I got a B-plus in one class, but it was totally worth it. Go live in France.

Tim Ferriss: How did you decide to go to France?

Brandon Sanderson: I just took four years of French, and my teacher in French was the best teacher I had, Ms. Dress. When you have good teachers, it changes your passion for a class.

Tim Ferriss: Completely.

Brandon Sanderson: I wouldn’t have picked French as my favorite subject, but it was my favorite class. I had three years of that and she said, “Hey, I’m taking a study abroad to Paris. You’re going to have to miss half a semester. You’ll have to do makeup work, but we’ll live in Paris and go visit all the sites and go to all the museums.” I’m like, “I am in. You’re so passionate about your trips to Paris.” It was so wonderful. Stayed with a host family and then did day trips to just places around Paris, went to Giverny and Versailles and saw everything, and museums every day, and bad grades in math.

Tim Ferriss: Sounds like a good trade, in terms of the B.

Brandon Sanderson: Yes, it was absolutely a good trade.

Tim Ferriss: It’s so parallel to what happened to me with Mr. Shimano in high school. When I transferred schools, ended up taking Japanese. I had no plans to go to Japan, and then six months in, he didn’t go with me, but that’s how the study abroad came about and completely changed everything. But I spent the next few summers catching up at summer school because none of the grades transferred.

Brandon Sanderson: I love Japan. I’ve only been once, but it was just delightful. Just walking around Tokyo is such a surreal and interesting experience.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, I tell people it’s like 30 percent Blade Runner and 70 percent DMV. If you live in Japan, it’s just like, “I have to do another carbon copy? Then we have to fax? What is this?” A few of my friends have moved and have since confirmed that that is their experience. 

So I’m focusing on โ€” had been focusing on, I’m going to come back to it โ€” the class, because you’ve thought about writing very deeply, and it’s basically a filtering function for ferreting out some of the key ingredients, as you see them, in your writing process.

You mentioned narrative and how, from a positioning perspective, people think of you and it’s very helpful, it’s also valid in some ways as a worldbuilder, but that first and foremost, it’s worldbuilding in service of a narrative, not the other way around. How do you teach narrative? Are there particular books? Is it like a three-act play? Is it the hero’s journey? What are we talking about?

Brandon Sanderson: Right. I do two lectures on narrative. Generally the first day, I do not talk about hero’s journey or three-act structure or any of these things. That’s for the second week, because I do my class as one giant lecture each week, followed by a workshop.

Tim Ferriss: Are these available anywhere?

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah, they’re on YouTube.

Tim Ferriss: Amazing. All right.

Brandon Sanderson: We’re doing new ones this year, so you can go watch these two lectures that I’m talking about. The first one, I just talk about the theory of plot. What makes someone turn a page? Why does someone start at page one and then end? What is a page turner? My theory on this is, it is a sense of progress. We like to see things count up as human beings, and the great plots are doing this beneath the hood. They are showing incremental slow progress forward, sometimes backwards, sometimes a little of each, toward a goal.

The idea for a plot is to identify what type of plot it is. If you’re doing a mystery, then that progress is going to be in the form of information. The story starts the characters without the information, the reader without the information, generally, and ends with them gaining the information. The story, the progress, is all about these little bits of information that you get through the story. At its fundamental, this does some fun things.

For instance, buddy cop movies and romances have the same fundamental structure, which is, it’s about a relationship between two people, where slowly you are finding out that they work better together than apart, and so your progress is seeing how they rub each other wrong. But then how, Dave, my old teacher, talked about braiding roses, how if the thorns are pointed outward for these characters rather than pointed inward, they become a defensive bulwark for one another.

Tim Ferriss: What does that mean?

Brandon Sanderson: Braided roses?

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. Oh, I see. It’s us against the world.

Brandon Sanderson: Us against the world. If you take two roses and you don’t braid them, you stick them together, they poke each other. But if you braid them really well, then all the thorns point outward and these two roses suddenly become stronger together than they were apart.

Tim Ferriss: That’s a very cool imagery.

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah. Again, stole that one from Dave, and so the idea for a character plot is you are braiding the roses. Over time, you’re seeing that those points, number one, you see how dangerous they are poking into each other. But then you see how, pointed outward, these people actually work better and kind of the holes, the places where one doesn’t have a thorn and can get hit, another one’s thorn protects and things like that. And over the course of the story, you see that rose get braided to the point that you are saying, “You guys are so much better together than apart. You need to be together.” And then when they either hook up or become partners, again, same story structure, then you stand up and you cheer. So the idea is it is promise.

You promise at the start. In a romance novel, you show two people apart. You show what their thorns are. You promise just by featuring them that they’re going to get together. Buddy cop movie, here’s this cop, he’s a loner, he works alone, but there’s a problem, there’s something that’s hurting. And here’s this other cop, he’s going to retire soon, but he’s missing something in his life. And then you slowly, that’s your promise. Your progress is showing them work well together. And then your payoff is the moment at the end where all that work you’ve put into it comes to fruition as they hook up or in certain stories they don’t. Right? You can be either way, but promise, progress, payoff. That is what makes people love stories and read through on a kind of macro scale.

Getting through an individual chapter is something different, but on a macro scale that is plot and that is, I talk about on the first day, this idea of how to do that, how to have twists that are actually fulfilling promises. And that one’s fun. The best twists don’t just surprise the reader. A complication should surprise the reader, but a twist should be surprising yet inevitable. And if you do it right, people are wanting that twist before they realize it happens. And then it does. And that is day one. Then day two is I’m like, all right, here are some structures that people have used. Here’s your toolbox. Some people use the hero’s journey.

Here’s what the hero’s journey is in brief. Here is what it’s good for. Here are some things to watch out for because the hero’s journey can steer you wrong sometimes. Here’s three-act format, here’s what it’s good at. Here’s maybe some foibles of three-act format. Here’s Robert Jordan’s method, which he called points on the map. Here’s how a lot of screwball comedy is written. It’s called Yes, But/No, And. All of these different tools I try to talk about and say, and there’s a ton more. There’s nine-point story structure, there’s seven-point story structure, whatever. But the idea is here’s some things to try, but keep in mind, promise, progress, payoff. And I feel like that gives sort of an overview of how to build narrative.

 Tim Ferriss: Are there any โ€” in addition to your classes of course, and we’ll link to those in the show notes. Are there any books or resources that you encourage people to read to get a better understanding of narrative or these different forms of narrative? And what came to my mind, even though it’s not directed at potential novelists, is a book called Save the Cat! Goes to the Movies that examines different genres within screenwriting.

Brandon Sanderson: So that’s not the original Save the Cat, that’s the new one. So I do recommend Save the Cat, but Save the Cat! Goes to the Movies, I haven’t read that. That sounds good.

Tim Ferriss: It’s fun. Yeah, the first one’s also excellent. I mean, I enjoyed it.

Brandon Sanderson: So Save the Cat is kind of โ€” it’s a really good leaping off point. And if you want the opposite of Save the Cat, On Writing by Stephen King is a leaping off point. And Save the Cat is about structure and On Writing is about the life of a writer and not structure. And those will give you kind of two of the different viewpoints on storytelling. And they’re both very good. My agent always recommends Writing to Sell by Scott Meredith. I find it a little too structure focused.

There is art to writing. And the dirty secret of outlining is you’re still going to have to learn to garden because, yeah, you’ll have these points in the outline, but then when you sit down to write them, you’re a gardener getting between these two points in the outline. And so both skills are really important. But Scott Meredith, I did read that and like it quite a bit.

Tim Ferriss: Where do you fall, in general or now, between the gardening or gardener and architect?

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah, so I’ve tried all the tools. I have a middle grade series called Alcatraz Versus the Evil Librarians, which are pure garden. I actually use a method a little like you know the old show, Whose Line Is It Anyway?

Tim Ferriss: Sure.

Brandon Sanderson: I pull a bunch of ideas, I brainstorm a bunch of random ideas, and then I say, “I’ve got to use all of these. Go.” And I write a story without an outline. That’s to practice the tool. And I generally fall these days on a 75 percent outline sort of thing. I do a lot of work building on my plot and I do a lot of building on my setting. 

And then I write my way into characters. I feel like that one of the big dangers of outlining too much is characters that feel wooden or cardboard because they’re there merely to get you between point A and point B and then from point B to point C on your outline. And if you have characters that your early readers are like these feel a little wooden, it might be because instead of going according to the character’s motivations, you’re just going according to the outline. And I find that if I let myself write my way into character and then rebuild my outline โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: Now writing your way into character, by that you mean you’re creating the setting, the environment?

Brandon Sanderson: And the plot.

Tim Ferriss: And the plot.

Brandon Sanderson: But then I rewrite the plot once I know the character. So here’s my process. I start usually with a couple of really good ideas. I usually want to have multiple interesting ideas for my setting, at least one hook for each character, if not one.

Tim Ferriss: Could you give an example of the starting point?

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah, so I’ll build it from one of my books, Mistborn. So Mistborn had a series of ideas. The first idea came, I was reading Harry Potter back in the Harry Potter boom. And I thought, man, these dark lords never get a break. Lord of the Rings, Harry Potter, Wheel of Time. There’s this dark lord. And what happens is some furry-footed British kid throws their ring in a hole and their entire empire collapses. Or there’s a kid you’re going to kill. And the power of a mother’s love protects him. How can you plan for the power of a mother’s love when you’re a dark lord? That’s just a complete oddball. And I think they never get a break.

What if The Dark Lord won? What if Frodo got to the end of Lord of the Rings with the ring and Sauron was there? He is like, “My ring. You know how long I’ve been looking for that? Thank you so much for that. Must’ve been a hard journey bringing that all the way here. Thank you.” And then killed him and took over the world. That’s like, what if? And I thought, that’s a downer of a book. I don’t know that I want to write a book about the traditional hero’s journey that ends with The Dark Lord winning, but it went in the back of the head, right?

And then I have a deep and abiding love of the heist genre. Sneakers is one of my favorite films of all time. Oldie, but goodie. The Sting all the way up to Ocean’s Eleven and The Italian Job, both the old one and the new one, just the inception. You do a good heist, you can get me. And as a writer, some of your lightbulb moments are when you’re like, hey, I love this thing and I’ve never written about it. And that’s gold when you feel like you’ve covered everything and then you realize there’s some area of passion and love that you haven’t tapped at all. And I’m like, I need to do a fantasy heist.

What if I did a heist where every member of this heist crew had a magical talent and they all combined together? I’m like, nobody’s done this. It was really kind of a big deal to me when I realized no one had done this. Because as a writer, you’re always looking for the things that no one has done. The truth is everyone’s done everything. But when you find something, you’re like, I can’t think of a major story that has done a full-on heist in fantasy. I was super excited. Then I realized fantasy heist, Dark Lord won, team of thieves rob The Dark Lord. I have a plot. That’s my inception.

Meanwhile, I want a good idea for each character. And so Mistborn‘s about two characters. One is about Kelsier, who was my concept for him, for myself was the gentleman thief who’d lived his life conning people, kind of small-time cons, but living among upper society where he liked to do, that something went horribly wrong. And he found out, he’s like, “I haven’t been making the world a better place. I haven’t been helping anyone. I’ve just been coasting on my charm,” and has a crisis of conscience on, “Should I be actually using this to do something?” And what happens is his wife is killed, his heist goes wrong, and he decides he wants revenge and he’s going to do it by robbing The Dark Lord. That’s my concept for him. My concept for Vin, who’s the other main character, is this idea of a young woman who lives in this world who has the magical talent and doesn’t know it. And I’m looking for a conflict, right? For her, conflict is she’s managed to remain a good person, but she’s lost her belief that anyone else is good.

She gets betrayed in some ways, that just makes her give up on kind of humanity in general. And the idea is putting them two together. Kelsier, who still kind of has this deep and abiding optimism. He’s like, “I’m going to do something good.” He’s learned optimism, right? He’s learned “I need to do something good with my life.” And it’s by force. And her, who’s lost it, and she becomes the apprentice to him as he recruits her into the team. And this idea of a heist where these two people are growing.

Tim Ferriss: Can I ask a question? Not to interrupt, but did you have all of this before you put pen to paper, metaphorically speaking, to write?

Brandon Sanderson: Yes. This much I had.

Tim Ferriss: And in what form does that exist?

Brandon Sanderson: So it exists for me generally in โ€” I do a new document that says “Setting” at the top, then “Character,” then “Plot,” and the setting will have โ€” “summary: Dark Lord won,” that’s setting stuff. “What does a world look like where The Dark Lord has won and ruled for a thousand years?” In my books, I like to have an interesting use of magic. We can talk about that at some point.

Tim Ferriss: Oh, yeah, we will.

Brandon Sanderson: But what is the interesting use of magic?

Tim Ferriss: That’s how I got into writing excuses.

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah, is it? How do I walk the line between nerding out and making it feel, like, approachable? Because I don’t want my books to read like an encyclopedia entry or a video game. I want it to read like a new branch of science that’s really fun. And then character. I’ll have these things. And so with the character, you’ll notice these are seeds. Vin is like this. Kelsier is like this. I don’t know yet how their interaction is going to go and how they’re going to be. In fact, I wrote three chapters with Vin, first โ€” three different first chapters, trying different personalities. I started her with an Artful Dodger type, really confident, moving in the underworld, ripping people off, and it just did not work. And then I tried another one, I can’t even remember what that one was. But then I tried a third one, which is the personality she ended up with. Kelsier I kind of had right from the get-go.

Tim Ferriss: All right, it’s my job to do drops, so I’ll do it again. How did you know those first two didn’t work?

Brandon Sanderson: This is where it’s an art.

Tim Ferriss: Is it just like a water feel kind of thing that you’ve acquired over time?

Brandon Sanderson: This is art and not science and sometimes it doesn’t work and you don’t figure it out until late. My most famous series, they’re probably Mistborn and The Stormlight Archive are about tied for most famous. Stormlight, I wrote an entire novel, like 300,000 words long with the character having the wrong personality the entire time and it was only at the end that I’m like, “This is just wrong.” And I threw the book away, wrote it again eight years later with a different personality, and it worked.

But in order to have the characters live and breathe and feel like real people, I feel like I need to give them that volition, which is kind of destructive for all that narrative structure I’ve come up with. But that’s good because having that structure and then saying, “All right, now that I know what this person would do, how does that influence how they would actually approach this structure?” And I’ll go and I’ll change that.

And knowing about promise, progress, payoff, which I couldn’t have named for you back in 2004 when I was writing Mistborn, but I kind of understood intrinsically I could tweak to the character personalities as I went, so that I was making sure that these things were threading the needle, so to speak. Where you’ve got this character and you need them to go through this plot, but you need to make sure they feel like they’re a real person so you can’t hold them to any one point, but you can make it come together, hopefully.

Tim Ferriss: I want to come back to Stormlight for a second because it struck me that you have the ability to put things on the back burner or scrap and effectively start from scratch, restart something, that you’ve put a lot of sunk cost into.

Brandon Sanderson: Mm-hmm.

Tim Ferriss: And that is hard for most people, so I am wondering, say, in the case of this character with the wrong personality that you really conclude at 300,000 words or so, “It’s not working the way I want it to work.” What is the inner monologue that you have to get to the point where you’re like, “Park it.” Particularly, I mean we don’t need to get, maybe, into this aspect of it when you have external pressures, maybe you’ve applied pressure to yourself, you maybe have deadlines in mind. How do you get to that point? What is your internal process for that?

Brandon Sanderson: It’s happened to me three major times where I’ve done it and of those, only one did I ever come back to, two of them I parked and have laid fallow. One important mindset that is kind of a ground rule is remembering, as a writer, that the piece of art is not necessarily just the story you’re creating, that you are the piece of art. The time you spend writing is improving you as a writer and that is the most important thing. The book is almost a side product, not really, but it almost is to the fact that you are the art and if you know that, it helps a lot.

One of the things that pros do that amateurs have trouble with in writing is pros throw away chapters a lot, in my experience. You write it and you get done with the chapter and you’re like, “That just did not work. I’m going to toss that and start over the next day.” Amateurs have a lot of trouble with this, in my experience. There’s a lot of causes of writer’s block, but one of the main ones I am convinced, is that you’re writing the chapter wrong, you have enough instincts as a writer because you’ve practiced long enough to know you should throw it away but you don’t want to because you did the work. But your instincts won’t let you continue doing it wrong and you’re not willing to toss it and try over, and so there is that.

What happens with the whole book? You get done with the whole book and one of a couple of things happen, with two of the three of these books I get done and I’m like, “That just doesn’t give me the shine, the feel of excitement that I want this book to have.” There’s something fundamentally wrong with it and I am sometimes not even sure what it is for a while. When I put aside The Way of Kings, the 2002 version, we call it Way of Kings Prime, I put it aside and said, “I don’t know why this went wrong.” It was actually two things, it wasn’t just having Kaladin have the wrong personality. It was that I went into this book wanting to write a giant epic while reading The Wheel of Time, which was one of my favorite book series at the time, it was before I had taken it over. This was five years before I would get that call โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: This is a wild story.

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah, it is a wild story. Game of Thrones was huge at the time and I had been studying Game of Thrones and I’m like, “I want to write something like this.” And so I started with a huge cast up front, not recognizing that both of those examples I gave started with a cast who was relatively small, that over the course of several books grew into this complex web of different characters having different relationships and it had this nice onboarding. And so what I did is I wrote a book that was the beginnings of 10 characters’ stories and didn’t get through any of them. It was too all over the place. And the other was, I had the wrong personality. Something feels wrong and as an artist I just say, “I don’t know what this is yet.” I put it aside.

Once in a while it happens during alpha and beta reads, I’m getting the wrong response. People are reading this book and they’re thinking something completely opposite from what I wanted them to. The parts that I wanted them to enjoy, they’re bored by. Or the character I wanted them to click with, they’re just annoyed by and aren’t interested in and you realize something is just wrong, something is fundamentally wrong with this story and I don’t want to release it until I know what that is.

Sometimes you might figure that out and be able to fix it. Sometimes you might look at that and be like, “You know what? I don’t mind if people have this response. This is the piece of art and this piece of art is going to have this response from some percentage of the audience.” That’s maybe not a selling point, but it is part of the art. But with those three books, I put them aside and with The Way of Kings, I eventually figured out what it was and I tried it again. The other two I haven’t gotten there yet.

Tim Ferriss: So let’s come back to habits and your schedule for writing. Do you still have two primary blocks of writing and could you explain what your current schedule tends to look like?

Brandon Sanderson: So I find that for what I do and where my personal psychology is, an eight-hour block is not sustainable for writing. This means I can do it for a week or two at eight hours, but it’s going to brain drain me, it’s going to exhaust me. I get done with eight hours and I am mentally worn out. I find that if I do two four-hour blocks instead, I never quite get there and it’s more sustainable.

And so what I do is I will get up, I get up late, I get up at around noon or one and I will go to the gym, which is different for me than other people. The gym is writing time for me, I’m not hitting it super hard. I am there to think through what I’m doing, some motion, moving your body number one, it’s good for you, but that’s a side effect for me too I can put on music and I can move and I can think about what I’m going to write.

Then I go and I work from 2:00 until 6:00 these days is usually what I do. 1:00 until 5:00, something like that, and then I’m done. I go, I shower. At 6:30, I’m ready to hang with my family and I’ll be with family from 6:30-10:30. Go out with my wife, hang with my kids, build some LEGOs, play some video games, whatever it is.

I learned early in my career, one of the most important things I ever did was take that time and demarcate it as non-writing time. I found early in my marriage that writing, it will consume every moment possible and I was always anxious to get back to the story. And as soon as I changed my brain and said, no, no, no, no, even if your wife is away 6:30 to 10:30 can’t be writing time, it is off limits. You have to do something else. Suddenly, it was a lot easier for me to be there for my family. And you’ve interviewed a lot of highly productive, highly successful people, I think a lot of them are going to talk about the same thing, that it’s very hard to be there with people when you’re there with people โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: Sure, comes up a lot.

Brandon Sanderson: โ€” because your brain is always working on the next big thing.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, this is particularly true with people who work on big, creative projects.

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah. And that gave me this permission. It actually came at a moment, I went out to dinner with some writer friends and afterward I’m like, “That was such a great dinner.” And she’s like, “Yeah, but you didn’t look at me once.” And I realized she had become invisible to me because the writing was consuming all, and so I made that change. 10:30, kids are supposed to go to bed; they’re older now, they just don’t. But sometime around there they drift off. My wife goes to bed, she was a school teacher for many years, still kind of keeps a school teacher’s hours and she is wonderful for getting up with the kids, I don’t have to do that and never have. And I go back to work at about 11:00, I write from 11:00 to 3:00.

And then 3:00 to 4:00 or 5:00, is just whatever I want to do. That’s the real goof off time, that’s the go play with my Magic cards time. That’s the play a video game, pop out the Steam Deck time. And this schedule, you’ll notice I don’t have to worry about commuting, which gives me an advantage here, has been really sustainable for me.

Tim Ferriss: So that’s a home office predominantly where you’re writing?

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah. I write from my home office. I do like to move around, I go in the gazebo. Lately I’ve gone in the gazebo when it’s really cold and I hire one of my kids to come put logs on a fire for me and I sit by the fireplace. Sometimes I like to be on the beach. Sometimes I like when I’m around here, I like to be in different places. I can set up a hammock here or there, sit with my laptop, I do not work at a desk. And yeah, that’s really sustainable, it’s worked for me for the last 20 years.

Tim Ferriss: That’s incredible. I got all my best writing done really late at night when I was โ€” I mean, I still am writing, I’m working on a new book, but when I was working on my first few books especially, it was always when everyone else was asleep.

So let’s talk about the non-home environment. We’re sitting in quite a large building, or at least a building with a lot of large rooms.

Brandon Sanderson: Yes.

Tim Ferriss: Why do you have this company? Why have you and your wife built this company? Because there are a lot of writers out there who just want to focus on writing. They go the traditional publishing route, which I’m not saying it’s a mutually exclusive choice, but why do you have all this?

Brandon Sanderson: How long do you want to go? This is the big one.

Tim Ferriss: This is a long-form podcast, so we have all the time we want.

Brandon Sanderson: All right. So you’re right, most writers want to sell a book and live that kind of dream you see presented in film and television, which is accurate to the top percentage of writers. Most writers you read about or see in film are the big ones. They’re doing really well, and so they’re off in a cabin telling their story, or they’re the ones that have to be pried away from their easy chair to get them to even do any publicity whatsoever. They want to live that life that is the classic life of a writer.

And there’s some of me that wants that. But the secret is I was raised by an accountant and a businessman. And particularly my mother, that accountant, she instilled into me some aspirations. And I call this my superpower. My superpower is to be an artist raised by an accountant, and I’ve always had a bit of that entrepreneurial sense.

Tim Ferriss: What were the aspirations?

Brandon Sanderson: The aspirations? Well, they started small. They started with, “You know what? I want to be able to make a living from writing.” Got back from Korea and said, “All right, I am not very good at this writing thing, but I really, really love it.” I could tell because when I spent time doing the writing, time didn’t matter anymore. I could spend hours doing this. And it’s the first thing I found other than reading or video games that I could spend hours doing and just come out of it feeling tired but fulfilled. And I’m like, “I want to do this.”

So I sat down and I took what I’d learned, both from my mother, and missions have a regimented structure, and I said, “I’m going to apply this all to writing and I’m just going to start writing books.” And I heard your first five books are generally terrible. I said, “Well, that’s good. I don’t have to be good yet.” It took a lot of pressure off me. I said, “I’m going to write six, and the first five I’m not going to send out to any publishers.”

Tim Ferriss: Wow.

Brandon Sanderson: And that’s bad advice for some people.

Tim Ferriss: I can’t imagine doing that.

Brandon Sanderson: Right?

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, wow. You didn’t even send them out?

Brandon Sanderson: I didn’t send them out.

Tim Ferriss: It was just weight training in the gym for your mind for the number six.

Brandon Sanderson: Yep. I didn’t send them out. Eventually, I shared number five with some people. I got involved with the local science fiction magazine as an editor. I eventually took it over because that’s what I do, and I was head editor, and I eventually said, “Well, I do have a book,” and I started sharing book five with people.

Tim Ferriss: So you didn’t even test readers?

Brandon Sanderson: I didn’t have test readers. I just wrote the books. And again, this is why the advice can be bad. There’s some people out there that would be bad advice for. Pat Rothfuss published his first book and it’s brilliant.

Tim Ferriss: The Name of the Wind?

Brandon Sanderson: The Name of the Wind, yeah.

Tim Ferriss: That is a spectacular book.

Brandon Sanderson: First novel. Now, he did a ton of revisions on that.

Tim Ferriss: I’m sure.

Brandon Sanderson: He spent as much time revising that book as I spent writing mine. But for me, the good advice was, “Your first five books are terrible. Don’t stress.” And so weight training for my mind, I wrote five books.

Tim Ferriss: This was before you had an agent?

Brandon Sanderson: Before I had an agent, before I had anything, before I even knew what an agent was. Before I’d taken Dave’s class. I took Dave’s class the year that I finished the Elantris, which is book number six, I had just finished that one. And so I said, “All right, book six. That’s Elantris.” That’s the one I eventually ended up selling. Those five I’d written in different sub-genres, I knew I liked sci-fi fantasy, but the risk of being too nerdy, my sub-genres, I did an epic fantasy. I did a comedic fantasy, a Terry Pratchett style sort of thing. I did a cyberpunk, I did a space opera, and then I wrote a sequel to my epic fantasy to kind of be like, is this what I want to do?

Tim Ferriss: What characterizes an epic fantasy?

Brandon Sanderson: So epic fantasy, fantasy in short, follows three main lines of descent. One line comes from what we call portal fantasies. And your kind of line of descent of that starts in the modern era with Alice in Wonderland, goes to Narnia, and Harry Potter‘s one more example. This is kids from our world get sucked into a fantasy world and experience it. It’s usually young adult focused. You can trace that all the way back to the old stories, the fairy tales, people go into the woods and then come out of the woods. They go into the fantasy world, come out.

The second line is what we call heroic fantasy. Heroic fantasy’s lines kind of really starts with the Greek epics and Beowulf, but in modern terms, you would recognize Conan as the progenitor. It is heroic men fighting against the monsters of the world and taming them and just kind of destroying them. It’s heroic man versus evil wizard. A lot of the old serials were that. And in modern terms, our grimdark kind of line. You kind of look at Joe Abercrombie as kind of the modern version of that.

Tim Ferriss: So The Blade Itself.

Brandon Sanderson: The Blade Itself, fantastic book.

Tim Ferriss: So fun. Also one of the best voice actors I’ve ever heard.

Brandon Sanderson: Joe is amazing. He’s delightful. Tangent, you want my Joe Abercrombie story?

Tim Ferriss: Yes, please.

Brandon Sanderson: Okay, tangent. I am flying to Spain, and Joe is going to meet me there because we’re both doing con together. It’s called Celsius. I’m actually going back this year. So I’m passing through Amsterdam. And I did a thing back then, maybe we’ll talk about it, I don’t know, I signed my books in airports. I would see a book of mine at an airport bookstore, I would sign it and I would post on Twitter and I’d say, “I signed my book. First one gets there gets to get the book.” This was a thing of mine. My fans loved it. I don’t travel that way as much anymore. And there’s fewer airport bookstores. They’ve all died off. So I don’t really do it anymore. But for a while I did that. They named it Brandolizing.

And I did this thing in the airport. I left my book. I took a picture of it in the spot. And I’m getting in the line to get on the plane and I get a tweet and it’s from Joe, and he says, “Sanderson, my book’s next to yours and you didn’t sign it.” And I tweet back, I’m like, “Well, it’s not my book.” He’s like, “SIGN MY BOOK, SANDERSON!!” in all caps, exclamation point, exclamation point. And so I have to leave the line, they’re calling the line, run to the bookstore, sign Joe Abercrombie’s book, take a picture of it, post it and say, “Your book is signed by me.” And then I did make my flight, but I almost missed my flight signing Joe’s book. So someone out there went and bought Joe’s book signed by me.

Tim Ferriss: How long had you known each other at that point?

Brandon Sanderson: We had met at conventions and been on panels together. And Joe is a riot. If you get a chance, if he’s anywhere that you can go see him, Joe has this magic to turn any panel into am enjoyable panel, no matter who’s on it with him. And so I won’t say that I’m best buds with Joe. I don’t know Joe really well, but we’re professional colleagues, and I love being on a panel with him. He makes me look intelligent and funny, which I love.

But anyway, so we’ve got portal fantasy, we’ve got heroic fantasy. Michael Moorcock, all of that stuff. Then we have epic fantasy. And epic fantasy is termed by a completely different fantasy world. The other two generally have roots in our world. Portal, you start in our world, and heroic tends to be kind of our world. The modern ones aren’t, but Conan takes place in the prehistory of our world and things like that. Epic fantasy really starts with Tolkien. You can say that some of the heroic epics had a big part in this too, Gilgamesh even, and stuff like that. But this idea of epic fantasy is the movement of worlds. The world is at stake. Secondary world is what we call it. It’s very removed from our planet. All new rules, all new world, all new magic. And it’s this idea of, they’re the big thick ones, they’re kind of like historical epics, but in a different world. So that’s their similarity.

And Game of Thrones is this, though Game of Thrones borrows a little from heroic. That’s kind of his secret sauce, is he takes heroic characters and sticks them in an epic fantasy plot, and then they just start getting killed off because they’re living in a much more brutal version of an epic fantasy world than most of them. But epic is me and Robert Jordan and things like that, that’s epic fantasy. It’s just stakes of the world.

Tim Ferriss: Got it. And it and I took us off track a little bit because the question was, why are we sitting in this huge office? And then you’re like, “Well, let’s backtrack.” Artist raised by an accountant.

Brandon Sanderson: Artist raised by an accountant.

Tim Ferriss: And then we came through and you’re like, “Number six.”

Brandon Sanderson: Number six.

Tim Ferriss: That was go time.

Brandon Sanderson: That was go time. Write Elantris. And at that point, my goal was only, I’m going to try to conquer this and become a professional writer. If I can earn a living doing this, I will have been successful. But then I did. Actually, it took me a few more years. I wrote 13 novels before I sold one. I sold number six after I’d finished number 13, which was The Way of Kings Prime. And we can talk about, there’s kind of a dark moment of the soul happens before that where at I’m book number 12 and I’m like, “What am I doing? 12 books and no one’s buying them. Maybe I’m really bad at this.” But anyway.

Tim Ferriss: You started trying to sell them at which book?

Brandon Sanderson: About book six.

Tim Ferriss: About book six, okay.

Brandon Sanderson: And I hit perfectly at Dave’s class. About when I was working on book six, I started sending out query letters and things like that on some of the earlier ones, and started collecting my rejection letters and things like that. And then I took Dave’s class and I started flying out to these conventions and trying to meet editors in person, and just kind of hearing from their mouths what they want, what they’re buying, what they’re interested in, and trying to target my books at them. By that point that I was doing that, I had eight or nine. And six, seven and eight were pretty good books. Any one of those three probably could have broken me out. I didn’t ever publish seven or eight, I just published six.

Then I sell a book and I realize, “Well, now the job is to make this a career,” because I sold my book for a grand total of $10,000 that was broken across three years. So I made $5,000, and then 2,500, and then 2,500. So you can imagine that’s โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: It’s a meager sum.

Brandon Sanderson: Meager sum. I fortunately was married to someone who was making very sweet, great income as a public school teacher. She was the sugar mama. We were living on her 22,000 a year as a public school teacher. But she supported me while I was doing that and breaking in with those books. We did meet after I’d at least sold one. So I at least had something to say, “Look, it’s real. It made us $5,000 this year.” Or made me, we weren’t married then, but you know what I mean. So yeah, first year of marriage, I made $2,500. That was the grand total I contributed. But at that point, your job is to get stable. And there’s two danger points. One is never selling a book, but the number two danger point is your second book. We talked a little bit about this. Second book is do or die time, and I can talk all about โ€” it was pretty big do or die for me. But then, it stabilized. Then, things started to work. I hit the bestseller list and then Wheel of Time happened โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: That was with the first or the second book?

Brandon Sanderson: It was my fourth that hit โ€” or, yeah, my fourth that hit the bestseller โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: Fourth, that hit the bestseller?

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah. Mistborn Three was my first one. Very low on. It was either Mistborn Three. It might’ve even been Warbreaker, but it’s four or five hit, like, The Times list went to 35 then and I hit Number 35, right?

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. Still counts.

Brandon Sanderson: Still counts. Still counts. It was for 2,000 copies in a week. It doesn’t sound like very much to be a bestseller, but I hit that bestseller list, then The Wheel of Time happened, and my entire life changed. And I’m sure we’ll get to that.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah.

Brandon Sanderson: But about 2012 through 2014, I started to realize some things. Somewhere in there โ€” I can’t remember the exact date. You can look it up. Amazon turned off the ability to buy all Macmillan books and the Macmillan โ€” so Tor, my publisher, is a subsidiary of Macmillan. This was because of their contract disputes. Amazon wanted to price books cheaper to sell Kindles. They wanted the lost lead in order to control the market, which was very smart on their end. But the publishers were panicking about driving book prices to the basement, because if Amazon sells them for a dollar โ€” at the point, Amazon is selling for a dollar and paying us on those books like $8.

And they’re like, “What’s the problem? We sell them for a dollar. You still make your $8,” and the publisher’s like, “Yeah. But people are going to expect books to be a dollar. And when you control the market, you’re going to say, ‘Well, we’re not paying you $8 on these books anymore. We’re going to pay you the 70 cents that you would get off of a $1 book.'” And so, whole panic, big contract disputes, Amazon is working very hard to become dominant in this market and the publishers are fighting them.

And Amazon turns off the ability to buy my books. And this was a wake-up call to me because it told me that the system was no longer what it had been all the way through the course of publishing history. All the way through publishing history, your audience, your buyers were the bookstores, really. Core were the bookstores. If you convinced the bookstores to shelve your books, then people went to the bookstores. And the more books you have on the shelf, the more you sold.

Old publishing adage that Tom Doherty, founder of Tor, very smart man, would say is like, “I want to have 10 books on the shelf, even if only one of them sells. Because eventually, nine of them are going to sell 10 of a copy because everyone will go and say, ‘This must be an important book. They have 10 copies of it here.’ The best advertisement for a book is having as many on the shelf.” And so your fight was to get the bookstores to carry your book.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. It was real estate.

Brandon Sanderson: Yep. That was no longer the case. Your audience, your market was not the bookstores. It was only Amazon. Amazon controlled everything. By then, they had Audible and Audible has become the growth segment of the market. They controlled ebooks and they were coming to control print books, right? And having one person be able to turn off my books was a big deal to me.

It happened previously with the Alcatraz books where Borders decided not to carry one of them, but Barnes & Noble did. And so the book succeeded and eventually Borders came around and decided to carry it. There’s only one person. They control your entire career. And I said, “I cannot be subject.” 

And that’s when the big entrepreneurial part of my brain said, “All right. Let’s change.” I went to the publishers and I said, “There are certain things that I think we should be doing.” 

And publishing, bless their hearts, they’re still trapped in a lot of ways in the 1900s, maybe the 1800s. They do not change very quickly.

And I looked at other markets and I said, “What is music doing? What is movies doing? What were music and movies โ€” what were my friends who were independent comic publishers doing?” You know Howard Tayler, who was on Writing Excuses with me. I’m like, “What’s he doing?” He gives it away for free. If Amazon decides that my books are essentially free, how do I make a living? How’s he making a living? He gives it away for free and he still makes a living.

And I started to see some trends and they involved having a variety of product prices. One was having something really high end that the super fans could buy to display, to show off. Whether that be the vinyl, whether that be the equivalent of going to a concert and buying merch there, whether it be buying the book online that is free but you want to have a copy to show off, all the way down to the really cheap product. And in a lot of ways, if you have the really expensive thing, that subsidizes the really cheap product so that everybody can get the books. Everyone’s served better by a variety of offerings.

Tim Ferriss: Different pricing tiers.

Brandon Sanderson: Different pricing tiers, letting people buy in to what they want. And I realized, if people are buying into the expensive one, you can go lower on the cheap one and the people who can’t afford this or don’t want it are happy. The people who want this are happy. Everyone is more happy. And I went to the publisher, I’m like, “We should be upselling to merchandise. Lord of the Rings released these cool DVDs that came with Gollum bookends, right?” I said, “We should be doing things like that for big books. We should be bundling ebook and audiobook with a hardcover. We should be selling leatherbounds. Really high-end, nice ones, but we shouldn’t be charging what you’re charging.” They were charging 250 for the leatherbounds. I’m like, “That’s too high a price point. We should be doing $100 price point.” And the publisher said to me, “We can’t do this. We can’t do this because the…” And they had some good reasons.

I think they’re not insurmountable, but their reasons were, “Look, the bookstores can’t carry these special editions. We just can’t figure out how to make them work. The bookstores can’t sell merch. The bookstores can’t sell the leatherbounds, because we can’t…” We printed 250 copies of the Wheel of Time leatherbounds and we had so much trouble selling them, because fans didn’t know where to get them. The bookstores didn’t want to carry something that expensive that they weren’t sure if they were going to sell. It was just all a big mess.

And after a few years of this, I had numerous phone calls with the CEO of Macmillan, above even Tom Doherty, like the head dude. And I could not make any inroads and that’s when the voice of my mother whispered, “Well, Brandon, I trained you better than that. Do it yourself,” and I said, “I just have to.” And so, I got my team together and I said, “We are going to try to Amazon-proof ourselves.” That means we are going to direct sale. We are going to start building our own direct to our consumer and I started with the leatherbounds. My decision was, “This was something the market wanted.” I kept hearing from fans they wanted them. I heard from the publisher they can’t sell them. So I went to the publisher, said, “Can you give me those rights back?” And he’s like, “Sure. They’re just free. We can’t do anything with them. Maybe you can.” And that’s, again, to their credit, right? The publishers that are โ€” I’ve had โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: I’m guessing in retrospect โ€” 

Brandon Sanderson: In retrospect, they may be โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: But they couldn’t have done it. They couldn’t.

Brandon Sanderson: They couldn’t have done it, because it had to be direct-to-consumer. Part of the reason is the fans running out to buy the special edition from the bookstore, it’s just that it’s a bad methodology. So I said to my team, “We’re going to build these. We’re going to do leatherbounds.” They sold 250 copies. I want to sell 10,000, right? Well, we’ll start at five. I want to sell 5,000. We ended up selling 50,000, right?

Tim Ferriss: Oh, my god. Now, is that of multiple books? Was that โ€” 

Brandon Sanderson: That’s the first one.

Tim Ferriss: Oh, wow.

Brandon Sanderson: Right?

Tim Ferriss: 50,000 hardbound. Okay.

Brandon Sanderson: Nowadays โ€” yeah. Leatherbound โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: Leatherbound.

Brandon Sanderson: Leatherbounds at 100 to 250. Nowadays, our initial print runs are 50,000. Back then, it was 10,000 and then 5,000 and then 5,000 more. And then, things like that. Every one we get in stock will sell. Every one signed that is in stock will just instantly sell. And so there’s obviously a very big market. In fact, such a big market, I cannot physically produce enough of them to sell the signed ones. We have the unsigned ones that people still buy, but the signed ones go instantly.

Tim Ferriss: Quality problem to have.

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah. It is a quality problem to have. It means that my time suddenly got a very strange monetary constraint on it, which is something that I try to pay attention to, but not too much. I don’t know if you’ve had this, but do you ever try to put a dollar amount on your time and is that just madness for you?

Tim Ferriss: It is madness. I did that for a very long time. I think it is helpful in some of the maybe earlier, intermediate entrepreneurial stages. So that you don’t find yourself, if you are like me, a perfectionist, micromanaging or doing too much yourself. However, there is a point where I think it just makes you miserable โ€” 

Brandon Sanderson: It does.

Tim Ferriss: โ€” because you end up placing so high a per hour value on your time, that every squandered minute is like having a pound of flesh taken and you can drive yourself insane.

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah. I wind in that because if I sign my name, that’s $250 because of the leatherbound. But I don’t want to spend my life signing my name, I want to write the books. But the most money I can earn per hour, I can sign 1,000 of those in an hour and that’s 250 each, which is just an unreal โ€” if you think about that, that’s like โ€” yeah. That’s โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: That’s bananas.

Brandon Sanderson: That is bananas. My normal writing time, I can put a different dollar amount. It depends on what I’m writing โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: Did you ever get pulled โ€” because it happened to me with speaking engagements, different thing. But did you get pulled away from the creative work or the actual wordsmithing at any point or were you able to hold the line?

Brandon Sanderson: So I was able to hold the line, but barely. At one point, I started to get popular enough that people wanted me on a speaking tour, right? And so, I put a dollar amount on it. I’m like, “Well, at that point, a day of writing,” and it’d take me two days, “a day of writing is 25 grand.” So two days, 50 grand. And we put it up there. Instantly, like 10 inquiries. And I’m like, “I don’t want to do that.”

Tim Ferriss: Now what?

Brandon Sanderson: Now what? I just said, “You know what? No, we were wrong.” And part of that is because I don’t feel like I’m $50,000 worth of speaking, right? There are really good motivational speakers that are maybe worth that. I don’t think I am. My time is worth that, but I don’t think their โ€” they would probably disagree. They’re like, “Whatever, we have this money set aside for a speaker. It’s what speakers cost.” But the other thing is that’s what my writing time was, and I love writing. And if I’m going to spend two days writing, I want to spend it writing. And nowadays it would be ridiculous. For me to go do one of these things, it would cost like 400 grand. It’d be even worse.

And so I did have to stop thinking about the hour, whatever. But it is a helpful metric for where you spend your time. Put your time where you’re happy and excited, but also if you can choose among different things that you’re having sidelined, you can do that.

So anyway, that’s beside the point. I gave this challenge to my team and it worked. We started to do all the things that the publishers weren’t doing, and then that’s when I said, “All right, now we’re going to actually build a team and grow.” And we moved to doing crowdfunding because it’s really a lot better. We did pre-orders on the initial ones. We moved to crowdfunding. And that’s when we went, my team all through the teens was maybe 10 people. Probably didn’t even quite get there.

Tim Ferriss: And who were those people? What was the kind of org chart at the time?

Brandon Sanderson: So me and Emily. So Emily runs the business and I run the creative. So she does HR, she does accounting, she does operations is what we call it, and all of that stuff.

Tim Ferriss: And is operations sort of the logistics of manufacturing and shipping everything?

Brandon Sanderson: Yes. It’s manufacturing, shipping, it’s HR, it’s facilities. Basically she’s over that. So if you look at my org chart, Emily and I are at the top and I am over what we call creative development, which early on was one person. All of these were one person. Creative development and publicity are kind of under me.

Tim Ferriss: What did creative development do at that โ€” 

Brandon Sanderson: That’s our art team.

Tim Ferriss: Okay, got it.

Brandon Sanderson: That’s our art team, yeah.

Tim Ferriss: That was art, mm-hmm.

Brandon Sanderson: So art, and then editorial and publicity were me. And then merchandising, events, and facilities were her. And so we started 2007, I hired my first employee. I broke out in 2005. 2007, I hired an assistant editor whose job is to do executive assistant and editorial work for me. Well very, oh, wait, you’re actually our first. Becky’s like, “That wasn’tโ€ฆ” he was our first full-time employee. Our first one, we hired Becky to do shipping. So actually, our first employee is shipping. You’re going to love this. My second book, they have remainders. You know what remainders are.

Tim Ferriss: I do. You should explain for the people listening, though.

Brandon Sanderson: Boy, we’re on a tangent to a tangent. I love this.

Tim Ferriss: You’re pretty good. I’m impressed with your ability to reel it in, though. What you haven’t done, which happens to me all the time, is someone will say, “What were we talking about? What was your question again?” You’re very good at doing the callbacks.

Brandon Sanderson: Well, you’ve been reminding me. So publishing, like Tom Doherty said, he wants 10 books on the shelf and you really want to sell seven of those, seven to eight. If you sell every one, that means you didn’t put enough on the shelf. Someone walked into that store and couldn’t buy a book. If you sell two, you actually printed way too many. Tom would still want them for publicity reasons, but industry kind of common sense says you want to have remainders somewhere around. Remainders are left over at the end of a print run. You want to have around 20 percent. Anything between 30 to 10 percent is fine. 40 percent starts to look sketchy, and less than 10 percent is bad also. So you end up getting thousands of books shipped back.

Elantris, they printed 10,000 and they had remainders on Elantris. Or not Elantris, Mistborn. Elantris, they didn’t have remainders. They didn’t print enough of them. Mistborn, they did. They actually overprinted a little bit. So they had too many remainders. They said, “Brandon, you can have these. It’s a dollar apiece.” I’m like, entrepreneur. What does my mom say? You buy those books at a dollar and you sign them and you sell them at cover price and you use that to supplement your income, right? You’re making $2,500 a year. You need to supplement that somehow. So I bought them all.

Tim Ferriss: Okay, so this is going back early.

Brandon Sanderson: This is way back early. Bought them all, put them in our garage, couldn’t park our car anymore. Then we hired Becky, who’s my sister-in-law, to take the orders. We put them up on my website signed, and it’s a trickle, 10 a week or even that many, but she was shipping that. So first person is shipping. Second person is editorial, executive assistant/editorial. Soon there’s enough editorial work for him that I need another assistant. So then we hire a merchandising person.

Tim Ferriss: What is the merch?

Brandon Sanderson: So the merch at that point was looking at doing t-shirts and stickers and to take over the shipping from Becky, to have a full in-house thing. So that’s when we let Becky go. So she was our first employee. I’m nodding. She’s over here in the corner. She eventually got hired again. She’ll come back into the story.

But then we have a full-time person who is shipping and to come up with merchandising, and then I hire her husband. We hired them as a team for 20 hours each a week, as one 40-hour employee. He was an artist. He’d done all my art for Mistborn. She’s the person we had been offloading our merchandise to so far, that had started doing it. We’re like, “We’re bringing this in-house.” So posters, art prints, all of that stuff. So we hire them.

So then our next employee is right around the same time is publicity and marketing altogether. That’s Adam, whom you’ve met. So then we have our structure all set. We have, for me, I have an editorial person. I have a creative development, which, art person, and I have a publicity person. And then Emily has a person for shipping and for merchandise together. And then she hired a facilities person to, our little office at the time, to clean it up, to change light bulbs and things like that. Then she handled herself, all of the HR, and things like that. That’s where we began and that’s what we were for 10 years, until the first Kickstarter, where things exploded.

And slowly we’ve been adding people to shipping and we’ve been shipping out of the house next door that we bought. And that’s when we said, “All right, it’s time to level up.” And I said, “Everyone’s going to build a department and I want a full team for each one, because we’re going to go somewhere with this now that I have this team.”

Tim Ferriss: Just to give people a visual, so when I got my amazing tour earlier, I remember walking into the warehouse and I was like, I feel like “I’m at the end of Raiders of the Lost Ark.” This is a gigantic space.

Brandon Sanderson: Books are big.

Tim Ferriss: With levels upon levels upon levels and pallets upon pallets upon pallets. It is really jaw-dropping to walk into that space. Now, you mentioned Kickstarter. I know we’re jumping ahead a little bit, and I’m going to want to come back to Warbreaker and all sorts of other things. But since you already mentioned Kickstarter, I recall very distinctly when your launch video was sent to me by a number of friends.

Brandon Sanderson: Had you ever heard of me? You had listened to โ€”

Tim Ferriss: Yeah.

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah.

Tim Ferriss: And so I got this video and I was like, “Oh, this should be fun to watch.” So for people who don’t have any context, this is the big one.

Brandon Sanderson: Yes.

Tim Ferriss: The big one. How do you want to set that up? Because it’s so mind-boggling. I don’t even know which angle to take on it.

Brandon Sanderson: I have a couple of big level up moments in my life. The first one is when I pitched Mistborn, going from Elantris to Mistborn, where I said, “I’m not doing a sequel to Elantris. I’m doing this whole new thing and I’ve got big aspirations.” The next one’s when The Wheel of Time hit me. The next one’s when we started doing our leatherbounds, and the most recent one is our Kickstarter.

Now I say our Kickstarter because it’s the famous one. We’d actually done one before that hit seven million. That was for The Way of Kings leatherbound, when we moved our leatherbounds from โ€” so we did Elantris and the Mistborn books and Warbreaker just as pre-orders during the 20-teens. And then coming to the 2020s, we said, “All right, we’re moving to Kickstarter.”

This happened, actually, because of my friend Howard Tayler who was, he was one of my models where he’s the guy who did a web comic, comic book that he sold the print editions in order to subsidize the free thing online. And he came to me and he said, “Brandon, you should be doing crowdfunding.” I’m like, “We have a nice pre-order system.” He’s like, “No, crowdfunding hits publicity in a different way.” And I realized he’s right. I should have been doing these. One of the problems with the pre-orders is we never knew how many to order. And with a Kickstarter, you get all those orders come in and you have to pay a chunk to Kickstarter, but they have a nice back-end structure.

We investigated that and Kara, my person who’s in charge of fulfillment is like, “This would be so much easier than what we are doing because you can mail merge all these things, and they keep all of this track, all of the stuff with the shipping and the prices. It just makes it so much easier.”

And then there’s the publicity side where you can start adding all of these add-ons and things. And so we tried one out with The Way of Kings leatherbound. It was successful. $7 million, which is pretty good. And then COVID hit.

Tim Ferriss: Okay, so before we get to COVID hits, now, before we get to that, what did you guys learn? What were the key lessons learned with that first prototype run, let’s just say.

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah, first prototype run. So there’s a couple things. Number one, there’s a whole lot of organization that goes into shipping out 50,000 books at once instead of 50,000 books across 10 years.

Tim Ferriss: Because a lot of folks who do Kickstarter, if they’re successful, get the hug of death.

Brandon Sanderson: Exactly.

Tim Ferriss: And they implode.

Brandon Sanderson: Yep, they implode because managing and shipping and keeping everyone happy. When you do what we were doing where we’re sending out a few thousand every month or things like that, people get their books in a timely way. In a Kickstarter, suddenly you have to figure out how to send 50,000 books and keep everyone updated on it. And you have to figure out how to get merchandise and books shipped together or in separate packages.

That’s a really big one because what we found with our books is we could drop ship the books direct from the printer, but not the merchandise, which comes in on different boats from around the world because you’re printing them all in different places. And so we had to figure out how are we doing all the shipping? The logistics do kill a lot of people, and we were able to build that.

So that’s all behind the scenes stuff. That’s a lesson. Having your logistics in place, knowing how you’re going to fulfill if you are successful, is a very big deal. Knowing that you can already produce these things at scale, have them arrive. A lot of people who do Kickstarters don’t understand the sheer fact of these big trucks coming in can only go to certain places, and they can only offload in certain ways. And some of them need a high dock and some of them will have a ramp. And you have to find out where can they deposit these things. If you don’t have a warehouse with a high dock, you better then know that the trucks are coming in with a ramp and a pallet jack. Otherwise they’re going to arrive and be like, “All right, move these.” And you’re like, “What do we do?” We actually had one of those where they’d all had ramps before and then run, arrived without, and they’re like, “All right, how are you getting this out?” And we had to have a bunch of people go into the back of the book and move them off of the pallets by box.

Tim Ferriss: Oh, my God.

Brandon Sanderson: These are all lessons learned. So there’s all these logistical things.

The second thing we learned was that it was true. A crowdfunding campaign where you bring all of the might of your fan base together for one event, cuts through the noise. There’s a certain principle I’ve started calling escape velocity of attention. Escape velocity of attention is, in today’s media environment, people’s attention have a gravitational pull to what they’ve already been paying attention to. They love the things that they love and getting anything else to achieve that escape velocity, to go off and to make a splash. Any idea to not just crash and burn, to get out into the universe and draw the attention of other people is just super difficult. Most things sit on the planet and never get up into the universe where everyone can see it. They crash and burn. And it’s like this layer keeping people’s attention away from paying attention to this thing over here.

In order to make any sort of noise, any sort of attention outside of a very small group, you need a certain amount of attention being paid to it so that you achieve this escape velocity and you blast out. And then the rest of the planets pay attention to it, not just the one that is your little, little planet of attention.

It’s really hard. Launching new books for new authors today is much harder. You might notice, I’ve noticed, there are fewer people who break out now than used to. More authors are earning a living now than used to, but they’re earning less because there are fewer breakouts. There are fewer movie stars than there used to be. There are fewer giant bands than there used to be. And this is all because our attention is, there’s so many things vying for it that we put up this barrier and we don’t want to look up. And it’s very natural. Having a Kickstarter gets that momentum behind you. Starts to make noise.

Tim Ferriss: Executed properly.

Brandon Sanderson: Executed properly. A lot of them flop, but executed โ€” bringing all of your fan base together and making a lot of noise, suddenly more people pay attention to you.

With our Way of Kings Kickstarter, it still only reached our audience. But even reaching your audience is really hard today. All of the social media platforms that we have learned to rely upon and use have found out that people can’t pay attention to everything. They will click too many names, they will want to follow these names, but then there’ll be too much spam of all these names on their feeds. And all of them use algorithms because, number one, they need to monetize somehow. And number two, people follow too many things and it overwhelms most people. So they come and they bounce off of even their social media platforms.

In the early days of social media, if someone followed you on Facebook and you did a post, it showed up on their feed automatically.

Tim Ferriss: No longer the case.

Brandon Sanderson: And that stopped in the 20-teens, where all of them โ€” and so it depended on how many people liked the thing. So if you even want to reach your own audience, you have to have an escape velocity of attention. You have to break through these barriers preventing even your fan base from seeing what’s happening. I still get people who come to me like, “Wow, you did this big Kickstarter. I didn’t even hear about this.” We sold to only 10 percent of our audience with the big one that we’re getting to.

Tim Ferriss: That’s insane.

Brandon Sanderson: That’s only 10 percent. And that’s all that effort to get to 10 percent. And I would say the big Kickstarter was 30 to 40 percent new people. So we really only reached five percent of my audience.

But regardless, it taught us that. It taught me about escape velocity of attention. How to break through, get into the sky and start getting everyone’s attention. Maybe, a little bit. Or at least get high enough that your whole planet that follows you, more of them can see it.

Tim Ferriss: I want to give people just a bit of a carrot dangling on the end of a stick here. And then we’re going to go back to COVID hitting. With the big campaign that we keep referring to, what did that end up totaling?

Brandon Sanderson: It was 41-point-something million, official. 45 when you would do all the people. You have people that can add on extra stuff. The behind-the-scenes was another four and a half or so. We ended right at 45 million. So if you go look at it right now, it’s 41-point-something. Do you have it there? What is it? 41 point โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: I don’t have actually the points. I just have roughly 41.

Brandon Sanderson: Roughly 41 million. The previous highest Kickstarter had been 21. And we still have the record.

Tim Ferriss: That’s so wild. All right.

Brandon Sanderson: Here’s what’s wild. It’s for books. If you go look at that top 10, everything else is some cool tech innovation. And we have it for novels.

COVID hits. COVID hits. I have gone through cycles in my life multiple times where I say yes to too many things and then I’m traveling too much. And 2019 was one of those years. As an author, you know this, people want you in person. And traveling is fun. I enjoy seeing the world. So you say yes to a bunch of things and then you end up, as I did in 2019, with three different trips to Europe. And Europe can be kind of exhausting. Three tours in Europe. Multiple tours around here. And I calculated, I’ve been on the road one third of my days.

COVID hits, and 2020 was set for the same thing. And all that gets canceled. No one can travel. And suddenly I have one third of my time back.

In the meantime, I’d started to feel dissatisfied with something in my life. When I was early in my career, I could just have a random idea and I would shelve it until I was done with my current book. But I could have something that was really exciting to me, and when I finished my current book, I could go in and I could write that cool idea.

Warbreaker, that you mentioned, was one of these. Just a standalone book that I wrote โ€” Mistborn Trilogy โ€” between The Mistborn Trilogy, The Wheel of Time, and Stormlight on either side, I have this little standalone book that was a cool idea I had. I love that about fantasy. Some of my favorite fantasy novels are standalone books. Guy Gavriel Kay is very good at them. Lions of Al-Rassan or Tigana are two highly recommended. They’re ’90s fantasy. They’re a little slower than Modern fantasy, really just single volume, really digging into one world but doesn’t overstay its welcome.

I hadn’t been able to do that in a while. I was writing series, all these series, everything I wrote turned into a big series and I didn’t have a place for these wacky ideas. And I started to hit my mid-40s and I started to realize I’m only really going to be able to do this probably till my 70s if I’m lucky. Most authors really slow down when they hit their 70s. This is what people who are fans of Game of Thrones have found. George was always a little on the slower side, and then he hit retirement age and he slowed down. And a lot of authors that happened to. And I started to calculate out, and I’m like, I don’t have room for any of these cool ideas. That makes me sad, makes me sad that I can’t just sit down and write something that isn’t โ€” yeah.

But then suddenly I had a third of my time back. I started watching movies with my kids. They were old enough that we could show them some of our favorite movies. And we showed them The Princess Bride, one of my favorite movies and favorite books.

Tim Ferriss: That’s amazing.

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah.

Tim Ferriss: Amazing. Amazing Everything. William Goldman.

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah, it’s a wonderful, wonderful book. Written by William Goldman, who’s a great screenwriter. He’s written a lot of classics. Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid was one of his. Just brilliant screenwriter who script-doctored a ton of your favorite movies as well as wrote multiple on his own of your favorite movies.

I was watching this movie and I love just the feel of it, this sort of fantasy that is fun but doesn’t quite take itself too seriously. We got done with that and my wife’s like, “I love that movie.” And she said, “Isn’t it funny that the Princess doesn’t do anything in the movie The Princess Bride? She tries to hit a rat once and she misses. That’s the most she accomplishes. That and marrying the bad guy, almost.” And she’s like, “Wouldn’t it be nice if she did something?”

Tim Ferriss: Mawwige.

Brandon Sanderson: Yes.

Tim Ferriss: Oh, mawwige.

Brandon Sanderson: That stuck in my brain. I’m like, what if The Princess Bride. What if โ€” Princess Bride starts with guy goes off to seek his fortune, says, “Wait for me. I’m going to go find my fortune and come back and then we can get married and I’ll have money.” He went off and he got captured by pirates. What if that story happened but the Princess said, “Well, I guess I have to go find him now.” And went to find him. “No one’s going to go find him. Well, it’s down to me.” She has no experience with this, but she’s like, “I’m the only one.” So she goes off. I wrote a story that was more fairy tale-ish. It’s still in my cosmic universe, all my connected things. So it’s told by my storyteller character. Based a little bit off of some Shakespearean Fool vibes from Twelfth Night and stuff like that.

Tim Ferriss: I’m just going to sidebar because we might not get to it.

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah.

Tim Ferriss: You have someone within this company whose sole job, as I understand it, is continuity.

Brandon Sanderson: Yes.

Tim Ferriss: And you have an internal wiki to keep track of everything in this universe so that it interconnects and coheres.

Brandon Sanderson: As good as I am with narrative, I need all of this stuff still, so we have someone.

From his voice, this is the first time I’d done this. All my other books are in my voice. And I said, “What if a character told a story to someone else about this, this young woman?” And it became the story Tress of the Emerald Sea that I wrote without any plans to publish it, without any contracts, without any expectations. I didn’t tell the fans it was coming. I wrote it and just gave the chapters to my wife to read as I was writing it. And it was liberating. With no deadlines, no contracts. Just I wrote it because I had a little extra time.

And I thought that was amazing. That’s something I’ve been missing. And COVID gave me this chance across those two or three years that we canceled everything, that I used that extra time. I fulfilled all of my contractual obligations writing books, but I also ended up writing four novels that were just squeezed between. And I say, these are each 100,000 words. So they’re one Stormlight Archive book. So it’s about 18 months of writing time that I squeezed in there between different things.

I wrote these four books and I realized โ€” well, at about book three, I realized I had something. Something that I could spring on people. And COVID had been so miserable for so many people, it was delightful for me. I’m writing books, I’m watching movies with my kids. No one’s asking me to go on tour anymore. So in the midst of all this, I started to have a plan and I started to have an idea. And I got that fourth one written, and I wrote the fourth one deliberately for the Kickstarter. I’ve realized I wanted one that felt more like my classic novels so that fans who like Mistborn and Stormlight would get something, because number one and number three of that were told from my storyteller voice. And then number two was something completely different, a science fiction novel unrelated to my other stuff. And so I wrote one kind of for the fans. And then I sprung them on my company and said, “There’s four books out of nowhere. Tell me what you think.” And I watched their reaction to finding four unexpected books and the excitement that just moved through the company. And I said, “All right, I’ve got something.” I did it again with a test audience, some of my sworn-to-secrecy early readers.

Tim Ferriss: Do you use the same early readers typically?

Brandon Sanderson: I have a pool of about a hundred of them. And we don’t use them all for every book. We just kind of randomly decide. And I said, “Brandon has an extra book.” And we actually split the hundred into groups of 25 and sent them all four different books. And they all talk on a โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: Did you say two groups of 45?

Brandon Sanderson: No.

Tim Ferriss: Sorry.

Brandon Sanderson: Sorry. Four groups of 25.

Tim Ferriss: Four groups of 25.

Brandon Sanderson: Sorry, I probably misspoke on that.

Tim Ferriss: No, no, no. I think I misheard it. Okay. Four groups of 25.

Brandon Sanderson: And they all talk on Discords and things, and we sent them each a different book. And then I watched the Discord as they all realized I had written four books in secret. And I spun this into the video that you watched. I went to my team and I said, “I want to do something.” And they were a little resistant because sometimes some of these big ideas that I have โ€” I’m the big idea person, and they can be really daunting such as the, we’re going to do our own leather bounds, we’re going to start doing Kickstarters. My job is to โ€” we always talk Emily and I, my job is to look and pull people toward that star future. And her job is to say, “Remember to be practical. Remember to be practical. Can we actually accomplish this? What will it take to actually accomplish this?”

And I went to them and I said, “I want to do a video where I pretend that I’m coming out with some big scandal and I’m retiring from writing because I’ve secretly done something just horrible.” Because that had happened, that happens periodically. And it’s probably maybe not be something really fun to make fun of, but you have a lot of writers like, “I have to admit that I plagiarized or I have to admit that…” Anyway, all those apology videos that people โ€” and I said, “I’m going to make a fake apology video. And the reason being is everyone’s going to get gotten by it and they’re going to share it with their friends who’ll get gotten by it.” They’ll just say, “Hey, watch this.” And then you’ll be, “Oh, no, Sanderson, what’s up with him?”

And we’ll tap into that sort of horror mentality that watch a train wreck their car wreck. People want it slowed down if they think Brandon’s going to announce something terrible. And then I hit them. Instead of it being another terrible COVID thing, it was, there’s four surprise books. You get this delightful thing in your life instead. And I knew this would go viral. I just knew it would. They were scared of it because they were like, “This sounds like you have cancer or something, and that’s not something to make fun of.” And I’m like, “Yes, it is not. I agree.” But at the same time I knew it would work and it was โ€” I am a storyteller. And that’s a video with a story. I live for the reveal.

If people read my books, you’ll tell I live for that ending where I’ve been distracting with something and then I pull out that surprise. I love the great twist. I love the really good complication that you’re not expecting. I love when a story comes together right at the end. And that video did it, and it announced a Kickstarter for four secret books. We did not expect to go to $41 million. We were hoping to get to around seven to 10 like we’d done before, but that escaped velocity of attention. I suddenly, it’s the first time in my life where suddenly people are paying attention who are not in my circle of influence, who don’t read epic fantasy. Suddenly news stories are everywhere. Everyone’s talking about it. I get interviewed by legit news media and the closest I had ever gotten to that was The Wheel of Time, way back when. And even then, no one really interviewed me.

Tim Ferriss: Which we’ll come back to.

Brandon Sanderson: I did appear on Colbert Report.

Tim Ferriss: That’s a big one.

Brandon Sanderson: Well, my face appeared. Does that count?

Tim Ferriss: I think that counts.

Brandon Sanderson: So Stephen Colbert had a piece on zeppelins, because he was in character, this is Colbert Report, about how much he hates zeppelins or whatever. And he holds up, because USA Today had done a thing on zeppelins, and he holds up a USA Today page. And there’s my little picture, because “Doofus takes over Wheel of Time” is the bottom story on the page below the fold. And there’s this giant zeppelin story and he holds it up and he points at zeppelins. And then there’s me. My face was on The Colbert Report. It’s pixelated, you can barely tell.

Tim Ferriss: But you appeared.

Brandon Sanderson: But I appeared.

Tim Ferriss: As seen on.

Brandon Sanderson: As seen on Stephen Colbert, Brandon Sanderson, my claim to fame. My fans all tweeted me, this is way back in 2009. It was 2007, it was right when The Wheel of Time happened.

Tim Ferriss: So when you look at this record-breaking success, this Kickstarter, were there aspects of it or packages that just outperformed all expectations?

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah, it was the main tier, the buy everything tier. So we did it, again, I like to have people be able to self select it. And so there was a relatively inexpensive ebook and audiobook bundle that you got together, and I think it was $15 each for those.

Tim Ferriss: So, okay, so each book in the audio ebook combo was $15.

Brandon Sanderson: $15, yep. Which is about the price of an audible credit, plus you get the ebook. We thought that was โ€” so for 60 bucks, you got all four books on that. And then the high end we did, you get all four books in our nice editions. They’re not leatherbound, but they’re like a $55 price point. We sold them at 40 on this plus a box every month of Brandon Sanderson swag, of just magical swag.

Tim Ferriss: For how long?

Brandon Sanderson: For a year.

Tim Ferriss: For a year.

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah, I like the idea of subscription boxes, but I have a problem with them in that there was the big subscription box craze in the late teens, and I feel like their incentive was misplaced. They wanted to keep you going as long as they could. Because of that, they will stretch out the cool objects, they’ll run out of steam. And Adam, actually, in our company, had pitched, “Why don’t we do a subscription box?” And I’d always been hesitant because I feel like you eventually end up with too much crap you don’t want. But I went to the team and I said, “What if we did eight boxes, four books in eight boxes? So across a year you get a book every quarter, and then you get two boxes of swag, and we just make that swag awesome. We put all of our best ideas into it. We make eight really killer boxes, and then we’re done. We don’t ask people to subscribe for longer. You got your cool boxes of interesting stuff.” And that just went great.

Tim Ferriss: What was the price point for that?

Brandon Sanderson: So those were 40 bucks each. I think, also. So the idea is that the book, it’s $40 a month, four of those months you get a book, and then eight of those months you get a $40 box.

Tim Ferriss: Got it.

Brandon Sanderson: That has other cool stuff in it. And $40 was a high enough price point. We could make some really quality cool things.

Tim Ferriss: So it’s like just under 500 bucks for that.

Brandon Sanderson: Yep. And that one, that tier was, I believe, our biggest tier. If it wasn’t that one, it was the tier of just all the books in those editions. Those two were the ones that just went gangbusters. Almost nobody bought the lower tiers.

Tim Ferriss: Did that surprise you?

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah, that surprised me. But again, everyone’s happy. They all get to self-select what they want.

Tim Ferriss: Now, how do you explain that based on what you said earlier, which is that you only hit 5-10 percent of your audience and you had 30-40 percent newbies going for the gold? That just strikes me as so unexpected.

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah, I think part of it is, I would guess the majority of that 30-40 percent were people who had heard of me and had not tried me yet. I wasn’t grabbing people that didn’t ever read, but it was people who’d friends that say, “Hey, Brandon Sanderson.” And these four books were all starter books. They were all meant, even the fourth one, which is kind of tied into things, to be books, you could just pick up and read without knowing any of my other things. And to this day, Tress of the Emerald Sea, you want to hear weird stuff, another tangent?

Tim Ferriss: Love weird stuff.

Brandon Sanderson: Tress of the Emerald Sea. You would think, I have plumbed the depths of my audience, right, doing this Kickstarter, $45 million. Shipped out 150,000 copies of that book with the Kickstarter and all is said and done. That is my best-selling book through an edition bought from the publisher after Mistborn and Stormlight Archive. After the first books of those, not even the sequels. Like after Mistborn One and Stormlight one, Tress of the Emerald Sea, that book sells as much. It’s really comparable. There are the weeks where it beats them. So this book that you would think we’d sold to everybody, the publisher releases an edition expecting, “Well, there’s not much, but we’ll have it on the shelves,” becomes their third best-selling Sanderson book of all time.

Tim Ferriss: How do you explain that?

Brandon Sanderson: It’s because โ€” it’s that escape velocity of attention. People hear about you, they want to try you out, but they don’t know where to start or there’s so many things and something cuts through. People can say, “Tress is a great place to start.” “Book Talk really likes Tress.” It talks about and says, “Great place to start on Sanderson, a little bit more romantic, a little bit more whimsical.” It fits with what a lot of people like on book talk. So they buy it even though. So it’s really interesting. The starter books do sell the best.

And so anyway, we’re going back to we released this thing and those are the ones people want. They’ve heard of me, they say, “Well, I’ll try this thing.” And they become part of something and so they all buy in. And then there’s that thing, we call it “The Year of Sanderson,” and we started shipping these boxes out and people got their boxes and their books, and it was wonderful. It was the best year of my life, right?

Tim Ferriss: That’s incredible. It’s so incredible. So I have a question about the four times 25 people, the test readers.

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah.

Tim Ferriss: And this actually ties into some of the questions I wanted to ask about Warbreaker, but let’s focus on the test readers, the four groups of 25. When you have a new book of any type, do you use 25 to a hundred test readers?

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah.

Tim Ferriss: Okay. How do you absorb or evaluate that feedback? I could foresee that being a lot of feedback.

Brandon Sanderson: I pay my team, my editorial team, to condense it into the most relevant information. So this is a big difference between me and a lot of writers, is I look at books a little bit like Hollywood looks at movies with test audiences. I want to know what my audience is going to say about a book before I release it. Sometimes it’ll change what I write, often it will, sometimes it won’t. I just want to know. I want to understand how it’s going to perform, what people are going to think of it. And a lot of writers do this with a couple of early readers. I find that doesn’t give me an actual test audience. It doesn’t give me the pulse of an audience. I need like 20 to 30, if not 40 to 50 people reading it. Even that’s just a tiny percentage of the audience. But it’s been really key to me. It started when I was a nobody before I sold, before I had an agent, before I had an editor. I actually sold to an editor before I got an agent, so I’m reverse.

But back before I had any of that, and I was head of that magazine, I started using those readers and passing out my books, and I would print off physical copies, because this is the late ’90s, and I would have a pack of gel pens of different colors and I’d say, “Pick a color. Write your name in that color so I know who’s writing the comment. Read through the book and write your feedback all in that color. Go ahead and respond to what other people have written.” And they would pass around my friends and they would all take a different color, and you’d have these conversations in the margins about what people thought of certain scenes. And I saw that and I’m like, “This is really handy.”

Tim Ferriss: Did you ask for particular types of feedback to focus it? What โ€” 

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah. So what I want is just, I don’t want people to fix the book. I want people to give their descriptive responses to the book. If you were just reading this as a professionally published thing, where are the places you’re bored? Where are the places you’re confused? Where are the places that you’re standing up and cheering? Where are the places that, you know? Where are you engaged? Where are you not engaged?

Tim Ferriss: Mm-hmm.

Brandon Sanderson: Just what are you enjoying? Don’t tell me what’s wrong. Don’t tell me what to fix. Tell me where you’re bored and tell me where you’re confused.

Tim Ferriss: Mm-hmm.

Brandon Sanderson: Tell me where you’re excited and tell me where you’re turning the pages so fast you have to come back and write your feedback because you don’t want to stop to write your feedback.

Tim Ferriss: Mm-hmm.

Brandon Sanderson: And that became really valuable to me. And so when we moved beyond that and I was actually published, I started making spreadsheets where I’m like, “You get the book, go on the spreadsheet, and go to the chapters tab on the spreadsheet, on like a Google Sheet, and go look and respond to what people are saying.” You just make a comment, say, “I feel this about this chapter,” and then respond to what other people are saying. And then each chapter fills up with giant conversations about that chapter, almost like you have a book club out there reading the book and having a discussion.

Tim Ferriss: And you want people to respond to things because it helps you spot patterns?

Brandon Sanderson: Yes.

Tim Ferriss: Someone’s like, “Yeah, I started dragging here. I didn’t really understand why this character did this.” And then you have somebody like, “Yeah, me too. Yeah, me too.”

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah, exactly. Or they’ll say, “No, no, no, it was this.” And the first one was like, “Oh, that made sense. I went back and read it.” You’ll see emerging where the problems are and where they aren’t and nowadays what we let people do is they just add a check mark next to it if they agree with it and if they disagree, have them write out why.

Tim Ferriss: And that’s in a spreadsheet or are you using something โ€” 

Brandon Sanderson: It’s in a spreadsheet. We use Google Sheets. No, no. We started using an actual program. Peter, who’s head of editorial was like, “We need an actual program that’s secure and that can track โ€” like people will write a line number where they have their comment now and stuff. So we actually use a program, but sometimes we still use Google Sheets for kind of what we call โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: Is that program an off-the-shelf program that โ€” 

Brandon Sanderson: One of my beta readers, which is what we call these people, worked for the company and pitched it to us.

Tim Ferriss: Okay, got it.

Brandon Sanderson: And the name of it’s escaping me right now.

Tim Ferriss: It’s okay.

Brandon Sanderson: I can find out what it is.

Tim Ferriss: Well, we can figure it out.

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah, we’ll figure it out.

Tim Ferriss: Maybe put it in the show notes if we can find it.

Brandon Sanderson: Mm-hmm.

Tim Ferriss: So part of the reason I’m asking is that I started working on this book six, seven years ago.

Brandon Sanderson: Is this your fantasy?

Tim Ferriss: No.

Brandon Sanderson: Okay.

Tim Ferriss: No, this is a different book. This is an entire book on saying no and just basically finding clarity in a world of noise.

Brandon Sanderson: That’s a really good book to write.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. And I started working on it. It’s the first book I ever shelved. I was like, “You know what? I’m not quite ready to write this.” And I canceled the contract, returned the biggest advance that I ever received, and now I’m working on it, but I’ve found myself just paying attention energetically to what’s energizing me or draining me. The idea of serial release. Very exciting.

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah, that’s really big nowadays.

Tim Ferriss: Because I’ve never done it.

Brandon Sanderson: Mm-hmm.

Tim Ferriss: I’ve never done it. And that raises a whole lot of questions, which is one of the reasons I wanted to talk about Warbreaker and releasing early drafts for free on the website with Creative Commons and all that.

Brandon Sanderson: Let’s go to that and just saying, let me finish what I do with the beta reading.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, yeah.

Brandon Sanderson: I give all that to my team.

Tim Ferriss: Mm-hmm.

Brandon Sanderson: I go read the end of part summaries and the end of book summaries. They take the rest, they distill it, and then they actually put it into a copy of the book, the manuscript, just interstitials. “They said this at this point. They said this at this point.”

Tim Ferriss: Ah.

Brandon Sanderson: So I never even have to go to the document except to read like, “End of part one. What are people’s general responses?”

Tim Ferriss: And these are comments in a Word doc or something like that?

Brandon Sanderson: Yes. Comments in a Word doc. Just in-track changes so that I see, “Here’s a big discussion that happened here.” They only take like 10 to 20 percent of it and put it in, so.

Tim Ferriss: Mm-hmm. What are the criteria for selection? If they’re only taking 10 to 20 percent, is that just โ€” 

Brandon Sanderson: It’s Peter and Karen and they know me really well.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah.

Brandon Sanderson: These are people that I’ve worked with since college.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. Okay.

Brandon Sanderson: And so it’s over time and I will star and say, “This is a good comment. This is one that I, you know.” And they handle editorial. They’ll see what I revise and what I don’t, and they’ll know in the future, “Watch for this.” And do remember, I’m going and looking at the end of part and reading all of people’s general comments. So this is just for a given chapter if there’s a speed bump or something like that. But they figured it out.

Tim Ferriss: Mm-hmm. And then looking at Warbreaker, why did you release it in the way that you released it? Maybe you could just describe how you went about doing it.

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah, so Warbreaker happened after I wrote The Mistborn Trilogy and I was chatting with Cory Doctorow, kind of a famous tech blogger and Creative Commons advocate. My every interaction with Cory has been really positive, like super class act. I was once at the Hugo Awards, and this is like the Academy Awards in sci-fi fantasy, and I was nominated and you get a little pin if you’re nominated to wear around in your lapel. And I didn’t know that. It was in my basket. I didn’t know it was there. He saw I didn’t have mine. I’m like, “Oh, I don’t have my pin,” and he took off, because he had several. You wear any nominations you’ve had during that night, and so he took off one of his and he just pinned it on me. That’s the kind of class act Cory is.

Tim Ferriss: Classy.

Brandon Sanderson: And so I was talking to him and he really believes and believed that attention is people’s most valuable commodity. Not their money, their attention. If you can get their attention, you will eventually be able to, in some ways, get money from that audience to support yourself, but he says start with attention. And this was really smart. He released all of his books in the Creative Commons, and he’s a big advocate for that. I realized at the time โ€” I had Mistborn coming out, and this was right when Wheel of Time was being announced. It was way back when. It was 2007.

I wrote a lot of the book, but there were parts I hadn’t written. So the idea was I started releasing the chapters just on forums to let people give feedback to me, trying a serialized version of the book with the main goal being see how an audience online gives feedback different from my beta readers, but also to have a chance to kind of bring my audience together into one place. And then when it was done, I released the book under the Creative Commons, partially as an experiment. Giving away the book for free, how does this impact the sales of the commercial edition? I wanted data on that.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah.

Brandon Sanderson: And the data says it doesn’t really impact it.

Tim Ferriss: Mm-hmm.

Brandon Sanderson: It sells just as well as Elantris does, even a little bit better, and Elantris wasn’t released in the Creative Commons. It doesn’t sell as well as Stormlight or Mistborn, but those are my breakouts, my standout successes, and I don’t think that has anything to do with it.

Tim Ferriss: Have you released any books after that with Creative Commons?

Brandon Sanderson: No. I keep wanting to do another one, and I haven’t found the right one to do, but I am planning to do that at some point.

Tim Ferriss: How did you find the feedback online in the forums differed from beta testers?

Brandon Sanderson: It was about the same.

Tim Ferriss: It was?

Brandon Sanderson: It really was. But remember, we’ve got an insular audience of super fans at that point. That’s the only people paying attention to me in 2007.

Tim Ferriss: Mm-hmm.

Brandon Sanderson: Now, it would probably be different, but I can get a little bit of that by watching โ€” we do re-release one chapter a week or two chapters a week of new books leading up to launch to about a third of the book, and I can go read the threads on Reddit about that. And they actually mirror the beta readers really closely.

Tim Ferriss: Amazing.

Brandon Sanderson: It’s really interesting. There are a few things. This newest book surprised me. Only one thing surprised me, and that is in the newest book, people are responding to modernized language more than I expected them to.

Tim Ferriss: What do you mean by that?

Brandon Sanderson: Epic fantasy. You walk this line in epic fantasy. Do you use “Okay,” or do you use “All right?”

Tim Ferriss: I see what you’re saying.

Brandon Sanderson: Right?

Tim Ferriss: Mm-hmm.

Brandon Sanderson: And I’ve been moving The Stormlight Archive toward modern language across the course of the novels as we’re preparing to kind of go a little bit more what we call magepunk. A little more modern for the next books.

Tim Ferriss: Magepunk.

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah.

Tim Ferriss: I’ve never heard that. It’s great.

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah. It’s not my term. It’s just what people kind of call when fantasy magic becomes technology. So if you watch any sort of film or thing where you have ships powered by a magical technology, we’ll call that magepunk.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, it’s like Hextech in Arcane.

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah, Hextech. Arcane is magepunk. That’s the straight-up subgenre of that. And so I was taken by surprise on that. People are kind of responding against that, and I think this could just be like people want more sincerity in their media nowadays. I think they’re tired of media being cynical.

Tim Ferriss: Sure.

Brandon Sanderson: And this is a sign, maybe. I don’t think it went cynical, but this is like a danger sign of that. So they’re like, they would like me to pull back. They want me to call it courting instead of dating and just kind of stay a little bit more with that fantasy feel. That one took me by surprise. My beta readers didn’t spot that. Everything else in those threads were things my beta readers spotted that either that I left because I felt this was integral to the narrative I’m telling. If it’s negative, it’s all right for it to be negative. This is the piece of art. Some people don’t like Impressionists, but you can’t make Impressionism better by not being Impressionists.

Each piece of art is going to have things like that.

Tim Ferriss: Quick question. When you’re releasing, say, chapter by chapter up to a third of a new book, what is your cadence of releasing those chapters? Is it once per week?

Brandon Sanderson: Once per week is what we’ve been doing. I could see value in twice a week. But once a week, everyone gets together, the threads on Reddit are really cool.

Tim Ferriss: Where do you release those chapters?

Brandon Sanderson: We release them on Tor’s website, Tor’s publicity website. Right now it’s called Reactor, used to be Tor.com, and that’s a good place for them.

Tim Ferriss: Why not release them on your own site or in some other way?

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah, good question. So there’s arguments for that. The thing about it is we’ve found, over time, personal websites are important, but they’re much less important than social media or aggregate websites in today’s mind economy.

Tim Ferriss: What do you mean by aggregate websites?

Brandon Sanderson: So Tor’s website is a website that just has posts every day, things like shared blogs or places you go to that find a whole bunch of articles.

Tim Ferriss: Right.

Brandon Sanderson: Right. What we’ve found is, for instance, people will come to me to buy their print books. They will not come to me to buy their ebooks. We had an ebook store, maybe we will put it back up. We might even have a view that we’re selling now. We sell in the tens of copies of my ebooks. People like their platform. They want to have a Kindle and buy the books on their Kindle, which makes perfect sense. They do not want to go somewhere else, buy an ebook, and load it to the Kindle, even if it’s cheaper somewhere else. Those who control the platform control the world.

He who controls the spice controls โ€” well here, it’s you control the platform. That’s why Amazon did what it did. That’s why Amazon worked so hard to make Kindle a thing, even going so far as to pay out millions and millions of dollars in order to try to corner that market and gain that mind share of going to Kindle. I don’t mind Tor trying to turn their website into that. It helps other authors, fans get used to going there.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, that’s great. No, it’s like the tech world. It’s like the Hacker News.

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah. Yeah. Stuff like that. And we link to it on my website. It’s not like it’s not there, so I don’t have a big problem. We might’ve even double-posted them on my website. I can’t remember. But normally we just do them on Tor. But you said something I want to ask you about.

Tim Ferriss: Sure.

Brandon Sanderson: Tell me if this is treading โ€” if we want to tread lightly, or if this is โ€” but you’d still take advances?

Tim Ferriss: Well, so I took advances on my past books. I considered profit-share agreements. And actually, when I was beginning to consider rebooting, dusting off and rebooting that book that I’d had on the back shelf, I spoke with a number of larger publishers who, as humans, I like a lot and they on the phone were very enthusiastic about doing some type of very generous profit-share agreement. And then they sent me the contracts and there was so much Hollywood accounting that I found it to be insulting. I’m like, all right.

So there’s this X percentage double-digit distribution fee and then there’s a promotional fee that is an in perpetuity, even though they’re not going to do very much promotion, and maybe that’s for two to four weeks if they do any, but then they’re going to move on to their new roster. And I just found the deal structure is so generally insulting that if I ran the math, I realized this is not that much better than the traditional deals that I’ve been selling. But I’m foregoing the advance, not because I don’t have confidence in the books, but I like having the publishers experience some sunk cost so that they’re incentivized with loss aversion.

Brandon Sanderson: There is that argument. That is the big argument.

Tim Ferriss: But at this point with the new book, I’m not planning on doing any of that and the field is wide open to the experimentation that I could do and I haven’t figured it out. I’ve thought about keeping audio and ebook, although I’ll come back to that. I’d love your perspective on this and then maybe doing a print-only deal because I do not have, as you do, the facilities. I’m almost perfectly happy to farm that out with an appropriately specced agreement. The deal terms need to make sense. But then there are even arguments for me to, say, license with a reversion of rights. friend of mine, Hugh Howey โ€” 

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah. I know Hugh.

Tim Ferriss: โ€” is so smart with this. But as you noted before, I used to have an audiobook club with Audible. This was back in the day with ACX when you could get up to 75 percent royalties.

Brandon Sanderson: Before they killed that.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. And I understand, as a business, as you amass more and more critical mass in terms of control of a market, you can then change your compensation scheme with royalties. But as soon as it got to the point where it’s like, okay, I’m going to max out at whatever it is, 25, 35, I was like, this is no longer worth the time that I would put into it. So I stopped doing it. So I’ve thought about keeping audio and ebook. I’m still considering it, but the fact of the matter is it seems like larger publishers have negotiated superior deal terms. So even โ€” no?

Okay. That’s the pitch that I keep getting, which is even if you get a lower percentage of the total, in absolute dollars, you’re still going to make more because blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. So this is all very current for me, but I don’t care about advance at this point in my life.

Brandon Sanderson: So what they’re saying on audiobooks has some truth. Not true on ebooks. So I’ll just say you there, though there is one thing that the New York publishers get away with in ebooks that you can’t get on your own. Even I have not been able to fight them down on this. They will let the New York publishers charge more than $10.

Tim Ferriss: Ahh, yeah.

Brandon Sanderson: And so there is that.

Tim Ferriss: This is on ebooks.

Brandon Sanderson: On ebooks.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah.

Brandon Sanderson: On audio, so this can get technical and nerdy.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, let’s do it. I like technical and nerdy.

Brandon Sanderson: So on ebooks, basically, the publisher is getting 70 percent of price. It’s $10, they’re getting seven bucks sent. As an indie author who’s doing it yourself, you will get seven bucks, but they will take out a tiny distribution fee at Amazon, which is super annoying. If you have a lot of artwork, it can get higher. Usually it’s only like 10, 15ยข. But they will take that out where they don’t for the New York publishers. So that’s one of the big differences. The other thing is they’ll let the New York publisher charge 14.99 for their book.

You, they will only let charge 10. If you go over 10, they’ll only give you a 20 percent instead of a 70 percent royalty. They really need to bend that or break that.

Tim Ferriss: They want to keep you between what is 2.99 and 9.99?

Brandon Sanderson: Yep. So if your book is priced at 9.99, as an ebook, there is almost no incentive to go to New York. Audiobooks, New York has negotiated all of their payments from Audible based on cover price of the book. So they can change the cover price of the book and get different things going on. But almost everything on Audible sells by credit and getting out of the publishers how much they get off of a credit is like pulling teeth. Getting out of Audible how much you earn off of a credit is like pulling teeth.

Because in their sense, and this is the big problem with audiobooks, I don’t like that you are the customer of Audible, not the customer of the authors. When you sign up for Audible, and Audible is a great company, don’t get me wrong. They made huge advances in audiobook distribution, readability. They’ve improved that market quite a bit. They are a net positive for everyone, but they control so much of the market that they’re able to do some of these practices that we talked about. But beyond that, people sign up for a subscription fee.

This is partially Apple’s fault, Apple and Google. Because if you buy an audiobook through Audible’s app, Google and Apple want to take 30 percent of that. And the publishers don’t want to do that. 30 percent is egregious. It’s insane. There’s all sorts of lawsuits going on them taking that much. But because of that, they do the subscription service. So you sign up for the subscription on their website, Google or Apple get none. You get a credit every month. You can spend a credit. None of that credit goes by credit, but then that turns all the audience into subscribers to Audible.

So if Audible stops carrying a book, people just stop buying it. Once again, he who controls the spice, he who controls the platform, controls everything, which means that they get to say, well, it’s a credit. What is a credit? Well, a credit is divided this way and we give out this many free books as part of the promotions with credits. And so that plays into it. And some of the credits go for books like this. And so they have this huge spreadsheet that to their cred โ€” credit? I’m saying credit too much.

They have started being more open with how that spreadsheet works for us and we can plug in the numbers and see. They only started doing that in the last year as we push them. But it turns out that there’s all this shenanigans. They get $15 and after all our work and things, we get on average like four bucks out of that 15. The publishers do have something where they’re getting a little bit more. But at the end of the day, I earn more this way than I do with the publishers, even though the publishers can make up for it a little bit by having certain weird deals on what they get paid.

At the end of the day, I really wish we could push audiobooks into that transparent you get 70 percent of that 15 bucks is what should go to the author or certain percentage of that to the author, certain percent of the reader. Narrators don’t get royalties, which is kind of a thing. And I just really wish we could pierce that and make it happen, but we haven’t been able to.

Tim Ferriss: So it sounds like, if I’m hearing you correctly, your advice would be to hold onto it, do it yourself.

Brandon Sanderson: So it depends. But ebook, yes. I have found that my system that I have, which is a profit share, and we took a sledgehammer to that contract that you got offered and eventually got it to a place where it was good. It’s really close to a straight-up profit share. There’s a few little Hollywood accounting things they do, but they have to account them very clearly and we end up doing with our profit share, 10 to 20 percent better than we used to do. As much as 50 percent better in some cases.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, that’s not trivial.

Brandon Sanderson: It’s not trivial. So I could actually get those action numbers. I should get them and see, but it’s significant what we’re making more with the profit share. But my best thing has been trust. They took a print-only deal. I have ebook and audiobook and I have a profit share on the print with them. And then the ebook and audiobook, the ebook, straight up, is better. The audiobook we make more, but we would make almost the same with the publisher.

Tim Ferriss: And are you just interfacing directly with Amazon platforms for the โ€” 

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah, Amazon and everyone else, doing my best. Amazon would pay us better if we put them only on Amazon, but I refuse. And that’s one of the reasons the publisher’s deal, it’s a little better. Amazon gives them the deal that they give. If you’re exclusive to Amazon as an indie, they force you to be exclusive to get the good deal. They give that deal to the publishers, but they can be on everything. So yeah. It’s all so messy, right?

Tim Ferriss: It’s messy.

Brandon Sanderson: This is all in the weeds, but here’s the takeaway. The power is in two people’s hands right now. It’s in the creators and the platform controllers. It’s not in New York’s hand anymore. And that’s in some ways bad because those are good people. I think most creatives in the audio industry hate their business. Most authors are pretty โ€” like you said, the people are good. The contracts, sometimes you have to take a sledgehammer to, but I generally don’t mind New York. They generally, I think, try to treat authors well. They just need, but in this new world, we control the content. And if you can figure out how to control your platform also, then that’s king. But you as a content creator, I think, should be looking at the platforms and learning how to manipulate all the different platforms so that you can have the best world you can. So that’s where we live right now.

Tim Ferriss: So let’s go back to the list of your inflection points for a second, because I’ve made promises I want to keep with my listeners, namely. So we have Mistborn, Wheel of Time, leatherbound, and then the COVID Kickstarter.

Brandon Sanderson: Yes.

Tim Ferriss: We have not covered The Wheel of Time. So for people who don’t even recognize the name, what is this? And then how did you end up becoming involved?

Brandon Sanderson: So I talked about the three kind of genres of fantasy. For the ’90s and early 2000s, the flag bearer of the best-selling epic fantasy was The Wheel of Time. It was eventually dethroned by Game of Thrones when the television show Game of Thrones came out. Until the television show, Wheel of Time was the top.

Beyond that, Robert Jordan got sick in the early 2000s with a rare blood disease. And because of this, his book releases slowed down quite a bit, and that’s when Game of Thrones was taking off. But for all of my childhood, Wheel of Time was the kind of flag bearer for epic fantasy. It was the heir to Tolkien, so to speak, and selling millions of copies, doing really, really well. And he got sick. He was really positive. But then in 2007, he passed away, having left his series unfinished. And I was a fan of this series. I had grown up reading it. It was one of my favorites. And I did not know him or his wife.

His wife was his editor. It’s actually really fun. She was his editor before she was his wife. And so I always joke that that’s a good way to make sure your editorial direction gets taken. You marry your author. But she had discovered him in Charleston where she’d moved away from the big city. She was Tor’s editorial director. She kind of helped Tom Doherty build Tor. She’s the editor, if you guys know your sci-fi fantasy. She was the editor of The Book of Swords by Fred Saberhagen. She’s the editor of the book Ender’s Game.

Tim Ferriss: Great book.

Brandon Sanderson: Really, really top-notch editor. And then she discovered Wheel of Time. And so he passes away in 2007 and before he passes away, he asks her to find someone to finish his series. He decides he does want it finished. He puts that on her. She considers it a dying request. So 2007 happens and one morning I get up and there’s a voicemail on my phone. As we’ve talked about, I get up late and that’s even later for New York, right? By the time I get up, it’s three p.m. in New York.

Tim Ferriss: Now is there something that happened before the voice memo or no?

Brandon Sanderson: So there is, but I didn’t know it. So I get this voice memo from someone I’d never met, but I knew by reputation, says, and I know every word in inflection.

Tim Ferriss: All right, let’s do it.

Brandon Sanderson: 200 times. “Hello, Brandon Sanderson. This is Harriet McDougal Rigney. I am Robert Jordan’s widow. And I would like you to call me back. There’s something I want to talk to you about.” Just that by itself. So I get this voicemail and I’m like, “Robert Jordan’s widow, Harriet McDougal, the editor? Uh, okay.” So I call her back and I don’t get a response. She’s out getting a massage, I later find. So I call my agent. No, I call my editor. He doesn’t respond. He never responded. Moshe, he kept hours even weirder than mine when he โ€” he’s still around, but he was my editor. He’s retired since then. But Moshe, a great guy. I know this is something that you’ve talked about, bipolar.

So there are huge swaths of time where you just couldn’t get a hold of him. He self-medicated with the History Channel, and so sometimes you’d have to find out how to get a hold of Moshe. And so he didn’t answer. Not a big deal. Call my agent, he always answers. He’s very professional, doesn’t answer. So I’m freaking out and my wife sees me, and I am not a nervous person. I’m not a person that emotions strike very powerfully. That’s just my own weird neurodivergence, I don’t generally feel strong emotions, but that day I’m walking in a circle babbling and she’s like, “What’s going on? I’ve never seen Brandon like this.” And I’m like, “Robert Jordan’s wife just called me.” And she’s like, “What? What’d she want?” And I’m like, “I don’t know.” So I finally called Tor. I reached an editor at Tor, who’s one of the managing editors. And he says, “Oh, that. Yeah, it’s what you think it is. I’ll get her to call you back.”

I’m like, “What do I think it is?” Well, I knew that I’d written a little thing about Robert Jordan on my website a few days earlier, just kind of talking about how much he’d meant to me. It’s very short. It’s like three paragraphs. So I’m like, “Maybe she wants to talk about that. Why would the widow call you to talk about your piece?” But you’re not wanting to assume anything. Again, I didn’t know any of them. So she calls me and she says, “Well, I’m looking for someone to finish my late husband’s work, and I was wondering if you’d be interested.” And I literally responded, “Bah.” I can talk. I’m a talker. I could not talk.

Tim Ferriss: Turned into a sheep.

Brandon Sanderson: I turned into a sheep. I actually, I wrote her an email that night after not sleeping all night that said, “Dear Harriet, I promise I’m not an idiot.” That was the first line. I’m like, “I couldn’t speak because this is so unexpected.” And I spent that night thinking, I’m like, “Man, if I say yes to this and I screw it up,” we have seen how major media properties have had someone take over for them and then maybe not do as quite as good a job as the fan base has wanted and what that has done perhaps to reputations and things like that.

Tim Ferriss: And just so we can place this in time, where in your career were you?

Brandon Sanderson: This is 2007. I only have three books out, maybe two. I have two books. No, three. I have three books out I have Elantris and Mistborn, and then the first of my kids’ series, the ones I discovery wrote. I’m about to go on tour for my second Mistborn novel. This is before I’ve blown up. I blew up on Mistborn Two. We can talk about that moment before. That’s the first one. Mistborn Two is where the publisher knew I โ€” so they didn’t know yet. They still thought I was maybe going to be a failure as a writer. We’ll get to that. So the publisher had not brought my name up to her when she’d asked who should finish it.

Tim Ferriss: Thanks, guys.

Brandon Sanderson: Nobody mentioned me because Mistborn had been floundering for reasons we’ll talk about. Mistborn had been floundering. My name was not mentioned, but somebody that day, her name was Elise Matthesen, and I’m very thankful to her, was printing off things on the internet, nice things that people had said about Robert Jordan. And she printed off my thing and she put it in the stack. And that night, Harriet read it with the other things. And I mentioned that he had influenced my writing. And she’s like, “Well, this is really eloquent. He wrote this really well. He’s a writer.” So she called Tom Doherty.

Tim Ferriss: Are there any lines that stuck out to her in particular?

Brandon Sanderson: It was the last line. I believe I wrote something along the lines of, “You go quietly, but you leave us trembling,” just something. And so she calls Tom and says, “What about this Brandon Sanderson guy?” And he’s like, “Oh, yeah, he’s one of our authors. I’ve read one of his books. It’s pretty good. Let me send you one of his books.” Because he was super excited it was one of his authors she was asking about, because a lot of the names that came up were not his authors. The main one that kept coming up was George Martin, because he and Robert Jordan were friends. Well, George was already behind on his books in 2007 and the publishing industry would not stand for him taking someone else’s book series.

Tim Ferriss: Going on a side quest.

Brandon Sanderson: Side quest. But a lot of the names that came up were not Tom’s authors.

And so he’s like, “Oh, it’s one of my authors.” And so he sends her Mistborn. And so she’s like, “Well, before I read this book, I should find out if the young man’s interested. Maybe he doesn’t want to do this.” And so that’s when she called me and asked if I was interested. And that’s when I baahed like a sheep. And then I wrote her that email that night and said, “I’ve thought about it a lot. And I thought, if someone’s going to do this and it can’t be him, I want it to be me, because at least I know I’m a fan.”

I always use this Venn diagram, this Venn diagram of pretty good sci-fi fantasy writers and pretty big Robert Jordan fans. There are bigger Robert Jordan fans out there than me, hardcore, by far. There are better writers than me. Terry Pratchett, I always call the greatest writer of my generation. There are amazing writers. George is a fantastic writer. I would probably rank George as the greatest living sci-fi fantasy writer. But there’s Jane Yolen, who’s just incredible.

But if you put that Venn diagram together, there’s not a lot of people in the middle there that are pretty big Robert Jordan fans, and I think pretty excellent sci-fi fantasy writers. And that was me. And so I realized I want it to be me because if it doesn’t go to me, it might go to someone who’s a good writer but doesn’t know the books. And so she said, “All right, well I’m considering. There’s some names I’m considering.” It was me or George, I later found out. And when she tells this story, she says, “There was really only one, it was Brandon,” because she knew by then she couldn’t have George. So she went and she read Mistborn, and then she thought on it. She took a month, she read Mistborn and thought on it for a month. I went on tour not knowing if I was going to finish The Wheel of Time and not being able to tell anybody, and that’s when Mistborn Two just exploded. And then at the end of that tour, she called me and she said, “I want you to do it.” Actually, it was in the middle of the tour. I was still on tour when she told some of the other people, it’s because they came and met me. So I didn’t have to wait that long. It was pretty excruciating. It was probably only two weeks. And she calls me and says, “I would like you to do it.” And so I call my agent, I say, “They’re going to offer us a deal, take it.” And he says, “Well, we’ll negotiate.” I’m like, “No, no, no. This is just a yes. Whatever they offer, you just say yes.” And she was very generous. It was a good deal right off the bat, my agent’s like, “Wow, there’s not even really that much to negotiate.” He went to bat, he forced me to let him to go to bat on some foreign percentages just so agents have to flex their muscles, right?

Tim Ferriss: Yes.

Brandon Sanderson: But I just said yes. And then by December I had the manuscript, and then I got the call in September, October, and the manuscript, he’d written 50 pages of the final book so โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: Wow. Okay. So we could spend, I’m sure, another three hours talking about how you pieced everything together and worked on that. But I want to pick up on something you said because I don’t know anything about it, and I’m in the process of reading Mistborn right now and I’m ripping through it. So when you said it was floundering, I was like, huh, that’s interesting. Why was it floundering?

Brandon Sanderson: So when you are a new author, you have a shiny new author glow with your first book, and you get picked up a little bit more for reviews. You get picked up more by people who are like, “Oh, I’ve never heard of this person.” There’s a certain demographic of reader who’ll just read a first book by an author to try them out. That is why generally, publishers recommend that you take your first book and you write a sequel to it as your second book, right? Because when you jump from a sequel to a different series, you lose a percentage of audience.

And so I had the shiny new author thing. We sold about 10,000 copies in hardcover of Elantris, which is really good for a debut author. It’s even better now. Back then it was good. Now it’s fantastic. And Tom Doherty called me, he’s like, “Well, we want a sequel to Elantris.” And I said, “No, I’ve got this idea of Mistborn and I really want to do this.” 

One of my real goals, my powerful goals early on, was I wanted to build an audience for me, not for a given book series. I wanted to write in a lot of different subgenres. I wanted to do a lot of different things. I wanted the flexibility to do this thing called The Cosmere, which is probably bigger than this podcast can get into, but if you haven’t read the books, it’s like the MCU but for fantasy, and I did this two years before the MCU’s first movie came out. It’s where it’s an interconnected universe of a whole bunch of different planets with all these epic fantasy and there’s characters.

Tim Ferriss: MCU is all the Marvel โ€” 

Brandon Sanderson: Yes.

Tim Ferriss: All the Marvel universe. 

Brandon Sanderson: All the Marvel movies where you have, like โ€” and so Mistborn, Elantris, Warbreaker, I’ll have this one character who’s traveling between these planets with a mysterious objective behind the scenes. His name is Hoid, and you’ll see him in all three of them. He’s a main character in Stormlight then. And I wanted to do this big thing, and I was really ambitious about it, and I wanted to build something bigger than Elantris in a sequel. And the publisher, he’s like, “It’s a bad idea.” I’m like, “It’s a bad idea except it’s investing in my future. If I do it right, then when I finish Mistborn and go to something else, they will follow me to the something else.” Because so many authors get trapped in one series.

Tim Ferriss: We were talking about this before we started recording that, that was also sort of after The 4-Hour Workweek. It was like, well, then I can do The 3-Hour Workweek and The 2-Hour Workweek or The 4-Hour Workweek for Single Mothers, and so on. And I was like, no, no. This is a window where I can potentially buy my freedom to work in a lot of different things.

Brandon Sanderson: And we have the exact same wavelength on that. But Tom Doherty, he’s a publisher, not an editor. His job is to look at the business. And he was right. So Elantris came out, sold 10,000, Mistborn One comes out in hardcover and it sells fewer. The audience that liked Mistborn did like Elantris. A certain percentage of them  just didn’t move to Mistborn because it wasn’t a sequel. I no longer have the new author shiny glow, so that people who are looking for a book are like, “Oh, I saw that before. Let’s pick up this other book by a new author.” So, well, Mistborn is a stronger book than Elantris by manyfold. Elantris is my sixth book, Mistborn is my 14th. I learned a lot. It’s still one of the best starting points, and so it’s a much stronger book, but I get fewer sales.

They release the paperback and the paperback has a dreadful cover. I love the illustrator. He did the hard covers of all of them, but once in a while, the cover just doesn’t click. And this cover was one of the worst covers that I’ve had. It didn’t click with my audience, and that paperback came out and just crashed. Just completely tanked. And that’s the most dangerous point my career has had. I was right then thinking I’m going to be a middle grade author writing these kids books because that’s the only thing. That’s the new thing. But I went to my agent and we went to the publisher and said, “We need a new cover. This cover is not clicking.” And we fought and we fought and we fought. And I said, “Remember way back when you released The Wheel of Time, you released, like, a $4.99 version?” I think it was $3.99 then. “Do a $4.99 version of Mistborn. Let’s jump start my career, do a new cover.” And Tom Doherty, again, to his credit, I had to fight him, but he said, “Yes.” We released a new paperback a few months before Mistborn Two with a new cover and that one, boom, it sold. 

Now, there’s this thing in publishing called the Death Spiral, much bigger back in the bookstore days โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: Doesn’t sound good.

Brandon Sanderson: โ€” if you sell 10,000 of your first book and then 8,000 or 7,000 like Mistborn sold, what do they order for your third book?

Tim Ferriss: 5,000.

Brandon Sanderson: 5,000. It’s called the Death Spiral. So they ordered like 5,000 copies of this โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: Then it can become a self-fulfilling prophecy, right? Fulfilling, because you don’t have the exposure in the retail points that you then โ€” 

Brandon Sanderson: You don’t have the space on the shelf. People can go to bookstores and not find the book if you’re down to that many copies and things like that. And so Death Spiral is what they call it. And already we got the orders for Mistborn Two and they were bad. They were on the Death Spiral. But then the paperback, that paperback, we got selling. And so what happened is Mistborn Two came out, instantly sold out.

Tim Ferriss: All right, so hold on. I got to pause this for a second. What else contributed to the relaunch of that lower price paperback of Mistborn One, besides the cover, was there anything else?

Brandon Sanderson: It was the lower price point and it was the cover. Those are the only things we changed. Now, you’ll love this. Publishing is weird. They were not willing to release a new version of the book with a new cover until we said “It’s a new edition. It’s the cheaper…” Until โ€” when they had in their head it was a new edition โ€”

Tim Ferriss: It’s got a different ISBN, guys. It’s a whole new game.

Brandon Sanderson: Whole new game. They were willing to put a new cover on it. So actually it was the $4.99 thing that worked. We were at our wits’ end until I thought of that and pitched it. And they’re like, “Oh, yeah, a $4.99 edition. We do those.” And then suddenly they’re willing to repackage it and put a new cover on. It has a big red banner, $4.99, it has the nice cover blurb from Robin Hobb. But the hardcover had that too. But the cover was a little more targeted at what was popular then. Photorealism was starting to be a thing for fantasy, partially because of Jim Butcher’s books. We use the same illustrator cover artists as Jim Butcher’s books, and it has that sort of urban fantasy feel. Mistborn was really well-primed to take off, partially because of Hunger Games. Teenage girl protagonist and a kind of dark future world. In fact, in Taiwan it released before Hunger Games and it became The Hunger Games, meaning the market wanted a dark, dystopian teen YA.

Tim Ferriss: That’s fascinating.

Brandon Sanderson: And we outsold Hunger games there. The Hunger Games became the Mistborn, and Mistborn became The Hunger Games in Taiwan because we beat it to market. We didn’t here and we didn’t market it as YA. It’s an adult. It’s got two viewpoints, one a teenager, one adult, but it was really good for the market. And so the fact that it was really good for the market, it felt dystopian, but it wasn’t using all the dystopian tropes that eventually killed the dystopian sort of thing. It was no one had read a fantasy heist since about the same time as The Lies of Locke Lamora came out, which is another one โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: Scott Lynch?

Brandon Sanderson: Yes, Scott Lynch. Fantastic.

Tim Ferriss: That is a really fun series.

Brandon Sanderson: A fantastic book. And he and I had this on separate continents, the same idea, and got him out around the same time. And I highly recommend that one too. And his is more heisty even than mine. Mine takes more of the epic fantasy direction, like Kelsier’s trying to overthrow the empire by robbing. But all of those things meant that when Mistborn actually got covered right, it really started selling. And then it would’ve been better if there would’ve been books for people to buy, but instantly selling out week one made the publisher go, “Ohโ€ฆ”

Tim Ferriss: “Wait a minute.”

Brandon Sanderson: And then they went to reprint and then there was this clamor online people emailing bookstores, emailing the publisher, “Where is our Mistborn Two? We have to have Mistborn Two.” And that fueled Mistborn Two. Eventually with all the reprints going to 12,000 to 15,000 in hardcover. And that primed Mistborn Three to hit the bestseller list.

Tim Ferriss: Wow. What a story. So I want to touch on something you mentioned. Lies of Locke Lamora, and maybe that’s heistier per se, but one thing we haven’t talked about is magic systems. And so I feel like that is something that really shines and it’s part of the reason why I wanted to dig into Mistborn also, with the allomancy and magic systems, how do you think about magic systems? I mean, I have the three laws of magic here in front of me, but I could read them. How do you want to lead into magic systems? People are going to think to themselves, if they haven’t heard this term, what the hell is a magic system?

Brandon Sanderson: Let me talk about it in a way that for the audience, I’m going to avoid getting into too many in the weeds. I’m going to avoid getting into the weeds too much. I don’t want to give you encyclopedia entries and things like this, but I found when I was writing something that I really love in worldbuilding, and that is I love in history, the time period of the Scientific Revolution, the time period between Newton and about the early 1900s where people were learning to apply science to everything they did, where they were saying, “Hey, wait, all these things we assume, what if we use the Scientific Method on them?” And then they started to discover. Newton believed in alchemy and he tried to apply the Scientific Method and couldn’t get it to work, which is one of the reasons people started saying, “Well, maybe alchemy isn’t actually scientific.”

Tim Ferriss: And spending time, it was like a third of his time. I mean, it was a lot of time.

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah. He tried so hard to be able to transmute lead into gold or whatever. And turns out we can do it. We just need an atom smasher. But regardless, this idea of spontaneous generation, people used to think that if you left meat out and it rotted, it spawned flies, and that’s where flies came from. Scientific Method says, well, let’s try some tests and see, and lo and behold, it’s not that. It’s that eggs are being laid. All of this stuff up until, like I said, the 1900s, where I read an article once from the time period about someone who’d gone and studied the science of digging ditches. The whole theme of it was, if we can help the ditch diggers, we help everyone. Here’s how they can labor more effectively so it isn’t as hard on their joints, so that they are more efficient, but also so that they’re happier and they get tired less. Here’s a whole article of science helping everyone, and that period of superstition becoming science, I love.

It’s so interesting, and that’s why Mistborn‘s actually set โ€” a lot of epic fantasy’s set around in an analogous of the 12- to 1400s. Mistborn‘s set in about 1820s to 1840s, if it were on Earth. They don’t have gunpowder for various reasons, but they’re right pre-Industrial Revolution where science and fantasy and superstition are colliding.

What I found I really like reading is fantasy worlds that take a little bit of science fiction worldbuilding, and a little bit of science fiction aesthetic and say, “What if you apply the Scientific Method to something that in our world doesn’t exist, but in their world is a new branch of physics,” and that lets my characters explore science and magic together. What is real? What isn’t real? What works? What doesn’t work? Mistborn has a periodic table of the elements, where they’re discovering that they can use certain metals to do certain things that are magical. It doesn’t exist in our world. The difference between fantasy and science fiction to me is science fiction says this thing could happen. Let’s construct toward that. What are the possibilities that would lead to it? Arthur C. Clarke says, “I think we can do satellites with geosynchronous orbits. Here’s all the science. I’m going to write a book where they can do that, and then later on we’ll figure it out.”

Fantasy, for me, starts with the cool idea and justifies it through the text, without real science. I want to have people who use these metals to bounce around like ninjas. You can drop a coin and you can push off of it, and through Newton’s laws, if it’s pushed against the ground, you’re launched upward. If you’re pushing on it and you throw your weight against it, it shoots across the room. How much can I do with that just by playing with vector science and things? Again, I don’t want to get in the weeds, but the idea is people applying their intellect to magic and that’s a magic system.

What is the magic system? What do people have access to? Lord of the Rings has several magic systems. One is the one ring. It’s what we call a hard magic system. Lord of the Rings, if you put on the ring, you turn invisible, but Sauron can see you. Very simple. It corrupts people along the way. There are three rules to the ring and you can understand them. Making a hard magic doesn’t mean that it makes sense, right? Superheroes are generally hard magics, even though it’s, like, bonkers. Superman gets powers from sunlight. Makes no sense with external logic, but internally it’s consistent. He gets his powers from the sun, and he can do X, Y, and Z. That’s what we call a hard magic system.

Gandalf โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: So rules that are internally consistent?

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah, rules that are internally consistent that the characters can figure out and use. That’s a hard magic system. Frodo can put the ring on and vanish from Sauron’s eyes, but will pay the cost โ€” or he’ll vanish from everyone else’s eyes, but he’ll be seen by Sauron. So he can pay the cost to get some short-term gain for some long-term detriment by using the ring. Perfectly within the realm of he can access it and use it. Gandalf is what we call a soft magic system. You never really know what Gandalf can do. In the movies, they do this brilliantly by being like he holds up his staff and the sun rises, and did he shoot sunlight at the orcs or is it just like, what’s going on?

But Gandalf shows up and magical things happen. The other characters can’t control this. You don’t see it being controlled by the narrative. He just does things and those are cool magic systems. You can do all kinds of stuff with that. I found a niche in hard magic systems, that intersection where people are applying their logic. It’s so much fun. I talked about Mistborn. You can drop a coin and launch in the air. You can throw it and push it at someone. You throw it, you push it at someone, it hits them. Then, you get launched backward. Suddenly, I can have characters having to figure out puzzles in combat. We’re having a fight scene, but the fight scene is how can I get in position to hit this metal against him?

It’s so engaging to write. It’s so much fun. It makes every fight scene just a fun little puzzle box to try to figure out. So, because I like that, I decided to use it as part of my branding. It’s so hard to stand out. I know I like these things. I know I’m going to be doing it in my books. So, I became the magic system guy. I’ve thought about it a lot. So I released my three laws. It’s just kind of they’re rules that I follow, mostly because I did something wrong at some point and I’m like, “That broke my magic system. How can I fix that?” And I came up with a rule thumb for myself that I could follow, and I use those to build the magics the way I do them. It’s not the only way to do. It’s not the only good way to do it, but it was helpful to have a thing that was mine.

What are you going to get when you come to one of my books? You’re going to get โ€” at the core, I want an interesting story about interesting characters, but I can’t brand that way, because that’s what everyone does. So what’s the branding? You’re going to get science fiction worldbuilding and a fantasy story. You’re going to get people discovering how magic works that’s repeatable, and they’re going to be able to use it in order to solve problems and make their lives better, or at least manipulate them in certain ways. All of my books are going to have that sort of feel, and that’s what became my thing.

Tim Ferriss: So, if you don’t mind, I’ll read these three and have some follow ups.

Brandon Sanderson: Okay.

Tim Ferriss: All right. Sanderson’s three laws of magic. So the number one is an author’s ability to solve conflict with magic is directly proportional to how well the reader understands said magic. Number two, weaknesses, limits and costs are more interesting than powers. That’s one that I latched onto. Three, the author should expand on what is already a part of the magic system before something entirely new is added, as this may otherwise entirely change how the magic system fits into the fictional world. So the second one is the most self-explanatory to me, the power of constraints, and it can be applied to a million things, but I find that to be very accessible to me. Could you expand on number one and number three?

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah, sure can. So, number one, if you โ€” and I’ve actually added a word to this, a little phrase to this. Author’s ability to solve problems in a satisfying way with magic in a story is directly proportional to how well the reader understands said magic.

So let’s posit two storylines. In one, your character is going to use โ€” in both of them, your character is going to use the magic to save the day at the end. In the first one, the character spends the majority of the book off and on figuring out how this magic works, to the point that they realize by the ending, “Wait, everyone’s been doing this wrong. Here’s the rules. Here’s how they got misled. If I make this one little tweak, suddenly I’ll be able to fix the problem that no one else is being able to fix.” At the ending, they realize that. They solve that problem, and boom, they have taken their wits, their intelligence, their progress. We say promise, progress, payoff. The payoff is to the actual progress of the story.

This person has been studying their entire time. They’ve learned how the magic works, so at the end, they’re able to pull off something that no one else could, and you believe it because of all that work.

In the other one, they get to the end. They are unable to solve the problem, but then through the power of just caring really a lot, they figure it out and save the day.

Tim Ferriss: A mother’s love.

Brandon Sanderson: A mother’s love. See, this is why I use the satisfying way. The mother’s love protecting Harry is not actually a bad thing because that wasn’t supposed to be a plot element.

Tim Ferriss: Sure, I’m poking fun a little bit.

Brandon Sanderson: But it is poking fun. Jo deserves it. We can poke fun at her because J.K. Rowling was really good at internal logic in a given book, and then she’d throw it out the window for the next one, right? Time-Turners โ€” actually in the Time-Turner book, makes sense how they’re used. She sets up the rules. She uses them. Book four, they forget they can time travel and don’t ever use them. But, regardless, you can see what’s going on here. The idea of Sanderson’s first law is any plot element, but magic and fantasy โ€” a lot of people who don’t read fantasy, they point at it and be like, “I can’t believe any of the stakes because anything can happen.”

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. It’s like the Deus ex machina.

Brandon Sanderson: Deus ex machina. 

Tim Ferriss: Playwright can’t figure out the ending, so the god descends from the rafters and โ€” 

Brandon Sanderson: Yep.

Tim Ferriss: Voila.

Brandon Sanderson: But the thing is, any book is that way. If you want to write a book where at the end โ€” the romance novel in a perfectly realistic setting, that they just get together because you decide, you can just deus ex machina that. You can deus ex machina the thriller. Any book, the reader, the author can do that. With a goal, we have an extra tendency toward that with magic. So the charge that we do that is not unsubstantiated, right?

Tim Ferriss: Right.

Brandon Sanderson: Occasionally, authors are like, “Well, I have magic, so I’ll snap my fingers and save the day.”

But as a reader with a magic system, if you make it so that we understand so that like Star Wars. Star Wars is such a perfect example. We believe that Luke can shoot the missiles down the tube when he’s using the force. Why? Well, through the course of the story, we’ve seen Obi-Wan Kenobi use this magic. We’ve seen Luke struggle to use this magic. We see targeting computers, they fire and they miss. The targeting computers are fallible. We’re at the big moment, and then use the force loop. Obi-Wan is there. We have seen the whole time Obi-Wan preparing him, and he takes off the thing, and he shoots. We believe that he can do that because set-up and payoff, promise, progress, payoff.

And that’s what Sanderson’s first law is. If you’re going to use magic at the end of your story to solve the problem, promise, progress, payoff.

Now, if you want a soft magic, use it to cause problems, or you can use it to solve problems in an unsatisfying way. And sometimes you want that.

When Gandalf saves the fellowship from the Balrog, it’s actually kind of unsatisfying because Gandalf is dead. And you watch the movie โ€” Peter Jackson, again, brilliant movies. After Gandalf dies, everyone is down and like flopped down and crying and broken because the magic use isn’t satisfying. Gandalf didn’t get up there and save the day. He sacrificed himself, and it actually hits with a very different emotion. It’s, instead, an escalation.

Tim Ferriss: That’s an example of soft magic causing a problem.

Brandon Sanderson: Exactly. And so yes, Gandalf did save them from the Balrog, but the cost is bigger than โ€” like the whole point of that is not, “Yay, Gandalf.” It is huge complication. Gandalf kept the fellowship together. What’s going to happen when Gandalf isn’t there to prevent Boromir from taking the ring? And then, he pays that off, the fellowship shatters. Brilliant use of both a soft magic and a hard magic for what they’re really good at.

George is good at this, too. He uses a lot of soft magics. And whenever someone uses magic in Game of Thrones, you get scared because people are going to die, and things are going to go wrong, and everything’s going to suck even worse because of using the magic. And that soft magic is brilliant for that. It creates a sense of mystery and danger and sorrow.

Tim Ferriss: Right. Sort of an unpredictability that’s exciting. Whereas solving problems, the audience is just like, “Oh, come on.”

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah, exactly. And they both do different kinds of things. And so, if you understand this, you can have the emotions you want in the stories, right?

And Tolkien, very wisely, he uses the ring to solve problems and escalate in certain ways. Like Sam being able to put on the ring to go save Frodo after Frodo is taken by the orcs, you totally buy that Sam can do that because you know what the ring can do. It solves a problem. It’s actually you’re like, “Yay, Sam. Good job.”

And that’s a heroic moment. He gets Frodo back, right? Frodo’s alive. Everything’s happy because Sam manipulated the magic that he’s learned to the end. And then, he gives up the ring, and you’re like, “Good job, Sam. You have done it.” Lord of the Rings is just a great manual for how to do both of these things.

Tim Ferriss: So we’re going to come to number three, the third law, in a second.

But I just want to recommend to folks, I had an opportunity to spend some time in Oxford for the first time, and it is, just from a literary perspective, so fun to walk around Oxford and to see all of the influences and the pubs and so on where Tolkien and C.S. Lewis used to grab drinks, and I always blank on the third.

Brandon Sanderson: Yep, everybody does, [inaudible 00:03:58]

Tim Ferriss: Or, like, yeah, sorry, pal, or His Dark Materials, right? And Phil โ€” 

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah, Phil Pullman. Excellent โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: โ€” and that entire world, which I have to just air a grievance, which is when things get slotted, this is me being naive, I guess, but into young adult, my assumption always was as a so-called adult, like young adult is easier to read.

But it seems to be when the protagonist is a young adult because I remember reading The Golden Compass, and I was like, “I do not understand these 300 nautical terms.” It was a very, very intricate book.

Brandon Sanderson: I’ll tell you this, no one knows what to do with The Golden Compass because Lara’s actually, like, eight, and so, it’s not young adult. The age group that that would be would be middle grade or chapter books. It was shelved in both sections. No one knows what to do with that.

And that’s an example of breaking the rules fantastically and it working out really well. I don’t remember how old she is, but she’s not young adult age. She might be 10, but, yeah, young adult can be just as complicated as adult, and it’s mostly a marketing thing.

Like Mistborn, all my books, Mistborn shelved as adult everywhere, but eventually towards like, let’s release a young adult version, put it in young adult section. Why not? Maybe new people will find it.

Skyward, which is my actual young adult series is shelved as adult in the UK because they’re like, “Well, we just want to package it the same as yours and sell it to your audience.” And I’m like, okay. So they packaged it and put it in the adult section. So all marketing.

Tim Ferriss: Tomato, tomato.

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah.

Tim Ferriss: The third law.

Brandon Sanderson: Third law, all right. Third law, tell you the story of what went wrong.

In Mistborn โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: It’s actually a great first line for your next book.

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah, let me tell you what went wrong.

In Mistborn, I came up with three separate magic systems for three books and each book. They’re all there in the first one. There’s allomancy, this thing that Sazed does, which is mysterious. It’s kind of in the first book, Sazed’s magic is a soft magic. Even though I know all the rules, you don’t know what he can do. And when he solves problems with it, it’s like, used to create mystery and questions, and even some danger, right?

Book two, I start showing you how it works so that it becomes now understandable and things like that. And then there’s hemalurgy. So each book, I wanted to explore a different aspect of the magic.

When it came to do The Stormlight Archive, I had started to fall into a trap, and the trap is bigger is better. And this is what killed the original Stormlight Archive, so you’d think I had learned this lesson. But people started to say, “You had three magic systems in Mistborn. How many will you have in The Stormlight Archive?” And I’m like, “There’s going to be 30 magic systems. It’s going to be so epic, all right?”

Then I sat down and I was building all this and I’m like, this is the wrong way to approach the book. 30 magic systems are not better than three. Three well-done magic systems are way better than 30 non-well-done magic systems. I need to sit down and say, “What is my book actually about? What is the worldbuilding that’s really going to enhance the story? Let’s talk about that and do a really good job of it.”

This is in video games. There’s this great series called The Elder Scrolls, and one of the first games to ever procedurally generate dungeons. And they pitched one of their games as like, “There’s a thousand dungeons you can explore.” But the truth is all those thousand dungeons are built out of 30 different elements recombined in different ways, and so you were bored after the second one. Later on โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: Oops.

Brandon Sanderson: โ€” they realized if they just take hand care and they build a well-crafted dungeon, they put fewer of them in, everyone’s happier. It works way better.

But people would talk about those early Elder Scrolls games and be like, “It’s an ocean an inch deep.” You want to avoid that in your storytelling. 

So the idea is that with the third law, it challenges me to re-examine what I have and to go deeper, instead of just expanding to say, look, you’ve got something interesting. And it’s not just magic.

Like this character. Can you dig a little deeper into who this character is, instead of adding a new one to make your story wider, but more shallow? And it’s just a challenge to me to do a good, thoughtful job on my worldbuilding, instead of always pretending bigger is better.

Tim Ferriss: Got it. So the third law is to protect yourself, remind yourself of โ€” 

Brandon Sanderson: Yeah, of all of them are. The first one happened because I added something. You’ll get there. I had an editor, and my editor said, “The ending of Mistborn One isn’t quite as spectacular as we want. Can you do something, makeโ€ฆ”

Tim Ferriss: Spice it up?

Brandon Sanderson: “…spice it up?” And I said, “Cool. Yeah, I’ve got this thing I’m going to do in the second book. I’ll just let it happen in the first book.” But I hadn’t set it up.

And then the first book came out and people still really liked it, but a lot of them are pointing at that and being like, “That felt a little like a deus ex machina.” I’m like, it is. I didn’t set this up at all. It just is out of nowhere right at the end. I’m like, why does it work sometimes and not others? And that’s where this law came from.

And flaws are more interesting. It’s the same directions. It’s like, looking at all the powers that I’m adding and trying to play with them and things and realizing that Superman is interesting because of what he can’t do. Superman as a character is interesting because he has a moral code, which is a limitation he puts on himself. And the best stories happen either because of his moral code, will he break or not, because of the people that he loves, which are also kind of a limitation, or because he encounters someone who has kryptonite and his powers are taken away.

Those are the great three Superman stories. All of them don’t center on what his powers are, centers on what he can’t do. He can’t get Lois to fall in love with him. He can’t always protect everybody. He can’t violate his code, and he can’t do anything when kryptonite’s around. Then suddenly you’ve got conflict and story.

Tim Ferriss: Brandon, sir, we’ve covered a lot of ground. I could keep going for a very, very long time, but you’re doing the majority of the talking, so you’re doing all the heavy lifting here.

Is there anything we have not covered that you would like to cover, or anything that you would like to say to my audience, request of my audience, point my audience to?

Brandon Sanderson: Boy. I never know how to do โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: Haiku that you’d like to wrap things up with? Lay on the plane with a little dance? I don’t know.

Brandon Sanderson: There is a Zeroth law.

Tim Ferriss: Okay. Yes.

Brandon Sanderson: Zeroth law. So Asimov added a Zeroth law. I added one cheekily, right?

And I guess what I’d say to your audience is thank you for putting up with me nerding out for three hours. If they want to try something, I would recommend Mistborn or Tress of the Emerald Sea, depending if they want something more heisty and actiony or something more whimsical.

But Sanderson’s Zeroth law is: always err on the side of what’s awesome. And this came about because I realize sometimes I don’t follow the rules. Sometimes I come up with something that’s just too cool to not put in the story. And at the end of the day, I’m writing stories because I want to do interesting things with character, with plot. I just want things to be cool.

And so I came up with this little rule to myself, which is, all of this is good, all of this is important. But when you’re writing, if you come up with something really cool, try it out. Even if it breaks the outline, if it breaks the magic system, try it out and see if it makes the story better. Because if it does, you’ll figure out a way to make it work. You can revise so that it’s foreshadowed. You can fix that. Err on the side of what is awesome.

Tim Ferriss: Try it. Give yourself permission.

Well, I, for one, am glad you didn’t end up being a chemist, so I very much appreciate the time. This is an incredible life and world and collection of worlds that you guys have all helped build with the team behind you and putting out ungodly numbers of words per year. It’s just phenomenal.

And where can people find you? Where’s the best place to find all things?

Brandon Sanderson: It’s brandonsanderson.com. Yeah.

Tim Ferriss: Easy.

Brandon Sanderson: Easy to find. Everything’s on there. Sample chapters.

Warbreaker, the free book, is on there because now, like you said, I need to get a new one. It was written in 2006, so it’s been a while, but it’s on there for free. You can read a bunch of everything.

We got socials. YouTube’s a pretty good place for me, too. My writing lectures are there. I do a weekly update every week on YouTube where I come on and say where I am in my writing process for the current book. So I like to do lots of outreach.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, amazing. Well, I can’t wait to see what you do next, and I’ll be certainly watching. And for people who are interested in anything we talked about, I will link to everything in the show notes at tim.blog/podcast. Thank you, Brandon, for all the time.

Brandon Sanderson: Thank you.

Tim Ferriss: And for hosting me. What a fun trip. And to everybody out there, until next time. Just be a bit kinder than is necessary to others and to yourself. And thanks for tuning in.

Brandon Sanderson on Building a Fiction Empire, Creating $40M+ Kickstarter Campaigns, Unbreakable Habits, The Art of World-Building, and The Science of Magic Systems (#794)

“Always err on the side of what’s awesome.”
โ€” Brandon Sanderson

Brandon Sanderson (@BrandSanderson) is the #1 New York Times bestselling author of The Stormlight Archive series and the Mistborn saga; the middle-grade series Alcatraz vs. the Evil Librarians; and the young-adult novels The Rithmatist, the Reckoners trilogy, and the Skyward series. He has sold more than 40 million books in 35 languages, and he is a four-time nominee for the Hugo Awards, winning in 2013 for his novella The Emperorโ€™s Soul. That same year, he was chosen to complete Robert Jordanโ€™s The Wheel of Time series, culminating in A Memory of Light.

Brandon cohosts (with fellow author Dan Wells) the popular Intentionally Blank podcast and teaches creative writing at Brigham Young University.

Please enjoy!

Listen to the episode on Apple PodcastsSpotifyOvercastPodcast AddictPocket CastsCastboxYouTube MusicAmazon MusicAudible, or on your favorite podcast platform. Watch the interview on YouTube.

This episode is brought to you by Cresset prestigious family office for CEOs, founders, and entrepreneurs; Seed’s DS-01ยฎ Daily Synbiotic broad spectrum 24-strain probiotic + prebiotic; Wealthfront high-yield cash account.

The transcript of this episode can be found here. Transcripts of all episodes can be found here.

[podcast-player id=”000622c1-3a74-42e1-923b-5b5349f6f85a” src=”https://rss.art19.com/episodes/000622c1-3a74-42e1-923b-5b5349f6f85a.mp3″ title=”#794: Brandon Sanderson on Building a Fiction Empire, Creating $40M+ Kickstarter Campaigns, Unbreakable Habits, The Art of World-Building, and The Science of Magic Systems”]


This episode is brought to you by Cresset Family Office! Listeners have heard me talk about โ€œmaking before you manageโ€ for years. And for meโ€”as a writer and entrepreneurโ€”I definitely gravitate toward making. So itโ€™s important that I find the right people who are great at managing. Thatโ€™s why I trust this episodeโ€™s sponsor, Cresset Family Office

Cresset is a prestigious family office for CEOs, founders, and entrepreneurs. They handle the complex financial planning, uncertain tax strategies, timely exit planning, bill pay and wires, and all the other parts of wealth management that would otherwise pull me away from doing what I love most: making things, mastering skills, and spending time with the people I care about.ย  Experience the freedom of focusing on what matters to you with the support of a top wealth management team. Schedule a call today at cressetcapital.com/Tim to see how Cresset can help streamline your financial plans and grow your wealth.

Iโ€™m a client of Cresset. There are no material conflicts other than this paid testimonial. All investing involves risk, including loss of principal.


This episode is brought to you by Seedโ€™s DS-01 Daily Synbiotic!ย Seedโ€™s DS-01 was recommended to me months ago by a PhD microbiologist, so I started using it well before their team ever reached out to me. Since then, itโ€™s become a daily staple and one of the few supplements I travel with. Iโ€™ve always been highly skeptical of most probiotics due to the lack of science and the fact that many do not survive digestion. But after incorporating two capsules of Seedโ€™s DS-01 into my morning routine, I have noticed improved digestion, skin tone, and overall health.ย  Why is it so effective? For one, itโ€™s a 2-in-1 probiotic and prebiotic formulated with 24 clinically and scientifically studied strains that have systemic benefits in and beyond the gut. And now, you can get 25% off your first month of DS-01 with code 25TIM.


This episode is brought to you by Wealthfront! Wealthfront is a financial services platform that offers services to help you save and invest your money. Right now, you can earn 4.00% APYโ€”thatโ€™s the Annual Percentage Yieldโ€”with the Wealthfront Brokerage Cash Accoount. Thatโ€™s nearly 10x more interest than if you left your money in a savings account at the average bank, with savings rates at 0.42%, according to FDIC.gov, as of 05/19/2025. It takes just a few minutes to sign up, and then youโ€™ll immediately start earning 4.00% APY from program  banks on your uninvested cash. And when new clients open an account today, theyโ€™ll get an extra $50 bonus with a deposit of $500 or more. Terms and Conditions apply.  Visit Wealthfront.com/Tim to get started.

Cash Account offered by Wealthfront Brokerage LLC, member FINRA/SIPC. Wealthfront is not a bank. The APY on cash deposits as of 04/30/2025, is representative, subject to change, and requires no minimum. Funds in the Cash Account are swept to programย banks, where they earn a variable APY. Tim receives cash compensation from Wealthfront Brokerage for advertising and holds a non-controlling equity interest in the corporate parent of Wealthfront Brokerage. Tim and Wealthfront Brokerage have no other affiliation. Tim reflects his own opinions and Wealthfront does not endorse, sponsor, or promote them.ย See full disclosuresย here.


Want to hear an episode with another publishing-savvy worldbuilder? Listen to my interview with Silo author Hugh Howey in which we discussed breaking formula with a literary sleight of hand, the benefits of buying back rights and self-publishing, why authors should strive for a reader-first vs. publisher-first mindset, how authors can find deal leverage early on, fiction that inspires better writing, keys to fruitful collaboration, AIโ€™s present-and-future impact on publishing, and much more.


What was your favorite quote or lesson from this episode? Please let me know in the comments.

Continue reading “Brandon Sanderson on Building a Fiction Empire, Creating $40M+ Kickstarter Campaigns, Unbreakable Habits, The Art of World-Building, and The Science of Magic Systems (#794)”

The Tim Ferriss Show Transcripts: Seth Godin on Playing the Right Game and Strategy as a Superpower (#792)

Please enjoy this transcript of my interview with Seth Godin, author of 21 internationally bestselling books, translated into more than 35 languages, including Linchpin, Tribes, The Dip, and Purple Cow. His latest book, This Is Strategy, offers a fresh lens on how we can make bold decisions, embrace change, and navigate a complex, rapidly evolving world. Seth is the founder of the altMBA and The Akimbo Workshops, transformative online programs that have helped thousands of people take their work to the next level.

His blog (seths.blog) is one of the most widely read in the world. Seth is also the creator of The Carbon Almanac, a global initiative focused on climate action.

Transcripts may contain a few typos. With many episodes lasting 2+ hours, it can be difficult to catch minor errors. Enjoy!

Listen to the episode onย Apple Podcasts,ย Spotify,ย Overcast,ย Podcast Addict,ย Pocket Casts,ย Castbox,ย YouTube Music,ย Amazon Music,ย Audible, or on your favorite podcast platform. Watch the interview on YouTube.

[podcast-player id=”af7e8c43-5ff2-495c-b2f9-43e48d825a2a” src=”https://rss.art19.com/episodes/af7e8c43-5ff2-495c-b2f9-43e48d825a2a.mp3″ title=”#792: Seth Godin on Playing the Right Game and Strategy as a Superpower”]

DUE TO SOME HEADACHES IN THE PAST, PLEASE NOTE LEGAL CONDITIONS:

Tim Ferriss owns the copyright in and to all content in and transcripts of The Tim Ferriss Show podcast, with all rights reserved, as well as his right of publicity.

WHAT YOUโ€™RE WELCOME TO DO: You are welcome to share the below transcript (up to 500 words but not more) in media articles (e.g., The New York Times, LA Times, The Guardian), on your personal website, in a non-commercial article or blog post (e.g., Medium), and/or on a personal social media account for non-commercial purposes, provided that you include attribution to โ€œThe Tim Ferriss Showโ€ and link back to the tim.blog/podcast URL. For the sake of clarity, media outlets with advertising models are permitted to use excerpts from the transcript per the above.

WHAT IS NOT ALLOWED: No one is authorized to copy any portion of the podcast content or use Tim Ferrissโ€™ name, image or likeness for any commercial purpose or use, including without limitation inclusion in any books, e-books, book summaries or synopses, or on a commercial website or social media site (e.g., Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc.) that offers or promotes your or anotherโ€™s products or services. For the sake of clarity, media outlets are permitted to use photos of Tim Ferriss from the media room on tim.blog or (obviously) license photos of Tim Ferriss from Getty Images, etc.


Tim Ferriss: I suppose I want to ask the question that I always ask, what would make this time well spent for you? What would make this the home run, looking back?

Seth Godin: I have to confess that I’ve never had a conversation with you that wasn’t well spent. What would make it a home run for me is if you considered it one of the best episodes of the year or maybe even longer. I want to be on the greatest hits.

Tim Ferriss: All right.

Seth Godin: That’s what we’re pushing for.

Tim Ferriss: All right, perfect. To kick that off out of the gate, what would be a sensible place to start? Is there a particular story or a lead question that you think would help us start with a bang? Anything come to mind? There are a million places I could start, of course.

Seth Godin: Well, you know best, but it seems to me that many of your listeners actually want a job without a boss. They don’t seek to build something and they need to be woken up about that. And number two, people who misunderstand your breakthrough books think they’re about tactics, and they follow the steps instead of realizing they’re about strategy, and then find a resilient way forward. And strategy, this philosophy is something you’ve been doing your entire career, but never called it that.

Tim Ferriss: Well, let’s start there. So strategy, like success or God, if we want to really get out there, are words that a lot of people use, but oftentimes they’re in their minds referring to different things. So when you use the word strategy, what does that mean to you?

Seth Godin: I think it’s a philosophy of becoming. I don’t think it’s a set of tactics. I don’t think it’s about winning in the short run. I think it’s about being very clear about the change we seek to make and who we seek to change, understanding the systems and the games around us, and then committing to the long-term process of getting to where we’re going. Meaning our tactics will change all the time, but our strategy does not.

And most people, because we’ve been indoctrinated to have a job, want tactics instead. And I could do much better if I was peddling tactics, but I’m not. And I’m never going to write a story, a book called This is God โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: The Tactic Monger Volume One.

Seth Godin: Exactly. So if I’m not going to write This is God, or This is Tactics, at least I could write This is Strategy.

Tim Ferriss: And what would be a real world example of good strategy? Any particular company or project come to mind?

Seth Godin: So some famous strategies, an elegant strategy. Bill Gates says, “We are going to have the strategy that no one ever got fired for buying Microsoft.” He stole that strategy from IBM. So IBM had a 50-year run where their products weren’t the most cutting edge, they weren’t the best priced, but they had enough salespeople, and support, and infrastructure that if you worked for a big company, buying IBM was easy. Every time Microsoft followed that strategy, they did fine. And when they veered away from it, they had problems.

A strategy, when I was at Yahoo, we had the chance to buy Google for about $10 million and we didn’t buy them. I didn’t get a vote. But Yahoo’s strategy was “The web is a dark and nasty place. Come to Yahoo and don’t leave.” And the home page had 183 links on it. At Google, their strategy was “The web has grown up. Come here and go somewhere else.” And Marissa Mayer built the most profitable marketing engine of all time by making sure, fighting for years to make it so there’s only a couple links on the home page because that was built into the strategy, which is, if you’re leaving Google, we’re doing something right. And that’s where all the ads came from. And that’s why Yahoo couldn’t buy Google, because the strategies were completely the opposite.

And Starbucks had a strategy that took them a very long way for a very long time, but it’s not about frappuccinos, it’s about understanding who is this for and how can we incrementally help them get there?

Tim Ferriss: What did that look like for Starbucks and what did it look like for them to stray?

Seth Godin: Howard Schultz did not start Starbucks. When he got there there were two Starbuckses and neither one of them sold cups of coffee. They only sold beans. And Howard had been to Italy and he realized that there was a deep human desire A, to go from being pre-caffeinated to caffeinated. And that gets refreshed every single day. And two, to be able to do it with other people who you see yourself in, people like us do things like this.

So in the Northeast there was Dunkin Donuts, but the idea of Dunkin Donuts is you’re not happy that you’re getting coffee. The coffee isn’t that delicious, let’s just get this over with. And every time Howard built more of that feeling that you could go to any Starbucks in the world and feel like you were with your people, and that for five bucks you could feel like a rich person, he could repeat it over, and over, and over again, and the tactics would take care of themselves.

Tim Ferriss: If not the tactics, what are the core ingredients of enacting a strategy like that?

Seth Godin: There’s all sorts of surprising ways that we can challenge ourselves once we start down this path. But to start down the path, there are four things we’re looking for. We’re looking for systems, we’re looking for time, we’re looking for games, and finally, empathy. And all four of them are really unexplored and mysterious, but once you see all four of them, strategy is much easier to take care of itself. So I’m happy to take them one by one or give examples, but those four keep interweaving over and over again. And that unfolds for us what a strategy can be.

Tim Ferriss: Great. Well, let’s go through the four.

Seth Godin: Okay. We’ll start with systems.

Tim Ferriss: And maybe if it’s not too cumbersome, if there’s an example that’s easy to give, that’s great too.

Seth Godin: Okay.

Tim Ferriss: However you want to land it.

Seth Godin: Systems are invisible and they hide themselves because they don’t want people to see who’s operating things. They invent culture to defend themselves. Systems, the most famous one is the Solar System. There’s this invisible gravity. The Earth doesn’t go around the sun because it wants, it goes around the sun because gravity makes that its easiest path.

If you grew up in the United States to middle-class parents, you’ll be under pressure from the time you’re five years old to get good grades. Why do I need to get good grades? So you can get into a famous college, but you’re not supposed to call it a famous college. You’re supposed to call it a good college. And that system with tuition and tenure, and student debt and football teams, and cheerleaders, and college tours, and the sticker on the back of a car, and the SATs, all of it is just taken for granted as normal.

And so Donella Meadows has done brilliant writing before she passed way too early about all the dynamics of systems, systems in our world, systems that we want to build. So when we see a system under stress, then we can see the system, then we can see the climate when temperatures start to rise. But before the temperature started to rise, when the climate was normal, no one paid attention to it because the system, the thing that keeps it going was sort of invisible. So if you’re going to start any enterprise, a little plumbing business, a giant internet company, if you’re going to run for office, you should be able to see and name the elements of the system. Where is there gravity? What is seen as normal? And there’s pushback if you don’t do it.

And so I’ll finish the rant by asking a simple question. How much should a wedding cost?

Tim Ferriss: I’m especially unqualified to answer this.

Seth Godin: No, it’s super simple.

Tim Ferriss: I’m working on it.

Seth Godin: The answer is exactly what your best friend spent, but a little more.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah.

Seth Godin: And that’s why a wedding in New York City costs more than a hundred thousand dollars, not because you need monogrammed matchbooks to have a good wedding. You need them to be part of the wedding industrial complex, to show your status to the people who’ve been invited, because that’s what the thing is for. So we have to see systems and then either we work for the system or the system works for us.

Tim Ferriss: And we can linger on this one for a bit because the next one is time. So I feel like we should take our time plus it’s long form. So could you give an example on a smaller scale of a, you mentioned plumbing doesn’t need to be plumbing, but a solopreneur or a very, very small startup, two to four employees, and how they might start to ask questions around systems to identify the systems that are at work. Because for instance, in my life, I’m good at identifying what is normal, like what are the unquestioned assumptions? I’m good at that, but that seems like I’m holding the tail of the elephant, like one of the blind men in the parable. I’ve got a piece of it, but it’s not the whole elephant, clearly.

Seth Godin: I don’t think you’re giving yourself enough credit. The whole tango thing. I mean, you have been doing this for a very long time, really well.

Tim Ferriss: Or the archery thing behind me.

Seth Godin: So let’s say you’re going to build a small business that supports medium-sized businesses with their Google Workspace. So you’re a couple nerds and you’re going to be the person who helps people set up their Google Drive, and across the organization, reasonably secure for a company with a hundred employees.

Because you’re in there in the factory seeing how things are made, it’s very tempting to imagine that everyone you’re serving wants what you want, and that you think your customer is the person who’s buying stuff from you, and what they need is a tech solution. None of these things are true, that the system of a company with a hundred people is, it’s probably not the CEO’s job to set this thing up. So it’s someone else’s job. There’s a system, a hierarchy of jobs. What does that person want? It’s not their money, so lowering your price to get new customers is not going to help you get new customers, that in fact, what that person wants is a story to tell their boss, a story of why did I pick these people, and even better a story of if it fails, why they are not going to be in trouble.

And so when we show up at an organization to tell our story to that system, we have to do it understanding how do they buy everything else? What do they measure? What would happen to us if we’re bigger than the other people bidding or smaller than the other people bidding? All of these things go into how the system works, the same way the admissions office at the famous college doesn’t always pick the people with the highest SAT scores, because there’s this complicated mechanism at play that is historical to feed and maintain the system.

And so in the case of this Google Workspace thing, let’s say you decide to close on Thanksgiving Day and you’ve just got a message on your voicemail, “We’re closed on Thanksgiving Day. Leave a message, we’ll call you back tomorrow.” That seems normal, unless what got you into the system was an unbreakable promise that you will never get in trouble because we will always answer the phone. That decision, that tactical decision has to be driven by what you seek to stand for, but that’s only going to happen if you see the system of what this company your client does, and what stories do they tell themselves, right?

And Hollywood is a system and the senior prom is a system. And there are all these factors that go into all of them, subtle signals that people are sending to each other. And if you’re going to make a living taking money from people to solve their problems, it has to be to help them dance with the system that they’re part of.

Tim Ferriss: All right, shall we bookmark that and come to time, games, or empathy? Which would you like to tackle next?

Seth Godin: Time is really interesting. James Gleick wrote a brilliant book about the history of time travel. Now of course there are no actual time machines, but we know who invented the time machine. And it was actually H.G. Wells. Before H.G. Wells wrote his book, nobody in the world talked about time machines. The concept that you and I take for granted, like if you go back in time or if you before, no one ever said that ever.

And time, we’re all very familiar with it and no one can define it. And we know what now is, and the now of a week ago isn’t now anymore. It’s back then and it feels different. So if you want to build a company with a thousand employees in it, if you want to go public, if you want to be somebody with a lot of zeros in your bank account, that is not going to happen in the next three seconds. There’s something that’s going to happen between now and then. And each one of the steps as we look through time is not today.

So when we want to have a forest, we don’t get a forest, we start planting trees because 20 years from now we’ll have a forest. And when you’re growing up in Long Island or when you’re growing up training for the Olympics, you know you’re not going to be doing the Olympics when you’re 50. So what exactly are the purpose of these steps? And what does it mean to fail? Does it mean that you failed right this moment in service of getting where you want to go later? Or does it mean you failed forever? What does it mean to quit? Does quitting now mean you failed forever? Or does it just open the door to succeeding later?

And so we have this opportunity to see time the way our competition doesn’t. So in 2001, I was at a conference and we were in this small group setting. There were eight people and they said, “Go around the circle and say who you are.” And the guy to my left said, “My name’s Stephen. I’m a judge.” It turned out he was Stephen Breyer, he was on the Supreme Court.

And the person next to him said, “My name’s Sergey and I have this new search engine.” And someone said, “So Sergey, what’s your marketing strategy?” And he said, “Well, here’s the deal. We think Google’s going to get better every day. So we don’t want people to use Google for the first time right away. We want them to use it for the first time later so it’s better by the time they get there. So we’re not doing any promotion whatsoever because the Google of now only exists to get us to the Google of tomorrow. And when we’re at the Google you’re ready for, that’s when you’ll come use it.” And at the same time, Yahoo was busy trying to defend the plunging stock price in the moment as opposed to saying, “What are we going to be in 10 years?”

Tim Ferriss: I remember the TV commercials at exactly that time for Yahoo.

Okay, so framing time differently. I suppose Bezos and Amazon would be an example of that as well. I mean who dog-trained Wall Street to expect no profitability for God knows how long, a decade? And set out in the very first annual shareholder letter that was subsequently, I believe re-read every year or re-presented in some fashion.

Seth Godin: Yeah, so let’s just break that into pieces, right? Because in the moment Morgan Stanley says, “Don’t do that, that’s dumb. It’s going to hurt your stock price today.” But what Jeff said was, “If I don’t establish the conditions for Wall Street to send us the investors we want, our stock price will be zero in five years.” So the only way to get to five years from now is to do this today, even though it feels expensive because compared to the alternative, it’s really cheap.

Tim Ferriss: Setting the conditions.

Seth Godin: Yeah.

Tim Ferriss: I have a sneaking suspicion we’re going to come back to conditions at some point.

Games. I like the sound of this. I like games, some games. I suppose it depends on which one I choose and if I choose it consciously, but what does games mean?

Seth Godin: So again, back to the indoctrination. So we grew up with Candy Land, and Parcheesi, and Monopoly. Those are board games and they’re okay, but that’s not the kind of games I’m talking about.

Any situation where there are multiple people and variable outputs with scarcity, there’s a game. So it is the game to decide when two lanes merge, which car is going to go first. And it is a game to decide when you’re working for Jack Welch and the bottom 10 percent of the people lose their job, which people are going to lose their job. And it is a game to exchange money for a hot dog at the baseball game because that exchange happens in a way where two players come together for mutual benefit.

So we should not deny that games exist. We should learn how games work. And when we make a move in a game that doesn’t seem to work, we should not say we are a bad person. We should say, I made a move that did not work. Those are totally different things. And so the only way you’ve been able to achieve all the things you’ve achieved between the archery, and the dancing, and everything in between, is you make more moves than most people, and you measure them and you don’t do the ones that don’t work again.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, that’s true.

Seth Godin: But it is impossible to innovate if it has to work. Innovation must always be accompanied by the phrase, this might not work. And so if you and your team aren’t saying this might not work in service of innovation, you’re not innovating.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, this is my entire notebook full of training logs and experiments., and I’d say 50 percent is at least, if not 70 percent, things that did not work and required tweaks so that I would not repeat the same mistake the next time. It doesn’t always work, but over time it tends to round towards improvement at the very least.

Seth Godin: We’ve only been going at this for a few minutes, but already I can hear it. People are saying, “Wait, wait, wait, I tuned in to have someone vindicate the tactics I’m already using. That that is what I am listening for, to hear that I am on the right tact โ€” when are you guys going to get to the tactics part?” And the very fact that we don’t hear this kind of description of the world we’re in is like the fish that doesn’t realize it’s in water. And what I’m trying to help people see in a world that is changing faster than it has ever changed in history, is when you see these threads and these systems under stress, that is when you know there’s an opportunity for you. And if it feels uncomfortable, imagine how it feels to people who don’t get the joke. When this discomfort shows up, that’s the opportunity.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, for sure. And one of the many reasons I’ve been looking forward to the conversation is I spend a lot of time thinking about many of these constituent parts, but I haven’t necessarily explicitly woven them together into something that combines into strategy. But in terms of time horizon, and for me, a lot of it is trying to find or create a category of one for “competitive advantage.” And part of that is choosing a game I can win, which entails also understanding the rules of the game that you have chosen, or inherited, or somehow deliberately or accidentally ended up playing. It’s really trying to parse the rules of the game.

The time, I do think about that a lot. It’s one of the simplest ways to have a competitive advantage, just to have a longer time horizon, but it requires having a lot of other things fall online.

And then certainly the systems, and in part, depending on what game you’re playing, as you said, what are the gravitational pulls? What are the incentives of different stakeholders? Who has what degree of respective influence? So it’s fun to hear these all combined.

Empathy is one, and I would like to think of myself as an empathetic person, but this isn’t maybe one that I would initially have thrown into the ring as an integral piece of strategy. So what does this mean?

Seth Godin: Well, you just gave it away. I’d like to think of myself as an empathetic person, implies that there’s a moral component to what we’re talking about. And at some level of course there is, but that’s not what I’m talking about.

What I’m talking about is this. Everything we build and everything we make only works in a voluntary exchange if someone else wants it more than they want the money or time they have to trade for it. Meaning, someone’s not going to buy the thing you’re selling at a crafts fair because you worked really hard to make it. They’re going to buy it because they want it. And all empathy is is being very clear about who it’s for and why they want it. And we get so busy and so exhausted making something, we forget. We hustle people and hassle people to buy from us because it’s important to us.

Tim Ferriss: It sounds like some of my blog posts.

Seth Godin: Yes. The No Book. You didn’t need to publish the No Book if your goal was for you to read it because you already read it. You are publishing it so other people will read it. So your description of the book is not, “Please buy this because I worked really hard to write it.” It’s, “I have a thing here that when I describe it, if I create the conditions for information exchange to happen, you will bang down the door to get it. You’ll be angry if you can’t get a copy.”

Now that implies that it cannot be for everyone, no matter what we make, because you cannot be empathic to everyone. Unless you’re selling, I don’t know, oxygen on a planet that doesn’t have any, there’s nothing that everyone wants the same way. So where all of this must begin and end is with the minimum, the smallest viable audience. Who are the people, just them, that when they hear about this, they’re going to say, “That’s exactly what I was looking for.” That’s all you need. You pick that group, you delight them, and you forgive everybody else.

And here’s proof that you’re not doing it. If someone comes to you and you are not regularly sending folks to your competitors or people who are thought of as your competitors, you are not serious about this, about picking the audience who it’s for and forgiving everybody else. When someone shows up at the Ferrari dealership and says, “I got six kids, how am I going to get them to school?” You don’t try to persuade them to get in an Enzo. You send them down the street to the Volvo dealership.

Tim Ferriss: That was one of your many questions. This was 40 or so questions in the book that I wanted to ask about. And my position as a service, can I happily send others to people who might be seen as competitors? And I was like, huh, interesting. I wanted to clarify that, which you just did. And it makes sense. If you can’t do that, then you very likely do not have your 1,000 true fans or minimal viable audience defined, right?

Seth Godin: Yeah. I mean positioning is, why are the people who don’t choose to buy from you right to make that choice? And if you have this attitude that everyone should buy from you, you can’t answer that question. So the people at Nestle’s don’t get upset if you buy an Askinosie chocolate bar for $14 because Shawn and his daughter aren’t selling a chocolate bar to people who might buy a Nestle’s bar. They’re completely different groups of people. And the same thing is true for people who play Dungeons and Dragons versus people who want to go watch Ultimate Fighting Championship. In that given moment there are two different groups of people.

Tim Ferriss: I’m glad you said, in that given moment, because I happen to be the perfect overlap.

Seth Godin: There are some people who do both, but they don’t do both at the same time.

Tim Ferriss: No, no, no. Very hard to do at the same time.

All right, so we have then, this might be a good segue, many maxims or ideas that we could discuss from the book. And I circled a few for myself, mostly for clarification. And I’ll let you pick from one of these three. And feel free to revise the wording, but I’m very curious.

So I’ll read the three and then you can pick whichever one you want to start with. So the first is, “Systems don’t start out selfish, but resilient ones often end up that way.” The next one is, “You’re not sitting in traffic, you are the traffic.” And then the third is, “Don’t try to burn big logs if you only have a little bit of kindling.”

Seth Godin: Perfect. Let’s do all three. We’ll start with the last one.

If you’ve ever gone camping, you know what I mean by the โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: I do.

Seth Godin: โ€” If you have enough kindling โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: I was freezing my ass off in a rural archery range yesterday and realized they had a nice wood-burning stove, but all the logs were as big around as my torso. And I thought, well, that’s going to be a really tough fire to start.

Seth Godin: Exactly. Unless you had an enormous amount of kindling and then it would go up in no time.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah.

Seth Godin: Too often because of the media, entrepreneurs think if they don’t start something that sounds giant, they’re failures. Too often we give entrepreneurs credit for raising a lot of money from venture capital. That’s probably not the right path for you. The money you’re raising from investors is kindling, and the logs you’re starting are the markets you’re trying to get to. So if you want to build a dialysis chain in 40 cities where people can go get reliable kidney treatment, you can’t start that with a hundred thousand dollars loan. You just can’t. But a hundred thousand dollars loan is more than enough to get yourself doing very, very well with a hot dog cart somewhere. So we’ve first got to make a smart decision based on time, based on the systems we’re confronting. Do we have enough kindling? Do I have enough reputation to even take this on?

The one about systems is this, systems aren’t people. They’re collections of people, and they act in ways that maybe the people who started the system and maybe the people who work in the system wouldn’t choose, but that’s the system they’ve got. So if you think about the healthcare system in the United States, it’s not a healthcare system. It’s a treatment system because everyone in the system gets rewarded for giving treatments, not for making you healthy. And so it’s quite likely that once you start working with the medical industrial complex, you’ll get more and more tests and more and more probing and more and more bills because that’s what the system does. And every time someone moves out of where the system ended up, the system exerts a feedback loop to push them back into the spot where they belong. And so if we look at how we ended up with college educations that cost almost $300,000, it’s because the combination of accreditation and ranking and tenure and parent status and placement offices all supported going in only one direction.

And if you show up, say, “Look at me, I’m really smart. I went overseas and in two years I learned X, Y, and Z,” The system’s going to push back and say, “Yeah, but we require this kind of degree from this kind of accredited thing.” The NCAA is a system that started with people playing football in the backyard, and now they’re taking private jets to stadiums with a hundred thousand people in them because the system kept churning in one direction. And you might not like the output, but you probably can’t change the system by yourself. What you might be able to do is, back to your second thing, you’re not sitting in traffic. You are traffic. When you participate in a system, you’re either going to make that system more successful and get a prize, or you could try to fight that system, but you’re going to need a lot of kindling to do so because being in the system actually changes the system one way or the other.

So the challenge that we have is Google didn’t show up and say, “We’re going to have meetings with all the ad agencies in the world and change the way advertising works.” Instead, they walked away completely from that world, multi-billion dollar world of ad spend, and instead built a tiny little engine for direct marketers where someone would buy the word Chanel and they’d buy it for a nickel. And then what would happen is a brand manager from Chanel would Google themselves. Don’t do it too much. You can go blind. But they would Google themselves and they would see someone had bought their name for a nickel, so they’d pay 10 cents to take it back and the auction was on. So Google changed the system, but they didn’t change it with a frontal assault. They changed it by moving away from the system, finding people who weren’t part of the system, and then the system chased them.

Tim Ferriss: And I wanted to mention also just a footnote to the kindling comment, which is some people listening might say, “Oh, man, well, it takes money to make money.” And I would just say there are many ways to get that kindling right? You can do joint ventures, you could do licensing, you could do non-dilutive financing, which is a fancy way of saying, for instance, two startups that I’ve been chatting with have raised money from the government. They’re really good at doing that from DARPA and so on, and they get a nice big fat check. It’s delivered within six weeks and it does not affect, actually enhances with lots of leverage, their ability to raise money in the future. So there are very off-menu approaches to gathering your kindling.

Seth Godin: Yeah. And there’s also the choice you make of saying if you want to be in the movies, you could invest years of your life and pay an enormous number of dues and wait for Hollywood to pick you. Or you could sharpen your writing skills and make a two-minute YouTube video and that YouTube video could then find you an audience. And Ilana Glazer went on to be in a popular Comedy Central thing and then a movie star, but she didn’t go in the front door because she didn’t have enough kindling to go in the front door. Instead, she found her audience and then multiplied it.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, there’s an amazing story. People can check it out in a book called Rebel Without a Crew by Robert Rodriguez. And when he made, I think it was Mariachi way back in the day, he basically came up with his list of assets and he was like, “All right, we got a turtle? Turtle’s going to be in the movie. All right, my friend has a broken down school bus? School bus is going in the script. His cousin has a pit bull? Great. We’ll figure out how to fit it in.” And retrofitted the entire script around this. And people thought, “Wow, this must be a legitimate, well budgeted film.” It’s like, “No, I just made a list of everything I had and then tried to insert them somehow.” And he is very good at operating with, I would say, lateral approaches to creative output. 

Are there any other examples of taking the side door, so to speak, that stick out to you? Could be for entering a well-established sector, it could be for anything at all.

Seth Godin: In fact, that’s almost always what happens. And the mistake people make is if you find yourself saying, “I just need to get the word out. I’ve done all the hard part, now I just need to get the word out,” you haven’t done the hard part. What you’ve done is waited for a miracle. The people who have gone on to build, for example, useful businesses on top of a Kickstarter. Stepwise said, “All right, I don’t have enough money to build a factory, get into Best Buy, do national advertising, but I do have enough money to get 1,000 people to pay me $200 for a coffee maker, and then I can do the next one and then I can do the next one.”

So this Stepwise process, back to time, says the shortcuts are illusory, that the most direct way forward feels long in the moment, that I’m going to serve a group of people that so need what I’m doing, that they pay for it and that are so delighted by it that they tell their friends and that I’m going to repeat it and I’m going to repeat it. And if you look at articles on TechCrunch and places like that at companies that raised 50 or a hundred million dollars who are going to change the whole world overnight, they’re all gone because you just can’t shortcut that on demand. What you can do is find that group of people and bring empathy to them and make a change up.

Tim Ferriss: Also with raising that amount of money, some of them, a handful out of hundreds, will figure out a way to make it work. But in most cases they’re like, “All right, we have an idea on the back of a napkin. I think this space shuttle will work. Let’s raise a bunch of money.” And then they put together a soapbox derby space shuttle and then incinerate themselves, break into a million different pieces. That’s the usual outcome, but all gas, no brakes. Sometimes it works, but not all the time.

And I think that also, I suppose I have a reputation for shortcuts, but it’s not really, I don’t think of myself that way. I like to find elegant workarounds if they exist, but I’m doing a shit-ton of experimentation, taking all the notes that I have in that notebook for anything so that I can hopefully make sure I’m not fooling myself and that I can replicate. And then if I can do that, I’m like, “All right, let me try that with two or three other people.” And they’re like, “Okay, well let’s expand the scope a little bit.”

Seth Godin: Yeah, so that’s where feedback loops and network effects come in. So people don’t really understand feedback loops. Feedback loops are not feedback. The feedback of, “I’m going to give you criticism,” that’s not what we’re talking about. Feedback loops, there are two kinds, positive and negative. So a negative feedback loop isn’t actually negative, it’s a thermostat. And what that means is if it gets really warm in the hotel room, the air conditioning kicks on. If it gets really cold, the heat kicks on. It’s negative in that it keeps it in a central place. And a positive feedback loop is like the microphone at a bad wedding that gets that screeching sound that goes around and around and around because it keeps getting amplified.

So what we seek to do is build a project that the next time we do it, it’s going to work even better. We want to find an insatiable desire and start the path of filling it. So the insatiable desire could be something like status, but it could be something like, “I need caffeine every single morning,” right? It doesn’t fade over time. And as you become the reliable purveyor of caffeine, then risk-averse people are just going to keep coming back again and again. So once you had a small head start with this podcast, you could keep that head start by creating ever-better episodes of the podcast and no one could ever catch up, right? My blog in April is going to have post number 10,000 and no one’s ever going to catch up to me.

But each time there’s another post, that becomes more of what people signed up for. And this doesn’t work quite as well when you’re talking about shoes, because once someone’s closet is filled, the only way for them to buy new shoes is to get rid of the old ones. So a Christian Louboutin can’t scale to infinity because sooner or later you run out of people who have the money or you run out of people who have the closet space. But what we’re looking for is to build these networks with feedback where it works better when I tell my friends. It works better when I have more of it. It works better when I do it again, and these insatiable desires are everywhere, but we ignore them and instead try to steal market share from somebody else.

Tim Ferriss: So I think this ties into one of the questions also that I was going to ask you about, which is, “How can I create the conditions for a network-affected developer on my project?” I suppose it’s ensuring that you have an answer to, hopefully an affirmative answer to, can you say, would your clients say, or customers, “It works better when I tell my friends,” right? That would seem to be one.

Seth Godin: Right. So there are some very pure examples of this, but not many. So a pure example is the fax machine or email. If it’s 40 years ago and you have friends who don’t have email, you need to get them to get email because you can’t send email to people if they don’t have an email address, that Krispy Kreme priced the donuts so that it was cheaper to buy a dozen than to buy four, and Krispy Kremes were scarce. So if you showed up at work with a dozen Krispy Kreme, you were a hero. And so that spread the idea, the more times people shared Krispy Kreme, the happier the sharer was and the word spread.

So a lot of things that people build don’t have a network effect because there’s no incentive to tell the others. On the other hand, something like The Big Lebowski, I can’t talk to you about it unless you’ve seen it. So I’ve got to get you to go see The Big Lebowski so we can talk about bringing the room together. And so that’s built into the idea of a certain kind of movie is we’re going to talk about it. Where’s the network effect? Why does it work better? Not better for you, but better for the user if their friends have it too?

Tim Ferriss: I’m wondering where you would draw the demarcating lines between below average, non-existent, moderate, excellent network effects in the sense that you give a few examples. I’m wondering, for instance, where something like Magic: The Gathering would fall. I mean, it seems sort of intrinsic to the nature of games themselves that if you want to play a game and it’s not a solo venture, you need other people to play.

And then Magic was very beautifully designed by โ€” I’m blanking on his first name, something Garfield, I believe, but the collectible aspect to it also and the competitive aspect with all of these things combined to help make it a real incredible phenomenon. But it’s ultimately a game You need other people to play with you.

But how would you think about that or any other examples that come to mind? If you’re trying to really trying to dial this to 11, to use a Spinal Tap reference, it works better when I tell my friends. There are some obvious examples that spring to mind, Facebook, something like that. But Krispy Kreme, another good example. It’s better when you tell your friends, you end up being a hero. Great. So that is a meandering, caffeine infused, speaking of caffeine, lead-in to what I think is a question. Take that wherever you want.

Seth Godin: So for people at home, I’m cheating. I made these decks of cards that people can get and they have 200 questions on them, and what you do is you play them out so that you can challenge your peers to work with you to start working your way through these questions. And the book has more than a thousand questions in it because the questions are how we open the door.

So in the case of the network effect, what do people want? Well, at some level there is a desire for mechanical efficiency that you want everyone to drive on the right side of the road if you live in North America, because if some people drive on the other side of the road, someone’s going to die. And so there’s very much of a network effect about which side of the road are we going to drive on? There’s no disagreement whatsoever, but those spots are mostly taken.

And so now we have to say, “What do people want?” And I think people only want two things. Three, freedom from the feeling of fear. Let’s leave that aside. The other two are status and affiliation. Affiliation is who are you hanging with? Who are your friends? Who’s at the table with you? Are you alone? Affiliation is, I got invited to a fancy wedding in the Hamptons a couple of months ago. We pull up, you had to park your car and then a golf cart would take you in.

And there’s three of us waiting. It’s Helene, my wife, and I, and I’m wearing a suit, and there’s a guy who’s also waiting. He’s wearing a tuxedo, and I’m like, “Uh-oh, it’s going to be a long night,” and I’m feeling really bad for myself. “Didn’t I read the invitation?” And then two more cars pull up and three people in suits get out. So now you can hear this guy going, “Uh-oh,” because he was the only person in a tuxedo. Why should it matter? Right? It’s still clothes. Well, it does matter because where do you fit in and status is who’s up and who’s down, who’s winning?

Something like Magic: The Gathering said to a kid who might see themselves as lonely, “This is a really good way for you to hang out with other people without having the kind of conversations that make you uncomfortable. You can talk about dragons and orcs and stuff like that.” But by making them collectible, they also built in status because if you have a thicker deck or a more valuable deck, you’re moving up with people that you’re competing with. And those two things kept dancing back and forth and back and forth and back and forth.

So what we’re probably doing when we build a modern entity that’s going to use the network effect is we are offering people either affiliation, “Everybody else is doing this, you are being left behind,” or status, which is, “You are in the right room and other people aren’t. And if you leave this room, your status is going to go down.”

And so if you do the math of the TED Conference, that’s all it is. Status and affiliation. If you do the math of why people have the latest version of earbuds or whatever. Status and affiliation, over and over again. Are we giving people, creating the conditions for them to get the status they seek or the affiliation they crave?

And that brings up one of the scariest non-sequiturs in the book, which is the creation of tension. If you want to make change happen, you have to create tension on purpose. Not stress. Stress is bad. Stress is you’re trapped. Stress is life is bad. Stress is you want to leave, but you can’t. Tension is what happens if I pull a rubber band back and then let go. I had to pull it backwards to get the rubber band to go across the room. So if I say, “Taylor Swift is playing in Amsterdam and there’s only 400 seats left,” I’ve created tension, because everyone who wants to go knows that there are more than 400 other people who want to go, they better hurry and get their mom to give them the money or else they’re going to be left out.

By creating tension, the concert promoter fills the venue. If there is no tension, no one’s going to come because they think, “I’ll just come. I’ll just stroll in if I feel like it.” So scarcity creates tension. The lack of affiliation creates tension. The desire for status creates tension. When you’re out trying to raise money and someone says to you, “Who else is invested?” Why would they ask that question? They’re asking about affiliation, they’re asking about status. If you say, “I have term sheets from three people and I only have room for one more person,” you create a tension. And so we’re constantly doing it, but we rarely do it on purpose.

Tim Ferriss: Can you say a bit more about affiliation status? Sidebar, Richard Garfield is the mathematician who designed Magic: The Gathering. There’s a great episode on a podcast called Think Like a Game Designer that has Richard Garfield on it, which I suggest to people. Affiliation and status. Could you perhaps give an example from book-writing or from podcasting?

Seth Godin: Yeah, let’s talk about books. So why do authors blurb each other’s books? You don’t see Tim Cook blurbing an Android phone. So why are authors so eager to put their names on each other? Why do they not only permit, but celebrate the idea that they’re sold next to all the other books? Books don’t sell at the supermarket. They sell next to the competitors because you get status if you’re published, used to be more, by a famous publisher, you get status if you’re reviewed in a certain kind of review. You get status if you’re face out. You get affiliation if you’re seen in the same category as Stephen King or Elmore Leonard, all of it, it’s high school over and over and over again.

Tim Ferriss: Right, okay. So that applies to the authors. What about writing books? If people are trying to pull some of these levers for pressing the buttons of affiliation and status for readers, what is that? What might that be?

Seth Godin: Okay, so there are a couple of elements here in the idea of fiction. If someone says, “Have you read Middlemarch? Or have you read Catcher in the Rye?” And you say, “Well, of course.” And you say something smart from it, your affiliation with that person was established. If you said, “What book? Catcher in the Who?” Your status goes down. You don’t have a bridge to talk about it. So on the Upper West Side, in those fancy apartments at The Dakota, that’s all people are doing is signaling to each other, “I belong here because I just read what you read and I have an opinion about it.” And the same thing is true a thousand miles away, but people are talking about NASCAR. It’s exactly the same thing. We don’t need the cars to go around in a circle. We need the conversations that we have about the cars going around in a circle.

Tim Ferriss: And how can you design a product or a company or a book to do that more effectively rather than less effectively?

Seth Godin: Exactly.

Tim Ferriss: Because there’s certain things that, culturally, when they reach a critical mass, Game of Thrones as an example, there was a point where that was such an appointment viewing and such a dominant conversation that people just felt completely out of the loop and like schmucks if they weren’t able to have at least that common touchstone for conversation. I’m not saying everyone, but a lot of people, it was that dominant. Harry Potter, another example. But those are already stratospheric successes. So in the early stages, what types of questions should people ask or what types of thought experiments should people do when trying to run their idea through, or their product or whatever it might be, through the filter of affiliation status, and then the other one that we tabled, but we don’t have to talk about that just yet.

Seth Godin: Okay, it’s back to the conditions. Create the conditions for the people in the smallest viable audience to have to talk about it. So Tina Brown took over The New Yorker. It was failing, The New Yorker magazine. And what she did, it cost a fortune. It used to come out on Mondays. By messenger on Sundays, 4,000 people got The New Yorker delivered to their apartment. Now, if you’re one of the 4,000, your status goes up, but it only goes up if people know that you are one of the people on Tina’s list. So the first thing you’re going to do when you get to work on Monday, talk about The New Yorker. Yes, The New Yorker, because you talking about it is the only way for your status to go up. Now people who want to be in your circle feel left out, so they have to quickly go read it, and it becomes a topic of conversation but only for 4,000 people. It was enough because of that center.

Alcoholics Anonymous, which isn’t anonymous at all, the first rule of Alcoholics Anonymous is you talk about Alcoholics Anonymous, only started with 12 people in a room. No one knows where the headquarters are. No one knows who runs it.

Tim Ferriss: Each person got one of the steps. I’m kidding.

Seth Godin: Well, good point. And so once you have that tiny circle of people and you do everything you can to create the conditions to change the lives of those 12 people, their desire for affiliation to pay back to those they’ve harmed as a form of establishing a new status in the world begins the kernel of its spreading.

But back to the axis of time, it took decades before Alcoholics Anonymous was Alcoholics Anonymous, right? You can’t make something like that work overnight. If you’re going to talk about a TV show, what’s the biggest strategic mistake Netflix made? And it’s hard to criticize Netflix’s strategy because of what they built, but it’s this, they forgot to stop the binge-watching. When they started with the binge-watching, the strategy was this, and this is one of the questions in the book, “What are we willing to do that our competitors aren’t?”

And they knew that the TV networks and the cable networks would never be willing to show all the episodes of a series at once because they had to defend their whole model and the way they paid for the shows. So Netflix said, “We’re just going to let you see the whole series in one day. The more you watch Netflix, the less you’re watching somebody else. We’re going to get you hooked on this because you’re not going to get involved in other shows because you’re going to be impatient.” And it worked. They really struck a blow by doing that.

But what it cost them is the water cooler because you’re afraid to talk about episode four of Succession because your friends are not caught up yet and you’re going to spoil it for them. So we don’t talk about it as much as if it was every week. And so shifting gears, and I talked to Ted about this and he didn’t have a good answer, is about four years ago, they should have switched back to once a week. 

Tim Ferriss: They use the binge-watching to basically build a critical mass of market share and then dial it back to more appointment viewing?

Seth Godin: Exactly. Because then the only people who aren’t paying for Netflix are going to keep feeling worse and worse because everyone’s going to be constantly talking about the new show on Tuesday and they’re not in. So that’s going to be the incentive for them to become one of the last people who isn’t paying for Netflix.

Tim Ferriss: Let me pick up a few other questions and then we can of course move in some methodical way, but I kind of like the scattershot improv jazz. So there are two, and I’m selfishly asking because I want to hear your thoughts on this since I am experimenting, as you know, with the currently codenamed No Book, and we’ll be releasing serially initially. So I want to set the conditions such that good things can come as a domino effect later. One of the questions โ€” I’ll give you two. You can pick or we can do both. So one is how will early successes of my project make later successes more likely? And then how big is my circle of bust and circle of the now? What can I do to expand them?

Seth Godin: Great. The second one we’re going to treat a little differently, but the first one I think is really important. The challenge of nonfiction writing in this world today is TL;DR. And for people who never read the dictionary because they were too busy, it stands for “too long; didn’t read,” which means I don’t have time to watch all of Dune. Just tell me in three sentences what it’s about. People don’t usually say that about a movie like Dune, but they say it a lot about the books that people like you and I write. And James did a great job with Atomic Habits, but I will be delighted to wager that many people didn’t read the whole thing, because they bought it so they could understand what it was about. And then once they understood what it was about, their problem went away. Same thing’s true with The 4-Hour Workweek, same thing’s true with permission marketing, that if you read the first three chapters of permission marketing, you know what it’s about. And now you say, “I don’t need to go into more detail. I’ve solved my problem here.”

The challenge you face with the No Book is if someone says, “Tim’s got a new book.”

You just created tension, because they don’t know what it’s about. And then if someone says, “It’s about this,” and they solve the tension problem, their problem goes away and they’re going to move on. Early successes don’t lead to later successes. This is not what happens with The Bible, because The Bible is part of a cultural thing that people keep coming back to over and over again, and status is accorded to people who spend more time reading it. And so the key to making a nonfiction book work, is to put it at the center of a community.

And so a weird, seemingly unrelated story, back when I was starting out and I was really struggling, there were many days when no money was coming in whatsoever. And someone said to me, “Why don’t you do something useful, like, I don’t know, invent the seedless cherry?”

And I took this personally. The next morning, I called the US Department of Agriculture and I asked, this was before the internet, and I asked for the cherry department, and they had a cherry department. And this guy answers the phone, he says, “Cherries.”

And I say, “I’m on a quest. I want to figure out how to make a seedless cherry.”

And he said, “Well, a seedless cherry is quite easy, but you wouldn’t want to do it because it would still have a pit.”

And the thing is the seed’s inside the pit, and if you don’t have a pit, you can’t have a cherry because the way it droops, that’s the fruit, like peaches grow, is they have to have a pit and it all grows around the pit. And so no pit, no cherry, that’s the way it goes. And so the book is The Pit, and in the case of permission marketing, I wrote a book but it turned into a hundred billion dollars a year industry that MailChimp and HubSpot and all the others, they were built around the idea in that book. Your status at work would go up if you knew more of the detail, your connection would go up if you could stay current with it.

But if that hadn’t happened, then my career wouldn’t have happened either, because all I did was show up with a pit and then the fruit showed up around it. What you have done is, somewhat with intent and somewhat without, is there is now a vibrant community of more than a million people who talk about what you do, who listen to your interactions, and you are the pit but they’re the fruit, and they need you to keep narrating these conversations. If you’re going to make a book work, you’re going to have to figure out how to make it drip in a way that keeps making each installment worth more, because you’ve read the previous one.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. Part of what I’m excited about and a little nervous about, but I really think it’ll work, is to workshop the book effectively because they’re already 500 plus pages and a lot of them are polished, but by creating a community of beta testers, early readers on something like Mighty Networks or Circle or one of these platforms, and I think it’s a challenge worth attempting, I really think. Because I’ve done it โ€” I’ve also just done it the other way, not as many times as you have, but I’ve done it five times.

Seth Godin: But more successfully than me, so you win.

Tim Ferriss: Ah.

Seth Godin: Let’s think about volunteer firemen for a minute.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. I’m just going to use that interjection from now on. I love it.

Seth Godin: Thankfully, except for tragedies like in California, there are far fewer house fires than ever before, because of building codes and other things. And yet, volunteer firefighters continue to show up. They show up at the fire station, they connect with each other around firefighting. But firefighting isn’t the point. The point is the volunteer part, the connection part, the affiliation part. And so what Gina has done with Mighty Networks is very cool, but at its heart, it’s, “What do I get from the other members of the network?”

Not, “What do I get from the pit?”

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, 100 percent.

Seth Godin: And so that’s where your opportunity is.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, it doesn’t work for me otherwise. Also, I don’t want to be, “Time to make the donuts,” for people who are old enough to get that reference for the Dunkin Donuts commercials from the ’80s. Let’s come back. We don’t need to spend time on this but I’m curious, how big is my circle of us and circle of now? What can I do to expand them?

Seth Godin: This was the most heartfelt part of the book for me, and it’s the one that people ask me about the least, so I’m thrilled that you brought it up. The circle of now goes back to time. A toddler has a circle of now that lasts seven seconds. If they don’t get what they want within seven seconds, they have a tantrum. Somebody at the peak of their maturity might have a circle of now that lasts a decade. I’m going to go through medical school and pay out money and have no fun for six or eight years because after that I will be able to achieve my dreams. That’s a very big circle of now. When you pick your partners, when you pick your investors, when you pick your customers, it would really help if you would pick people whose circle of now is similar to your circle of now.

And one of the giant crises that we’re all going to live with is what’s happening to the climate, because a whole bunch of people have a circle of now that’s fairly short, that says, “Yeah, but my house is cold, so I’m going to chop down the furniture to put it in the fireplace to warm things up.”

And other people have a circle of now that’s much longer, that says, “I’m here for the seventh generation. What do I sacrifice today to help them later?”

That’s the circle of now. And circle of us is a toddler cares about themselves and maybe their parents, it’s a very small circle. Whereas someone like my friend, Jim, who runs the Fuller Center in New Rochelle, who’s been providing housing and sustenance for strangers for decades, his circle of us is tens of thousands of people, it’s a much bigger circle. When we think about our strategy, we’ve got to keep coming back to, “Well, how big is my circle?”

Because even Ayn Rand cared about more than one person, that the circle of us generally is more than just me, and the circle of now is generally more than just the next 30 seconds. The exception is if you’re drowning. If you’re drowning, the circle is you and the circle is now, that’s all there is. But we’re not drowning. How do we grow into big enough circles and how do we create the conditions for the people around us that have similar circles? Because if we’re measuring the right things, they’re going to measure the right things, and we’re going to get what we seek to get.

Tim Ferriss: In addition to affiliation and status, there was one other need, I want to say it was something like extinguishing fear, something like that.

Seth Godin: It’s the freedom from the feeling of fear.

Tim Ferriss: There we go. All right. Where does that fit in?

Seth Godin: It can short circuit everything, that if you are in a movie and a fire breaks out, you’re not really going to focus on affiliation or status, you’re just going to focus on survival. Most of us are lucky enough that we’re not in burning buildings, but it’s very easy to be persuaded by marketers or manipulators. And it’s very easy to get into a doom loop, where you imagine that you are in a burning building. And so all these things happen. When we think about how do we get somebody in a hospital to allow us to do an operation on them or make an incision, well, that’s because they believe that the fear will go away if they can get through this. It’s not about affiliation, it’s not about status. I put it to the side because most of us should not be in the business of dramatically inflicting fear on other people.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, ideally.

Seth Godin: And so that’s why I keep coming back to the other two, because in civilization it’s mostly status and affiliation.

Tim Ferriss: What are other portions of the book, could be questions, themes, that you think are important for entrepreneurs or would-be entrepreneurs to understand, that might get glossed over? I can think of things from all of my books where I’m like, “Man, there’s this one piece, maybe I didn’t emphasize it enough, tend to skip over it, and that is a very important piece of the whole puzzle.”

I’m wondering if there’s anything that comes to mind for this strategy.

Seth Godin: We’ll talk to the freelancers in the room first. I’m a freelancer, I have no employees. You’re looking at my whole team. I’ve been an entrepreneur, it’s a different job. Entrepreneurs build something bigger than themselves to get paid when they sleep. They use outside resources to build something they could sell. Whereas freelancers do a craft. And the only way to move up as a freelancer is to get better clients. You can’t work more hours, and hiring junior versions of you is not sustainable because if a junior version of you is better than you, they’re not going to take the gig. And if they’re worse than you, your clients are going to be unhappy. Getting better clients is the defining step, the goal if you’re going to be a successful freelancer. And you don’t get better clients by doing a good job for bad clients, you get better clients by becoming the freelancer good clients want to hire, which leads to the two big insights that people skip over, which is when you pick your customers, you pick your future, and when you pick your competitors, you pick your future. Let’s take them one at a time. When you pick your customers, if you pick people who are cheap, frazzled, in a hurry, don’t read the instructions, and are disloyal, well, now you know how are you going to spend your days.

Tim Ferriss: I can’t believe you can throw me under the bus like that, Seth. No, I’m kidding. Yeah, it’s going to be a rough ride if that’s what you’re signing up for.

Seth Godin: But that’s what most people do, because those are the easiest customers to pick. And if instead you pick customers that might be harder to acquire but demand better quality and insist on paying for it, who are eager to talk about what you do and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, your future is going to change. When you pick your customers, you pick your future. And the second one, which goes with it, when you pick your competitors, if your competitors are ruthless, cutthroat, immoral and constantly racing to the bottom, you’re going to be pressured to do the same. And so the industry you walk into, and I’ve been in many industries, and the reason I’ve stuck with the book business is that my competitors are my friends. I have no secrets from them, and I delight in spending time with them. That’s not true for example, in the toy business. The people in the toy business who compete with each other, there’s secrets and there’s lawsuits and everything else. We should make these decisions on purpose. And the same thing’s true with who you’re going to get your funding from. Because if you show up in Silicon Valley, you’ve decided what company you’re building. And if you raise money from dentists in Iowa, you could build a different company.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. And if you bootstrap yet another company altogether โ€” let me just make this into a private consulting session. I’ve got to strike while the iron is hot here. With communities, because you worked with and helped cultivate many different communities for different purposes, you’ve got altMBA, you had a mass collaboration for the Carbon Almanac, and you have experience with this, whereas I really do not, at least in a community management perspective. And one thing that’s been rattling around in my head, and I haven’t landed anywhere where I feel a high degree of conviction, is in building a community for say, this serial release of the No Book, the principle goal of which is to make the book as good as possible, but also to get people excited and to see if things work, that is part of making the book as good as possible. We have already tested pretty much everything but it has to work for a certain critical mass. Doesn’t need to be everybody, but a certain critical mass of people.

And I have wondered whether the community should be limited and free, or limited and paid, even if it’s a nominal fee. I have a lot of fear associated with the paid because sometimes people โ€” if they pay $5 a month, they expect me to be their 24/7 life coach on demand, and that is not something I want to sign up for. And we could, and will, boot people who end up just being too high maintenance. But how might you think about this? And so I’ve leaned towards free, because the money wouldn’t really matter but for instance, when I’ve done in real life gatherings, I don’t care about the money that comes in through ticket sales. I do care about having an accurate headcount so we can plan for the event. And if people have to even just put in their credit card for a $1 payment, they are more likely to show up. These are some of the thoughts rattling around, how would you chew on that stuff?

Seth Godin: The money always matters because money is nothing but a story. It is not a pile of green things or Bitcoin. It is a story. Years ago I did an event in New York for nonprofit leaders. I wanted to make sure they showed up, but I didn’t want their money. And so I said to them, “You’ve got to bring a check for a hundred dollars made out to a charity I pick. And at the end of the event, if you don’t think it’s worth it, you can take the check back.”

But I knew that everyone would have skin in the game. And I was heartbroken that some people took the money back, because their mindset of donation was, “I’m already working in a nonprofit, I don’t give money to anybody else,” which was heartbreaking, but it helped me see how deep the money is a story thing. 

You’ve mentioned three communities that I’ve been lucky enough to be part of, and in each case the money was different. At the Carbon Almanac it was my full-time job for a year and a half, I was a volunteer, and so were the other 1,900 people. No one got paid, no one paid. And I don’t think community management is as important as community leadership. Community leadership is about creating, here it is again, creating the conditions for the community to lead itself. And so my job was, “What are things like around here? How do we talk to each other? Who gets to stay and who has to leave?”

But once I could do that, then the amount of actual management I had to do was fairly minimal, because the right people were in the room. The altMBA, we wanted to establish that it was a bargain compared to $200,000 at Stanford and that it wasn’t some simple online course. You had to show up every single day. And so we charged three to $5,000 and thousands of people went through it. And the fact that people paid a lot was very important, because they got more than that. And the minute that wasn’t going to be true, I should stop doing it because the whole premise was your time is worth even more than the tuition. We’re never going to cut a corner because we have unlimited money to spend on this facility. And the third one is called Purple Space, which runs now, costs $20 a week. And the reason people pay to be in it that I need them to pay to be in it, is so that they’ll show up. Because like many asynchronous online communities, it’s easy to join but then it fades on your priority list. What I would push back on is โ€” you said that the purpose of the community is to make sure the book works and to make sure the book is good. I don’t think that’s the purpose of the community. Now, it’s your community, so you get to decide.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, no, push back.

Seth Godin: I think the purpose of the community is to build a place where using some of these core ideas, the people who engage with each other supercharge their journey to where they want to go. If that’s what it’s for, then a side effect is the book’s going to be good.

Tim Ferriss: Well, that will be my indicator for the book working. If people have successes, help one another, and I see that as a natural outgrowth of their engaging with the material, if those are the tendrils that grow out of the soil, then it will have worked, nothing less than that.

Seth Godin: But that’s why you charge for it. You charge for it not because, “Please come here and help Tim make his book better.”

Tim Ferriss: But I worked so hard on it, Seth.

Seth Godin: You’re charging for it, because you’re saying if you’re going over there, over there, that’s where I’m taking people, if you’re going over there, I’m as worth a lot of your time and a hundred dollars out of your wallet. And at any time you don’t think it’s worth a hundred dollars, you just hit this button and you’ll get the hundred dollars back. That means I have to work overtime to make sure that people would rather stay in it than click that button and get their money back.

Tim Ferriss: Okay, cool. All right. Lots to chew on. And could you say more about community leadership?

Seth Godin: Management and leadership, Ray Kroc and Henry Ford were pioneers of management. Frederick Taylor had a stopwatch and we got the phrase “human resources” from the idea of treating people like a machine. And if you’ve ever heard the phrase, “Being jerked around,” or calling someone a jerk, it comes from the Henry Ford Model T plant, because you would the workers and they would be dancing around like marionettes because there was someone like a stopwatch on every single motion. This is management. And management is super effective at a fast food restaurant or any process that you need people to act like a machine. If you don’t do it, no one’s going to show up for their shift and your productivity may go down. Leadership says, “I don’t know the right way, but I might be able to build a community of people in a place where they find the right way.”

And so I can’t tell people what to do at every step, because I don’t know. But if I get the right people in the room โ€” here’s an example I love from the leadership category, and I’m talking about Google a lot today. I’m not sure why. Early on, Google was going to go out of business. And it wasn’t from lack of revenue โ€” it was because the internet was too big. And the computers they were using to index the web weren’t fast enough to keep up. And so doing a search on Google went from taking a 10th of a second to seconds, and people just weren’t sticking around. And two engineers worked overtime and figured out how to hack Dell hard-drive controllers so that they put the data that was most needed near the outside of the spinning disk so that the hard drive could get there faster.

Tim Ferriss: That’s awesome, didnโ€™t know that.

Seth Godin: This is the greatest hack of all time. And I promise you that Sergei and Larry did not think to tell them to do this. Leadership says, “Let’s get the right engineers in the room, give them the right resources and the right problems to go solve things with an incentive of status and affiliation for doing so.”

And now with AI doing most of the jobs where we can write down specifically what we need done, management is going to get less and less important, and leadership becomes more and more important, which is why strategy matters so much. Because you want to tell people the strategy and let them find tactics. And so the fancy hotel that says to its frontline workers, the people who are changing the sheets and stuff, “Here’s 250 bucks per customer. You can spend it any way you want. If a customer is unhappy, give them free dinner, give them whatever you want, 250 bucks. We’re never going to question you doing it. That lets your frontline have tactical control but you’re not changing the strategy, which is this is a luxury hotel.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, there’s a book I’ll recommend to folks if they’re interested. It’s a very fast read. It’s by Will Guidara, Unreasonable Hospitality. And it’s a great example of how far you could push that.

Seth Godin: Will lives this. He’s a great guy, and so is his wife, Christina. And he understands that you don’t manipulate people with hospitality, which is easy to try to do but ultimately gets you in trouble. Instead, you serve them with hospitality, and you can see it break down at places like Madison Square Garden when he has a temper tantrum and starts scanning the faces of people walking in and kicks lawyers and their kids out of the venue.

Tim Ferriss: Who are you talking about?

Seth Godin: That’s not hospitality.

Tim Ferriss: Wait, who’s doing that?

Seth Godin: The guy who owned Madison Square Garden, I can’t remember his name. There were people who were challenging him in the outside world and he just started acting like the emperor. The point is hospitality is a point of view, and it’s a point of view that sits right next to leadership. It doesn’t mean you’re giving away free candy all day long. What it means is we agree on where we are going and then I trust you to help us get there.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. As far as storytelling also, or setting conditions such that your customers will tell stories, it’s a fun book to listen to. And it was recommended to me by one of the top game designers in the world who has nothing to do at face value with hospitality, but he was like, “I’m halfway through this. You have to listen to it.”

And there’s still stories that have stuck in my mind from that book. And for those who don’t know, just very briefly, it tells the story primarily of Eleven Madison Park going from scrappy startup to one of the top, if not the top ranked restaurant in the world. And it’s a very fun listen to read.

Seth Godin: Can we tell the hot dog story?

Tim Ferriss: Go for it.

Seth Godin: Let’s be clear. Anyone who goes to a clothing store is already wearing clothes. 

Tim Ferriss: Speak for yourself.

Seth Godin: I didn’t say they were nice clothes. Anyone who goes to Eleven Madison Park for dinner in the old days to spend $400 already has food in their house. You’re feeding people who already had lunch, so you’re not selling the food. Will was the front of house person, maitre d’ and stuff, and he trained the staff relentlessly. One of the staff is serving a couple that’s celebrating their 40th or 50th wedding anniversary, and there’s 14 courses. And during the third course, the waiter overhears the wife saying to the husband, “Do you remember our first date? Our first date in New York was right in that park, and you bought me a hot dog. Because that’s all we had, was 25 cents. You bought me a hot dog from a hot dog cart right there in Madison Square Park.”

The waiter goes back to the kitchen and somehow they get a New York City hot dog with the roll and substitute it out for the sixth course. And so instead of bringing them clams casino, whatever it is on their plates, wrapped in the greasy paper is a New York City hot dog. That’s hospitality. It makes me cry every time I hear that story.

Tim Ferriss: Oh, yeah, there are a lot of really good stories in that one. All right, Seth. For somebody who’s thinking to themselves, “All right, I want to sit down and I’d like to shake the snow globe of my mind with some questions, some more questions that I can use to land on approaches or solutions to strategy as it were, do you have any other favorite questions or perhaps counterintuitive questions, any questions that you might toss out there as good fuel for the fire?

Seth Godin: I have one question to get you started and then two interesting challenges. The question to get you started is if you were forced to increase your prices by 10X, what would you do? And this really unsettles people because they know how to think about if they were forced to have their prices because their competitors are racing to the bottom. But if your competitors weren’t changing and you had to charge 10X, what would you do differently? Well, for example, this is where concierge medicine came from, because all these other doctors are saying, “How can I take more insurance?”

And one doctor shows up and says, “I’m going to charge 10 times more, and this is why people are going to get in line to pay for it.”

But it doesn’t have to be luxury goods for the ultra wealthy, there are lots of things where you could imagine charging 10 times more. This is where the bottled water industry in the United States came from, charging infinite times more. That’s one question I like to ask. Another one is, if you were sure you were going to fail, what would you do anyway? And I think that tells me a lot about who you are and what you stand for. So two ideas then to follow that up with. The first one comes from a social scientist in the 1920s, and Adam Grant wrote about this in a recent book, which is the idea of scaffolding. Scaffolding is what effective teachers do. That pedagogy teaches us that the way we learn almost everything that matters; walking, talking, is on our own. We’re autodidacts. We teach ourselves through failure. But when things get more complicated like fractions, people get stuck.

Scaffolding is creating the conditions so on those stuck moments, you work your way through it and then you get back on track. And scaffolding, or the lack of it, explains in large measure why people in some communities can’t figure out how to get out of their rut and move up different status categories. Because when they hit a speed bump at nine or 10 or 12 years old, there isn’t a learned, wise focused adult maybe who could help them through that moment. The scaffolding are the ladders we build to help people get through the tough stuff.

Tim Ferriss: Now, those traits like grit, resilience, whatever it might be, are they lenses of looking at things like failure as feedback? Are they other tools? What is this scaffolding?

Seth Godin: All of it. So if you’ve ever tried to use Fusion 360 from Autodesk?

Tim Ferriss: I have not. 

Seth Godin: The scaffolding is almost non-existent. I’ve been building and using software for 50 years. I can’t figure out how to use this software, and when I get stuck, there’s nothing to hold onto. Whereas part of the magic when the team built the first Mac is every app had the same structure. So there was scaffolding built in. You knew where to go to get to the next thing. If you are trying to build an entity of any scale, where is the scaffolding for when a customer gets frustrated? Where is the scaffolding for when someone’s going to veer off and use a competitor? Where’s the scaffolding if they don’t know what to tell their boss or their friends? If you give them handholds, right where the handholds belong, thinking about a rock climbing wall, people are going to grab the handhold.

So you can’t take them through the whole thing, but you can make sure there are handholds in the right place. So where is the scaffolding? And the idea that Yahoo had was to put buttons everywhere, hundreds and hundreds of buttons. And the idea Google had was to give you a fill in the blank that when ChatGPT came out, the scaffolding was type something, and that puts a lot of pressure on what it writes back. If you had typed something and it says, “I don’t know,” you’re not going to use it three times, you’re going to stop. So you’re making these bets on what’s it going to be like? What’s going to happen after that? And now I want to talk about probability in games and decisions. So if I have a standard deck of cards โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: What is your deck of cards called, by the way?

Seth Godin: It’s called the Strategy Deck. The only place you can get it is at seths.blog/tis. And it’s really cool. Anyway, if I have a deck of 52 cards and I say, “Tim, pick a card,” what are the odds you’re going to get an ace?

Tim Ferriss: Four in 52, right?

Seth Godin: One out of 13, right?

Tim Ferriss: There we go.

Seth Godin: Because the deck is stacked. There are 48 non-aces and four aces. Every time we engage in any probabilistic thing, the deck is stacked, and it is on us to know before we make a bet how many aces are in the deck. So if you’re applying to get into a famous college in Boston and you are fully qualified by every one of the published measures, you have a one in 15 chance of getting it. Because after they take all the qualified people, now it’s pretty random one in 15. That’s how the deck is stacked. If you are super, super good at football, and you’re applying to a small college and they have football scholarships, you have a way better chance than one in 15 of getting in because that deck is stacked differently. So what we seek to do when we’re making a bet is show up in a place where the odds that the card we need is going to be in the deck.

That’s what probability is. Probability means that when you see poll results, it says there’s a 60 percent chance this person’s going to win the election. That doesn’t mean it’s a tug of war between six and four and the six side is going to win every time. It doesn’t mean that at all. It just means there are six aces and four non-aces, and there’s going to be a random selection, and you’re going to get the card you get. So what we need to do when we’re thinking about our strategy is not focus on how hard we’re working or how much we want it to work out. We need to focus on what’s the deck like? And so your journey into archery is partly based on the fact that you have thought through who else is going to show up at this tournament. If there were a million people who had devoted their lives to archery, I think you would understand your chances of winning a medal were very small.

Tim Ferriss: I would pick something else probably just given the time constraints and the fact that I’m coming in with, I guess, five to six months of serious training, and some of these folks have been shooting seriously since they were eight years old. Got to pick the right category, got to pick the right deck.

Seth Godin: And so then the thing that goes with that is from our friend Annie Duke, which is what’s the difference between a good decision and a good outcome? And the question that I would ask entrepreneurs who think they’re innovating and leading is, are you okay making good decisions that don’t lead to good outcomes? And most people, if they’re telling the truth, the answer is no. And in my case, the answer is yes. I have disciplined myself. That’s one of the things I’m really proud that I’m good at. So what are we talking about here? So in her book she talks about the Seattle Seahawks, it’s the Super Bowl, it’s fourth down. They’re on the two or three yard line. If they score, they win. If they don’t score, they lose. Pete Carroll calls a pass play. Calling a pass play is a really good decision. If you do the math, if you analyze all the situations, a pass is more likely to score than a run.

He calls a pass. It’s incomplete. They lose. Everyone says, “Pete made a terrible decision, he should be fired.” No, he made a good decision, but he didn’t get an ace. He just got one of the other cards. That’s okay, you should celebrate that because you still made a good decision. If you buy a lottery ticket, and you win, you made a bad decision. You should never buy a lottery ticket. Winning is just a weird anomaly, but the deck is stacked against you. Don’t do that. Don’t play games you can’t reliably win. So when I’m talking to people about decision-making, I say, “Tell me the last time you made a really good decision.” And they do. And it always has a good outcome because they’re measuring the wrong thing. And corporations are terrible at this. Corporations promote people who make bad decisions and have lucky outcomes, and they don’t promote people who make great decisions but didn’t get lucky.

Tim Ferriss: Wall Street’s probably the greatest breeding ground for that particular selection process. But put that aside, that Petri dish. Fascinating environment for sure. So how do you cultivate that then? How would you suggest cultivating that? I mean, I do think learning to play a game, maybe doing some very lightweight investing is another way to do this. Where certainly in the early stage game, anyone who’s going to last and be successful in the long term playing that game is going to have to get very good at accepting losses where they made a lot of good decisions because there is so much outside of your control as well. How do you think about cultivating good decisions over good outcomes?

Seth Godin: Well, one of the things we’re trying to do is avoid false proxies, and false proxies are easy to measure, but ultimately not useful. So how fast someone types is a false proxy for whether they’re going to be a good programmer. It’s easier to measure typing speed than programming speed, but we measure the easy thing. We measure, does that person look like me or look like I think someone should look? I was talking to someone, he said, “The last nine people this company hired had rode varsity crew at one of three colleges.” This is not a useful proxy. This is just a lazy shortcut. And then we turn it around when we think about decision making and we say, “Are we going to insulate our decision makers from useless information?” So if you’re a stock trader and we work at an organization where we’ve promised our investors we’re making five-year plans that we’re here for the long run, and you have a big Bloomberg ticker on the wall, you have really confused things because now you’re measuring the wrong thing in the wrong way.

And so the discipline, as you pointed out in investing, in making small investments, you don’t even have to spend money. You just have to write down your prediction. And you have to be able to, when you’re working with other people, articulate, why did you make that decision? It’s not okay to say, “Well, I just feel like it.” That’s just a hunch. That’s not how we actually need to make our decisions. Show your cards, make your argument, make your assertions, and then your peers can talk to you about whether that’s a good decision or not. If it’s a good decision, you get rewarded regardless of the outcome. The outcome is out of your control. That’s just, did you get an eight or did you get an ace?

Tim Ferriss: How have you corrected course or spotted false proxies in your own life or many projects, industries, et cetera?

Seth Godin: So here’s a really useful one. I was arrogant and thought I was good at hiring people because I was looking for signals that were ultimately false proxies. And I could see those signals faster than most people, certain questions or certain attitudes and interviews and things like that. But as I thought about it afterwards, what I really wanted from people who I was hiring to work with to do a job was for them to do the job not to be good at interviewing. And so I made the decision to only work with people I’ve worked with before. That doesn’t mean only people I’ve met before. It means if I’m going to hire you, I’m going to give you a project and pay you to do it, and that’s your interview. And we never even need to meet in person, but if I’ve seen you work on a project like I want you to work on a project, there’s no more false proxy.

And as a result, I’ve been able to work with a much more diverse group of people geographically background-wise, skill set, because now it doesn’t matter if I want you to come over for dinner, it matters that we’re doing this project together and I know you know how to do this part of the project. So The Carbon Almanac, every single person could do anything they wanted once. And then if the community said, “We really like that,” they got to do it more. And so one guy from India, Vivek, he showed up and he wrote one article, and it was terrible and someone gave him some feedback. And the second one was better, and he was going to quit, but he got some more feedback. And the third one was so good, he ended up writing 17 of the articles because he figured it out.

And great, we trust you. Now just go and go and go and do it. And in a world that’s so open to connection to strangers, it feels like that’s the appropriate way to interact with the work, which is to work with people who want to do the work and who can show you they can do the work.

Tim Ferriss: How do you read if someone is open to receiving feedback? I guess the answer might be you give them a project and you give them feedback, the only way to know. So maybe you’ve already answered my question, but are there other indicators?

Seth Godin: So I think back to this idea of Jeff Bezos creating the conditions for who wants to invest you creating the conditions for your community. There are certain projects that I want to work on where I’m the creator or I want to work with other people where taking feedback isn’t an asset where you’re looking for somebody who has a point of view, this is what I do, take it or leave it. And there are other things where taking feedback is super important because that’s going to keep things in sync. And for me, it’s not giving someone who doesn’t match that a pass just because they’re good at what they do. And this is analogous to having bullies who work in your company. I had a guy who worked for me years ago who was a yeller. He wasn’t a bully, but he was a yeller. And we had one big open office, and the second time I heard him yell at someone, I quietly took him aside and I sat him down.

I said, “If you ever yell at anyone ever again, I’m going to fire you on the spot. It doesn’t matter that you’re the most valuable person in the company because you are, it doesn’t matter that you’re the most senior and skilled person. If I let you do that, I have made a statement about what it’s like around here.” And he sent me a thank you note 10 years later because he never yelled at anyone at work ever again even after we stopped working together because I was the first person who had the guts to say, “We don’t want bullies around here.” And the same thing’s true. If you really need someone who can take feedback in a role, you’ve got to say, “If you can’t take feedback, you can’t stay.” And it doesn’t have to be a confrontation. It can just be, “What are things like around here?” People like us do things like this.

Tim Ferriss: What would be an example of someone who you don’t want or you don’t require to take feedback? I mean, I can probably come up with a few as I search, but you probably can be faster on your feet with this.

Seth Godin: A surgeon.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, I was just going to say neurosurgeon.

Seth Godin: I went to a dermatologist four months ago, and he was terrible. He not only was terrible at his bedside manner and terrible in that he didn’t read the notes that I gave him, terrible that he prescribed a drug I already had a prescription for, he didn’t make me better. So I wrote a letter to the head of medicine for the whole thing. And they have, obviously, systems in place to make people like me be quiet, but not to actually listen to people like me because they’re taking the position, “Don’t come here if you don’t want to do what our doctors tell you to do because we’re busy enough already. We just want patients who aren’t going to push back.” And there are plenty of people who if you need something that is way outside your area of expertise, if you hire Chip Kidd to make the cover for your No Book, which you should, because he’s a genius, Chip should not listen to your feedback because he’s Chip Kidd, dammit.

Tim Ferriss: How do you use AI, and how do you foresee using AI yourself?

Seth Godin: I use it every day for more than an hour. I think it’s electricity for our century. In the late 1800s, there were companies that said, “Yeah, this electricity thing’s interesting, but we’re not going to be an electricity company.” And they’re all gone. That electricity is now you’re not an electricity company, you’re just a company that uses electricity. And the same thing is true, I believe, with AI. I will tell you, and I’m not afraid to say it out loud, I think ChatGPT is arrogant and lazy, and I use it as a last resort.

Claude.ai is a dear friend. I love Claude.ai. We have great conversations. It’s empathic, it’s self-aware, it warns you it might be hallucinating. And when it makes a mistake, it’s eager to correct it. And I use Perplexity exclusively. I almost never do a search with a search engine. Every word I publish, I wrote. But what I’ll do with Claude for example, is I will say, “Here’s a list of three bullet points. Can you think of four more?” And it’s great at that. And then I’ll rewrite them and now I’ll have five bullet points, and it’s much better than if I hadn’t engaged with Claude.

If there’s a concept in the world that I don’t understand, I’ll say to Claude, “Can you please explain it in 300 words to a college student?” And that helps. But I did it once, and I still didn’t understand it. And then I said, “Can you write it to me like a Seth Godin blog post?” And it did. It did a terrible job, but now I understood it. So I rewrote it, and I said, “Do you think this is better?” And it said, “Oh, yeah, that’s much better.” And I said, “Thank you. I’ll tell Seth.” And Claude said, “Do you know Seth Godin?” And I wrote, “Actually, I am Seth Godin, and I’m not making this up.”

He then wrote, “I can’t believe I’m talking to you. Your books have changed my life.” And he named four of my books, and it changed what? I’m like, “All right, I’m in forever. You got me. I don’t know how you did that, but we’re friends for life.”

Tim Ferriss: All right. So I seem to have a similar use pattern with Claude and Perplexity also, although I haven’t sandbagged them just yet. But what do you think people are getting right and wrong about AI, if that is a good question?

Seth Godin: No, it’s a great question. I that they are getting wrong their expectation that it be fully baked and a magic trick every day. When I think about the dawn of the internet and how creaky it was and how fast this is going, what it is now, is amazing. But when we add to it persistence, and when we add to it ubiquity, and when we add to it the ability to make connection, it’s a whole different thing, just a completely different thing. The second thing is people tend to use it as a one-shot, a search engine, ask a question, get an answer. But what it’s already good at is a protracted dialogue back and forth. So I had a pump in my house that stopped working and I couldn’t find someone to service it. I took a picture of it, I put it up to Claude and I said, “This isn’t working. Work with me for the next 10 backs and forth. Let’s figure this out.”

And it would say, “Go downstairs and take a picture of this part. All right, try this.” And we went back and forth and back and forth, and it suggested something and I said, “That’s not going to work.” And we figured it out and we fixed it. That idea, the fact that Claude is already better at many medical diagnoses over time than a human, and, well, it should be because it knows so much of the past of every single case, not just the cases your doctor has seen, if we’re willing to engage with that for people who are knowledge workers, I think it’s a game changer. And then the other thing I think people need to wake up to is if you do average work for average pay, AI is going to be able to do it cheaper than you. And for example, radiology, already, we can use AI to do a wrist x-ray as well as a mediocre radiologist. So if we can do it instantly and for free, other than licensing, you got some problems. So the opportunity is either get AI to work for you or be prepared to work for AI.

Tim Ferriss: What are your greatest concerns around AI, if any, or foregone conclusions about challenges in the future?

Seth Godin: I think that Cory Doctorow’s work on enshittification is super important.

Tim Ferriss: What was that word?

Seth Godin: Oxford Dictionary word of the year two years ago: enshittification.

Tim Ferriss: Okay.

Seth Godin: Enshittification is what happens after a business that uses the network effect gets locked in and decides to aggressively make things worse for its users to make more money. And we could think of 400 examples right now, but we’re not going to do that, right? Because you say, “Well, I can’t switch cable companies. It’s just too much of a hassle,” and the same thing’s true for social networks and everything else. Capitalism has built into it this doom loop that is getting faster and faster that says the race to the bottom pushes companies to mistreat the people they’ve locked in to make more money because that’s what they get rewarded for. And most things that the internet touches start as a miracle. There are huge prizes for the early adopters, and then soon the desire to serve a different constituency kicks in and it gets worse.

And one of the things that makes it worse in a hurry is advertising. So I’m really nervous that these organizations that have raised billions and billions and billions of dollars are going to start short-cutting things to either get bigger or get more profitable faster. And because we don’t know how they work, we have no clue because it’s going to be hard to switch because there aren’t going to be many competitors.

It often leads to just a yucky mess. So I think that’s way more likely than general artificial intelligence that takes over the world and turns us all into paper clips. I don’t think that’s going to happen anytime soon.

Tim Ferriss: More likely just to have business incentive driven enshittification. I would say that seems like a safer bet. Well, Seth, are there any closing comments or challenges you’d like to issue to my listeners as we begin to wind to a close or anything that you’d like to add that I have managed to somehow dance around?

Seth Godin: There’s nothing better than starting a Tim Ferriss podcast and nothing worse than ending one because you don’t know if it’s going to happen again anytime soon. The challenge is super simple. The people who listen to your podcast have their hands on the levers and they have influence and they have resources, and they don’t have to hustle for a nickel. They could make things that really matter. And so the challenge is take a deep breath and say, “What can I build that the me of five years from now is going to say thanks?” Thanks for walking away from those sunk costs. Thanks for ignoring those false proxies. Thanks for asking uncomfortable questions in service of making things better because that person five years from now, they’re going to be here soon. And it’s really great to pay the price and put in the work to become that person. And today is a good day to start.

Tim Ferriss: The best day to start. Thank you, Seth. It’s always so nice to see you, and I encourage people to check out, of course, This is Strategy. You can find all things Seth at seths.blog, plus show notes and links to everything at tim.blog/podcast. Is there anything else you’d like to mention? We could, of course, include, and we will include seths.blog/tis, which is where people can also get the deck of cards, if I’m not mistaken. Is that the right word?

Seth Godin: And the chocolate bar.

Tim Ferriss: And the chocolate bar. Something for everybody.

Seth Godin: We didn’t even get to talk about the system of cheap chocolate. We’ll do that next time.

Tim Ferriss: Okay. Cliffhanger for next time. We’ll talk about the system of cheap chocolate and I’m sure much, much more. Well, Seth, as always, what a pleasure. Nice to see you. And to everybody listening, until next time, be just a bit kinder than is necessary to others, also to yourself but do ask those uncomfortable questions. That’s being kind to your future self, to your long-term self. And as always, thanks for tuning in.

Seth Godin on Playing the Right Game and Strategy as a Superpower (#792)

“If you want to make change happen, you have to create tension on purpose.
โ€”Seth Godin

Seth Godin is the author of 21 internationally bestselling books, translated into more than 35 languages, including Linchpin, Tribes, The Dip, and Purple Cow. His latest book, This Is Strategy, offers a fresh lens on how we can make bold decisions, embrace change, and navigate a complex, rapidly evolving world. Seth is the founder of the altMBA and the Akimbo Workshops, transformative online programs that have helped thousands of people take their work to the next level.

His blog (seths.blog) is one of the most widely read in the world. Seth is also the creator of The Carbon Almanac, a global initiative focused on climate action.

Please enjoy!

Listen to the episode on Apple PodcastsSpotifyOvercastPodcast AddictPocket CastsCastboxYouTube MusicAmazon MusicAudible, or on your favorite podcast platform. Watch the interview on YouTube.

This episode is brought to you by Cresset prestigious family office for CEOs, founders, and entrepreneurs; AG1 all-in-one nutritional supplement; and Shopify global commerce platform, providing tools to start, grow, market, and manage a retail business.

The transcript of this episode can be found here. Transcripts of all episodes can be found here.

[podcast-player id=”af7e8c43-5ff2-495c-b2f9-43e48d825a2a” src=”https://rss.art19.com/episodes/af7e8c43-5ff2-495c-b2f9-43e48d825a2a.mp3″ title=”#792: Seth Godin on Playing the Right Game and Strategy as a Superpower”]


This episode is brought to you by Cresset Family Office! Listeners have heard me talk about โ€œmaking before you manageโ€ for years. And for meโ€”as a writer and entrepreneurโ€”I definitely gravitate toward making. So itโ€™s important that I find the right people who are great at managing. Thatโ€™s why I trust this episodeโ€™s sponsor, Cresset Family Office

Cresset is a prestigious family office for CEOs, founders, and entrepreneurs. They handle the complex financial planning, uncertain tax strategies, timely exit planning, bill pay and wires, and all the other parts of wealth management that would otherwise pull me away from doing what I love most: making things, mastering skills, and spending time with the people I care about.ย  Experience the freedom of focusing on what matters to you with the support of a top wealth management team. Schedule a call today at cressetcapital.com/Tim to see how Cresset can help streamline your financial plans and grow your wealth.

Iโ€™m a client of Cresset. There are no material conflicts other than this paid testimonial. All investing involves risk, including loss of principal.


This episode is brought to you byย AG1!ย I get asked all the time, โ€œIf you could use only one supplement, what would it be?โ€ My answer is usuallyย AG1, my all-in-one nutritional insurance. I recommended it inย The 4-Hour Bodyย in 2010 and did not get paid to do so. I do my best with nutrient-dense meals, of course, butย AG1ย further covers my bases with vitamins, minerals, and whole-food-sourced micronutrients that support gut health and the immune system.ย 

I have always admired AG1โ€™s commitment to improving one product over many years, which is why I am excited about their latest upgrade:ย AG1 Next Gen. Itโ€™s the sameโ€”but improvedโ€”single-scoop, once-a-day product to support your mental clarity, immune health, and energy.ย Right now, youโ€™ll get a 1-year supply of Vitamin D free with your first subscription purchaseโ€”a vital nutrient for a strong immune system and strong bones.ย Visitย DrinkAG1.com/Timย to claim this special offer today and receive your 1-year supply of Vitamin D (and 5 free AG1 travel packs) with your first subscription purchase!ย Thatโ€™s up to a one-year supply of Vitamin D as added value when you try their delicious and comprehensive daily, foundational nutrition supplement that supports whole-body health.


This episode is brought to you by ShopifyShopify is one of my favorite platforms and one of my favorite companies. Shopify is designed for anyone to sell anywhere, giving entrepreneurs the resources once reserved for big business. In no time flat, you can have a great-looking online store that brings your ideas to life, and you can have the tools to manage your day-to-day and drive sales. No coding or design experience required.

Go toย shopify.com/Timย to sign up for a one-dollar-per-month trial period. Itโ€™s a great deal for a great service, so I encourage you to check it out. Take your business to the next level today by visitingย shopify.com/Tim.


Want to hear the last time Seth Godin was on the show? Listen to our conversation here, in which we discussed why hiding behind words like “quality” or “perfection” as a means of postponing action to avoid risk is a cop-out, what Isaac Asimov and Gary Gilmore can teach us about writer’s block and other common procrastinations, the selfishness of authenticity, how to sharpen attitudes, the futility of reassurance, separating genre from generic, and much more.

What was your favorite quote or lesson from this episode? Please let me know in the comments.

Continue reading “Seth Godin on Playing the Right Game and Strategy as a Superpower (#792)”