Jim Collins and Ed Zschau (#741)

This episode is a two-for-one, and thatโ€™s because the podcast recently hit its 10-year anniversary and passed one billion downloads. To celebrate, Iโ€™ve curated some of the best of the bestโ€”some of my favoritesโ€”from more than 700 episodes over the last decade. I could not be more excited. The episode features segments from episode #361 “Jim Collins โ€” A Rare Interview with a Reclusive Polymath” and #380 “Ed Zschau โ€” The Polymath Professor Who Changed My Life.”

Please enjoy!

Bios of guests may be found at tim.blog/combo.

Listen to the episode on Apple PodcastsSpotifyOvercastPodcast AddictPocket CastsCastboxYouTube MusicAmazon MusicAudible, or on your favorite podcast platform.

Brought to you by Eight Sleepโ€™s Pod 4 Ultraย sleeping solution for dynamic cooling and heating, AG1ย all-in-one nutritional supplement, and LMNTย electrolyte supplement.

Transcript of the full Jim Collins episode | Transcript of the full Ed Zschau episode | Transcripts of all episodes

[podcast-player id=”a7ee9ab6-2f39-4fb3-abd0-a26e9e373b8c” src=”https://rss.art19.com/episodes/a7ee9ab6-2f39-4fb3-abd0-a26e9e373b8c.mp3″ title=”#741: Jim Collins and Ed Zschau”]

This episode is brought to you byย AG1!ย I get asked all the time, โ€œIf you could use only one supplement, what would it be?โ€ My answer is usuallyย AG1, my all-in-one nutritional insurance. I recommended it inย The 4-Hour Bodyย in 2010 and did not get paid to do so. I do my best with nutrient-dense meals, of course, butย AG1ย further covers my bases with vitamins, minerals, and whole-food-sourced micronutrients that support gut health and the immune system.ย 

I have always admired AG1โ€™s commitment to improving one product over many years, which is why I am excited about their latest upgrade:ย AG1 Next Gen. Itโ€™s the sameโ€”but improvedโ€”single-scoop, once-a-day product to support your mental clarity, immune health, and energy.ย Right now, youโ€™ll get a 1-year supply of Vitamin D free with your first subscription purchaseโ€”a vital nutrient for a strong immune system and strong bones.ย Visitย DrinkAG1.com/Timย to claim this special offer today and receive your 1-year supply of Vitamin D (and 5 free AG1 travel packs) with your first subscription purchase!ย Thatโ€™s up to a one-year supply of Vitamin D as added value when you try their delicious and comprehensive daily, foundational nutrition supplement that supports whole-body health.


This episode is brought to you by LMNTWhat is LMNT? Itโ€™s a delicious, sugar-free electrolyte drink mix. Iโ€™ve stocked up on boxes and boxes of this and usually use it 1โ€“2 times per day. LMNT is formulated to help anyone with their electrolyte needs and perfectly suited to folks following a keto, low-carb, or Paleo diet. If you are on a low-carb diet or fasting, electrolytes play a key role in relieving hunger, cramps, headaches, tiredness, and dizziness.

LMNTย came up with a very special offer for you, my dear listeners.ย For a limited time, you can get a free LMNT Sample Pack with any purchase. This special offer is available here: DrinkLMNT.com/Tim.


This episode is brought to you by Eight Sleep. Temperature is one of the main causes of poor sleep, and heat is my personal nemesis. Iโ€™ve suffered for decades, tossing and turning, throwing blankets off, pulling them back on, and repeating ad nauseam. But a few years ago, I started using the Pod Cover, and it has transformed my sleep. Eight Sleep has launched their newest generation of the Pod: Pod 5 Ultra. It cools, it heats, and now it elevates, automatically. With the best temperature performance to date, Pod 5 Ultra ensures you and your partner stay cool in the heat and cozy warm in the cold. Plus, it automatically tracks your sleep time, snoring, sleep stages, and HRV, all with high precision. For example, their heart rate tracking is at an incredible 99% accuracy.

Pod 5 Ultra also introduces an adjustable Base that fits between your mattress and your bed frame to add custom positions for the best sleeping experience. It also automatically reduces your snoring when detected. Add it easily to any bed.ย And for full coverage, you can include the Blanket, which uses the same technology as the Podโ€™s Cover to extend temperature regulation over your entire body.

And now, listeners of The Tim Ferriss Show can get $350 off of the Pod 5 Ultra for a limited time! Click here to claim this deal and unlock your full potential through optimal sleep.


What was your favorite quote or lesson from this episode? Please let me know in the comments.

Continue reading “Jim Collins and Ed Zschau (#741)”

Greg McKeown and Diana Chapman (#740)

This episode is a two-for-one, and thatโ€™s because the podcast recently hit its 10-year anniversary and passed one billion downloads. To celebrate, Iโ€™ve curated some of the best of the bestโ€”some of my favoritesโ€”from more than 700 episodes over the last decade. I could not be more excited. The episode features segments from episode #355 “Greg McKeown โ€” How to Master Essentialism” and episode #536 “Diana Chapman โ€” How to Get Unstuck, Do โ€œThe Work,โ€ Take Radical Responsibility, and Reduce Drama in Your Life.”

Please enjoy!

Bios of guests may be found at tim.blog/combo.

Listen to the episode onย Apple Podcasts,ย Spotify,ย Overcast,ย Podcast Addict,ย Pocket Casts,ย Castbox,ย YouTube Music,ย Amazon Music,ย Audible, or on your favorite podcast platform.

Brought to you by Momentous high-quality supplements; Wealthfront high-yield savings account; and Helix Sleep premium mattresses.

Transcript of the full Greg McKeown episode | Transcript of the full Diana Chapman episode | Transcripts of all episodes

[podcast-player id=”9d7adfee-e779-4aa8-85a9-1fb659629125″ src=”https://rss.art19.com/episodes/9d7adfee-e779-4aa8-85a9-1fb659629125.mp3″ title=”#740: Greg McKeown and Diana Chapman”]


This episode is brought to you byย Momentousย high-quality supplements!ย Momentous offers high-quality supplements and products across a broad spectrum of categories, and Iโ€™ve been testing their products for months now. Iโ€™ve been using theirย magnesium threonate,ย apigenin, andย L-theanineย daily, all of which have helped me improve the onset, quality, and duration of my sleep. Iโ€™ve also been usingย Momentous creatine, and while it certainly helps physical performance, including poundage or wattage in sports, I use it primarily for mental performance (short-term memory, etc.).

Their products are third-party tested (Informed-Sport and/or NSF certified), so you can trust that what is on the label is in the bottle and nothing else. Use code TIM at checkout and enjoy 35% off your first subscription order or 14% off your first one-time purchaseAnd not to worry, my non-US friends, Momentous ships internationally and has you covered. 


This episode is brought to you byย Helix Sleep!ย Helix was selected as the best overall mattress of 2024 byย Forbes, Fortune, and Wired magazines and many others. Withย Helix, thereโ€™s a specific mattress to meet each and every bodyโ€™s unique comfort needs. Just take their quizโ€”only two minutes to completeโ€”that matches your body type and sleep preferences to the perfect mattress for you. They have a 10-year warranty, and you get to try it out for a hundred nights, risk-free. Theyโ€™ll even pick it up from you if you donโ€™t love it.ย And now, Helix is offering 20% off all mattress orders atย HelixSleep.com/Tim.


This episode is brought to you by Wealthfront! Wealthfront is a financial services platform that offers services to help you save and invest your money. Right now, you can earn 4.00% APYโ€”thatโ€™s the Annual Percentage Yieldโ€”with the Wealthfront Brokerage Cash Accoount. Thatโ€™s nearly 10x more interest than if you left your money in a savings account at the average bank, with savings rates at 0.42%, according to FDIC.gov, as of 05/19/2025. It takes just a few minutes to sign up, and then youโ€™ll immediately start earning 4.00% APY from program  banks on your uninvested cash. And when new clients open an account today, theyโ€™ll get an extra $50 bonus with a deposit of $500 or more. Terms and Conditions apply.  Visit Wealthfront.com/Tim to get started.

Cash Account offered by Wealthfront Brokerage LLC, member FINRA/SIPC. Wealthfront is not a bank. The APY on cash deposits as of 04/30/2025, is representative, subject to change, and requires no minimum. Funds in the Cash Account are swept to programย banks, where they earn a variable APY. Tim receives cash compensation from Wealthfront Brokerage for advertising and holds a non-controlling equity interest in the corporate parent of Wealthfront Brokerage. Tim and Wealthfront Brokerage have no other affiliation. Tim reflects his own opinions and Wealthfront does not endorse, sponsor, or promote them.ย See full disclosuresย here.


What was your favorite quote or lesson from this episode? Please let me know in the comments.

Continue reading “Greg McKeown and Diana Chapman (#740)”

Brenรฉ Brown and Edward O. Thorp (#739)

This episode is a two-for-one, and thatโ€™s because the podcast recently hit its 10-year anniversary and passed one billion downloads. To celebrate, Iโ€™ve curated some of the best of the bestโ€”some of my favoritesโ€”from more than 700 episodes over the last decade. I could not be more excited. The episode features segments from episode #409 “Brenรฉ Brown โ€” Striving versus Self-Acceptance, Saving Marriages, and More” and episode #596 “Edward O. Thorp, A Man for All Markets โ€” Beating Blackjack and Roulette, Beating the Stock Market, Spotting Bernie Madoff Early, and Knowing When Enough Is Enough.”

Please enjoy!

Bios of guests may be found at tim.blog/combo.

Listen to the episode on Apple PodcastsSpotifyOvercastPodcast AddictPocket CastsCastboxYouTube MusicAmazon MusicAudible, or on your favorite podcast platform.

Brought to you by AG1 all-in-one nutritional supplement, LinkedIn Ads marketing platform with 1B+ users, and LMNT electrolyte supplement.

Transcript of the full Brenรฉ Brown episode | Transcript of the full Edward O. Thorp episode | Transcripts of all episodes

[podcast-player id=”926e48e2-74ec-4a73-8740-61b21b7d566e” src=”https://rss.art19.com/episodes/926e48e2-74ec-4a73-8740-61b21b7d566e.mp3″ title=”#739: Brenรฉ Brown and Edward O. Thorp”]


This episode is brought to you byย AG1!ย I get asked all the time, โ€œIf you could use only one supplement, what would it be?โ€ My answer is usuallyย AG1, my all-in-one nutritional insurance. I recommended it inย The 4-Hour Bodyย in 2010 and did not get paid to do so. I do my best with nutrient-dense meals, of course, butย AG1ย further covers my bases with vitamins, minerals, and whole-food-sourced micronutrients that support gut health and the immune system.ย 

I have always admired AG1โ€™s commitment to improving one product over many years, which is why I am excited about their latest upgrade:ย AG1 Next Gen. Itโ€™s the sameโ€”but improvedโ€”single-scoop, once-a-day product to support your mental clarity, immune health, and energy.ย Right now, youโ€™ll get a 1-year supply of Vitamin D free with your first subscription purchaseโ€”a vital nutrient for a strong immune system and strong bones.ย Visitย DrinkAG1.com/Timย to claim this special offer today and receive your 1-year supply of Vitamin D (and 5 free AG1 travel packs) with your first subscription purchase!ย Thatโ€™s up to a one-year supply of Vitamin D as added value when you try their delicious and comprehensive daily, foundational nutrition supplement that supports whole-body health.


This episode is brought to you by LMNTWhat is LMNT? Itโ€™s a delicious, sugar-free electrolyte drink mix. Iโ€™ve stocked up on boxes and boxes of this and usually use it 1โ€“2 times per day. LMNT is formulated to help anyone with their electrolyte needs and perfectly suited to folks following a keto, low-carb, or Paleo diet. If you are on a low-carb diet or fasting, electrolytes play a key role in relieving hunger, cramps, headaches, tiredness, and dizziness.

LMNTย came up with a very special offer for you, my dear listeners.ย For a limited time, you can get a free LMNT Sample Pack with any purchase. This special offer is available here: DrinkLMNT.com/Tim.


This episode is brought to you byย LinkedIn Ads, the go-to tool for B2B marketers and advertisers who want to drive brand awareness, generate leads, or build long-term relationships that result in real business impact.

With a community of more than 900 million professionals, LinkedIn is gigantic, but it can be hyper-specific. You have access to a diverse group of people all searching for things they need to grow professionally. LinkedIn has the marketing tools to help you target your customers with precision, right down to job title, company name, industry, etc. To redeem your free $100 LinkedIn ad credit and launch your first campaign, go to LinkedIn.com/TFS!


What was your favorite quote or lesson from this episode? Please let me know in the comments.

Continue reading “Brenรฉ Brown and Edward O. Thorp (#739)”

Dr. Gabor Matรฉ and Dr. BJ Miller (#738)

This episode is a two-for-one, and thatโ€™s because the podcast recently hit its 10-year anniversary and passed one billion downloads. To celebrate, Iโ€™ve curated some of the best of the bestโ€”some of my favoritesโ€”from more than 700 episodes over the last decade. I could not be more excited. The episode features segments from episode #298 “Dr. Gabor Matรฉ โ€” New Paradigms, Ayahuasca, and Redefining Addiction” and episode #153 “The Man Who Studied 1,000 Deaths to Learn How to Live.”

Please enjoy!

Bios of guests may be found at tim.blog/combo.

Listen to the episode on Apple PodcastsSpotifyOvercastPodcast AddictPocket CastsCastboxYouTube MusicAmazon MusicAudible, or on your favorite podcast platform.

Brought to you by Vuori Clothing high-quality performance apparel; Shopify global commerce platform, providing tools to start, grow, market, and manage a retail business; and LinkedIn Ads marketing platform with 1B+ users.

Transcriptย of the full Gabor Matรฉ episode |ย Transcriptย of the full BJ Miller episode |ย Transcriptsย of all episodes

[podcast-player id=”e34d41e0-2dad-4c83-874e-1c25605f0c05″ src=”https://rss.art19.com/episodes/e34d41e0-2dad-4c83-874e-1c25605f0c05.mp3″ title=”#738: Dr. Gabor Matรฉ and BJ Miller, MD”]


This episode is brought to you byย Vuori Clothing!ย Vuoriย is a new and fresh perspective on performance apparel, perfect if you are sick and tired of traditional, old workout gear. Everything is designed for maximum comfort and versatility so that you look and feel as good in everyday life as you do working out.

Get yourself some of the most comfortable and versatile clothing on the planet at VuoriClothing.com/Tim. Not only will you receive 20% off your first purchase, but youโ€™ll also enjoy free shipping on any US orders over $75 and free returns.


This episode is brought to you by ShopifyShopify is one of my favorite platforms and one of my favorite companies. Shopify is designed for anyone to sell anywhere, giving entrepreneurs the resources once reserved for big business. In no time flat, you can have a great-looking online store that brings your ideas to life, and you can have the tools to manage your day-to-day and drive sales. No coding or design experience required.

Go toย shopify.com/Timย to sign up for a one-dollar-per-month trial period. Itโ€™s a great deal for a great service, so I encourage you to check it out. Take your business to the next level today by visitingย shopify.com/Tim.


This episode is brought to you byย LinkedIn Ads, the go-to tool for B2B marketers and advertisers who want to drive brand awareness, generate leads, or build long-term relationships that result in real business impact.

With a community of more than 900 million professionals, LinkedIn is gigantic, but it can be hyper-specific. You have access to a diverse group of people all searching for things they need to grow professionally. LinkedIn has the marketing tools to help you target your customers with precision, right down to job title, company name, industry, etc. To redeem your free $100 LinkedIn ad credit and launch your first campaign, go to LinkedIn.com/TFS!


What was your favorite quote or lesson from this episode? Please let me know in the comments.

Continue reading “Dr. Gabor Matรฉ and Dr. BJ Miller (#738)”

Naval Ravikant and Nick Kokonas (#737)

This episode is a two-for-one, and thatโ€™s because the podcast recently hit its 10-year anniversary and passed one billion downloads. To celebrate, Iโ€™ve curated some of the best of the bestโ€”some of my favoritesโ€”from more than 700 episodes over the last decade. I could not be more excited. The episode features segments from episode #97 “Naval Ravikant โ€” The Person I Call Most for Startup Advice” and episode #341 “Nick Kokonas โ€” How to Apply World-Class Creativity to Business, Art, and Life.”

Please enjoy!

Bios of guests may be found at tim.blog/combo.

Listen to the episode on Apple PodcastsSpotifyOvercastPodcast AddictPocket CastsCastboxYouTube MusicAmazon MusicAudible, or on your favorite podcast platform.

Brought to you by Eight Sleep Pod 4 Ultraย sleeping solution for dynamic cooling and heating, Momentousย high-quality supplements, and LinkedIn Jobsย recruitment platform with 1B+ users.

Transcriptย of the full Naval Ravikant episode |ย Transcriptย of the full Nick Kokonas episode |ย Transcriptsย of all episodes

[podcast-player id=”d2255f46-e60f-4204-995e-8d91e4b854ea” src=”https://rss.art19.com/episodes/d2255f46-e60f-4204-995e-8d91e4b854ea.mp3″ title=”#737: Naval Ravikant and Nick Kokonas”]


This episode is brought to you by Eight Sleep. Temperature is one of the main causes of poor sleep, and heat is my personal nemesis. Iโ€™ve suffered for decades, tossing and turning, throwing blankets off, pulling them back on, and repeating ad nauseam. But a few years ago, I started using the Pod Cover, and it has transformed my sleep. Eight Sleep has launched their newest generation of the Pod: Pod 5 Ultra. It cools, it heats, and now it elevates, automatically. With the best temperature performance to date, Pod 5 Ultra ensures you and your partner stay cool in the heat and cozy warm in the cold. Plus, it automatically tracks your sleep time, snoring, sleep stages, and HRV, all with high precision. For example, their heart rate tracking is at an incredible 99% accuracy.

Pod 5 Ultra also introduces an adjustable Base that fits between your mattress and your bed frame to add custom positions for the best sleeping experience. It also automatically reduces your snoring when detected. Add it easily to any bed.ย And for full coverage, you can include the Blanket, which uses the same technology as the Podโ€™s Cover to extend temperature regulation over your entire body.

And now, listeners of The Tim Ferriss Show can get $350 off of the Pod 5 Ultra for a limited time! Click here to claim this deal and unlock your full potential through optimal sleep.


This episode is brought to you byย Momentousย high-quality supplements!ย Momentous offers high-quality supplements and products across a broad spectrum of categories, and Iโ€™ve been testing their products for months now. Iโ€™ve been using theirย magnesium threonate,ย apigenin, andย L-theanineย daily, all of which have helped me improve the onset, quality, and duration of my sleep. Iโ€™ve also been usingย Momentous creatine, and while it certainly helps physical performance, including poundage or wattage in sports, I use it primarily for mental performance (short-term memory, etc.).

Their products are third-party tested (Informed-Sport and/or NSF certified), so you can trust that what is on the label is in the bottle and nothing else. Use code TIM at checkout and enjoy 35% off your first subscription order or 14% off your first one-time purchaseAnd not to worry, my non-US friends, Momentous ships internationally and has you covered. 


This episode is brought to you by LinkedIn Jobs. Whether you are looking to hire now for a critical role or thinking about needs that you may have in the future, LinkedIn Jobs can help. LinkedIn screens candidates for the hard and soft skills youโ€™re looking for and puts your job in front of candidates looking for job opportunities that match what you have to offer.

Using LinkedInโ€™s active community of more than 1 billion professionals worldwide,ย LinkedIn Jobsย can help you find and hire the right person faster.ย When your business is ready to make that next hire, find the right person with LinkedIn Jobs. And now, you can post a job for free.ย Just visit LinkedIn.com/Tim.


What was your favorite quote or lesson from this episode? Please let me know in the comments.

Continue reading “Naval Ravikant and Nick Kokonas (#737)”

The Tim Ferriss Show Transcripts: A Strategic Deep Dive on TikTok, The Boiling Moat of Taiwan, and Chinaโ€™s Next-Gen Statecraft โ€” Matt Pottinger, Former U.S. Deputy National Security Advisor (#736)

Please enjoy this transcript of my interview with Matt Pottinger. Matt is a distinguished visiting fellow at the Hoover Institution and chairman of the China Program at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.

Matt served as U.S. Deputy National Security Advisor from 2019 to 2021. In that role, Matt coordinated the full spectrum of national security policy.  Before that, he served as the NSC’s senior director for Asia, where he led the administrationโ€™s work on the Indo-Pacific region, and in particular its shift on China policy.

Before his White House service, Matt spent the late 1990s and early 2000s in China as a reporter for Reuters and The Wall Street Journal. He then fought in Iraq and Afghanistan as a U.S. Marine during three combat deployments between 2007 and 2010. Following active duty, Matt ran Asia research at Davidson Kempner Capital Management, a multi-strategy investment fund in New York.

Mattโ€™s new book, The Boiling Moat: Urgent Steps to Defend Taiwan, is coming out July 1st.

Transcripts may contain a few typos. With many episodes lasting 2+ hours, it can be difficult to catch minor errors. Enjoy!

Listen to the episode on Apple PodcastsSpotifyOvercastPodcast AddictPocket CastsCastboxYouTube MusicAmazon MusicAudible, or on your favorite podcast platform. Watch the interview on YouTube here.

[podcast-player id=”0ae53212-c3f8-4a9e-957c-e88dc8ca390c” src=”https://rss.art19.com/episodes/0ae53212-c3f8-4a9e-957c-e88dc8ca390c.mp3″ title=”#736: A Strategic Deep Dive on TikTok, The Boiling Moat of Taiwan, and Chinaโ€™s Next-Gen Statecraft โ€” Matt Pottinger, Former U.S. Deputy National Security Advisor (#736)”]

DUE TO SOME HEADACHES IN THE PAST, PLEASE NOTE LEGAL CONDITIONS:

Tim Ferriss owns the copyright in and to all content in and transcripts of The Tim Ferriss Show podcast, with all rights reserved, as well as his right of publicity.

WHAT YOUโ€™RE WELCOME TO DO: You are welcome to share the below transcript (up to 500 words but not more) in media articles (e.g., The New York Times, LA Times, The Guardian), on your personal website, in a non-commercial article or blog post (e.g., Medium), and/or on a personal social media account for non-commercial purposes, provided that you include attribution to โ€œThe Tim Ferriss Showโ€ and link back to the tim.blog/podcast URL. For the sake of clarity, media outlets with advertising models are permitted to use excerpts from the transcript per the above.

WHAT IS NOT ALLOWED: No one is authorized to copy any portion of the podcast content or use Tim Ferrissโ€™ name, image or likeness for any commercial purpose or use, including without limitation inclusion in any books, e-books, book summaries or synopses, or on a commercial website or social media site (e.g., Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc.) that offers or promotes your or anotherโ€™s products or services. For the sake of clarity, media outlets are permitted to use photos of Tim Ferriss from the media room on tim.blog or (obviously) license photos of Tim Ferriss from Getty Images, etc.


Tim Ferriss: Matt, so great to see you again.

Matt Pottinger: I’m delighted to be here. Thanks for having me.

Tim Ferriss: Absolutely. ๅฅฝไน…ไธ่ง  hวŽojiว”bรบjiร n [โ€œLong time no seeโ€].

Matt Pottinger: ๅฅฝไน…ไธ่ง  hวŽojiว”bรบjiร n [โ€œLong time no seeโ€]. Your tones are actually still quite sharp and acute, I don’t know how you did that.

Tim Ferriss: ๆฒกไป€ไนˆๅฅฝๅฐฑ mรฉishรฉnme hวŽojiรน [โ€œItโ€™s nothing goodโ€]. I guess we saw each other not too long ago and we were sitting in your kitchen at your dining room table and there were some calligraphy on the wall, and I asked you, because my characters have grown a little rough around the edges, and I asked you what this calligraphy meant. Recognized a few characters, but not all of them. What is this calligraphy that’s on your wall?

Matt Pottinger: That piece of calligraphy was written for me by Bao Tong. Bao Tong was a high Chinese official in the People’s Republic of China, and he happened to be the chief of staff to the party secretary of the Chinese Communist Party, Zhao Ziyang, when the Tiananmen protests took off in the spring of 1989. And Bao Tong ended up like his boss, getting arrested. His boss spent the rest of his life under house arrest. Bao Tong went to prison for essentially siding with the students, the pro-democracy students, and eventually got out of prison, but spent the rest of his life under house arrest. And we developed a friendship remotely and he wrote two pieces of calligraphy for me. And that one says ๅ…ˆๅคฉไธ‹ไน‹ๅฟง่€Œๅฟง xiฤntiฤnxiร  zhฤซyลu รฉryลu [โ€The first concern is affairs of stateโ€], and the unwritten, but second part of that, is ๅŽๅคฉไธ‹ไน‹ไน่€Œไน hรฒu tiฤnxiร  zhฤซlรจ รฉr lรจ [โ€œEnjoying the pleasure comes laterโ€].

It was a famous quote by a Chinese statesman from 1,000 years ago named ่Œƒไปฒๆทน [โ€œFan Zhongyanโ€]. And ่Œƒไปฒๆทน was this polymath who created the Chinese examination system, and so forth, but he was a loyal official who had to go into exile. That’s what would happen. If you really screwed up, you’d get killed by the Emperor, but he got sent into exile. But it’s really a motto. What it means is that you need to be the first one to worry about all under Heaven and the last one to enjoy the pleasures of all under Heaven. So it’s about the responsibility of a good official.

Tim Ferriss: How did you develop a friendship with this person?

Matt Pottinger: During the days when I was a reporter for The Wall Street Journal, based in China. And sometimes he was able to have visitors, and so we struck up a correspondence.

Tim Ferriss: So I should say from the outset, and this goes without saying, but fascinated by IM and UR Chinese culture language, we’re going to talk about how that entered the scene. And I’ve spent time at two universities in China, this is a long time ago, in ’96, and we both studied East Asian languages in school. How did you decide to do that?

Matt Pottinger: Yeah, it was highly accidental, like most good things in life. I was studying Spanish in high school and my Spanish teacher and I weren’t a good match.

Tim Ferriss: Creative differences.

Matt Pottinger: Which is to say he was strict and serious, and I was a 15-year-old who was struggling in third-year Spanish, because I hadn’t paid enough attention in second-year Spanish. Anyway, I remember seeing the Chinese language teacher. This is very rare, this is in the 1980s, I was at a high school, which was very unusual at the time โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: Super unusual.

Matt Pottinger: โ€” to have a Chinese teacher.

Tim Ferriss: Where was this?

Matt Pottinger: This was in Milton, Massachusetts. Milton Academy, south of Boston.

Tim Ferriss: Good school.

Matt Pottinger: And Mr. Murray, Michael Murray, was walking across the quad and I was trying to figure out how on Earth I’m going to escape Spanish class. And I asked if I could jump into Chinese and he let me do that. And so that was the beginning of โ€” my love affair with China started with the language. And I went on, in college, the University of Massachusetts at Amherst had one of the truly great East Asian languages and literature programs, classical Chinese. Al Cohen, Don Gjertson, and others.

Tim Ferriss: Classical Chinese.

Matt Pottinger: I studied classical, yeah.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. If contemporary Chinese isn’t hard enough for you.

Matt Pottinger: Yeah, it’s like just starting to learn English and someone’s like, “We’re just going to throw in Latin on top of that.”

Tim Ferriss: With a little Beowulf on the side. Enjoy.

Matt Pottinger: Old English and Latin while you’re struggling to order a pizza in a new language. So I was really lucky to have great teachers and I remember I studied with Perry Link of โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: Wow, Perry. I studied with Perry.

Matt Pottinger: โ€” Princeton University at the time.

Tim Ferriss: Amazing, amazing teacher. Yeah.

Matt Pottinger: He was my Chinese teacher for a summer program in Beijing, and we’re still in touch today.

Tim Ferriss: No kidding.

Matt Pottinger: Yeah.

Tim Ferriss: Wow, I did not know that part. ๆž—่€ๅธˆ lรญn lวŽoshฤซ [โ€œLin teacherโ€/โ€Mr. Linโ€]

Matt Pottinger: ๆž—่€ๅธˆ lรญn lวŽoshฤซ. Yeah. Right, right.

Tim Ferriss: Man. Brutal in his enforcement of the tones, which is probably why it stuck. I just remember โ€” 

Matt Pottinger: You’re stuck.

Tim Ferriss: I just remember โ€” this was, let’s see, probably ’95, ’96. Chinese 101 at Princeton at the time and the first class had maybe 35 students. I would say a few weeks later, 14 students.

Matt Pottinger: Yeah, serious attrition.

Tim Ferriss: It was serious thinning.

Matt Pottinger: That’s like my Marine Corps officer candidate school class was roughly that level of attrition. No, he’s no nonsense and a wonderful teacher.

Tim Ferriss: Really, really phenomenal teacher and thinker. I remember one class โ€” I’m going to give him credit and bust his balls a little bit at the same time, because I remember a winter class. First of all, Chinese one-on-one had five or six classes a week, I want to say. It was some unbelievable volume of classes, and that was, I want to say โ€” probably including language lab, where you would have to read and record your tones, and then you’d have these one-on-ones where you would get cross-examined for your failures with your tones. It worked really well. And there’s one class in the middle of winter, we’d all shuffled through the snow and bitter cold to get to this class. And this poor girl, this one girl had some type of laryngitis or something, and we would all repeat whatever word it happened to be, right?

I want to say it was something like ไนŸ่ฎธ (yexu), right? And so we’re saying this word, ไนŸ่ฎธ, and she’s like, โ€œไนŸ่ฎธ.โ€ And he’s like โ€” holds up a finger, and he’s like, “You. Again, again, again,” and he just made her do it like 12 times and we’re like, “The brutality.”

Matt Pottinger: It’s Marine Corps methods, it’s a drill instructor.

Tim Ferriss: But it worked. And a question for you, when you learned Chinese, and I’m going to backstep โ€” and don’t worry, guys. We’re going to get to the geopolitics and all the juicy bits, TikTok included. But this all starts with a deep fascination and not a deep critique. That’s part of what I’m trying to underscore, like a deep fascination. One thing that worked really well at Princeton and contrasted it with a lot of other schools at the time is we used something called GR. I don’t know if you remember this. It was ๅ›ฝ่ฏญ็ฝ—้ฉฌๅญ—, Gwoyeu Romatzyh, so it was teaching tones with different spellings. So the romanized version of, say, ๅ›ฝ guรณ, โ€œcountry,โ€ second tone, would be G-W-O. Or if you wanted to say, like, ๅŽป่ฟ‡, qรน guรฒ, like, “I went.” Fourth zone would be G-U-O-H, and it worked. It seemed to work really well in terms of memorizing tones where pinyin with diacritical marks was really hard for a lot of students to remember. Did you learn with pinyin?

Matt Pottinger: I did learn with pinyin. Chinese language teachers have a joke that if you stay in the business of teaching Chinese long enough, you ultimately end up creating your own syllabary romanized language to approximate Chinese or you end up studying the I Ching and teaching it. The mystical text from way back. But I learned it with regular [foreign language 00:11:48] pinyin, ็ฝ—้ฉฌๆ‹ผ้Ÿณ luรณmวŽ pฤซnyฤซn which is the Chinese standard one. But what I learned from teachers like Perry Link and Wang Xuedong, and others who taught me, was not to read that and to focus on the tapes. We were using cassettes in those days. Going into that lab, putting the headphones on, and being able to repeat perfectly. Even if you didn’t understand what the words meant yet or the grammar, you had to be able to say those words, just emulate, mimic the sounds rather than trying to read a Romanized approximation of it. And that was one way to break the back of the ways that you can go wrong trying to study pinyin.

Tim Ferriss: All right, so since this is the podcast that deconstructs people who are good at various things, excellent at various things, any other tips for people who may want to learn Chinese?

Matt Pottinger: Yeah. Well, look, I learned โ€” after I learned Chinese, I learned Japanese. I’ve forgotten most of it, because this was 30 years ago. But what amazed me was I followed a smarter technique for studying the language and I learned it much faster than I was able to learn Chinese. And it started with those tapes, recording yourself, repeating full sentences. Not vocab lists, not studying the Roman โ€” in Japanese, it’s called Romaji, right? You’re studying Latin letters. Instead, you have the discipline to just listen to full sentences, be able to say those sentences flawlessly before you start to deconstruct the sentences according to the vocab and the grammar, and so forth. So it’s starting like a child, with the sounds, and then getting to vocab and grammar.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. So you and I have a very similar approach in that way. I did not realize we had this parallel, and don’t worry, guys, we’re going to get off this language learning kick in a second. But I went from public school on Long Island to St. Paul’s in New Hampshire. I had decided I was bad at Spanish and then I hopped ship to Japanese, so I did it in the opposite order. In part, because a friend of mine was taking Japanese and I wanted to be in a class with one of my friends at least if I was going to be bad at a given subject, IE, language learning. And then the Japanese took off and then I learned, or studied, I’ve forgotten most of it, so we have the opposite in that sense. My Japanese is still pretty strong for, forgot most of my Chinese, but had a much more refined method for the Chinese, because I threw so much against the wall with Japanese to begin with.

Matt Pottinger: Perfect.

Tim Ferriss: And landed in a very similar place, like start with full sentences, and that recording is so key. I feel like that’s still pretty neglected in modern language teaching.

Matt Pottinger: Totally right. It makes me want to go back to learning Spanish, because that was the worst approach that I took.

Tim Ferriss: I eventually got back to Spanish.

Matt Pottinger: Awesome.

Tim Ferriss: I eventually got back to Spanish. I’ll throw in a bonus language learning tip, which is you can use a comic that is very widely translated, like One Piece. If you have English or any other language, you can take two volumes, say volume four in One Piece. The exact same comic book panel by panel in two languages, and go back and forth without using a dictionary. So you can actually study dialogue and conversation, which is one of the benefits of comic books, so I’ve used that for a couple of different languages. Language, the Chinese language is one of your superpowers. It allows you to do things that a lot of other folks cannot do, and I would say one of those is, for instance, looking at Chinese language speeches, memos, internal documents, or maybe not exclusively internal documents, and we’re going to edge into that. But since it’s the topic of the hour, TikTok.

Matt Pottinger: Yeah.

Tim Ferriss: You and I have spoken about this before and I was amazed how little I actually knew about TikTok. What are some salient points that you might underscore for folks as it relates to TikTok?

Matt Pottinger: Well, there’s been a lot of discussion about some of the risks of using TikTok, and most of that discussion in the US is focused on the data security aspect. That this app, once it’s in your phone, it goes everywhere, it pulls everything. Now, famously, although people have forgotten, TikTok was using that data to track American journalists to try to figure out who their sources were, so they could fire those sources from TikTok. So they go in and actually look at where specific users are to track their activities and who they know and what they’re doing, so that is a risk. It’s actually secondary to the bigger problem with TikTok, which is not being discussed head-on very frequently, and that is that the Chinese Communist Party has stated explicitly that it wants to use tools such as TikTok, specifically short-form video apps, of which TikTok is the really key one, to, in the words of Xi Jinping, “Win the global majority.”

That’s his phrase. They want to use it as a megaphone in what he calls “A smokeless war” or “A smokeless battlefield,” for ideological persuasion and also destruction. Namely, if you look at how TikTok trends certain content and you compare that, which is not easy to do, TikTok makes this hard to do, but you could use some of their proxies, some of the data that they share for advertisers, which they’ve since shut down, because they didn’t like the fact that people were starting to look. But what you found was that anti-American, anti-democratic, anti-Israeli content after the October 7 terror attacks by Hamas in Southern Israel occurred, that stuff trends at multiples of what it does on things like Instagram or Reels or X. And it’s not because of the demographic, because people have done control studies to look at how Taylor Swift trends across those platforms.

And it turns out she trends almost exactly equally across all these different apps and platforms, but when it comes to things that are embarrassing to the Chinese Communist Party, that stuff gets minimized on TikTok through the algorithm. When there are things that they want to amplify, pro-Communist Party, or things that make Americans hate one another or hate or lose faith in their system of government, that stuff gets amplified inordinately. And so it’s very clear that the algorithms are being manipulated, and those algorithms are subject to the control, very explicitly subject to the control, of the Chinese Communist Party. So Xi Jinping back โ€” I think it was in 2021, he had a study session, right? He’s the chairman of everything in China. He’s dictator par excellence. He holds a study session for the ClipPolitburo, which is the highest body of Communist Party officials, and it’s on external discourse mechanisms.

And what he’s talking about is โ€”. In fact, one of his senior intelligence officers said publicly, “It doesn’t matter what’s true and what’s false, it only matters who controls the platform and, therefore, we need to use this platform to win the global majority.” And TikTok โ€” so Xi Jinping holds this study session. The People’s Daily, which is the Communist Party mouthpiece newspaper, a couple of weeks later, makes clear that what he was talking about were short-form video apps and they talk about TikTok specifically. So it’s a weapon, it’s a weapon pointed at our democracy.

Tim Ferriss: So to double-click on a few things. First is, in terms of company structure or parent company structure, people involved, is there anything that would be instructive to point out there? Let’s begin with that.

Matt Pottinger: Well, a good friend and colleague of mine is โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: And why should we take you to be an expert in TikTok? How have you studied this?

Matt Pottinger: Well, look, I have the benefit of working closely with a number of extremely talented historians, linguists, technologists who are focused on China. We run a small private company. We do research, open-source research, about what China’s doing and where it’s going. My colleague, John Garnaut and Matthew Johnson, two colleagues of mine โ€” Matthew’s great, he was an Oxford professor of Chinese modern government before we kidnapped him to come do work for us. John Garnaut was a journalist like me in China, an Australian, he wrote for The Sydney Morning Herald. And eventually, a little bit before I went into government, he was working for Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull as one of his China advisors in Canberra. Anyway, they decided to do a very in-depth study looking at the history of TikTok, trying to figure out things like the structure, who’s it beholden to. And what you have is this interesting saga of a truly innovative Silicon Valley-type company that emerges from the mind of Zhang Yiming, a very, very bright, talented entrepreneur and technologist in China, and some of his partners.

And it quickly catches on in ways that catch the attention of the Chinese government. And so over time, what the Chinese government does is it inserts itself. The Communist Party, which is superior to the Chinese government, inserts itself into the heart of that company. And in fact, the company I’m talking about is ByteDance. ByteDance is the parent company that fully controls TikTok, along with a number of other apps, including the Chinese version of TikTok that’s called Douyin. And it turns out they share the same engineers, it’s all in China, the same engineering core, same algorithms, but adjusted very, very differently. So if you go to Douyin in China, you’re not going to see any of this awful content, you’re going to see wholesome content and pro-Communist Party content. You’re not going to see things that pit Chinese people against one another or that agitate them, even though it’s the same algorithms, same back office, same engineers.

And by the way, the editor in chief of ByteDance, with responsibility for all of the apps and their content, is also the Communist Party secretary who was assigned by Xi Jinping, and his general office, to babysit that company and to make sure that it is serving the purposes of the Chinese Communist Party. His deputy is the deputy editor in chief of all apps, and he’s also the deputy Communist Party secretary for the company. So it took a lot of digging to piece all of this together, because TikTok and ByteDance have erased this history, but there are ways to go back and look at websites that have since been erased and piece this together. They’ve airbrushed out all of this history. And TikTok masquerades as a foreign company. They say, “No, no, we’re Singaporean. It’s nonsense.” It has nothing to do with Singapore. I mean, there’s only a handful, relative to their overall staff of people there. And the guy who’s the CEO is really just a front man, is sort of a spokesman. He doesn’t have any power compared to the Communist Party secretariat that actually governs TikTok’s parent company.

Tim Ferriss: So a question about the airbrushing for a second. So I’m trying to think of the most, let’s just say, obvious closed case examples that you could point to where you might find a contrast between, let’s just say, the Taylor Swift being relatively equally surfaced or not surfaced by different platforms. So you said there are things that might be embarrassing to the Chinese government, are there examples of any particular things that you could give where there’s much less visibility? Because people might be wondering, “Well, yeah. Maybe it’s how you torture the data,” right? Maybe it’s like, “Yeah, it appears 10 percent on Instagram and eight percent on TikTok,” but really, is that conclusive? Are there any, to your mind, very clear cases?

Matt Pottinger: Yeah, I would point you to the house committee in Congress. It’s called the Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, and this is a committee that’s been chaired by Mike Gallagher, who’s a Republican congressman from Wisconsin. And the ranking committee member is a Congressman Krishnamoorthi, who’s a Democrat from Illinois. The very bipartisan group of 20 or so congressmen and women who were in that committee, they did a hearing in November last year, which is worth looking up, because they actually share some of the data, some of the studies that they did comparing TikTok information. It wasn’t like an eight percent incremental difference, we’re talking from three to five to 10 to 50 X certain content that would appear on other US-based platforms. So pro-Chinese military propaganda, multiples. Anti-Israeli, and some of it really nakedly just anti-Semitic content.

Tim Ferriss: Quick question on that, because people might wonder. Why is that โ€” why would that be a potential CCP government priority?

Matt Pottinger: It’s perfectly aligned with Beijing’s policy. What Beijing did when Putin re-invaded with a full-scale invasion in early 2022 Ukraine, China cited itself in terms of its propaganda orientation, in terms of becoming the main lifeline economically for Russia, in terms of becoming the main diplomatic champion for Russia and its war in Ukraine. Why did China do that? If you read through, as colleagues and I have, some of the internal Chinese Communist Party textbooks, they say explicitly that, “We want to see Europe in chaos. We want Russia to become more aggressive, we want to see America weakened,” because those things actually provide an opportunity for the Chinese Communist Party to advance an authoritarian model for global governance that they feel safer with, that’s going to be advantageous to Xi Jinping and his party.

So when the attack occurred on the 7th of October in southern Israel, Hamas did their worst depraved terrorist attacks, China immediately oriented its propaganda to blame Israel and to blame the United States, just like it blamed Ukraine and blamed the United States for the war that Vladimir Putin undertook. So they take the side of the aggressor and try to spin the aggressor into a victim, because anything that embarrasses, humiliates, discredits the United States is a good thing under that model, and that’s why โ€” China had okay relations with Israel until October 7th, and now they’ve demonized Israel, because they view that as a way to discredit the United States.

Tim Ferriss: So I have to say, there’s a part of me that’s excited to have you on the show. Number one, because I enjoy having conversations with you. Number two, because you have such deep familiarity with native source material, right? You can actually look at the actual words used, these stated objectives in Chinese. And I also must admit, I have this admiration for the 4D chess that China has played with respect to things like access to natural resources in South America, building infrastructure in Africa. It’s really remarkable how good they seem to be at playing a very, very long game. It’s incredibly impressive. And also, just to give credit where credit is due, I guess โ€” I mean, there are trade-offs, of course, with all these things, but I went to a very fancy event where, I’m not going to name the country, but a country in Europe, Middle Eastern area, was talking about partnerships with China, and they said it’s simply more stable and predictable.

With the US every four years, we have no idea what’s going to happen, we don’t know if this, that, and the other agreement are going to change. There’s a certain predictability that is advantageous for certain countries that might want to, say, partner with one or the other. And we can come back to that, I just wanted to mention that first. But coming to TikTok just as a way of studying the micro to study the macro, things that might be embarrassing. And if we look at, for instance, these may or may not be the right examples, but Tibet, Uyghur, or ethnic minorities in China, are those 10 percent, 20 percent less than other platforms, or is it โ€” 

Matt Pottinger: It’s almost zero, it’s almost zero on TikTok. Very hard to find. There was famously one woman who was doing โ€” wanted to talk about the genocide. According to our Secretary of State, Tony Blinken, there’s a genocide taking place in Xinjiang, Northwest China, against ethnic minorities, including the traditionally Islamic Uyghur people. She wanted to get word out about that on TikTok, so she recorded an eyelash video for โ€” she’s showing doing a how-to, how to curl your eyelashes. While she’s doing this, she suddenly cuts into talking about the genocide, what’s going on there, and eventually TikTok even erased that content.

But look, I agree with you. The 4D chess is no joke. It’s why I think we need to be a lot more candid about what China’s doing that does harm our interests, harms the interests of other democracies. A lot of autocracies in particular talk about, “Well, one thing we like about dealing with the Chinese Communist Party is they don’t really bug us about our own human rights problems.” And there’s often a consistency in that approach. We’re a democracy, it means that we’re an X factor, probably more than we should be. There’s certain things that we did throughout the Cold War that served us very well, where there was a continuity in our Cold War policy from Democrats, from Truman, to Eisenhower, to Kennedy, and on the thread makes curves, but you can string that thread through the overall policy of containment with some variations and so forth.

We’d be well served to remember what Senator Vandenberg said. You remember who Vandenberg was? He was an isolationist Republican before World War II, who ended up becoming an internationalist bipartisan partner of a Democratic president, Harry Truman. And he ended up getting the Marshall Plan through the Senate. He’s the one who got NATO through the Senate. And so, Vandenberg had a famous line, he said, “Politics stops at the water’s edge.” That is a great motto that we should return to and actually try to โ€”

Tim Ferriss: What does that mean?

Matt Pottinger: It means we can have bitter debates internally between left and right, Democrats, Republicans, independents, Trump, Biden, but when it comes to our national interest, there must be a general consensus that prevails that we are on the same team, and that there needs to be some predictability and continuity in our policies.

And in fact, by and large, even that still continues to some extent. You have bitter fights over things like what should our approach be to Iran? But you also have strong alliances. We’ve got NATO. It’s probably the most successful multilateral alliance in world history, and you’ve seen it strengthened by Putin’s attack on Ukraine. President Biden’s meeting with the Japanese Prime Minister. We’ve got a very strong relationship with Japan, with South Korea, with Australia, the Philippines, and those things serve us well. Those are our shields that protect us.

Tim Ferriss: We’re going to segue to Taiwan in a second. I want to put a little button on top of TikTok and then we’ll move on. In terms of weapons or offensive techniques, or let’s just call it overall threats from China against, say, US national interests, where would you rank TikTok, and what would you like to see policymakers or others do in terms of next actions if they’re like, “Hey, this is a lot for me to digest. Just tell me what we should do.”

Tim Interlude: Just a quick note before we get back to the interviewโ€”this conversation with Matt was recorded prior to the April 23rd passage of the TikTok bill in the Senate. Go to tim.blog/tiktok to learn more about the bill. Now, back to the episode.

Matt Pottinger: Look, I’m telling you this sincerely. As a former Marine, Deputy National Security Advisor, I was juggling the most serious national security threats facing the United States. I think TikTok is near the top. Near the top, okay? Think for a moment how preposterous it is that we are in a situation where the main platform is controlled by a hostile totalitarian government. The main platform by which a whole generation of Americans communicate and acquire their news. Remember TikTok, you say, “Oh, no, it’s just cat videos.” It’s actually a primary source of news for people under the age of 30. We would never have allowed the Nazis to control all of our newspapers and radio stations in the 1930s. And in fact, we passed laws under President FDR, Roosevelt, that made sure that you could not concentrate media ownership in the hands of any foreign power. So we have simply not updated those rules. Those are long standing, 100-year-old rules, almost, that are blessed by the Supreme Court, they’re sound with our First Amendment rights. Why is it that we’ve allowed the Chinese Communist Party to be the primary arbiter of what content trends and what content gets suppressed? It’s insane.

And so what would we do about it? I would say that the United States Senate right now, specifically Senator Cantwell, a Democrat from Washington, is the most important person in America at this moment, because she’s the one who’s either going to stall and water down the bill, very good bill that’s already passed the House overwhelmingly, I think it was 362 votes for this TikTok bill. President Biden has said he’d sign the bill if it came to his desk, and now it’s stalled on her desk. Several of her top aides are now full-time lobbyists for TikTok, several of them. Okay? So I’m hoping that she does the right thing for the country that she doesn’t say, “No, I’m okay with the Nazi party owning all American newspapers and radio stations,” which this is the equivalent of.

And by the way, it’s not a ban of TikTok. This is what TikTok has spread information and disinformation about. All it says is that TikTok cannot be owned by a Chinese entity and subject to Chinese Communist Party control. They simply have to sell it, and then the thing will still happen. The idea is not to suppress or ban the speech that people are contributing to TikTok, it’s to make sure that that speech is actually organic, and unfettered, and is not manipulated and suppressed or amplified according to the dictates of a totalitarian adversarial government. It’s very reasonable. It’s certainly not a First Amendment threat.

It’s interesting to me. I mean, TikTok owns Washington D.C now, okay? They’ve thrown millions and millions of dollars at this. They’ve managed to get on the left, the ACLU. And by the way, look at who the ACLU’s donors are. It includes perhaps their largest donor is one of the biggest American shareholders in TikTok. And so the ACLU says, “Oh, no, this is the First Amendment issue.” No, BS. This has nothing to do with the First Amendment. This has to do with ensuring that people really do have free speech on these platforms and that it’s not being suppressed or amplified according to a hostile government.

And then on the right, you’ve got Jeff Yass, who is one of the other largest shareholders in TikTok and his parent company, and he’s a Republican donor and he is giving huge amounts of money to any Republican that is willing to ensure that TikTok stays under Chinese control. So here we are. I mean, it comes down to some big money investors, both left and right. It’s an equal opportunity. It’s a bipartisan effort by big stakeholders in TikTok to try to ensure that TikTok remains under the control of the Chinese Communist Party. It doesn’t make any sense.

Tim Ferriss: And what was the senator’s name who you mentioned?

Matt Pottinger: Cantwell.

Tim Ferriss: Cantwell. And those, you said, I guess it was I think two or three lobbyists on staff, well, they’re not lobbyists, but they’re people โ€” 

Matt Pottinger: They don’t work for her anymore. This is her former Deputy Chief of Staff and one or two other senior aides to her who have left to lobby for TikTok.

Tim Ferriss: What are the incentives? I don’t really understand lobbying. How does that work, in brief? Why would they do that?

Matt Pottinger: They get millions of dollars. I don’t know exactly how much they’re getting paid, but lobbying firms, their firms get paid millions of dollars to try to block the US Senate from allowing this House Bill to pass. It’s as simple as that. They have a huge campaign, advertising campaign, disinformation campaign saying that it’s an attempt to block speech, to ban TikTok. No, it’s saying, “TikTok can thrive, but we’re not going to let it be edited and controlled and manipulated by a totalitarian dictatorship that doesn’t even have the rule of law, much less free speech rights.”

Tim Ferriss: Mm-hmm. All right, thank you for that. And we’re going to go to Taiwan now. So Taiwan, what is the significance to the US of Taiwan? Because I imagine a lot of people have many things they try to track in the news, Taiwan, they’re like, “Yeah, I think it has something to do with processors, or chips or something, but is that really the end of the world? Can’t we onshore that,” et cetera, et cetera. What are the most important characteristics of Taiwan? Why is it important?

Matt Pottinger: Why does it matter? Why does it matter? I mean, look, it’s this small, I can’t remember the size. It’s like the size of Connecticut and it’s a small, amazing geography, very mountainous. The tallest mountain in East Asia is not Mount Fuji, it is actually Yu Shan Jade Mountain in Taiwan. And then you have these beaches, and you’ve got this tropical sort of climate that meets some of the biggest urban centers in the world, roughly 25 million or so people, many of them of Chinese heritage. And so why does it matter? So it matters because of geography, it matters because of democracy, and it matters because of economics, okay? It matters for us here in the United States.

Geographically, the Chinese Communist Party views Taiwan rightly. In fact, General Douglas MacArthur would agree with this assessment. And in fact, he made a similar assessment all the way back in 1950 after World War II. He said, if Formosa, which was the old Portuguese name for Taiwan, if it were to fall to a hostile government, it would become a springboard for aggression throughout the region. And in fact, it had already been that. The Japanese, Imperial Japan had controlled Taiwan from 1895, all the way for 50 years till the end of World War II. And they used it as a springboard to move into Southeast Asia, particularly when World War II kicked up 1940/41, the Japanese were promoting this idea of a Greater East Asian Co-Prosperity Sphere. I know that’s a mouthful, but what it was was it was the Japanese government saying, “We’re going to dominate Asia. We don’t want Western colonial powers anywhere near this, but we also don’t want those countries to run themselves.” So it was an involuntary invasion of Japan’s neighbors and they said, “Well, this is going to be great for everyone. We’re going to be on top. It’s a new empire that we run, but we’ll take care of the economics. We’ll take care of the security and so forth.”

In fact, what it did was it kicked up massive response antibodies to this approach. Millions were killed in China under that period. There were millions killed throughout Southeast Asia. And then of course, the United States comes into the war after Pearl Harbor in late 1941. The rest is history. China’s following a similar model to the Japanese model of 1940. Xi Jinping has even given speeches, I don’t know whether he has a sense of irony about this or not, or whether he’s even aware, but he gave a big speech in Shanghai, one of his Politburo members just last week gave another speech, Zhao Leji, talking about the importance of Asia remaining in control of Asians, by which he means, Beijing. It was Tokyo in 1940, but it is very similar language to what we heard when the Japanese were promoting a Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere, which was an empire.

Tim Ferriss: You mentioned the size of Taiwan. Sounds like a speck. Why is it positionally advantageous?

Matt Pottinger: If you look at the map from the perspective of China and you’re looking eastward, American strategists during the Cold War used to describe it the way that Chinese strategists now describe it, which is the first island chain that prevents Beijing from expeditionary of projection of military force. And so if you look, it’s the Aleutian Islands, which are part of Alaska. It comes down to the Japanese Islands and down to the Ryukyu Islands where Okinawa is, also Japanese islands. And then right in the middle you’ve got Taiwan, and then it continues on to the archipelago of the Philippine Islands. So you’ve got, basically democracies that hem in Beijing’s military ambitions. And for China to send a bomber, or a ship, or even a submarine through that first island chain, they have to go through, in essence, a gateway of democracies that are, by and large, allied with the United States. And so, Beijing believes that Taiwan is the linchpin of that first island chain. If Taiwan were to fall under Chinese control, Chinese military doctrine, their own manuals say, “At that point, we can dominate Japan.” So there’s a Chinese Air Force manual for Air Force officers that says, “We turn this into an air base.” And even though it’s just extending out 150 miles from China’s coast, it means that Chinese bomber patrols โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: It provides safe passage, in a way โ€” 

Matt Pottinger: Safe passage for them to, in the words of their own doctrine, inflict a blockade on Japan, at will.

Tim Ferriss: Could you say more about that? What is a blockade against Japan?

Matt Pottinger: A blockade would mean that it’s an act of war. A blockade means that you’re cutting off trade to and from a country, by either surrounding it with ships, or aircraft or threatening it with missile strikes to say, “We can shut down your economy. We can shut down your food and energy supply. The lights go out in Japan.” Japan doesn’t produce energy, right? They’re wholly dependent on imports other than some of their nuclear plants. And so China says, “We will basically have so much leverage over Japan as well as the Philippines to the south, that we kind of have them in our pocket at that point.” And so Taiwan is the key to that geographically.

Now, it’s also a great democracy. So if you look at independent sort of assessments of democracies, The Economist magazine has what’s called the Economist Intelligence Unit. They do rankings, right? They have found consistently that Taiwan is the most liberal democratic state in all of Asia, and it actually ranks higher than the United States. So they know what they’re doing. They built something pretty special.

Tim Ferriss: I have to ask, sorry, I won’t be able to let this go. Based on what does it rank more highly than the United States?

Matt Pottinger: Freedom of speech, a rule of law, equality of access to run for government. Taiwan’s legislature is 40 percent women compared to, I think about 27, 28 percent of our Congress are women in the United States. Many of the top cities are governed by female mayors. They’ve twice elected a woman as President of Taiwan. In terms of freedom of the press, I mean, it’d be worth taking a close look at these EIU, what their methodology was, but they’re not the only ones. There are others as well who say Taiwan is really a true, liberal democracy in the classical sense of the word “liberal.” It has really shed its authoritarian past. And so, if that were to fall because it was coercively annexed by Beijing, that would have huge ramifications for the region and knock-on effects for the world. Right โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: Now, why is that? I’m curious if you could say more about that. Because I have to admit, right, growing up with my dad yelling at the TV about politics, I just basically tuned it out. I decided to be sort of selectively ignorant about this, which I regret on some level, but I think to myself, “Okay, they are this sort of ideological paragon of democracy in the region.” I understand the positional advantage of, say, Beijing having control of Taiwan, as you just described โ€” 

Matt Pottinger: The geographic element.

Tim Ferriss: Exactly. But if Taiwan falls ideologically, what are the ripple effects?

Matt Pottinger: I think what you have at that point is the state of emergency in all of the other democracies of the region, where they are now facing an existential threat, military threat and states of emergency aren’t good for democracies. Even if it’s, I mean, look at what happened to us just during the lockdowns, during COVID in ’20. Imagine you’re in a situation where these countries are having to rapidly militarize in order to try to deter China from now being able to threaten them with blockades. And it’s pretty clear that Beijing has much bigger ambitions than just Taiwan.

The other part is that Taiwan right now is a beacon for a lot of Chinese people on the mainland. Chinese people who visited Taiwan generally come away with a pretty positive impression. And it’s almost like they’re visiting this Alice in Wonderland alternative future, where people enjoy free speech, they can go vote for their leaders, and yet they’re speaking the same language. They share a lot of the same heritage. You can actually see freedom of religion in Taiwan in ways that are spectacular. You have traditional Chinese religions, different strains of Buddhism, and Daoism, ancestor worship, Christianity, Catholic and Protestant. It’s all there and it is unfettered. It is unmolested by โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: People who don’t have the history, I mean, a lot of that got cleaned out of Mainland โ€” 

Matt Pottinger: Absolutely.

Tim Ferriss: For a host of different reasons.

Matt Pottinger: The Chinese government demands that it oversee any religious activity in China, in ways, to put it mildly, that distort the doctrine, and in effect demote God to below the Communist Party.

Tim Ferriss: Okay, so we have the geographic importance. We’ve got the โ€” 

Matt Pottinger: Ideological.

Tim Ferriss: Ideological component. Is there anything else you would add to that?

Matt Pottinger: Economy. Look, Taiwan, this amazing small country produces 92 percent of the advanced semiconductors in the world. 92 percent. So we’re talking about โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: It’s wild.

Matt Pottinger: I know. We’re talking about CPUs, Central Processing Units that go into your phone to GPUs, which are the chips like Nvidia is famous for making, that are really central to everything from self-driving cars to other AI sorts of applications. Taiwan doesn’t design all those chips. American companies are sort of in the lead in design, but they actually produce them. They’re the best company in the world as a fab, a contract fab, meaning that they fabricate the chips based on the instructions and blueprints that they’re provided by American, and Korean and Japanese and other companies. And there you have it, TSMC, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Corp, which was founded by Morris Chang. I’ve met him. He’s an incredible figure who was at Texas Instruments way back during our silicon sort of revolution and went on to build a superior company. It’s one of the best run, most valuable companies in the world.

If Beijing were to even blockade Taiwan, that is to say, not attack it, not bomb it, but prevent ships from coming and going, and flights from coming and going, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Corp would begin to die very quickly. Necrosis. You can think of a firm like theirs, those plants, as being a lot like a human brain. It needs a constant supply of oxygen and nutrients in the form of everything from software updates to recalibrating after an earthquake. There was just a huge earthquake, condolences to the people of Taiwan, but there are also lots of little earthquakes that take place there, you have to recalibrate the equipment. You have to buy equipment from the Dutch, chemicals from the Japanese, key equipment and designs from Israelis and Americans. If that stops, the whole thing starts to calcify in ways that are very hard to reverse. So we will be in, some would argue we would be in a Great Depression, even with just a blockade of Taiwan, we’d be facing a global Great Depression.

Tim Ferriss: Okay. So I think you’ve done a good job of establishing the significance of Taiwan on a number of different levels. What should the US do and why aren’t we doing it already?

Matt Pottinger: Look, if we’ve learned one thing from Putin’s โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: I’m sorry to interrupt. It doesn’t need to be limited to the US. Maybe there are other state actors that should be involved as well. But since we’re sitting here in the US โ€” 

Matt Pottinger: It’s the D word: deterrence. Okay? Deterrence is a funny thing. People don’t often think about deterrence as a strategy. We think that if we just kind of build a big military, people won’t want to push us around, but deterrence is more than just having a very capable military, hard power. It’s also sending a signal to decision-makers in aggressive states like Beijing currently is, a message that, “If you try this, if you attack, if you blockade or coercively try to annex Taiwan, there will be costs associated with that that are going to be worse than what you thought you would’ve gained. And by the way, you’re not going to be able to gain it anyway. We’re going to deny you. It’s deterrence by denial. We will deny you your goal. Taiwan will be so well-outfitted with things like anti-ship missiles that can be launched from trucks that are disguised like milk trucks driving around Taiwan. You’re going to run into so many sea mines, you’re going to have swarms of drones that come down on your ships trying to cross. And by the way, we’ve got friends behind us, we’ve got the United States, we’ve got Japan, we’ve got Australia, as well as other countries that don’t want to see…”

Tim Ferriss: I got it. So you’re speaking from the perspective of Taiwan right now.

Matt Pottinger: Taiwan now. Taiwan is going to make the moat of the Taiwan Strait into a boiling cauldron, a boiling moat, and if you try to cross that moat, you’re going to lose your navy. That’s the message that we all, in coordination, need to be sending to a certain person who is the one decision-maker that counts in the Chinese system, and his name is Xi Jinping. He’s the chairman of everything.

Tim Ferriss: How do you strategically or tactically do that in terms of, let’s just say next actions? What would be the next actions if you could wave a magic wand and compel the people in power to take certain next steps, what would those things be? Because I think one of the fundamental disconnects, and this may relate on a more macro level, is that I’ve observed conversations among media pundits and so on who say, “Well, Xi Jinping, he’ll do a calculus on acceptable cost and yada, yada yada, and then we will not do A, B, and C because of D, E, and F.” But it’s all viewed through the lens of acceptable cost in a Western democracy, which is not necessarily a comparable. So what would the next actions look like? For instance, do we have sufficient quantities of missiles, or fill-in-the-blank military technology to even provide in terms of assistance?

Matt Pottinger: That’s really key one. So it starts with hard power. There’s a diplomatic element to deterrence, there’s an economic and informational aspect, but all of that doesn’t amount to much if you don’t have the foundation of hard power. The reason we’ve kept the peace for 70 plus years, almost 80 years from the end of World War II, there was, because was such a stark imbalance between what the Chinese military was capable of versus what Taiwan and the United States together were capable of. So you don’t want a balance of power. That’s a misnomer. You want a gross imbalance of power. That’s what keeps the peace. And so, right now we’re moving towards a balance of power, and that’s why things are actually so dangerous. So, it starts with hard power.

You put your finger on one of the really, really key elements, which is do we have a defense industrial base that is capable of outproducing China’s incredibly formidable defense industrial base? The short answer is, “No.” Do we have to match them equally? Also, the answer is, “No.” But we have to be able to make asymmetric weapons. That is things that are relatively cheap, relatively plentiful, that can threaten an aggressor in ways that negate their massive advantages in terms of just mass, of the number of ships they’re cranking out or the number of bombers, the number of missiles.

So one of the things I learned as a Marine early on was the old rule of thumb is that you need three times as much force to take a position as you need to defend it. So we’re on the better end of that cost curve, because we’re trying to defend Taiwan in order to show Xi Jinping that it’s not worth even attempting. Taiwan has this moat. They’ve got very few beaches that are suitable for landing on. They have a number of very big ports, but those can be cut off through anything from sea mines to other actions that could be taken. They’ve got mountainous terrain that you can’t really approach very easily from the east side, and you’ve got muddy flats if you try to approach from the west side, it would be a disaster for โ€” imagine Saving Private Ryan, but you have to run three miles to get to the machine gun nest that’s shooting at you.

So Taiwan has these natural advantages that should work to our benefit, but it does mean that we have to show Xi Jinping that we have the ability to produce, and we actually are producing and have the stockpiles of these kinds of munitions; anti-ship missiles, drones, you name it, the things that really count because they pose such a big threat to China’s Navy, or to its helicopters and other elements of an invasion force.

Tim Ferriss: What would Xi Jinping need to see to decide it’s not worth it? And on what basis are you saying what you’re about to say? How do we have any idea โ€” 

Matt Pottinger: The things that spook him, and we know what spooks him because they get really upset at certain things. One is the hard power aspect that we’re talking about, but the other is will, will to fight. So it was Liddell Hart who was an early 20th century writer about war, said, “Will is the chief incalculable in war. It’s the thing that’s hardest to measure in advance of war, but which counts more than anything else once a war begins.” And a good example of that is Ukraine. Everyone said Ukraine is going to crumble in a matter of days. It seems to be the assessment of the US intelligence community. It seems to be the assessment of Vladimir Putin that it would fall quickly and yet it didn’t. Right? Here we are two years plus later, and Ukrainians are bravely fighting. They’re not asking for anyone to send troops. They’re putting their own lives on the line. Will to fight was that X factor that actually created a catastrophe for the Russians.

We have to help Taiwan reinvent its culture, its military culture in ways that add what friends of mine would call, “Social depth.” I brought a number of Israeli military officers to Taiwan last summer to meet with Taiwan military leaders and civilian leaders, and it was a very useful set of conversations, because the Taiwanese are used to hearing from Americans who come to visit, it’s very rare that they get a chance to meet with the Israelis. And there’s certain things in common. It’s a small geography with a lot of hostile neighbors. They don’t even have the benefit of a moat in the case of Israel, right? I mean, they’ve got land borders. And yet Israel has won every war that it has ever fought, and it’s done it with predominantly a reserve military. These are reservists who get activated, like they did within 24 hours of the October 7 debacle, three hundred, almost four hundred thousand troops, most of them who had already trained, they’d already gone through that crucible of being a conscripted soldier or officer, men and women both, and then they were able to mobilize rapidly because they’re continually trained. Taiwan needs a little bit of Israel right now. It needs a little bit of Finland. It needs a little bit of Estonia. These small countries that face steep odds but have social depth because they have a culture of service, and โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: What do you mean by social depth? Could you just give me another brief explanation of what that means?

Matt Pottinger: So I’ll give you an example. In the case of Israel, not only did you have people who left their jobs suddenly; everyday jobs as tech entrepreneurs or nurses or you name it, and were in uniform, ready to fight, but you also have a core of a civilian cadre that knows how to respond to emergencies, that knows how to provide logistics, even though they’re not in military cammies, that knows how to turn hospitals into triage centers for combat victims.

Tim Ferriss: I got it.

Matt Pottinger: So it means that you’ve got more than just โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: It’s sort of a broad social fluency with skills and playbooks, checklists.

Matt Pottinger: That’s it. Things that the military doesn’t have to itself be responsible for, but will depend vitally on in the event of a war.

Tim Ferriss: So I’ve neglected something important, which we should probably hit on, and I arrived at this somewhat obvious element; timeline, because I was thinking to myself, do we really have time to help Taiwan develop this social depth or are more expedient next actions required? So how should people think of the imminence or maybe amount of time that we may have before there is decisive action on the part of China to potentially do something disruptive or aggressive or otherwise towards Taiwan?

Matt Pottinger: Yeah. The specific date, no one knows. Probably Xi Jinping himself doesn’t yet know what the specific date would be that he would try to push this to crisis and push it to a head. But we can do better than saying we have no idea. It’s really Xi Jinping’s lifespan, okay? Xi Jinping is in his early 70s now, he has broken the template for roughly decade-long tours of leadership by his last two predecessors, and he has installed himself for life. He’s pretty much in charge for life. We know that. I mean, we know it’s likely that he’s going to stay in. I don’t think, as Robert Gates, our former secretary, once said of the Russians, he’s someone who’s going to leave off his feet first. He’s either going to leave in handcuffs or in a coffin, basically.

Tim Ferriss: Seems to be a trend around the world.

Matt Pottinger: Right. So here we are, he’s 72 years old. As my wife sometimes reminds me, assholes never die, they seem to live a long time. And then you also have statements of โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: This is what I was wondering about, any telegraphs?

Matt Pottinger: Yeah, well, sure. I mean, he has been very clear and has distinguished himself from his predecessors in how he talks about the goal of unifying Taiwan. He says it is the essence, that word, the essence of his broader agenda, which he calls the Chinese dream of the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation. That handful โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: It sounds more poetic in Chinese.

Matt Pottinger: It’s actually brutal either way. Sometimes it’s called The Chinese Dream for short, sometimes it’s called The Great Rejuvenation. But he says the essence of it is unification with Taiwan. I think that’s a very serious statement by him. He told President Biden, when they were in San Francisco just last November, that he now expects the United States not only not to interfere, but to actively support China in its goal of coercively annexing Taiwan. That was pretty cheeky. We’ve never heard a Chinese leader say that before.

Tim Ferriss: That’s a strong ask.

Matt Pottinger: That’s a strong ask. That’d be like Putin saying, “Listen, it’s good to talk to you President Biden, we need your help destroying Ukraine and annexing it.” That’s what Xi Jinping has just asked of President Biden.

Tim Ferriss: Has he given any specific dates in official statements or in closed conversations that then have transcripts for whatever reason, have there been any dates mentioned?

Matt Pottinger: There are certain dates that aren’t tied explicitly to D-Day, but we know that 2027 is a year that Xi Jinping had told his military that it needs to be capable of taking them, and the Indo-Pacific commander of the United States, this is a four-star admiral, Admiral Aquilino, who’s soon leaving his job in Honolulu, he’s responsible for practically half the world as a military commander. But he said before Congress recently that he thinks that the Chinese military will meet that deadline of being ready to take Taiwan. Xi Jinping has also expressed his impatience by saying things to visiting people from Taiwan along the lines of, “I’m not going to let this get passed down from generation to generation anymore.” That was very much in contrast to what some of his predecessors used to say. Like Deng Xiaoping said, “If we have to wait a thousand years, we’ll wait a thousand years for Taiwan, but we’re not going to let it declare independence.” Xi Jinping has changed that formula. He’s saying, “It’s not good enough.”

Tim Ferriss: “The buck stops with me.”

Matt Pottinger: Yes, it is not good enough for Taiwan not to seek independence, it needs to come back into the bosom of the motherland.

Tim Ferriss: So coming back to what would need to be shown to sufficiently deter, in the case of the hard power, is it some type of official statement or some type of information that gets deliberately leaked so that it makes its way back to the CCP that is in effect, “We have these numbers of these types of weapons, so we are prepared and ready.” But that shows the capability but not necessarily the will.

Matt Pottinger: That’s right. That’s right. Without capability, will is going to be insufficient oftentimes, so capability is a pretty good place to start. You touched on something which is, as you develop capabilities, they’re not going to deter very effectively if you don’t show a little leg, you kind of show some of the things that we’re working on, you create headaches for Chinese military planners who say, “Ah, I didn’t think we’d have to deal with that. We thought we just had submarines and some bombers to worry about.” No, you want a whole layered defense of different capabilities, some of which are pretty spooky.

And there are things that are being worked on, you’ve probably heard of the Replicator initiative, which is, I would refer you to some of the speeches by Kathleen Hicks, who’s our current Deputy Secretary of Defense. She’s working on some things that are designed to field large numbers of drones that could be very dangerous. They’re very cheap, they’re attritable, they can be expendable for us, and yet are very dangerous to exquisitely expensive hardware like Chinese destroyers and frigates and ferries that would carry over men and equipment. So you want them to have to worry about several different dimensions of a layered defense. And then will is a tough one. Like I said, it’s hard to measure in advance, but it starts with cultivating a culture of service, a strategic culture like, I would argue, Israel has.

Tim Ferriss: And you’re saying in Taiwan?

Matt Pottinger: In Taiwan, absolutely.

Tim Ferriss: And that can be done reasonably quickly? I mean, in the span of two or three years?

Matt Pottinger: There are really brave, energetic people trying to do that right now. You’ve got people like Enoch Wu, he was educated in the US but went back to do his military service in Taiwan and has now built something called The Forward Alliance, which is basically a civilian cadre of emergency response workers. And it has a lot of people signing up.

Tim Ferriss: So if you were, let’s say hypothetically, back in the White House after the next election cycles, whoever ends up in the big seat, and they say, “All right, Matt, next six months or next year, give us the top three things. I’ll sign off.”

Matt Pottinger: On Taiwan specifically? Because this is the biggest โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, on Taiwan. I mean, if you wanted to throw in a bonus that’s not Taiwan, that’s fine too from a national security perspective, but Taiwan or other, but certainly including Taiwan.

Matt Pottinger: Number one, I would ask the president to call Xi Jinping to tell him that we are imposing significant costs on his economy in response for the support he is providing to Iran, which is waging terrorist proxy wars against us and Israel and others in the Red Sea and across the Middle East and so forth, as well as his support for Putin and the biggest war in Europe since 1945. Xi Jinping is the main backer of that war. He’s the underwriter. The State Department says that Xi Jinping is spending more money on pro-Russian propaganda worldwide than Russia is spending on pro-Russian propaganda worldwide.

Tim Ferriss: I had no idea.

Matt Pottinger: It’s big.

Tim Ferriss: How do you determine something like that? Not to put on my skeptics hat, but I’m like, how would you even figure that out? If the Russians are getting around sanctions with tether and so on and so forth, at least according to a cover story in the New York Times, how do you figure that out?

Matt Pottinger: Jamie Rubin is the head of the Global Engagement Center at the State Department, and he knows the answer to that question.

Tim Ferriss: I got it. Okay. All right, so we got number one. So, Mr. President โ€” 

Matt Pottinger: Yeah, that’s number one, imposing costs. You can’t be an agent of chaos around the world to try to weaken the United States. By the way, you know what the next one is? Xi Jinping is backing the dictator in Venezuela, Maduro, to threaten his small neighbor Guyana.

Tim Ferriss: Why?

Matt Pottinger: It’s chaos. Like I said โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: I mean, I’ve spent some time down in Suriname, which is right next to Guyana, and it’s like these countries are tiny. Tiny little countries. Now, they happen to be important for a couple of reasons, like Suriname with respect to the Netherlands and also narco trafficking and so on, but โ€” 

Matt Pottinger: Oil.

Tim Ferriss: Oil? Okay.

Matt Pottinger: Guyana has a lot of energy deposits and they’ve discovered more, and so Maduro’s just signed a law sort of claiming that a big, huge chunk of Guyana is actually Venezuelan territory. Guess who’s backing him in that? Chinese Communist Party; diplomatically, propagandiscally, one of the main customers for the Venezuelans.

Tim Ferriss: Now, is that chaos intended to distract the US specifically or is it part of a broader strategy that includes but is not exclusive to the US?

Matt Pottinger: It’s primarily about us, because they view us as the main obstacle to a world vision that Xi Jinping calls, “A community of common destiny for all mankind.” And that is his โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: Sounds good.

Matt Pottinger: I know. He’s tied it to Marxist-Leninist theory, that basically you would have a series of Leninist single-party dictatorships, and the United States is a big obstacle to that. So it’s about spreading us thin. Xi Jinping gave a speech in 2021 where he said, “The single most important word to describe the world today is chaos.” ๅคงไนฑ dร  luร n. Chaos.

Tim Ferriss: Wow. Literally?

Matt Pottinger: He goes on in the speech to say that this works to China’s advantage. He says that, “This trend of chaos will continue and the trends are in our favor.” He also goes on to say that the risks of world turmoil are outweighed by the benefits to the Chinese Communist Party. Two years later, that was right before the Ukraine war went into overdrive, he signed an agreement, a no-limits pact with Putin. In February of 2022, and less than three weeks later, Putin was sending tanks in to try to take Kiev. Now, a year after that war began, Xi Jinping went to visit the Kremlin. He went to go see his best and most intimate friend. That’s his own phrase by the way, Xi Jinping says, “My best, most intimate friend is Vladimir Putin.” He went to go check in on his friend, see how the war is going, see what he needs.

And as Xi Jinping was leaving the Kremlin, he was caught on camera saying in essence that he was not only benefiting from chaos, but that he was one of the architects of global chaos. What he said specifically to Putin was, “Vladimir, you and I are seeing changes occurring in the world that only happen once in a century.” And this is a phrase Xi Jinping uses a lot, “Opportunity that comes once every hundred years,” and he’s talking about the opportunity for China to become the global dominant power. And he said, “You and I, Vladimir, are the ones driving those changes.” So in essence, he was saying, “We’re the architects of turmoil. We are agents of chaos.” And so it gives you some insight into the way that he’s thinking about these things. That’s why I would tell the president of the United States, step number one is impose massive costs on China’s economy until Beijing starts to back off of lighting or squirting lighter fuel on these conflagrations that are taking place now on multiple continents.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, “The opportunity of a lifetime. A chance that it arrives only once every hundred years.” Again, there is part of me, begrudgingly, that has a high degree of admiration for the long-term implementation of some degree of anti-fragility, thinking in terms of Nassim Taleb. It’s like, okay, can you not just be resilient in the face of chaos but benefit from chaos?

Matt Pottinger: I think it’d be very dangerous not to respect an adversary that’s as committed and capable as they are. When I worked at the White House, when I was deputy national security advisor, my boss was Robert O’Brien, who was the national security advisor at the time. I remember him once saying to me, “Doesn’t Xi Jinping take off a weekend to play golf?” It’s just relentless, right? It’s this constant. And it takes enormous effort to seize the initiative in that dynamic and to become a protagonist again in the story. Xi Jinping is the protagonist. I don’t mean that in the sense that he’s the hero, I mean it in the sense that he’s the one driving events, by his own admission in his little meeting with Vladimir Putin. He’s the protagonist of the story and it takes immense effort, will, coordination, and guts to actually seize back the initiative and to become the protagonist again in this story, because it’s not a story that’s going to end well if we let Xi continue writing it.

Tim Ferriss: I would love to segue briefly, because it’s an area of deep fascination for me, to information or informational warfare, right? Disinformation, misinformation, just kind of statecraft in terms of intelligence, asset development. What are the most formidable techniques or capabilities that China has with respect to those types of activities? Because they seem to be very sophisticated and to have incredible patience also with a lot of it.

Matt Pottinger: They’re getting more sophisticated about it. And of course, AI tools. I’m still waiting for our AI firmament, all these smart technologists who are developing these technologies to figure out how to use that to sniff out foreign government interference. I don’t have a good answer yet, but what I can tell you is that Beijing is experimenting with deep fakes in ways where they create whole personas that look like Westerners speaking in very fluent local English or other languages. So they’re able to localize the messengers and to create them out of digits. And so they look like newscasters, and yet they’re providing fraudulent or deceptive sorts of messages.

Tim Ferriss: Just a quick side note on that. I say side-by-side comparison of a real Chinese newscaster and a deep fake Chinese newscaster, and you really could not, even at this point, tell the difference. It’s remarkable. So what other perhaps types of tells should people be aware of or cognizant of? And the one that comes to mind is, for instance, if you are maybe a naturalized citizen in the US but ethnically Chinese, you have family in China, it seems like a lot of people have outreach on social media from folks they might develop a relationship with over years, and then lo and behold, they’re like, “Oh, yeah, I saw you got promoted to this tier in Google. It’d be really helpful for me to know A, B, and C, your family in Guangdong would really appreciate it,” type of situation.

Matt Pottinger: LinkedIn has been a very potent espionage tool for the Chinese premier spy agency and others.

Tim Ferriss: So what kind stuff should people be on the lookout for? What type of demographic should be just hip to these types of techniques?

Matt Pottinger: Yeah, I mean, Sunshine is a good disinfectant. If people understand what these modalities are โ€” there’ve been a number of cases that MI5 in the UK and FBI here in the US have cracked, that have involved people being approached through social media and things like LinkedIn. And you don’t want to take money from strangers to share secrets and things that you know, you need to know who you’re really dealing with. And in that system, that type of activity always has to feed back into the party apparatus. It’s what they’re really good at. The Chinese Communist Party was really superior in many ways to the Soviet Communist Party because they perfected what’s called united front activity.

Now what is united front? We don’t use that word very often. It’s a central concept in the history of the party, but especially under Xi Jinping. He has massively increased funding for united front activity. What it is it’s something that’s between legitimate organization and espionage. So it’s things that involve a degree of a lack of transparency about what the real goals are, but what it’s designed to do is to spot and assess and recruit allies to the party’s goals. But they don’t always let you know that it is actually for the sake of the party’s goals. You think it’s just an individual or โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: Can you give an example of what that looks like? Because on the espionage side, I’m like, okay, we’ve all seen spy movies, we can imagine what that might look like. And then you’ve got two levels up. You’ve got a sort of official party doctrine and explicitly stated goals. This intermediary, could you give an example of what form that could take?

Matt Pottinger: Yeah. A lot of them have the name “friendship organizations,” there’s a whole plethora of these groups. And it looks like it’s an organic sort of small movement of people saying, “Well, this is something we believe. We believe that Taiwan really needs to become part of China again, that’s our personal view.” But in fact, the funding is coming from the Communist Party. The group has a huge tail to it. It has information that’s being fed to it about people that show promise, that look like they’re ideologically sympathetic or susceptible to some of those messages. And then it identifies up and coming politicians, and they start to target and sometimes compromise a mayor who looks like someday he might be governor or even president. I’ll give you another example; some of the student associations that look like, we were in college, there are all kinds of student associations, but there’s one, the Chinese students and Scholars Association, which is actually reports to and is funded by the Chinese consulates and embassies, and they get special additional jobs. They’re on 220 US campuses, that’s by an old account.

They have people who organize protests against professors or students who are talking about things like Tibet or talking about the Uyghurs and the genocide there, or talking about democracy in China or talking about Taiwan and all the great things about Taiwan. They will organize demonstrations because they have a playbook, that’s actually one of the reasons that they’ve been constituted. And they also keep an eye on other Chinese students on campus who come from China. I met this terrific student who was at a university in the Midwest, I met her when she was still a student. I had a number of students come to the White House individually to tell us about some of the issues they were dealing with. And she had a friend on campus. She’s from China, her friend was from China, and she was organizing things having to do with the freedom of the Uyghur people and specific Uyghurs who are being held as political prisoners.

Tim Ferriss: A risky move if you have family in China.

Matt Pottinger: Risky move, and she does have family in China. And one of her friends one day told her, who’s actually part of this organization, he made sure that their phones weren’t on them, that they were in another room, he said, “I really like you. That’s why I have to tell you we shouldn’t talk anymore because I have to report back everything you tell me to handlers that ultimately go back to Beijing.” And so here you have people who are coerced into spying on US campuses on fellow students.

And so I think this is something we should take head on, put a spotlight on it. I think we should be issuing a smartphone to every student who arrives from an authoritarian country in the United States, make it a university program to say, “This is your freedom phone. You can put any apps on here that you want. Don’t put any Chinese apps on here. Don’t put TikTok on here. They’ll see everything. Don’t put WeChat, Weixin,” the Chinese app which is used also as a surveillance tool, “Don’t put that on here. Put all your free society things onto this phone and then know that your other one is being monitored by Beijing, by the party.” So we should be doing much more for the Chinese diaspora that comes here to study. We should be giving them a shot at actually breaking free from this bubble of surveillance and censorship that follows them when they come to the United States. We should be breaking out of that.

Tim Ferriss: So here’s a question that I don’t know the answer to, but I’m pulling on a thread that could be something I misremembered. To what extent โ€” let me rephrase this. Taiwan comes under Chinese rule. They now have Chinese passports and they travel overseas. How does the reach of an influence and ability to exert power on those citizens differ from, say, a US example, where US with a passport moves to Amsterdam and they’re there and they’re criticizing the US government, okay, fine. But the equivalent example for someone with a Chinese passport or someone who gives up their passport, I’m not sure that’s even a process you can go through in China, I don’t know, but could you speak to that?

Matt Pottinger: Well, look, I mean, there are Hong Kong citizens who have now moved to the UK or they’ve moved to the United States, many of them are now Americans or British citizens who still come under coercive pressure. I can think of a couple who, their parents have been called in Hong Kong, and there have been warrants issued for the arrest of American citizens for things they say about Hong Kong, not even in Hong Kong. So this is the extraterritorial new phase of China’s repression, which is to say, “We’re not just going to repress our own people in our borders, we’re not just going to threaten our people when they go abroad, we’re going to threaten foreign citizens.” So the things they say in their home country about us can be punishable under the national security law that’s taken effect and has really undermined the autonomy and the rule of law of Hong Kong. So this is the new phase that people have to face up to. People โ€” we should be helping. I mean, look, there’s a mass exodus of people out of China right now. People from China want to live in countries where they can enjoy the rule of law, where human rights are going to be respected, where they have a lot of different opportunities that they can pursue. They’re leaving by the millions to go to other countries. I think that we should view those people as natural allies, but it means that you have to make some work, you have to take some steps because Beijing will use their families as hostages to make them quiet. I talked to a friend recently when I was visiting Japan. A lot of very wealthy Chinese have moved to Hokkaido in northern Japan. And recently โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: I did not realize that.

Matt Pottinger: Yeah, yeah. Singapore is one of the places that they’re escaping to.

Tim Ferriss: Singapore I’ve heard for sure. I don’t know how much safety that confers to someone, but โ€” 

Matt Pottinger: And Japan is another one. But I was told that a very outspoken, wealthy Chinese guy was recently run over by a car in Japan. I have to double-check the story. But what I was told from someone who’s pretty well plugged into that community was that it had a chilling effect, that people viewed this as an effort by Beijing to cause discomfort about even speaking your mind in a free country like Japan. So we should be getting creative about ways to neutralize that sort of terror. We should be identifying people who are conducting that sort of extra-legal interference in our own system, people who are thugs, people who are coerced into spying. We should be focusing on that so that people feel safe in the United States.

Tim Ferriss: So I feel obligated to say a couple of things. The first is, for people listening, I fully recognize that this type of statecraft, espionage, this is part of the game. Right? China’s not the only people with boots on the ground. Everyone is conducting this type of โ€” maybe not exactly this species, but in terms of information gathering, having agents on the ground, I mean, this is just kind of part of geopolitics. Secondly, I want to say that I’ve spent time in China in a bunch of different places, I’ve enjoyed a lot of my trips, I’ve spent a lot of my life studying Chinese history. Did take a class on the I Ching, believe it or not, way back in the day even. I’ve spent time in Taiwan, Japan. And what we’re talking about is, at least for me, a grand chess match. Maybe chess isn’t exactly the right game because that would be a game of complete information. Maybe it’s closer to backgammon. Who knows? But โ€” 

Matt Pottinger: Did you ever play Weiqi? The game Go?

Tim Ferriss: Oh, I have played Go. Yes, I have. Absolutely.

Matt Pottinger: It’s closer to Go. And โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: Okay. Please explain.

Matt Pottinger: Go. You can see what’s happening on the board, but you can’t see the strategy readily.

Tim Ferriss: For those who don’t know, the image, white and black stones โ€” 

Matt Pottinger: It’s a 19 by 19 board. And famously, up until recently, a computer could never beat a pretty good human being at Go โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: Until AlphaGo.

Matt Pottinger: โ€” whereas it’s been years and years that chess masters have been defeated by AI. And then of course you had AlphaGo a handful of years ago, which changed it, and actually taught Go masters new ways of approaching the game.

Tim Ferriss: So wild.

Matt Pottinger: Yeah, it’s a great game.

Tim Ferriss: Demis Hassabis between โ€” 

Matt Pottinger: But China’s playing Go. We’re playing checkers right now. If we can get our game up to playing chess against their Go, we’ve got a chance.

Tim Ferriss: So the broader question I wanted to ask you was, US. What a rocket ship. This young upstart of a country, bada bing bada boom, has turned into this incredible global superpower. In terms of studying empires, pretty short-lived so far. Still an adolescent, let’s just say. But what can the US do, in your mind, broadly speaking, to continue to act as a global superpower? And maybe this ties into other factors that could affect China like a population implosion, if that seems to be a pending problem with birth replacement rates and so on in the next 20, 30 years. I don’t know. But what are the things the US should be thinking of maybe if we go one level up? Like, they’re China specific questions, but this is more a permanence question writ large. What can the US do or should do differently?

Matt Pottinger: Yeah. One thing we should first do is recognize that we are a very special country. We have to recognize that the things that the United States has made possible well beyond our borders. Democracy. Right? The Bill of Rights. Look at how many countries around the world have emulated that model. And yet that model is not sustainable without the United States. You can’t have British successful parliamentary democracy today or in Denmark or in Japan if the United States does not remain the strongest Democracy.

Tim Ferriss: Why is that?

Matt Pottinger: Because the nature of these Leninist systems or totalitarian systems that are more like monarchies like you have with Russia or North Korea today, they are compulsively hostile because they will never feel safe within their borders or confined to their borders when their neighbors are liberal democracies. It’s just โ€” you know. It doesn’t matter how much you try to reassure them. The nature of that kind of a system is that it is compulsively hostile. And so small countries are not going to have an easy time standing up to a juggernaut like the People’s Republic of China so long as it is a totalitarian Leninist system. And now China’s stitching together an axis of these countries. Venezuela is one of the minor partners. Iran is a more important partner. North Korea as a freakish, difficult partner, but a partner nonetheless. And then you’ve got Russia.

Tim Ferriss: It’s a difficult cousin of the family reunion.

Matt Pottinger: Exactly. The Kim family regime spoils a lot of dinners at the holidays. But what you are facing now is a very significant decision by these unnatural partners to decide to work together because they believe they have a once-in-a-century opportunity right now to break the back of American credibility and American power. So first we have to recognize that as many problems as we have at home, and I’m the first โ€” that’ll be another podcast for us to talk about. We are a country that deals with those problems openly and with the participation of our citizenry and with the protection of the rule of law. Those are very, very special things that we should not take for granted and we should actually be proud of them and own them. And I think if we were to do that, even as we talk openly about the legacy โ€” 

Ronald Reagan, when he was president, people remember that he made this very hostile set of remarks about the Soviet Union. He called it an evil empire. He said it was the root of all evil in the world. People forget that when he gave that evil empire speech, he also talked about the legacy of evil in American history. He talked about slavery. So he’s not โ€” there’s a โ€” I mean, can you imagine a Chinese leader or Putin giving a speech like that? It’s impossible because they don’t โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: Meaning one finger pointing outward, but another finger pointing backward.

Matt Pottinger: Yeah. Saying, look, we are a country that navigates by a north star that is really worthy of navigating by. Even though we don’t reach the North Star, when we deviate from that path, we know that we’re on the wrong path. So we have to keep going towards those higher human ideals, the things that the founders framed in the Declaration and in the Constitution. These are very powerful ideas and things that we should continue to try to live by.

But by speaking more openly about those things, we should also not be afraid to be candid about what distinguishes our system from ones that are actually pretty dark. I’m sorry. Genocide in the year 2024, as recognized by a number of countries, as recognized by both Mike Pompeo when he was Secretary of State and by Antony Blinken when he is Secretary of State. This is not a country that we’re going to be able to do business with amiably. This is not a leader who has declared himself essentially an agent of chaos in the world, and who’s funding and anti-democratic and anti-American propaganda. That’s not someone who we’re going to be able to resolve problems with. Okay? So we need to be a bit more real. We need to impose more costs. We need to be rhetorically sharper in drawing the distinctions between who we and our allies are and other democracies and โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: And that’s in terms of just informational campaigns in the US for the citizenry of the US, you mean?

Matt Pottinger: Yeah. I mean, President Biden has given some good speeches. When he first came into power, people rarely read strategy documents. I wish the press would do a better job of reading them because the president took the time to write an introduction to his strategic guidance six weeks into his administration. And he said we’re facing a serious moment right now that’s going to determine whether the world is predominantly democratic, law-abiding, peaceful, or whether it’s going to be authoritarian, anti-democratic, violent. And so I’d like to hear him talk more about that, but then also to follow up with more policies that show that we’re doing something about those problems. That’s where I think the disconnect has been with President Biden. But I think those speeches were admirable.

Tim Ferriss: So I’d like to segue to some of your personal history because maybe it ties into other parts of this conversation. So age 32. You make some decisions. So can you walk us through some of what you did up to that point, and then what changed?

Matt Pottinger: Sure. So I spent my 20s for the most part as a reporter writing for Reuters and The Wall Street Journal in China. I spent eight or nine years in total, either as a student or as a reporter living in China. It was a great exciting time to be there through the ’90s into the early 2000s. But I had a near miss on September the 11th. I was coming back from our Hong Kong bureau to visit the managing editor and the foreign editor of The Wall Street Journal. And our office happened to be right across the street from the World Trade Center. So the World Financial Center was the old Wall Street Journal headquarters at that time. And I had gotten in the day prior.

My father, who lives in Westchester County New York, said, “I’ve got an idea. I’ll drive you into town tomorrow. You’re right there at the World Financial Center. Why don’t we get breakfast at Windows on the World in the World Trade Center?” And I said, “Look, I’ve got to prepare my story ideas. I’m going to be talking to Paul Steiger and John Bussey, the top editors at the journal. I want to tell them what I want to work on. I want to tell them what I’ve been working on and some of the ideas I have. And I’m exhausted. I’m jet-lagged. Let’s just sleep in and you can just drive me straight in. I’ll grab a bagel for the car ride.”

So as we were headed into town, we got the news that the towers had been hit while we were listening to the talk radio, AM talk radio. And as it unfolded, became clearer and cleaerr what had happened. This wasn’t an accident. It was something much more serious than that. We left the city before we’d even really gotten deep into it. Went back home. And I stewed on that. I mean, I was absolutely in a state of shock about the September 11 terrorist attacks. I ended up going back to the bureau and writing in Beijing and in Hong Kong and other places in China for the next few years. But I was watching out of the corner of my eye as the US went into Afghanistan and then ultimately in 2003 decided to invade Iraq. And by 2004, as I’m watching these developments, it became clear to me that the war in Iraq was going very badly. We had the two battles of Fallujah. It was metastasizing into really an insurgency.

And then there was sort of a confluence of a bunch of different influences in my life. My stepfather had been an Air Force officer. His dad flew B-17s in World War II. I grew up with those stories and with a strong sense of respect for military service as a result. They were both West Point grads. I also met a bunch of Marines in quick succession by happenstance. I don’t know if you remember the Indian Ocean tsunami that struck the Indian Ocean country, Southeast Asia. Devastating. A quarter million or so people were killed by that tsunami day after Christmas, 2004. I got scrambled down to Thailand to cover that story and ended up pulling back from the devastation along the beach where I’m interviewing family members, survivors of this thing.

And I went up to U-Tapao Air Base, which was an old air base in Thailand that the US used to use during the Vietnam War, except it was bustling again with American troops who had all arrived basically to carry out the humanitarian response to that tsunami. And the guy who was in charge was a Marine. Met a bunch of these young kids who were like โ€” I couldn’t even make coffee when I was 20, and here you had the corporals who were leading squads of Marines and they were really, really gung-ho and proud of the work they were doing to help get humanitarian stuff out there.

So anyway, one thing leads to another and I suddenly meet a Marine colonel just around that time who challenges me to go visit a recruiting station. And I couldn’t even believe it. You know? It was actually an officer selection office, recruiting office for officers of the Marine Corps. And I started reading up on the Marine Corps. I ended up taking an appointment and going down to the USS Intrepid, which is the aircraft carrier museum on the Hudson River.

Tim Ferriss: Let me pause you for one second. So you have a job. You’re doing pretty well with said job.

Matt Pottinger: Yeah. No, it was great.

Tim Ferriss: What was the inner monologue or the moment where you’re like, “Okay, I’m actually going to take this meeting now.” Because you’ve sort of taken โ€” now you’ve crossed a threshold, right? When you’re taking a meeting.

Matt Pottinger: Yeah.

Tim Ferriss: So how did you just make that decision?

Matt Pottinger: It’s funny. I mean, it was a โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: Or was it more of a like, “Ah, it can’t hurt, so why not?”

Matt Pottinger: No, no. It was sort of an out-of-body experience. The logic became more and more apparent as I made those tentative steps. And then it came to feel almost inevitable. But the feelings, sort of abstract feelings were, “Wow, we’re in trouble.” Our power, our system, our constitution, all these things are actually more fragile than I thought they were, number one. Number two, we’re losing a war and fighting another war at the same time in Afghanistan, which would end up going worse over time. And then there was the feeling that, “What if I don’t do this? You know? I have a happy job. I’ll become a bureau chief in one of The Wall Street Journal offices. I love The Wall Street Journal, I love reporting.

But I also had this sense that if I don’t do this, I may regret it because this is the moment where I’m supposed to serve. We’re in two wars. They’re not going well. If I don’t serve now, I won’t be able to serve. I’ll be too old to do it. So I need to do this gut check and see if this is something I’m up to. And it became a test of myself too. It was a self test.

Tim Ferriss: So then what happened?

Matt Pottinger: I discovered that I’m out of shape and I meet a Marine who is studying in Beijing. He’s a captain and he’s there doing an Olmsted Foundation scholarship, which is like you can go study in a foreign university for a year or two. And he’s getting his master’s degree. And this is such a great Marine Corps moment because I’m a nobody; I’m a stranger. But I meet him at the Marine Corps Birthday Ball, which I don’t know if you’ve ever โ€” any city you go to in the world โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: I’ve never been to a Marine Birthday Ball, if that’s what you’re going to ask me.

Matt Pottinger: Well, the Marines who guard our embassies around the world, every year for the Marine Corps birthday when it was founded, November the 10th, they put together a ball where they invite dignitaries and the ambassador and foreign attaches and so forth. And I got invited to one of these things. And I end up meeting this Marine captain who’s in his dress blues, and I tell him, “I’ve got to let you in on something. My family doesn’t know this. My employers don’t know this, but I’ve just have to spill my guts to you. I’m thinking of joining the Marine Corps.” And so within two days at sun up I’m at a stadium with him in the middle of Beijing, and he’s PT-ing me, giving me physical training. We’re doing sprints and, what do you call it, interval training around the worker’s stadium.

And this guy becomes my personal trainer. Just kicks my ass. His name’s Cedric Lee. He’s still in. He’s a Colonel now in the Marine Corps working at the White House. And Cedric Lee trains me to be ready and trains me so well that by the time I get to Officer Candidate School, I’m actually near the front of the pack, at least on the physical aspect. I’m not a big guy. I’m light. He got me so I could do 20 pull-ups, dead hang pull-ups, and I could run my ass off. And then I was in for the shock of actually going through 10 weeks of Officer Candidate School training, six months of the basic school training to become a provisional rifle platoon commander, and then intel training after that. It was an unbelievable organization and culture.

Tim Ferriss: How did that โ€” what would you say were the biggest impacts of that experience on you?

Matt Pottinger: Well, it’s funny. One of the first things you learn โ€” you just inhabit your own head all the time. That’s what we do when we walk around. You have โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: Nature of being human.

Matt Pottinger: It’s called being human. And you come into this thing and they’re like, “Hey, this isn’t about you.” You’re like, “Well, what do you mean? I made the decision to be here.” They’re like, “No, no.” We had this great colonel, Colonel Chase, who was running the Officer Candidate School. He’s a former enlisted guy. He had been a drill instructor, now he’s a colonel running the Officer Candidate School. And he gives this talk. I mean, it was very personal. It was visceral. It was because he had been a drill instructor too. And he basically said, “None of you are going to make it through here if I don’t believe that you’re going to be a good leader of Marines.” And this was a promise, this was a threat. And he held to it.

I heard that he got in trouble for attriting so many officer candidates at a time when we were at war that he got some shit for that. But I’m proud of him irrespective of whether that’s true. He basically winnowed out almost half of the group of us. And he basically said, “If I don’t see it, if I don’t smell it on you that you’re going to be a good leader of those Marines whose lives you’re going to be responsible for and putting at risk, then I’m not going to let you march across the grinder and become a Marine officer. You’re not going to pin those lieutenant bars on.” And so this culture where suddenly โ€” now you’re suddenly feeling real responsibility. It’s like, holy shit, I’m not responsible for myself in war. I’m responsible for a platoon of 40 young men and women. And it’s a shock. You know? And I didn’t have any leadership skills naturally. Everything I learned had to get pounded into me through repetition and screaming and making mistakes and touching the electric fence and finding out it hurts. And it was really something.

The other thing about the Marine Corps that people should all know, and this goes for the military generally, is that it is a โ€” the Marine Corps in particular pushes down responsibility. It delegates to the lowest level. So the idea is โ€” think about how many things in American life are about we’re going to give opportunity to the guy who’s at the top. The creme de la creme, de la creme, de la creme. We’re going to keep skimming and giving you unlimited opportunity to achieve your goals, to achieve fame and fortune.

Marine Corps is the opposite. It says, “I want to know who the worst guy is in your platoon, and I want to make sure that you’re pulling him up so that the baseline is present.” Now you’re talking about an organization that is incredibly effective because the worst guy is pretty good. Is pretty good. So it’s very much about the focus is on the bottom of the layer of the pyramid. And the officers just have the privilege of being custodians for a while and being able to lead a group that has leadership already imbued in it. And where that young 20-year-old, 19-year-old lance corporal or corporal has immense responsibility very, very quickly.

Tim Ferriss: We’re going to wrap up in a few minutes, but I wanted to ask, are there one or two leadership lessons, as you said, that to get pounded into you, one or two that have really stuck with you? Could be something you observed, could be a principle, could be some type of expression. Anything that sticks out.

Matt Pottinger: The Marine Corps talks a lot about both physical courage but also moral courage. So moral courage is more important. It’s this idea that you will do the right thing when no one’s looking, the idea that you will sacrifice yourself and not your integrity or your honor, but your position in order to make sure that the right thing gets done, even when it exposes you to ridicule. And moral courage isn’t something that people talk about a lot in everyday life. I’ll tell you one funny quick story that you just reminded me of because we’re talking about the basic school. You have to do gas chamber training where you put on a gas mask and you run into this concrete hut, which they fill with CS tear gas. Okay? And I was in the first wave to go through this. And they’re teaching you how to wear the mask, how to clear the mask so that you take the mask off and then learn how to clear it just like you’re scuba diving โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: It’s like scuba diving. Yeah.

Matt Pottinger: It’s a lot like that. And because I was either insufficiently attentive, but also because I was still getting acquainted with the gear, one of the valves was part way open. So you had these two coin sized valves on the side where one side, depending on which side you hold your rifle on, you put the canister there that filters out the gas. And so when I got in there, I cleared the mask and put it back on, but I was sucking in pure CS gas through this hole, gaping hole in the front of my mask. And anyone who tells you that tear gas isn’t lethal is full of shit. You can easily die from this stuff. And I ended up asphyxiating. My entire throat closed off.

Tim Ferriss: Oh, no.

Matt Pottinger: And I passed out and I slid down the wall. And I ended up getting carried out on the back of a fellow lieutenant. And so here you’ve got a whole company of Marines getting ready to go through, and I’m the first one out. And they lay me down on the ground, strip my mask off. And everyone at first thought it was a joke that it was meant to just kind of spook them. And then they saw that I was deep, deep purple, like blue, and not breathing. And one of the corporals, it was a sergeant came over and literally was about to give me mouth-to-mouth and was sort of pushing my chest and so forth. And then I sprung up to my feet again. I mean, instantly. Like, wild wake up. And apparently I turned from purple to blue to green in front of everyone’s faces. And a couple of lieutenants started puking.

But the best part of the story is my platoon commander is looking at me. I mean, I’m just a mess, right? I mean, I’ve been unconscious. And Captain Gaskell, who is my platoon commander, says, “Hey, do you know where you’re going?” And I said, “To the infirmary?” He says, “No, you’re going straight back in.” And so I get my mask fixed and then I go and do the whole thing again and it worked out. But that was one of my โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: Wow.

Matt Pottinger: Back on the horse, son. I lost some IQ points that I never got back from that whole incident, unfortunately.

Tim Ferriss: Wow. Well, man of many stories, many capabilities. And I’m very glad we got time to, not just meet and spend time eating pho at your house, which was spectacular, but also talking about some very important topics. And the book is The Boiling Moat: Urgent Steps to Defend Taiwan, which I’m very excited about. I encourage people to check this out. Is there anything else you would like to mention, say, point my audience to, anything at all that you’d like to mention before we went to a close?

Matt Pottinger: Well, I’ll only say one thing, which is that service is really good stuff. You know? Like a life of service, whether it’s military service or teaching. But public service is one of the best mistakes I stumbled into in my life, especially for your young listeners. And I joined the Marine Corps at 32, and I wouldn’t trade that experience for anything.

Tim Ferriss: Thanks so much, Matt. I really appreciate all the time. And for everybody listening, we’ll link to everything in the show notes as per usual at tim.blog/podcast. You can search Matt Pottinger, will probably be easier. Taiwan, Boiling Moat. Any of those things and it’ll pop right up. And until next time, be a bit kinder than as necessary as always to others, but also to yourself. And thanks for tuning in.

Magic Pill โ€” Johann Hari and the New “Miracle” Weight-Loss Drugs

Photo by Diana Polekhina

Ozempic and other GLP-1 receptor agonists have skyrocketed in popularity as a treatment for obesity, promising rapid weight-loss at a hefty price.

“Miracle drug” is one of the descriptors use by celebrities, influencers, and many journalists. I have so far held off on first-hand experience (Related read: No Biological Free Lunches), and I suggest reading Dr. Peter Attia’s warnings regarding possible side-effects.

But just like the rest of the world, I am fascinated by the promises and perils of these drugs, and I am actively tracking how things unfold.

This is why I’m excited to share exclusive excerpts from Johann Hari (@johannhari101), who reports on his research and direct experience in his newest book: Magic Pill: The Extraordinary Benefits and Disturbing Risks of the New Weight-Loss Drugs.

Johann is the New York Times bestselling author of Stolen Focus: Why You Canโ€™t Pay Attention, named a Book of the Year by the Financial Times and the New York Post; Lost Connections: Uncovering The Real Causes of Depression โ€“ and the Unexpected Solutions, described as โ€œone of the most important texts of recent yearsโ€ by the British Journal of General Practice; and Chasing the Scream: The First and Last Days of the War on Drugs, which was adapted into the Oscar-nominated filmย The United States vs. Billie Holiday, for which Johann also served as an executive producer.

Johann has written for some of the worldโ€™s leading newspapers and magazines, including the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, and the Guardian. His TED talks, Everything You Think You Know About Addiction is Wrong and This Could Be Why You Are Depressed or Anxious, have been viewed more than 93 million times.

If you’re pressed for time, skip to the second excerpt to read about Johann’s first-hand account of taking Ozempic, but I suggest reading all of the below.

These drugs and their close cousins will get more and more attention in the coming year, and the more you know, the fewer mistakes you will make.

Please enjoy!

Enter Johann . . .

In the winter of 2022, the global pandemic seemed to be finally receding, so for the first time in two years, I went to a party. I felt schlubby and slightly self-conscious because I had gained a stone a half [21 lbs] since the world shut down. Some people say the main reason they survived the pandemic was the vaccine; for me, it was Uber Eats. The party was being thrown by an Oscar-winning actor, and while I didnโ€™t expect Hollywood stars to have pudged out as much as the rest of us, I thought there would be a little swelling at the edges. 

As I milled around, I felt disconcerted. It wasnโ€™t just that nobody had gained weight. They were gaunt. Their cheekbones were higher, their stomachs tighter. This hadnโ€™t only happened to the actors. The middle-aged TV executives, the actorsโ€™ spouses and kids, the agentsโ€”everyone I hadnโ€™t seen for a few years suddenly looked like their own Snapchat filter, clearer and leaner and sharper. 

I bumped into an old friend and said to her, in a kind of shamed mumble, that I guessed everyone really did take up Pilates in lockdown. She laughed. Then, when I didnโ€™t laugh back, she stared at me. โ€œYou know it wasnโ€™t Pilates, donโ€™t you?โ€ I looked back, puzzled, and she said: โ€œDo you really not know?โ€ 

So, standing at the side of the dance floor, she pulled up an image on her phone. 

I squinted at it in the darkness, as the shrunken partiers all around us shook their bony behinds and discreetly declined the canapรฉs. 

On the screen, I could see a light blue plastic tube with a tiny needle sticking out of it. 

Continue reading “Magic Pill โ€” Johann Hari and the New “Miracle” Weight-Loss Drugs”

A Strategic Deep Dive on TikTok, The Boiling Moat of Taiwan, and Chinaโ€™s Next-Gen Statecraft โ€” Matt Pottinger, Former U.S. Deputy National Security Advisor (#736)

Illustration via 99designs

“As a former Marine, Deputy National Security Advisor, I was juggling the most serious national security threats facing the United States. I think TikTok is near the top. Near the top, okay? Think for a moment how preposterous it is that we are in a situation where the main platform is controlled by a hostile totalitarian government. The main platform by which a whole generation of Americans communicate and acquire their news.”
โ€” Matt Pottinger

Matt Pottinger is a distinguished visiting fellow at the Hoover Institution and chairman of the China Program at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.

Matt served as U.S. Deputy National Security Advisor from 2019 to 2021. In that role, Matt coordinated the full spectrum of national security policy.  Before that, he served as the NSC’s senior director for Asia, where he led the administrationโ€™s work on the Indo-Pacific region, and in particular its shift on China policy.

Before his White House service, Matt spent the late 1990s and early 2000s in China as a reporter for Reuters and The Wall Street Journal. He then fought in Iraq and Afghanistan as a U.S. Marine during three combat deployments between 2007 and 2010. Following active duty, Matt ran Asia research at Davidson Kempner Capital Management, a multi-strategy investment fund in New York.

Mattโ€™s new book, The Boiling Moat: Urgent Steps to Defend Taiwan, is coming out July 1st.

Please enjoy!

Listen to the episode on Apple PodcastsSpotifyOvercastPodcast AddictPocket CastsCastboxYouTube MusicAmazon MusicAudible, or on your favorite podcast platform. Watch the interview on YouTube here.

Brought to you by Wealthfront high-yield savings account, Helix Sleep premium mattresses, and Shopify global commerce platform, providing tools to start, grow, market, and manage a retail business.

The transcript of this episode can be found here. Transcripts of all episodes can be found here.

[podcast-player id=”0ae53212-c3f8-4a9e-957c-e88dc8ca390c” src=”https://rss.art19.com/episodes/0ae53212-c3f8-4a9e-957c-e88dc8ca390c.mp3″ title=”#736: A Strategic Deep Dive on TikTok, The Boiling Moat of Taiwan, and Chinaโ€™s Next-Gen Statecraft โ€” Matt Pottinger, Former U.S. Deputy National Security Advisor (#736)”]


This episode is brought to you byย Helix Sleep!ย Helix was selected as the best overall mattress of 2024 byย Forbes, Fortune, and Wired magazines and many others. Withย Helix, thereโ€™s a specific mattress to meet each and every bodyโ€™s unique comfort needs. Just take their quizโ€”only two minutes to completeโ€”that matches your body type and sleep preferences to the perfect mattress for you. They have a 10-year warranty, and you get to try it out for a hundred nights, risk-free. Theyโ€™ll even pick it up from you if you donโ€™t love it.ย And now, Helix is offering 20% off all mattress orders atย HelixSleep.com/Tim.


This episode is brought to you by ShopifyShopify is one of my favorite platforms and one of my favorite companies. Shopify is designed for anyone to sell anywhere, giving entrepreneurs the resources once reserved for big business. In no time flat, you can have a great-looking online store that brings your ideas to life, and you can have the tools to manage your day-to-day and drive sales. No coding or design experience required.

Go toย shopify.com/Timย to sign up for a one-dollar-per-month trial period. Itโ€™s a great deal for a great service, so I encourage you to check it out. Take your business to the next level today by visitingย shopify.com/Tim.


This episode is brought to you by Wealthfront! Wealthfront is a financial services platform that offers services to help you save and invest your money. Right now, you can earn 4.00% APYโ€”thatโ€™s the Annual Percentage Yieldโ€”with the Wealthfront Brokerage Cash Accoount. Thatโ€™s nearly 10x more interest than if you left your money in a savings account at the average bank, with savings rates at 0.42%, according to FDIC.gov, as of 05/19/2025. It takes just a few minutes to sign up, and then youโ€™ll immediately start earning 4.00% APY from program  banks on your uninvested cash. And when new clients open an account today, theyโ€™ll get an extra $50 bonus with a deposit of $500 or more. Terms and Conditions apply.  Visit Wealthfront.com/Tim to get started.

Cash Account offered by Wealthfront Brokerage LLC, member FINRA/SIPC. Wealthfront is not a bank. The APY on cash deposits as of 04/30/2025, is representative, subject to change, and requires no minimum. Funds in the Cash Account are swept to programย banks, where they earn a variable APY. Tim receives cash compensation from Wealthfront Brokerage for advertising and holds a non-controlling equity interest in the corporate parent of Wealthfront Brokerage. Tim and Wealthfront Brokerage have no other affiliation. Tim reflects his own opinions and Wealthfront does not endorse, sponsor, or promote them.ย See full disclosuresย here.


What was your favorite quote or lesson from this episode? Please let me know in the comments.

Continue reading “A Strategic Deep Dive on TikTok, The Boiling Moat of Taiwan, and Chinaโ€™s Next-Gen Statecraft โ€” Matt Pottinger, Former U.S. Deputy National Security Advisor (#736)”

The Tim Ferriss Show Transcripts: Craig Foster of My Octopus Teacher โ€” How to Find the Wild in a Tame World (#735)

Please enjoy this transcript of my interview with Craig Foster (@seachangeproject). Craig is an Oscar- and BAFTA-winning filmmaker, naturalist, author, and ocean explorer. His films have won more than 150 international awards. He is the co-founder of the Sea Change Project, an NGO dedicated to the long-term conservation and regeneration of the Great African Seaforest. His film My Octopus Teacher has led to making the Great African Seaforest a global icon.

His new book is Amphibious Soul: Finding the Wild in a Tame World.

Transcripts may contain a few typos. With many episodes lasting 2+ hours, it can be difficult to catch minor errors. Enjoy!

Listen to the episode on Apple PodcastsSpotifyOvercastPodcast AddictPocket CastsCastboxYouTube MusicAmazon MusicAudible, or on your favorite podcast platform. Watch the interview on YouTube here.

[podcast-player id=”bf18085d-ba1b-4993-be4f-237a31a0cea0″ src=”https://rss.art19.com/episodes/bf18085d-ba1b-4993-be4f-237a31a0cea0.mp3″ title=”#735: Craig Foster of My Octopus Teacher โ€” How to Find the Wild in a Tame World”]

DUE TO SOME HEADACHES IN THE PAST, PLEASE NOTE LEGAL CONDITIONS:

Tim Ferriss owns the copyright in and to all content in and transcripts of The Tim Ferriss Show podcast, with all rights reserved, as well as his right of publicity.

WHAT YOUโ€™RE WELCOME TO DO: You are welcome to share the below transcript (up to 500 words but not more) in media articles (e.g., The New York Times, LA Times, The Guardian), on your personal website, in a non-commercial article or blog post (e.g., Medium), and/or on a personal social media account for non-commercial purposes, provided that you include attribution to โ€œThe Tim Ferriss Showโ€ and link back to the tim.blog/podcast URL. For the sake of clarity, media outlets with advertising models are permitted to use excerpts from the transcript per the above.

WHAT IS NOT ALLOWED: No one is authorized to copy any portion of the podcast content or use Tim Ferrissโ€™ name, image or likeness for any commercial purpose or use, including without limitation inclusion in any books, e-books, book summaries or synopses, or on a commercial website or social media site (e.g., Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc.) that offers or promotes your or anotherโ€™s products or services. For the sake of clarity, media outlets are permitted to use photos of Tim Ferriss from the media room on tim.blog or (obviously) license photos of Tim Ferriss from Getty Images, etc.


Tim Ferriss: Craig, so nice to finally meet. I have wanted to connect with you for quite a few years, so thank you for making the time.

Craig Foster: Incredible to be here, Tim. I had the same thing. I’ve listened to so many of your podcasts and I’ve always wanted to talk to you, so it’s very exciting.

Tim Ferriss: I thought we would start with just a slice of life. We had our first text exchange this morning and I shot you a quick note and I said, “I’m really looking forward to connecting.” And would you mind describing for the audience your response and your morning perhaps, or at least what you were doing prior to texting?

Craig Foster: Sure. So just before coming on, I went for my swim in the Great African Seaforest which just is 50 meters to the right of here. It’s a very wild, windy day today. So that the technique is to swim long distances along the coast because the underwater tracking is quite difficult and you’re hoping to pick up something interesting.

And I was thinking, “Oh, it’s not much happening.” And suddenly I saw this enormous white shape and just below me was the biggest stingray in the world, I mean this is the biggest species in the world. They’re up to 16, 17-feet long, 14-feet wide, incredible animal. And what is strange about this animal, Tim, was it was absolutely white. They’re normally dark gray or black, and it was covered in a very fine layer of sand that was over the slime that’s on the skin.

So it was this dark, wild forest with a 30-knot wind above me and this massive animal in the kelp forest. And then it actually was watching me for a while. And you have to be incredibly careful with these animals. They’re gentle, but if they do get agitated and they get a spine in you, it’s pretty much game over. It’s a necrotic poison that rots out your organs. So you’ve got to be super careful.

They teach you to move very slowly in the water. Then the animal came up right to the surface and it’s weighing about a ton. So it is actually weighing down part of the kelp forest and I just managed to glide with it for maybe 10 minutes right next to it, just trying to keep my vibrations right down. So it was just such an incredible feeling to be in that wild space with this giant beautiful animal. And I’ve never seen a white one like that in all my time.

Tim Ferriss: We’re going to cover a lot of ground, literally and metaphorically in this conversation, so it’s not going to be all underwater, but it seems like your underwater experiences started very, very, very early. Could you describe the day of your birth, please?

Craig Foster: Sure. Obviously I don’t remember it, but I’ve been told the story many times by my parents. They brought me home from the nursing home and we lived in a little wooden bungalow that was actually half the house was below the high water mark, so it was a crazy place to live. The waves used to smash the windows in.

But they took me straight from the nursing home and dunked me in that Atlantic Ocean, which is probably 12 degrees centigrade, which is about 50 degrees fahrenheit. And it’s quite a shock obviously for a young child. I screamed like hell. But that was our kind of family tradition.

And then I, from a very early age, was in the intertidal, diving at three years old. My mother when I was in the womb would be pretty much in the water every day while she was pregnant. So that Atlantic Ocean has just always been part of my life.

Tim Ferriss: So when you say family tradition, that means that prior generations were also dunked in the ocean right after being born?

Craig Foster: Apparently, yes.

Tim Ferriss: Wow.

Craig Foster: And I did the same with my son, but I felt that I couldn’t take him immediately, so I waited until he was, I think a week or so old, and his little belly button actually broke off and washed out to sea when I took him in.

Tim Ferriss: Okay. So we’re going to span from the ocean to the Kalahari here. And I’m front-loading a couple of stories just to give people a buffet, a few tastings of different dishes. I was actually, I wouldn’t say introduced to your work, but partially introduced to your work by a friend, a mutual friend. Well, actually it was Boyd Varty, who’s been on the podcast. The Lion Tracker’s Guide to Life is one of his books.

And also separately, a friend of mine named Alex, who lives in South Africa, who’s a master tracker who pointed me to the โ€” 

Craig Foster: Oh, wow. Yeah, Alex, I know him well, he’s a wonderful guy.

Tim Ferriss: There you go. All right, so I’ve spent a bunch of time with Alex and Renias.

Craig Foster: Oh, amazing. Amazing.

Tim Ferriss: And this is fun to explore with you because we are just meeting each other, but we’ve been exposed to the others’ work. The Great Dance, and I found the video of The Great Dance and found it endlessly fascinating. But since this is a bit of inside baseball, would you please describe this film and how it came to be? I don’t know the genesis story.

Craig Foster: That’s going back a long time. So this was the late ’90s and my brother and myself had been living on remote islands in different parts of the world, just living wild for many, many months. And we came back to Southern Africa, to South Africa, and we’d always been fascinated by the San and these incredible trackers from the Kalahari.

And we’d heard of this extraordinary, we almost thought it was a myth that there were these last master trackers who could still run down animals and pit themselves against the animal without a bow and arrow. They could only run in the extreme heat over 40 degrees or over 100 degrees fahrenheit.

So we had this crazy wild mission to go up there and see if we could be the first people to film this. And it was very extreme, very, very, very extreme. We were like skeletons after these shoots. Wejust lost so much weight and it was so intense.

But we eventually managed to get the sacred hunt, this hunt by running. And we met these extraordinary trackers who became real mentors and they’ve always stayed with me for my whole life that โ€” they immersed us in a wild existence. That was, it felt like they’d taken us back 10,000, 20,000 years in time and everything started lighting up in me. It was incredible.

But it was also disturbing because I realized how far outside of nature I was compared to them. And that started this niggling in my head to try and get eventually inside of her.

Tim Ferriss: And “inside of her” referring to Mother Nature. All right, so let’s take a closer look at the San Bush Hunters for a moment. There are a few scenes that really stuck out to me, and this is not necessarily me threading together a cohesive narrative. But one of them was after a day of tracking and hunting, assembling, I guess I wouldn’t say they’re thorn bushes, but some type of brush around the fire so that they can tell stories, recount the day and then sleep while there are other animals, certainly about. Not all prey necessarily at night. And it really did strike me that that scene could have been from thousands of years ago, more or less unchanged.

And for definition’s sake, you said run down animals. I want to paint a picture for folks. So this is also called persistence hunting. And the reason the temperature is important, please correct me if I’m neglecting any aspect of this, is that for instance, if you were in New England in the United States and you tried to run down a whitetail deer, good luck. It’s going to be very, very challenging. But when the temperatures are high enough, why can humans, on an endurance basis and survival basis, outlast something like a kudu or an antelope? How’s that possible?

Craig Foster: It’s basically because we can sweat and keep ourselves cool, whereas those animals overheat. And this is โ€” just to be clear, Tim, this is not something that happens very often. This is a sacred hunt that maybe happens once every three or four years and it’s done โ€” almost a religious experience and it’s very dangerous for the humans as well. They’ve got almost no water, so they can also quite easily die.

So it’s this testing of their ability and their strength and their incredible ability to track. What is the most fascinating thing to me was that after a certain point in time and the hunt that we managed to film took over four hours and for I’d say at least three of those hours, Karoha the tracker was not following the physical tracks. He had gone into an altered state and was somehow mysteriously locked onto that animal.

And these kudu are like the ghosts of the bush. They’re impossible to follow unless you’re at a master level. But the kudu is doing everything to outwit him and he would just go straight across the tracks and find it in this impossibly dense bush.

The central Kalahari, you can’t see more than 100 meters, you can’t see the animal at all. So 90 percent of the time he’s running at quite a high speed and he can’t see anything and his body is like a radar system. And I’ve come across this ability with other indigenous people, even ocean navigators, that the body in its primal state has got this incredible ability to be able to follow things and find things. But that’s how it worked.

Tim Ferriss: I recall, just to give people a reference as well, if they’re interested in digging into this, there’s a book called The Wayfinders by Wade Davis that has a long chapter on Polynesian navigation, which blew my mind. I won’t go into great detail with that now, but โ€” 

Craig Foster: I know that book and I know those Polynesian voyagers. I know Nainoa Thompson well.

Tim Ferriss: It’s unbelievable.

Craig Foster: Yeah, it’s extraordinary. In there’s, really, if you make a mistake, you’re dead. And that’s exactly the same kind of thing. In fact, I spoke to Nainoa, had an incredible day with him here in False Bay. We dived together when he circumnavigated the world.

I spoke to him about the Solemn Trackers and he was like, “Yes, that’s exactly what we are doing. We’re using our bodies and obviously the stars and everything as this navigation device.” And you might recall his great teacher, Papa Mau, used to lie asleep. And when that ocean-going canoe moved one degree off course, his body would wake up and he’d tell him. So even asleep, he was able to do this extraordinary navigation.

Tim Ferriss: The parallels are really striking to me, even though I’ve had no contact with Polynesian navigators, and I’m probably getting my terminology wrong, but one thing that really stood out is as a Westerner who also has zero sailing experience, but as someone who has certainly read a story here or there, I think of a captain as navigator. But it seems like in these older Polynesian traditions and certainly skill sets, you have the navigator and then you have something akin to, I suppose, a captain who’s running other aspects of the ship minus the navigation component.

The reason I say parallels is that thinking of, I’ve never met the Kalahari Bushmen, but watching your film and then reading these accounts of the Polynesians, it strikes me that their experience, their cognitive experience, their experience of consciousness, the way that they parallel process is, I think, something that would seem very foreign to most people who live 18 inches away from a laptop screen or in an urban jungle most of the time.

How would you describe their mode of existence? And by that I don’t mean what they do, what type of house they live in, but more how they experience the world. How is that different from what most people โ€” say I’m sitting in a high-rise in Austin, Texas. I’m sure a lot of people listening to this are in Los Angeles or New York. How are those experiences of the world most different in your mind?

Craig Foster: What was fascinating to me was โ€” and immediately [inaudible] comes to mind, this incredible bow hunter that we worked with and a lot of the other San I’ve worked with over the years. You’ll be walking along tracking, looking for signs, looking for tracks, and suddenly there will just be this beautiful laughter that boils up inside him and just comes out and you’re looking around to see what is funny or what’s amused him. And it’s not something from the outside world, it’s this primal joy of being in that space and being so connected to the wild. It just comes out and it happens quite often.

And there’s this tremendous joy, despite, if you think about it, many of the lives of the people I’ve worked with are very hard and they’re extremely poor and it’s difficult sometimes to survive. Yet there’s this innate joy, this kind of what has been coined by โ€” some researchers I’ve worked with have called Wilderness Rapture.

A lot of other people have noticed this in indigenous societies. There’s an extraordinary sense of joy that seems to be connected to being very embedded in the natural world. So I’ve met also very joyful people in our society and obviously some people have just got more or less of that, but it seems to be very apparent in some of these people who are deeply connected to the wild.

Tim Ferriss: When I think about your physical location, as we speak and also as well-documented in My Octopus Teacher, fantastic film. Of course, I’m not the only person who feels that way.

Craig Foster: Thank you.

Tim Ferriss: You have within striking distance, and you have had it seems for a lot of your life within striking distance. And this is a term I’ve ended up using a lot in the last few years when people ask me where I most want to live, say, when I have a family, in or around immersive nature.

I would draw a distinction for me at least, experientially, between say where I am now, where I am within a few blocks of walking on a dirt trail around a man-made lake, which is a section of a river. And there are some beautiful trees around town like here in Austin, and you feel like you are around nature, but it doesn’t have the vastness that you might perceive when you are, say, in the mountains. When you’re in an alpine environment where you feel dwarfed by your surroundings or I would imagine in a kelp forest in the ocean and you see a 14-foot stingray.

Which is not to say everyone needs to have these experiences all the time, but I’m wondering how your proximity to that affects your life, your mental health contrasted maybe with times when you have not been close to that.

Because when I think about what I would love to have with family, not just for myself but also for kids, I would really love to be within very easy access of this type of immersive experience. And I’m wondering if you could share your thoughts on that very long-winded mini TED Talk that I just gave.

Craig Foster: It gave me time to think, which is great. I think of course there is a big advantage to being close to areas which are filled with biodiversity. The human psyche somehow knows that and it reacts and it does feel more relaxed, more at home. And there’s all sorts of reasons for that.

But there’s another factor to this as well, Tim. I’ve sort of searched for wildness my whole life and struggled actually to find it in many ways. And I’ve done very extreme things to try and get close to wildness, like diving with crocodiles and this kind of thing.

But strangely enough, when I’ve sometimes felt the closest to wild nature is when I’ve just spent time with some small animals, say like limpets, which look really like little stones on the rocks, they hardly move. But I’ve got to know those little animals intimately. I’ve got to know how they move away from the sun. I’ve seen them looking after their gardens. I’ve seen how they broadcast spawn. I’ve got incredible intimacy with them and that has let me sort of slip inside their lives. And that somehow is deeply satisfying.

So you could, in your environment, say you got very close to even a single group of insects, you could be much closer to wild nature and to what I call the mother of mothers than if you were in an area that was in the middle of Africa where it’s just teeming with game. So it does very much depend on your ability to immerse and see these, what I often refer to as the secret lives of these animals. So it’s even possible โ€” 

It’s more about your observance and your detailed look. It obviously helps a lot if you’re surrounded by these things, but it’s the intimacy that makes all the difference. And this is this idea of mine of like, “Well, you feel you’re kind of outside or inside of nature and you can get inside even through a tiny animal, an ant, an insect if you spend enough time.”

Tim Ferriss: So let’s talk about maybe an extreme example of intimacy and then I’m going to pull in an example that I believe you’ve given of one tree in New York. So we’re going to bring it to New York, but we’re going to go back to the Kalahari.

Alex, who I mentioned earlier, Alex van den Heever. I hope I’m pronouncing that correctly. I don’t speak Afrikaans, but it’s probably close enough for the purposes of โ€” 

Craig Foster: Close enough, yeah.

Tim Ferriss: Close enough.

Craig Foster: Van den Heever, yeah.

Tim Ferriss: There we go. I knew it wasn’t right. I knew it was going to be one of those Volkswagen type of situations. I know that’s not Dutch, by the way folks, or Afrikaans in any case.

Alex, I encourage people to check out Tracker Academy, which is an NGO nonprofit, which Alex is deeply involved with, which I’ve also supported. And they do fantastic work on a number of levels.

He has incredible respect and admiration for the tracking abilities of the San or the San. I’m not sure how to pronounce that correctly. What makes them so impressive? Alex, he, himself, he is a master tracker. What he can do blows my mind when I watch him identify tracks and follow tracks at high speed. It is almost incomprehensible, although I have some basic vocabulary now because I’ve spent time with him and others studying tracking at a very, very one-on-one level.

What makes the hunters you spent time with in the Kalahari so particularly impressive, at least to you?

Craig Foster: It was fascinating to see that they could observe animals with their technique moving up to one and a half kilometers away so they can feel a predator moving one and a half kilometers away and you can’t see more than 100 meters. And they’re doing that by listening to the ripples of sound that the small birds are giving off. So these ripples come through and these incredibly subtle sounds, they then feel and see in their mind’s eye in this aural picture, that predator moving.

And they can feel a big raptor flying as well from a long distance away. And then they will pinpoint sometimes when it makes a kill, and they’ll even know what animal’s being killed by these reactions a lot of the time. So it feels at first like total magic until you realize how this whole bird language story works.

What makes them so incredible is I think this incredible legacy, their lineage goes back 120,000 years. So it’s this tradition that’s been passed down for an enormous time period longer than any other group of people on the planet. I think that is one of the many factors that make them so extraordinary.

Tim Ferriss: And if we pull back and try to bring that, say, to people listening in the US, there are a lot of people listening internationally, but plenty of people in the US. I recall coming back from South Africa, from the Sabi Sands Reserve and the fauna, certainly the flora are going to be totally different in the United States. But even in my backyard I could, or near anyone’s house, if you have some greenery, even in an urban environment, coyotes, raccoons, you can actually start to try to notice these small things that do change, right?

And if you develop a basic vocabulary, you can start to try to figure out possible gender direction, speed. And it seems to just give you a greater fidelity of perception in these experiences. You’ve said, I believe, you can’t read or you can’t believe everything you read on the internet, so please feel free to fact check this.

But you’ve said that “If a person took one tree in New York and figured out how that tree changed over 365 days, what animals interacted with it, what insects live in there, how the tree is surviving, et cetera, you could have quite a large effect.” And this really rings true for me. I’m wondering if you could elaborate on that or give other examples of how people, even if they are in a largely urban environment, how they can cultivate this type of awareness and feeling of interconnectedness.

Craig Foster: Yeah, you can do it in cities. I’ve seen incredible trackers in America doing this. I’ve got a great friend, Jon Young, who’s an incredible tracker, bird language expert who wrote the definitive book on bird language.

But even on a simple level, Tim, if you just start to look at a small area where there are few insects and maybe a few birds, maybe one or two amphibians, and you start to just take notes and observe every day, just, say, for half an hour. And after a while, you’ll be absolutely shocked at what you couldn’t see before. It’ll be like so obvious and it was totally invisible to you before. It’s like, “Can’t believe I missed all these things.”

And it’s not just about the leaves changing color, but there are thousands of these things going on that, unless you take notice, you will miss. And then you start โ€” nature then becomes this incredible teacher.

And it’s just about persistence. You don’t have to have any great intellect or anything. You just have a little cell phone camera, some notes, and you just start observing these things and suddenly this incredible invisible world becomes visible to you and it becomes very fascinating. And then you think after a year or two of doing it, okay, I already know what’s going on.

And then if you persist, oh, my goodness, there’s another incredible layer and it just keeps going on and on and on, and you basically fall in love with this extraordinary biosphere that is keeping us alive. And you start to have this conversation, this incredible wild conversation with this environment that’s around us.

Tim Ferriss: I bounce around a lot in these conversations, so please forgive me with what might seem like a non sequitur, but I want to make sure that I don’t forget to ask you a bit about freediving and breath holds, and then we’re going to come back to the thread that we’re leaving behind temporarily.

You have perhaps a unique experience in listening to episodes of this podcast. I believe you’d mentioned, this is prior to us recording, that you’ve listened to something, dozens or close to 100 episodes, but while holding your breath, and I was hoping you could elaborate on that. And also perhaps share, and this is not prescriptive advice, people have to be very, very careful in the water and especially if they’re doing any type of breath training to avoid shallow water blackouts and things like that.

But I’m wondering if you could just describe your breath hold and cold exposure practice, although maybe it’s not explicitly for cold. And then perhaps add to that, how much of the breath hold capability you think is inbuilt, because I believe both of your parents have done quite a lot of diving and how much of it is trainable? If you could speak to that.

Craig Foster: Sure. You’re absolutely right. Every morning I do a breath hold practice where I do deep breathing and then I hold my breath for, say, three to five minutes, do it three or four times.

I quite like having some really interesting distractions. I don’t feel like the desire to breathe and your podcasts have been the sort of favorite thing to listen to. I love so many of them. I do this because it makes one feel very relaxed. It builds the immune system, and of course it helps with the diving, but one’s got to be very careful never to do any of these breathing techniques close to actually going in the water. You probably want at least half an hour or more away from that. I never do these breathing things and then go into the water. Any freediving, I will only take two or three deep breaths before I go in a dive. You’ve got to be so careful with that.

The cold exposure, I’ve always, I’ve spent the last 12 years pretty much diving every single day. So I’ve acclimatized myself to the cold. I feel mostly very comfortable in cold water for an hour or so, but if I haven’t slept or if I’m particularly stressed about something or not feeling well, that changes radically.

It’s amazing how the body’s ability to thermoregulate tells you how your mind is feeling, so that can plummet radically. So if it’s all going well, then I can stay in for quite a long time. And what I love about the cold is that it feeds the brain with these extraordinary chemicals, dopamine and noradrenaline and all these beautiful chemicals that make you feel really good and motivated and set the day up beautifully.

So it also helps the underwater tracking because it’s somehow the cold makes your mind sharper. And I try and relax a lot so I don’t get much cortisol going in. And then actually, even though I could obviously spend longer in the water with a wetsuit, I prefer an hour or so, and with all these amazing chemicals from the cold that helped me focus and understand the secret lives of these animals.

Tim Ferriss: I would love to hear a little bit more about underwater tracking because that would be โ€” Greek is hard enough for me. Let’s call that terrestrial tracking. And then I imagine that underwater is jumping from Greek to Chinese, if you’ve never read Chinese.

In the sense that in South Africa with Alex and Renias, you have smell. So it turns out that at least male leopard urine smells like burnt popcorn, and you can smell it pretty clearly. It smells exactly like burnt popcorn. It’s unbelievable, it’s uncanny. And then you see the alarm calls from vervet monkeys or different types of birds, francolins, and based on that, they can identify whether it’s a python or this or that, in which direction, how far away it is. It’s unbelievable.

So you have those auditory cues as well, and much more as you know. What are some of the components or indicators in underwater tracking?

Craig Foster: Yeah, it’s a great question. At first, I struggled for several years, I had this idea, I got incredibly inspired by the San in the Kalahari, and I thought, could I ever track underwater? And it just seemed impossible because a track gets put there and then the next swell washes it away. So there’s nothing there.

And then I started to notice the slime trails. So a lot of the mollusks leave very subtle slime trails, and those collect tiny particles of sand. And if you’re not looking very carefully, you’ll never notice those, but they’re actually everywhere. It’s like, oh, gosh.

So that was the first track I saw and was very excited. And then I started seeing all these tracks on the backs of animals like that ray that I told you about. So the mollusks are interacting with that ray and I could tell how long that animal’s been resting because of that. Their enormous number of tiny little marks that the predators make.

So once you know all the drill holes, you can tell who’s been in an area, who’s been eating who, and by the shininess of the shell, and a lot of other things you tell the timing, there are bite marks everywhere. There are literally thousands and thousands of these subtle signs but it’s taken me 10 years to slowly put together because there’s no manuals on this, there’s no books. As far as I know, nobody’s really done this in the bigger aquatic picture. So it did take a very long time to figure it all out.

Tim Ferriss: How has, and this is a leading question of course, maybe the answer is it hasn’t, but how has that transferred to experiences outside of the water? Not necessarily in a tracking capacity, but how have those experiences transcended underwater tracking?

Craig Foster: First of all, it’s made my desire to be better tracking on land stronger. So now I’ve got a wonderful friend, JJ Minye, Xhosa master tracker, who I work with and who’s teaching me on a weekly basis. So that’s been very profound on land. And I sometimes take him into the intertidal in the water and show him what I know there. So it’s exciting. But I think what you’re asking is what has happened to me is that through the tracking underwater, I’ve been very fortunate and privileged to have these special relationships with a lot of different wild animals.

And remember though, animals in the water are not afraid of people like they are on land, you know, this primate on land on two legs is very dangerous, a lot of animals are very scared. That didn’t happen in the water. So these animals are quite curious. A lot of the time they’re not scared. So I can get very close to a lot of animals and for instance, an animal equivalent size and a ferocity to a lion, I can be right next to it, one meter away and I’m safe and I can be โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: What would be an example of that?

Craig Foster: Like a sevengill shark or a great white shark, a tiger shark, that kind of thing. So it’s fairly safe to be with those animals and sometimes there’s an enormous number of them together. In the case of the sevengills, I’ve been with 55, 60 of them, and they’re each the size of a lion and they hunt seals, they hunt dolphins, but they don’t know that I’m prey. So it’s quite safe to be with them. But what has happened, and I’ve got a lot of relationships with these smaller creatures, and because of that, it feels as if I’m not as reliant on my human relationships because I have this, it feels like family, like kin in the water after a while, many years you just feel this tremendous love for these creatures and they’ve taught me so much.

They’re real teachers for me, so I love them. And then I have these bonds. So the human relationships on land, I don’t feel I need as much from them. So I think my relationship with my wonderful wife has become better because of that. And with a lot of close friends, family, if something happens in the psyche, and if you can imagine, throughout prehistory for countless hundreds of thousands of years, we’ve had these relationships with all these species. Now in many cases, it is totally taken away. Well, where’s that going to go? Where’s all that relationship going to go? And it mostly goes, I think, to a bit more pressure on human relationships. So that’s one of the things I’ve felt quite profoundly.

Tim Ferriss: Maybe you could tell a story if you wouldn’t mind. I came across a story, I’d love for you to tell it, and hopefully this will be enough of a cue. This was from an interview you did with Scott Ramsey, I believe, about a Cape clawless otter, a very intimate encounter. And I’d love for you to perhaps tell that story because I may have some follow up questions.

Craig Foster: That’s amazing, your ability to dig things out from the deep past. Good tracking, Tim.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, thanks.

Craig Foster: That’s a long time ago. So this was actually quite in the early days. I was probably, I’m guessing now three years into diving every day. And I was questioning myself. I was going in the early morning, was freezing, middle of winter, and I was thinking, “What the hell am I doing here doing this? Is it really going to pay off? Am I just going mad?” And I was about halfway through the dive and I suddenly felt a fairly large animal under my sort of periphery vision and thought, “Oh, my goodness, this is a Cape clawless otter.” And especially in those days, it’s changed slightly now, but these animals are super shy. Some people who’ve lived here their whole lives have never seen one.

So it was very exciting and my instinct was to keep still and not turn to face the animal because I know that from working with a lot of wild animals, they see them, our mouths and our fronts as the aggressive part that maybe will bite them. So I just kept quite still and just looked out the corner of my eye. And this animal became more and more curious and I was amazed to actually feel it starting to touch my feet. They’ve got these incredible dexterous hands, clawless front paws, three claws on the back, and it was just this electric energy of this animal actually making physical contact without me doing anything. I kept still and then it moved up my side, and then I just saw this unbelievable whiskered face and these incredible bright eyes just looking straight into my mask. And it reached out and started touching my face. And it was so overwhelming that I actually shed a few tears in the mask and it was very powerful.

And then animals swimming around and bouncing off the ocean floor, they are very playful, beautiful animals. And it was just, oh, my God, now I know why I’m here. This is just incredible. And actually it was so overwhelming, I couldn’t take it for too long. It was so much and so powerful. I got out of the water and this otter followed me right into the shallows and was popping its head out and making this high-pitched sound as almost to call me back in. It was very strange and I didn’t really know what was going on. And afterwards I did a lot of research and found out that there’s a very long tradition of humans hunting with wild otters. It goes back deep into prehistory. And I wondered, I mean, I don’t know for sure at all, if this animal had a deep memory and was somehow trying to reconnect with that heritage or if it was just curious and wanted to look and feel the strange, the sort of primate flopping around in the water.

Tim Ferriss: That’s incredible. And by hunting with you mean some type of partner hunting akin to maybe coyotes and badgers in North America, which for a long time people considered a myth and it had been passed down through oral tradition among some Native American tribes. And lo and behold, with various trail cams and remote triggers, you can now see this type of footage of these two species cooperating. It’s wild and you see this.

Craig Foster: I didn’t know that. That’s fascinating.

Tim Ferriss: It’s incredible. You see it, there’s footage, people can find it online. I’ll try to put it in the show notes of a coyote comes into frame and it jumps down much like a domesticated dog, kind of a downward dog tail wagging like a puppy might do to elicit play. And then there’s this badger waddling around behind it, and they’re off to go do some night hunting together. It is remarkable.

Craig Foster: Wow. That’s incredible.

Tim Ferriss: So when you stay hunting with humans, do you have any more details on what that might’ve looked like or what otters and humans would hunt and why did it make sense to hunt together?

Craig Foster: So the story actually came through my wife, Swati, who grew up for all her life in India, is a conservation journalist, had her own wildlife show on TV. And she knew people from Bangladesh, the last few people who were still practicing this in some form. And they hunt for fish and then the fish gets shared between the humans and the otters. But I think it goes back in a much, much deeper, deep, deep in time. And if your imagination, you start going, imagine these early humans, how many interactions they would’ve had with wild creatures and the possibilities that what they would’ve got up to, I think, could be pretty extraordinary.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, I’m fascinated by interspecies cooperation when it’s sort of the most unlikely of combinations or things you wouldn’t expect. And I want to say, and I’ll put this in the show notes, I’ll get the proper reference, but then in Ethiopia you see examples of baboons and I want to say jackals cooperating. It’s not typical. Very often the jackals will eat the baby baboons and they’re sort of sworn enemies, but they have temporary ceasefires to hunt together. And similarly you see, I want to say it’s the hornbill, Alex is, he should give me a slap on the wrist if I get this wrong, and the dwarf mongoose who will also cooperate, and I want to say it’s the hornbill, it could be another bird, but they’ll go harass the colonies of these dwarf mongoose to wake them up so that the mongoose will come out, the birds will, in effect, through alarm calls and so on, protect them against airborne predators while the mongoose kick up the insects and the birds get the insects. That’s fascinating to me.

Craig Foster: I see it in the kelp forest, these alliances. We see it with the octopus and the super klipvis. The fish are following the โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: What was the second animal that you mentioned?

Craig Foster: A super klipvis, it’s a rockfish, a type of rock rockfish, and they follow the octopus hunting around and they pick off and scavenge. It’s not too clear exactly what the octopus might get out of it, but they’re probably acting as in the same way like the bird’s alarm call. So if a bigger predator comes in and the fish will tell the octopus.

Tim Ferriss: Why did you decide to write Amphibious Soul, subtitled Finding the Wild in a Tame World? And it’s rare that a book exactly resonates with what has been deeply on my mind for certainly the last few years. But could you just speak to the genesis of this? How did this come about? Writing books is hard, at least for me. So how did this come about for you?

Craig Foster: I went through a pretty tough period after the film came out. I wasn’t in any way expecting or be ready to be exposed to hundreds of millions of people on Netflix. It was a huge shock for me, and part of it was trying to come out of that space and just to get down on paper what was in my head. But I also had this feeling of this relationship with all these animals that I mentioned to you. I just wanted so much to tell their stories. And I’d learned so much beyond the octopus. Obviously that film was very much focused on that one animal and that one story. And I had this strange feeling, Tim of this, I didn’t even know what it meant at the time, but it kept coming up, this amphibious soul, what the hell is that? And it felt like much like I think you maybe feel, that I was living a double life. Part of my life was wild and connected to three million years of deep evolution in all my incredible ancestors from Africa.

And then part of my life was very connected to all the tame world and all the comforts and all the wonderful technologies and things that come with that. And it was very hard to reconcile the two. How do I find the balance between these two extremes and the pull of the tame world and all the technology and these phones and all this stuff was so strong, but yet I could feel in my deep design that I was completely, I was born wild. I’m a wild animal. These creatures that I interact with taught me I’m a wild animal. So how could I find that balance? And it was almost like I was walking along the shore and then that ocean to the one side was my wild self and the land to the right was this tame self. And I was trying desperately to find a balance.

Because you can’t go back to a fully wild existence, that door is completely shut for us now. But how could I find this balance? And certainly not easy. I don’t pretend to have found this incredible, perfect balance. But I must say when I practice all these things that I’ve tried to put in the book about retaining the wildness, I do feel a lot more centered and a lot calmer. And then when I get too, and don’t get me wrong, I love a good cup of coffee. I love watching movies. I love all the incredible things in science. I love the science, so I love the tame world as well. But if I get drawn too much in that, I feel my nervous system just ratchets up and I can’t sleep properly and I feel odd. So it’s just about trying to find that balance and I’m very passionate about this subject.

Tim Ferriss: It strikes me that, and this has become more perhaps salient for me in the last 10 to 15 years in particular, but to be really well-adapted to an almost exclusive modern existence requires you to somewhat be a freak of nature, if that makes sense. In the same way that there are super sleepers, people who have the genetic predisposition and capability to feel fully rested on four hours of sleep, four and a half hours of sleep. And these people do exist. There’s predictive power in looking at their, say, genotype. And it is something that you see, but it is not something that is common or the default by any stretch.

And in the last, let’s just call it decade and particularly in the last five years, each year scheduling, I don’t have the access that you have on a daily basis, but scheduling a week, say for an annual bow hunt. I’ve gone bow hunting for a long time now, and I go once a year typically and blocking out another week or 10 days for a rafting trip and another segment of time for a group trip with friends to spend time in the mountains doing ski touring, those points of reconnection or reactivation of that felt sense of connectedness seem to me to be so critical for their carryover effect into the rest of the year that it’s hard to overstate, at least for me the importance, which is part of the reason why I’m so excited about this book. And I’m wondering, I’m going to give you a few cues and I’d love to hear you expand on any of these. So this is dealer’s choice.

Craig Foster: Can I just say something to add to that? I’d had exactly those experiences like you’re saying, it’s just suddenly you got the fuel to be able to operate well for weeks or even months after that experience, like one of those experiences. But it hit so hard home when I had this very fortunate experience to spend a month on this research station on this very, very remote island, thousands of kilometers off East Africa. It’s a near pristine environment. So it looks and feels like the Earth was 50,000 years ago. Everywhere you look there are animals, it is teeming, it is mind-bending in terms of what is there.

But what was most fascinating, Tim, was how that near pristine biodiversity affected my psyche and the people around me. It was as if I’d been given some magic elixir and I felt so much calmer, so much more present, so much more at home. And that feeling lasted for months and months and months. So I think it’s, depending on how much nature is around you and how much you’re able to access it and your experience of it, it deeply affects the psyche in a very, very profound way. So I absolutely, I mean it’s so great that you’re doing those experiences on a regular basis and you’re feeling, you know exactly what I’m talking about. You come back and it feels like you’ve been rebooted.

Tim Ferriss: So the dance is working in the sense that literally the first cue I was going to give you was pristine wilderness. So it seems to be working, and I’d love for you to say a bit more about the feeling that endured for months afterwards. Can you put more words to that so people can perhaps begin to envision what that is like?

Craig Foster: I think what it is, and it might be connected, Tim, to when we know there’s enormous biodiversity and health in the ecosystem around us. You must remember we’ve had in our species 300,000 years as hunter-gatherers. So when you’re in an environment like that, you know you can survive, there’s plenty of food, you don’t have to work very hard to get all your needs. So you feel very relaxed. If you are in an environment where there’s almost no biodiversity, your ancient creature that’s living inside you, your deep design, is terrified because it doesn’t know you can go to the supermarket. It’s just looking and feeling and hearing and smelling. There’s no life around. So the experience of going to these wilderness places tells that wild part of us that everything is okay, that this is actually, there’s plenty for everybody and we just need to go and harvest a tiny bit each day and there’ll be plenty for everybody, for the family. And you feel, oh, everything’s all right, everything will be fine. This is good. This is the good life.

Tim Ferriss: That strikes a chord with me. And I think it would surprise perhaps a lot of folks who think of the hunter-gatherer life as very austere and brutal, which it certainly can be. I mean, if you watch in some respects, it can be from a nutritional perspective depending on where you are, right? In the Kalahari, you see, I would imagine symptoms of certain nutrient deficiencies in, say, the hair on some of the Bushmen and so on. However, when you’re in a very, very dense area with high degrees of biodiversity, and I experienced this in October, I was in Suriname spending time with some indigenous groups like the Trio as part of actually exploring work sites or partner communities of nonprofit called the Amazon Conservation Team. And man were these guys relaxed โ€” guys and gals โ€” because they could go fishing and hunting.

They walked out into the forest for any given need. I mean the sophistication of their pharmacists, let’s call them, who could walk out, and every plant, every tree, every turn was known, as you put it mind-bending, happened to be out with them. They would always bring a shotgun with them. These days it’s more shotguns than bows, although some of the old-timers still use bows. And if they ever went for a walk, they always brought a shotgun and got to see a peccary hunt and they dismantled, field dressed the entire animal, created backpacks out of various vegetation and vines and so on. And there’s a certain ease, there’s a certain calm that permeated the entire village, which isn’t too overly romanticized either, because prior to a lot of the missionary work, the intertribal warfare was just nonstop, unceasing. So there are issues with any groups of humans because humans are humans.

Craig Foster: I asked some of the old San, “Which do you prefer, this new life or the old ways when you were nomadic?” And like you said, it wasn’t an obvious answer, half of them said, “We are desperate to go back to the old life. It was incredible and such an adventure and so powerful.” And half of them said “No, it was just too difficult. And we much prefer being static and we’ve got a water supply. We are not going thirsty for weeks.” And they preferred that. So as you say, it’s not all roses, depending on where you were. But I think some of those early lives were just incredible. 

Tim Ferriss: I’m very energized by this conversation because I rarely get the chance to connect with someone who’s spent so much time as you have in deep close proximity, both out of water and underwater, which is for me at least a rare combo. Few questions. So the first is, how much of this deep transfer after this immersive experience is activating something very old, almost like birds know how to build bird’s nests without having to go to bird school? My experience, the first time I ever went for a hunt, which was for my third book, which related to food, and I thought it was an obligation for me to at least forage and garden and hunt as part of understanding the entire supply chain of food, was my first time butchering an animal in the field. I felt like my hands kind of knew what to do and it was shocking to me.

There was some type of, for lack of a better descriptor, like ancestral knowledge, which makes sense given our history. Is that a component for you of this activation, for lack of a better term? And then the second piece is, to what extent, and this is getting perhaps into some mystical areas, although I think at some point it won’t be mystical because we’ll have better tools. But my experience in the jungle is also one of maybe a density of consciousness or activity in addition to that feeling of ease. There’s a density that has such a distinct impact on my inner experience that I can’t really describe to my own satisfaction. But could you bounce off of either of those in any way that makes any sense?

Craig Foster: It totally resonates with me, Tim, and the struggling to say it is โ€” I love that because it’s mysterious. So much of this is mysterious to us because we are programmed to see the world through the window of science. Don’t get me wrong, I love science. I love marine biology, especially, and paleontology. But what happens as you immerse is what you’re saying, there’s this remembering. And I think what I’ve experienced is my eyes and my brain are looking around and they’re seeing an enormous number of things, enormous number of signs, some of which now I can identify, but some of which my conscious mind is not recognizing, but the unconscious is taking everything in. So when I then am looking for something or trying to find something, what I’ve found is if I just actually relax and released it and let that enormous unconscious that’s connected to the deep ancestry, that’s connected to three million years in our genus as Homo and 300,000 years as Sapiens, let that connect with my unconscious and just come up to the surface.

And then it’s like it’s there and it feels magical, but it’s actually a process that all the sensory system and all these memories are coming together, honing in and saying, and when you were talking, I was thinking of the heart urchin. I spent three years trying to find this animal. Occasionally I’d find a dead shell of this magnificent echinoderm, and I just didn’t know where they were coming from. I didn’t know probably from the deep ocean, I thought none of the scientists knew. And then one day I did what I’ve described, and it just said to me, it’s underneath the sand and that’s what you’re talking about. This is this conversation. It’s underneath the sand.

And I dug about that deep in the sand and out came this incredible live heart urchin, this extraordinary animal. And I realized, okay, this is how it’s working, this is where they’re coming from. And then I was able to put together all the clues, and now I can find them quite easily. They have these very, very subtle detritus traps. That is a very subtle trap, but I didn’t know that. But my unconscious and all the memories of how to do this and put the dots together clicked into place.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, I’ve had some, maybe another time for a bottle of wine, but I think you and I have had a number of bizarre experiences that if you try to put words to them, end up sounding like you should be put in an institution. But just because they’re hard to verbalize does not mean that it’s magical thinking, right? In the example you gave, in the example that I gave with the field dressing, it’s not implying magic just because it’s hard to verbalize. And if you think about our evolution, language is a pretty recent arrival, at least to the extent that we’re talking right now. This level of if we are being generous with sophisticated communication is pretty new on the scene.

There’s a lot of machinery and a lot of perceptual faculties that developed very, very well prior to that. So I think that in part it’s becoming attuned to different ways of knowing, even if you can’t explicitly explain those things in a conversation like this. Could you speak to any number of other things that I would love to hear more about? Nature as mirror is one that I’m very curious about, play and song catching specifically, which direction would you like to go first?

Craig Foster: It’s working because I wanted to talk about the mirror because of what you said. And this is almost feeling some of that magic right here. So what I’ve noticed is of course there’s attention bias. If you’re looking for a certain animal, say a tuberculate cuttlefish comes to mind. Oh, my God, you keep seeing them everywhere, but it’s often because your mind is just focused on that shape, on that animal and that movement. And of course you’re going to see more of them than you usually do. But there’s some other fascinating factor that I’ve just seen again and again and again. And when I’ve spoken to some of the scientists even I work with, certainly some of the cinematographers, there’s this strange thing that the wild ecosystem is somehow mysteriously mirroring the human psyche and almost wanting to teach us and show us things way beyond where the edge of attention bias leads.

So it’s almost as if when we are attentive, when we care, when we focus, there is something which is very hard to explain, that seems to come about in the natural world, that feels just incredible, like behavior, especially animal behavior that I would often have never seen in my whole life. And then I’m focusing on this one particular animal, desperate to learn from it and then I just see right in front of me this incredible behavior, that maybe and has never been recorded before. And that’s happened again and again and again. And it eventually forced me to realize, there’s some extraordinary relationship between us humans and the natural world and probably the entire world is natural in many ways, but especially in these areas of high biodiversity, there’s this strange, mysterious process that’s going on that I find very difficult to explain, but it feels like this mirror, and that sometimes when I’ve been in dark, difficult spaces, I see some pretty tough, difficult things. And reflecting back at me, things are tough.

Tim Ferriss: I am really so enjoying this conversation, in part because you are a โ€” you’re an explorer and you have deep, deep, consistent contact with nature. And just to draw a quick, maybe, analogy, the coaches and athletes at the highest level of sport are always a few steps ahead of, say, the published exercise scientists. Of course, because there’s so many barriers, number one, to publication, as there should be, peer review and so on. And the coaches and athletes don’t necessarily get everything right, but they are the experimentalists, so they’re always going to be a few years ahead when they find something that works or something that clicks. And my experience is that that’s true in many different fields, right? Field biologists are going to see things that they can’t explain that might seem ridiculous, that ultimately bear out as incredibly valid and important, it just might take 10 years. So you have discovered how many new species of shrimp?

Craig Foster: We’ve lost count, we’ve actually been able to name and identify three species of shrimp. The most interesting one for me was the one that actually lives inside the octopus dens and probably has a mutual relationship with the cephalopods. In this part of the world, Tim, you won’t believe how easy it is to find a new species. It’s the naming of it that’s an enormously difficult job. So sometimes when I’m with my amazing prof, Charles Griffiths, we find a new species and we almost don’t want to look at it, because we know how much work is going to take to describe it. So you should almost ignore it.

Tim Ferriss: Heteromysis fosteri. That would be one, right?

Craig Foster: Yeah, yeah. Good tracking. That’s another little shrimp that lives inside the shells of โ€” discarded shells of animals, yeah.

Tim Ferriss: And for people who don’t know the naming convention, very often the discoverer, per se, will have their last name appended to the end. Much like Lophophora williamsii, probably pronouncing that wrong, but I don’t speak Latin. Better known as peyote. Although certainly there were many people well before Mr. William or Williams who were intimately familiar with hikuri or peyote. 

So coming back to play, what is song catching?

Craig Foster: Song catching was introduced to me by โ€” the idea by Jon Young, who’s a wonderful tracker in California. And he used to go out with Bill Monroe, I think was the father of bluegrass music, or I could have got that wrong. But they used to go out into the wilderness and spend sometimes weeks out there and open themselves up to the wild, and they used to be able to somehow catch a song of a tree or a landscape or an animal, and they’d frantically write down the song before it disappeared. And Jon’s played some of these songs to me and they’ve had some really strange coincidences where people have got a very similar song about the same species of trees, so it was fascinating to me. And I thought, “I’d love to try and catch the song of the kelp forest,” but Jon’s a great musician and knows all about songwriting, and I’m actually pathetic with all these things, so it was extremely difficult for me.

And that is a long and involved story, I don’t know how far you want to go, but we eventually managed to catch a song, but I had to have a lot of help, and it involved Yo-Yo Ma โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: We have all the time in the world, man. This is the benefit of a long-format podcast. So yeah, let’s not skip any of the juicy bits, okay? So as a pathetic song catcher, first, just for sake of explaining this for the audience, so โ€” I think his name was Jon, that you mentioned. Song catching โ€” 

Craig Foster: Jon Young.

Tim Ferriss: โ€” this is, in effect, waiting for inspiration to strike, such that you feel like you have felt an appropriate song surface to your conscious awareness that matches whatever you are focusing on. Is that a fair way to describe it?

Craig Foster: That’s a wonderful way of describing it. Absolutely, yes.

Tim Ferriss: Okay. So how does โ€” 

Craig Foster: It goes deep into our deep past and the famous songs that โ€” the song of the Kalahari have caught at night in dreams or in visions that make up the trance dance, so it goes deep back in time. So I thought, “I’m just going to go and I’m going to get a beautiful song coming out.” And I went into the kelp forest for weeks and literally got a dribble of terrible sentences that were nowhere near a song. And I was like, “This is not going to happen.” And then I got a few little words and phrases and then had this, out of the blue, strange coincidence. Someone from the Yo-Yo Ma Foundation called me from New York and said, “Yo-Yo Ma is coming to South Africa and he’s interested in some of the work, and is there anything you’ve got that we might do together?”

And I stupidly said, “We’re catching songs. We are doing the song catching,” and they were fascinated by this. And then he wanted to come and listen to the song we’d caught. And of course, it was, I suddenly realized, a huge mistake.

Tim Ferriss: Because you didn’t have a song.

Craig Foster: I didn’t have, and the greatest musician on this planet’s now coming to listen. It was like, “What have I done? Absolute idiot.” So I then โ€” we’ve got this amazing group that I work with, a nonprofit, Sea Change Project, and I said, “Guys, we’ve got a problem, and I desperately need your help. How can we do this?” And they all came on board very kindly and helped me. And we started to have these strange experiences where we weren’t catching so many lines or songs, but we were finding these amazing instruments that could be played underwater. So there was a whale’s ear bone that I’d found many years ago and didn’t make any sound on land, and we just intuitively took it into the water and struck this.

Free-dived into a cave, one of our favorite caves, and we struck it there and the sound just went straight through our bodies. It was absolutely incredible. This deep booming sound from this whale’s ear bone about the size of my fist, and it was unbelievable. And we’d recorded this, we used abalone shells and made these incredible sounds. We found giant rocks on the shore that could be rocked and made these incredible percussive sounds. And then, I think it was Pippa, got hold of some good musicians. I think it was Ronan Skillen, who’s one of the best percussionists in the country, and he got hold of Zolani Mahola, this incredible Xhosa singer.

And we all got together and said, “Yo-Yo Ma is coming, what can we do?” And Zolani, of course, being an amazing performer, was able to connect onto this idea. And I took her diving and, literally, I was so amazed. On her first dive, she was able to catch songs from the kelp forest and we had these incredible instruments. We made an octopus drum from eight stipes of the kelp that washed up, and we tuned these โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: What’s a stipe?

Craig Foster: Sorry, that’s the long stem of the kelp. So they’re up to 15 meters, 45 feet long, but we had them washing on the shore after the storm and we got 10-meter long ones, and my son and Ronan tuned them. And he played these incredible tubes made from the kelp like a drum.

Tim Ferriss: So it’d be like playing water glasses of different heights, in a sense. 

Craig Foster: Exactly. But he was striking the top.

Tim Ferriss: Like a xylophone.

Craig Foster: Yeah. That kind of thing. 

Tim Ferriss: But with the tubes of the different lengths.

Craig Foster: Exactly. 

Tim Ferriss: Whatever that is.

Craig Foster: You see how bad my music is. And the musicians were so excited, because they’d never heard sounds like this before. And we just got this thing together in time as Yo-Yo Ma luckily arrived at my house. It was terrifying, I was really stressed out, and Zolani was so cool and calm. And then we performed for him and this group and it was very, very magical, and he played the cello on our deck. It was very, very magical and helped us afterwards wonderfully with our NGO and our conservation works. Through that idea of play and song catching, these beautiful relationships formed with these amazing people who were committed to this strange idea.

Tim Ferriss: What does the word “home” or concept of home mean to you?

Craig Foster: About a year and three months ago, we lost our home because of an electrical fire. And literally, from one hour to two hours later, I had this beautiful home that my wife and I and my son had nurtured for 16 years was ashes. And we totally lost โ€” we lost everything. I didn’t have my passport, one pair of shorts, and a t-shirt. Nothing, absolutely nothing. Everything was gone. And what was so fascinating, first of all, our incredible friends and care and love from people around us helped us tremendously to get over that shock quite quickly, but that day of the fire, there was blisters everywhere and everything.

I walked down to the ocean and I went in that kelp forest and I looked back towards the house that was no longer there, and it struck so hard in my heart that this ocean, but also very much this planet, this original deep mother that birthed our species and it nurtured me from my whole life was actually my home, and I would be absolutely fine as long as that biodiversity and that biosphere was functioning well and was healthy. And it struck so hard and it was a pity that I had to learn it by losing the house, but it was a profound lesson that this place, this wildness, the health of this place is our โ€” or certainly for me is my deep home, and I can always rebuild my home, which I am doing now. My house.

Tim Ferriss: That sounds like a possibly terrifying and dangerous experience. Was anyone in the house when that happened?

Craig Foster: My son, his friend, and myself were in the house. Swati, my wife, was in India, about to come back, and we literally ran out with glass exploding around us, and we were lucky enough to get not seriously injured. It happened so fast, it was just crazy. They say that โ€” this fire scientist who came and looked said, “If you don’t catch it, and especially a bed or something catches, within 30 seconds, you’re not going to put that fire out.”

Tim Ferriss: That is so lucky. Terrifying and tragic and very lucky that no one was injured.

Craig Foster: No, that was the main thing. Yeah, that was a big factor, Tim, was like โ€” if no one gets injured, then you can quite easily, I think, get over that process.

Tim Ferriss: How have you thought about, especially when your son was younger, how did you think about parenting? And that’s very broad, but I’m wondering of any lessons learned or things you feel like you did right or things you would do again. Anything along these lines, asking for a friend. Aspiring father, as he may be.

Craig Foster: I think, certainly for me, certainly a huge turning point was when I felt I was inside of the natural world, I rarely had something to pass to him. I didn’t want to try and overly push him or teach him as such, I just wanted to instill the love for that in him, but I knew I could only really do it if I knew it in my own self. So that was a big factor, and I can see that it’s in him now. He doesn’t have the mad, crazy passion. He’s actually, ironically, an incredible musician and does music for film. God alone knows where he got that from, but definitely not from me. He has a deep love for nature and it was amazing to pass that on, and I think the main thing for a child really is โ€” it sounds like a cliche, but if they truly know that you really love them, that’s the most critical thing.

My parents were very loving, but particularly my great-grandmother and my grandmother had this incredible love, and I can still feel that sitting in me today very strongly. And when I’m in โ€” have great difficulty, I can draw on that. And just time, dedicated time. I made sure I dedicated focused time to doing things with him, but things I also enjoyed doing, not just โ€” that we both enjoyed doing and we still today. This morning, we had an incredible game of frisbee together, and he helped me set up this podcast, because he’s much better technically, I’m useless with that. So it’s just very special to spend time. I go diving with him a lot, swimming a lot, we exercise together, so I think it’s just the love, the time, and also having โ€” you’ve got so many incredible experiences and so much to share with a child there, the child would be โ€” yeah, I’d love to be your child.

Tim Ferriss: Thanks for saying that. Yeah, I would love to be your child, too, from the sounds of it. And I must ask two things, I guess. Do people in your family tend to have kids young? Because you said great-grandmother. And my grandparents passed away when I was very, very young, so that’s part one. Part two is, how did they show that love? I’m just wondering how that was expressed, such that it made such an indelible mark on you.

Craig Foster: I didn’t have my son that early, but they were having children in their early twenties. So my great-grandmother used to walk seven miles every day to our house, he was very active, and she lived until 96, and she was strong until 94. But the way she showed their love, and my gran as well, was with amazing attentiveness. So they used to come to our house when I was very young, I used to go out with my brother into the intertidal every day, and we used to look for animals and fiddle around. But what was always in the back of our minds was we were going to be able to go back to the house and my gran and my great-gran would sit and totally focus on our silly little kid stories, like with an absolute, rapt attention. And there’s something about that focus and not being distracted with other things that was immensely powerful, that gave our childhood meaning.

It gave meaning to those stories, and it was a tremendous act of love to have that attention and a true interest in our naive young minds. And it was unconditional โ€” it felt like an unconditional type of love and care. And then we were sick, they looked after us, and it was just very, very special. My parents had to work and they had enormous distractions of trying to survive and didn’t have much money, so it was much harder for them. But the grandparents were just, yeah, phenomenal.

Tim Ferriss: You mentioned earlier having a tough time after the success and vast global exposure of My Octopus Teacher. Could you say more about why that was hard, what that experience entailed?

Craig Foster: I guess you can imagine, Tim โ€” you hear on the end of the planet, I’m right at the end of โ€” the tip of Africa, fairly isolated in a way. I mean, at that point, I’d made 25 films, I’d done a lot of documentaries, some of them like The Great Dance, somehow you’d managed to see, because you were very interested in that subject, but we’d had some level, little levels of success. And the films would go on and, a few months later, then they’d go away, and so on. So I was expecting maybe a few people to be interested in this little octopus film. We’re either used to these smaller channels also, like National Geographic or BBC, or whatever, and it goes on and it comes off. Now you’ve got this giant, Netflix, this enormous reach, and suddenly, you absolutely, like nobody on the end of the planet, just fascinated by these animals and you’re in 100 million homes plus, whatever the crazy number is.

And it’s enormous shock for the psyche to suddenly realize, “How did that happen?” And then a lot of people are trying to get hold of you, you’ve got no method for dealing with that at all, we’re getting an email every four seconds. My nature is to be wanting to reply to everybody. Of course, that becomes impossible. I think there’s also a factor where โ€” I don’t know if you’ve thought about this, but going back to our design and where we come from, the San societies and my San teachers, that’s a very egalitarian society. To even have a competition for someone who’s better than somebody else would be absolutely out of the question, so we come as humans from this vast lineage where these people knew it was good to keep everybody on the same level and not to have competition. Now, suddenly, you’re winning awards, all the stuff. It’s somehow โ€” it’s very exciting, but it’s also very disturbing for the psyche.

And for me, my nervous system was completely knocked out of kilter. So the main way it showed that was by not sleeping, so I didn’t sleep. I slept extremely badly, sometimes just a few minutes a night for weeks and for months, and that does a horrible thing, horrible things to your psyche.

Tim Ferriss: That’s a problem.

Craig Foster: Yeah, that’s a serious problem. And then more people want to contact you and they’re very kind and they want to talk to you and interview, and you can’t even see straight, because you haven’t slept for three months. So it adds to the whole madness. So it was very difficult, but also, of course, that adversity is powerful, because I’m in an altered state for 24 hours a day and you’re trying to deal with that. And then you start to see into the deep psyche and to see parts of your mind that you’d never glimpsed before, and then I slowly used wild nature, just going into that sea. I couldn’t last for very long, because my system was so shattered and I lost so much weight. My beard went gray overnight kind of thing. But I used nature and I used all these I’d learned from the wild to rebuild my nervous system.

Just gentle access to the cold and to the spaces and to these animals, and I was able to rebuild my system, but it helped, because it made โ€” it just crushed me so much, it made me so โ€” felt that deep humility of that adversity, and I realized that the awards and all that stuff really didn’t matter at all, but the one thing that mattered so much was these incredible letters that we got from people all over the world who’d been moved by the film and had helped their lives, and that really mattered. That was real, that was something that you could hold onto, and it was very beautiful and very, very grateful to those people, because that’s what kept me going.

And if I had to go back and say, “Would I want to go through all that hell of not sleeping again?” In retrospect, I’m glad I went through it. I’d hate to ever repeat that, it was very traumatic in some ways, but I learned a great deal from it. I learned a lot and I managed to, I think, heal parts of my psyche in certain ways. It ended well. It could have been bad. If it continued, I think it would’ve been โ€” I mean, it’s eventually you die if you don’t sleep.

Tim Ferriss: Not ideal. So what stopped it? Was it just the natural decay rate of fame when people moved on to Tiger King, or whatever the next hot thing happened to be? Or was it something else? Was it a set of decisions you made or other factors? What finally got you back to sleeping, in addition to rebuilding your nervous system?

Craig Foster: So it was just focusing on nature and tracking and the cold and my ancestors and all I’d learned from working with Indigenous people for years and years and years. Drawing on all those things. Breathing, just calming everything down, just breathing sometimes for an hour or more a day. All these things that I learned. And of course, eventually, the people quickly forget, if you don’t feed that system, as you know, then it starts getting quiet and people start forgetting you very quickly, which is a huge relief. Because it was very intense when it first came out and it was that perfect storm with COVID and everybody thinks about these things.

Tim Ferriss: Perfect storm, it really was.

Craig Foster: It was strange. It was so strange, Tim. I mean, I don’t know, with your trajectory and you’ve got this huge following and everything, if it was slow, but it was from literally as that thing went out, it was just an explosion.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, mine was similar. It wasn’t of the magnitude of 100 million plus on Netflix, but with the first book, when it hit the New York Times list pretty quickly and then stayed there for a few years, four or five years I suppose, and that was zero to 100 for me, certainly, in my own scale. And it’s a shock to the system, it is a shock to the system. And I wouldn’t trade it, it’s certainly provided opportunities like this. It set the stage for growing the blog, which set the stage for having the podcast, which set the stage for having conversations like this, so I’m very grateful. And we are not evolved to handle that type of dynamic at all. At least โ€” 

Craig Foster: I mean, there’s nothing in the prehistory, and that big spotlight comes. And I mean, imagine people who โ€” for me, I was thinking of people who โ€” this is a tiny little thing in many ways, people are big actors in Hollywood, and how they manage, I do not know. I had a tiny taste of that in a small, small way, but I believe the Buddhists have got a special prayer for people in the spotlight who are famous. They know that it’s a difficult thing. But as you say, I think also it’s a huge privilege and I’ve met so many incredible people through it. Amazing opportunities, of course, is the flip side of that, which is very special. And when everything quietens down, it’s much easier.

Tim Ferriss: So who is the new book for? How should people think about that, and then what should they expect to get from reading this book, Amphibious Soul?

Craig Foster: The few people who have read the advanced copies have felt this real sense to start some of these practices, to start learning what I call the oldest language on Earth, and to start observing this wild world around them, even if they live in a city. And it has been excitingly, for just a few people, quite transformative in that way. They started to look at the wild world in a different way and it affected them quite positively. So it’s for, I guess, people who want to have more of a relationship with this incredible world we live in, even the universe that we live in that gave birth to us 13.7 billion years ago, because I go into some of that through an amazing cosmologist I met.

So it’s people who want a deeper relationship with themselves and with the wild, and also, you don’t have to have affinity with water, but of course, if that is part of your desire, then there are quite a few good examples of how to deal with cold, how to deal with water, how to track animals, and how to actually acknowledge and benefit from these incredible ancestors who have actually built our minds. You and I talking now is thanks to these extraordinary ancestors going back to long ago, millions of years, who’ve actually built our minds. We can only do what we do because of them and their incredible ability to come through sometimes amazingly difficult times. Groups of them just slipped through, they almost went extinct a few times, so it’s quite incredible that we’re sitting here talking.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, that is remarkable. I’m very excited about this book and I do not say that lightly. As you would imagine, I get offers to have hundreds of books sent to me every month just about, it feels. And to the extent that I had to put a blog post up saying, “I’m not reading any books in the same year they’re published,” but I might make an exception for this one. This one is right down the fairway, as we would say, in terms of the convergence of my current interests, because I feel like it will give words to experiences I’ve had and also experiences I hope to find patterns within, so that I can cultivate more of them, if that makes sense. And I’m very excited about it. 

Would you like to say anything about Sea Change Project?

Craig Foster: That is our not-for-profit organization that’s focused on ocean conservation. We’ve been going for about 10 years, and so started with an amazing group of volunteers who volunteered a lot of their time for five years. One of the big focuses, of course, the Great African Seaforest, and one of our methods has been โ€” how do you protect something if it’s not even known? Nobody knows about the kelp forest. So my wife, Swati, gave it this name, “The Great African Seaforest,” and through the film, My Octopus Teacher, we’ve now, by some miracle, managed to make this place a global icon and it’s been referred to, in scientific papers, by this name all over the world. So it’s much easier to protect it and the animals in that space. So we are studying 1001 animals in the kelp furrows, bringing their stories out, and we are also trying to get this idea across that โ€” and this way, I’m quite fascinated by your sense of this is that there’s enormous emphasis on climate change and all the carbon problems and everything. And that’s absolutely critical and that must go on absolutely, but I feel there’s not enough emphasis on biodiversity. And when I talk about biodiversity, I’m talking about all the plant and animal species on this planet, but they actually form our immune system. They are the life support system of everything. So if the phytoplankton communities in the ocean collapse, we stop breathing. Literally, that’s it. So every single investment that you might have in the bank or any property you might own or any future children that you might want to have, that’s game over for all that. That investment is worth zero if biodiversity collapses.

So what I can’t understand is why businesses and governments are not putting much more attention on looking after and regenerating the deep foundation that keeps every single investment and every single enterprise on this planet going. So it’s like this mother of mothers is just sitting there looking after everything, but we’re kind of like a child who’s forgotten that his mother exists, but we are completely dependent on her in every single way. Why do you think it is that a lot of the attention is not on looking after her?

Tim Ferriss: I mean, I can take a stab at that if you like. I appreciate bringing this up. I think about this quite a bit. And I would say that as you and your wife have done so brilliantly, I think words matter a lot and labels matter a lot. This sounds self-evident. But what I mean by that, I’ll give an example that’ll probably piss off a bunch of folks in the US who might identify as liberals. And by the way, I would say I’m pretty apolitical and I’m issue by issue, right? I don’t like to pick team A or team B because if you agree with everything in your party, then you’re probably not thinking for yourself. I just lived in the Bay Area for 17 years, for God’s sake. So I would say that in a lot of ways I would point myself in that direction.

However, there’s a book called Words That Work by Luntz, I’m blanking on his first name. He is a Republican strategist who, for instance, came up with the term or the phrase “death tax,” which is a rebrand of sorts of inheritance tax. And he’s very good at using words to catalyze or create narratives and stories that can then change behaviors, which can then change beliefs and policy, right? So I think there’s a lot to be learned from people like that.

And as I think about, for instance, our long-term best interests and perhaps a bias towards short-term thinking that has evolved and how to reconcile those two, I think a lot about a few different things. One is incentives. So how can we possibly create or modify incentives such that or add incentives that help to bend behavior towards longer term outcomes? For instance, and this is painting with a broad brush, but if we have, let’s just say, the CEOs of public companies who are being judged on a quarterly basis and who have their various payouts and bonuses and so on pegged to relatively short-term goals, then you have policymakers who might be more focused on reelection in one year or two years than they are on any type of long-term game, if it means they’re going to potentially face political opposition or lose constituent support, how do you try to thread that needle?

And you, I think, have an advantage in thinking about this because you are on some level, and I suppose we all are, but you’re a very well-practiced storyteller. And what I’ve tried to do is find compelling stories that have some short-term payoff, hopefully. Maybe it’s just that they’re gripping stories. I can give some examples that then act as Trojan horses for getting people to take actions that serve certain long-term goals, if that makes any sense. That’s very abstract. So I’ll give a concrete example. You might choose, for instance, and what I’m dancing around here is the word conservation. I’m dancing around the word conservation because at least in the US, that has become, and I think it’s kind of silly, a polarizing word that gets associated with bleeding heart liberals in Berkeley. Whereas if you go way back to like Teddy Roosevelt and others, hunters, historically, a lot of people on the right would also be and still are, in fairness, conservationists fundamentally, but that word has become tainted on some level. So I dance around it.

You might choose, say, a very charismatic species and tell stories around that species, which lead people to read a book, watch a YouTube video, enjoy a documentary that then leads them to think about personal changes in terms of behaviors, right? Let’s just say, I’m making this up, but we use that single tree example. They end up taking an interest in perhaps the oldest tree in their neighborhood in Austin, which happens to be an oak tree in a park. And all of a sudden they’re on this sort of benevolent slippery slope of becoming more engaged with their surroundings, and then they become involved with a foundation that does trail repair and so on and so forth, right?

So I’m always thinking about how to get someone to just try the appetizer, right? And I’m not going to sell them on the 20-course tasting menu that costs $1,000 off the bat. It’s just too much of a commitment. And I’ll give you an example. Wolves are a very controversial species in the United States. They’ve become an ideological battleground and very politicized. And I’m going to leave that third rail alone for a second, although I’ve been very involved in a lot of these conversations on a national level, including policymakers, and man, oh, man, do people get upset! But the reason I bring up wolves is there’s a book, Of Wolves and Men, by Barry Lopez, and it was such a genre-busting, category-redefining book when it was published. It’s a beautiful book and it is incredibly well-written. And it pulls people in whether they want to be pulled in or not. And it’s apolitical. That type of art has the potential to move people in a way that lecturing does not. Does that make sense? As soon as you start lecturing โ€” 

Craig Foster: Absolutely.

Tim Ferriss: โ€” people turn off. And I feel so fortunate, and I’ll shut up in a second, but I know this is something we chatted a bit about before recording. How do you reconcile evolved short-term interest? And you see this, by the way, for instance, in South America. A lot of indigenous groups are making really bad long-term decisions because they’re getting seduced by mining companies with concessions who are giving them free electricity and ATVs and various bribes effectively to completely rape and pillage their ancestral land resources, right? And so we’re all susceptible to this. How do you try to reconcile these?

So I don’t know if any of this resonates, but I think about it a lot. For instance, with respect to mental health in the United States, I’ve been very involved with psychedelic-assisted therapies, historically, half of this country, at the very least, would be viewed as very anti-drug, anti-psychedelic, let’s just say, if we’re painting with a broad brush on the right, and then you have the hippies and so on and the lefties who are pro drugs. But you can get around that if you look at certain subpopulations who have a certain degree of sympathy from both sides who are politically immune, for instance, veterans with complex PTSD. There are ways that you can find common ground and bipartisan, in the case of the US, support with something that if you approach it the wrong way, if you take a sanctimonious lecturing position, it’s doomed to fail, right? And I think that’s the biggest weakness that I see. I see that as the biggest weakness with a lot of attempts at conservation. It’s a positioning failure and it’s a high horse failure.

So at the end of the day, if you ask anyone like, “Do you want to see all green disappear from your world? Do you want to have a silent spring where you hear no birds?” No one’s going to say yes. It’s like, “Let’s start there and then try to work backwards and find some common ground.” And it’s actually been a wonderful experience for me, and I’m going to stop in a second, but I don’t talk about this much publicly because I don’t really want to show my cards and I don’t have some ulterior motive. It’s just like this is part of the craft that I take so seriously, which is how do you help to shape hopefully the benevolent long-term beliefs and behaviors that serve the individual and collective good, not in some socialist way, right? It’s just like an existential way. How do we not completely drive ourselves and the planet to catastrophe?

And I think there are ways to do it. So for instance, getting into hunting. I grew up hating hunters and hunting because I grew up on Long Island and guys would just get shit-faced and these rednecks would go out and just make a mess, and animals were injured, and it was very disrespectful, and the whole thing was terrible by and large. But when I met really responsible ethical hunters, and I was very lucky that a pretty well-known guy now, amazing author also, Steven Rinella, took me on my first hunt white-tailed deer in the Carolinas. And from soup to nuts, it was approached in such a responsible way, cooked heart that evening, harvested some organs in addition to doing the butchering, and then had that meat that I felt so unconflicted about versus, say, cellophane-wrapped meat of questionable origins in the supermarket. It was surprising to me how deeply unconflicted and good I felt about it.

And that has been an opportunity because most folks on the left view hunting as some barbaric exercise and just an indulgence of blood-lust, which for some people, it might, but for a lot of people it’s not. And that’s been a foot in the door for me to connect with a lot of people who, at face value, might identify, say, on the right. And that does not mean I need to have any conflict with these people whatsoever. And I also have, on an issue-by-issue basis, I would say, probably lean conservative in a bunch of ways, and having that common language is what I’m almost always looking for, right? What is the foot in the door where we can say something that really has no grounds for disagreement? How can we start there? What is that thread?

So I’ll stop there because that’s a whole lot that I just spewed out. But what have you learned about this? Because you’ve had wide-ranging conversations, you’ve had a chance to talk about, say, Sea Change Project and other things through the blessing and the curse, which was the mega success of your film. What have you learned as you’ve had these conversations?

Craig Foster: It aligns in quite a few ways to what you’re saying, and I think that there is this massive pandemic of mental health throughout the world, let’s face it. And I feel that part of that is this underlying disconnection from nature, from this original mother. So I think it’s a wonderful idea to reintroduce people, as you say, very gently to that wild person that’s inside of all of us and just gently coaxing a tiny bit of that wild person to have a look around and see what the world looks like. And then once that starts happening and the people start to build a relationship with the wild creatures, with the kin, with the plants, even with the minerals, with the universe, then the whole decision making process changes. You then don’t want to do things that harm your family, that harm biodiversity. You’re keen on looking after the insects, you’re keen on looking after the birds. They become precious to you.

So it’s a slow, gentle process, as you say, of storytelling in a way that is not โ€” it’s so easy in this conservation game to point fingers, and I’m very wary of that because the finger can point back at me so easily. We all are involved in this process, and we all do things that aren’t great for the planet, let’s face it. I’ve never met a single person who doesn’t. So we kind of need to come together as a community and reconnect with this massive extraordinary heritage and then uplift so many of our lives. We don’t need so many of the things from the tame world. It’s wonderful to enjoy some of them, but by giving up and sacrificing some of those things, we can actually create a much better life for ourselves in many ways. And so I think it is quite attractive and people are struggling a lot and it’s something that is not new. We’ve known this for an enormously long period of time. So it’s not something โ€” if we start remembering it, just it’s transformative.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, I totally agree. And I’ll just say a few more things now that I’m all warmed up. The first is that here I’m in Austin, and Austin is sometimes called the blueberry in the tomato soup because it’s a mostly liberal outpost in a predominantly Republican state. And I’m going to say something that a lot of my friends on the left will not like to hear, which is, first, yelling on the internet is not actually taking effective action. That’s the first thing I’ll say. Just because you’re screaming on Twitter does not mean that you’re moving the needle on the things that you care about.

The second is that many of the folks I’ve seen with direct action take steps to conserve wildlife and land are Republican hunters. And there is common ground to be found, there’s a lot of common ground, much more. You just have to look for it and avoid the third rails, which are often specific phrases. So I’ll give you an example. I was on a trip recently and I was having a great conversation with this gentleman in the hydrocarbon business. So he’s involved with petroleum and gas and energy. And we were having a great conversation and he wanted to have a sparring match. So he said, “What’s your opinion on climate change?” I was like, here we go, open shot fired. And I said, “Well, look, do you want to have a conversation about this or are you just setting us up for a Rock’em Sock’em Robots fight here? Is this what we’re getting ready to do? I thought we were having a perfectly nice conversation.” And I just said all this explicitly. And he kind of chuckled because he knew exactly what he was doing.

And I said, “Look, first of all, let’s not use that word because I can tell where this is going.” And I said, “What I would say, if I give you an answer, is that number one, let’s put aside whether humans had anything to do with contributing to what we’re about to discuss, because that’s a huge point of contention, right? Did we do it? Did we not? Now, people have strong opinions about this, but let’s put that completely aside to avoid those strong opinions.” Said, “Okay. What we can observe, I would say, pretty uncontroversially is more extreme weather events. So flooding events, mudslides, wildfires, et cetera. Are we on board? Great. We’re on board. Cool. So if we want to avoid catastrophic destruction of property and this, this and this and this, even if we had nothing to do with the growing frequency of these phenomena, it is probably our responsibility, or at least in our best interest, to take some human action to try to figure out how to deal with these things.” I was like, “Okay. Cool.” And then there was a lot less room to fight, if that makes sense, right?

And so I would just say to people out there, number one, don’t take the bait, don’t fight easily. It’s so simple to fight. See if you can do the harder thing, which is fun to figure out, and that is dance around the words that are automatically going to set off a fistfight and use different language because if you use different language, it is how you change thought, it’s how you convey thought, and then you can actually get somewhere. So that’s something that I think a lot about, which is why this book like Words That Work, which was recommended to me by a friend, Matt Mullenweg, who thinks deeply about these things as well, is something I would encourage people to check out just so they can start to train their brain to at least identify where they’re using basically not words that work, but words that incite some kind of โ€” 

Craig Foster: Yeah.

Tim Ferriss: โ€” immediate knee-jerk violence โ€” 

Craig Foster: Because you’re never going to persuade anybody by going in hard or having โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: Yeah.

Craig Foster: โ€” the straight line opinions. I mean, our whole nature is so contradictory in โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: Yeah.

Craig Foster: โ€” our human nature, and to accept that and to just try and work together rather than apart. I totally agree with you. I like that a lot.

Tim Ferriss: And look, I’m not saying I’m the paragon of equanimity and I’m walking around like the Dalai Lama and just constantly turning the other cheek. I get fired up and pissed off and say stupid things and send emails I shouldn’t send. I do these things. But just aspirationally, I think it’s worth paying attention to. And of those 1,001 species, we’re going to step out of the octagon for a second, is one of them octopuses that steal cameras? Am I getting this right?

Craig Foster: We had this fascinating experience not that long ago. I was with my friend and marine biologist who works with Sea Change, Jannes, and we were going out to study the shaggy sea hares that hardly ever come to this area, and very focused on the sea hares. And the next moment, this very curious octopus rushed out of its den and grabbed my camera. Now, I know that I must be very careful with these animals. I just don’t want to grab a camera back because it can really disturb and unsettle that animal. So I was like, “I’ve got to be a bit careful there.” So it dragged the camera through the gravel back to its den, and then I thought, “I’ll just wait and hopefully the animal will give my camera back.” But what was so fascinating, I happened to be recording at the time, this curious octopus looked at the camera, then turned the camera and started filming us. And its arms were draped over the lens. So you get these incredible images of these suckers and arms right over the lenses and us in the background.

And eventually, the octopus gave the camera back. And when we looked at these images, it had this amazingly profound effect on us that it is suddenly looking through this world from the octopus’s perspective. It was so powerful. And we both came up with this idea, octopus should be number one and homo sapiens, the human animal, should be 1,001 because we forget that we are part of this wild world. We’re born wild, we had this incredible heritage. So it was such a simple but profound experience that this animal kind of taught us. And I mean, I think you may have seen some of the images. It’s quite wonderful to turn it around โ€” 

Tim Ferriss: I did. They’re wild.

Craig Foster: โ€” and to see it from that and imagine what that animal’s life is like, imagine what its consciousness is like. We can’t obviously quite get into that, but we can start to sense it. We are all made of the same stuff. We come from the same original mother. So we bonded more closely than we think. So it was a wonderful lesson from the wild.

Tim Ferriss: And you’ve mentioned and also alluded to something that I would like to put into words for myself as a reminder as much as anything else and that is, it’s so easy as the skin encapsulated egos that we are walking around, particularly in urban environments, staring at screens, deforming our eyeballs, one Zoom meeting at a time, that we are separate. And this comes back to language, which is a reflection of thinking that if we say we need to conserve nature, we’re implying a separation that, at least from my felt experience, isn’t quite capturing what I take to be true at this point, which is almost for me, and you’ve told a number of stories, I’ve experienced this, it’s an extension of us, right? We evolve to operate in this environment. They’re not separate things, which is part of the reason why uploading consciousness to the cloud and so on, I think, is sort of a flawed objective to begin with because disembodied consciousness, and we’re already seeing this in actually AI research and robotics, requires some type of form moving through space.

So it’s fundamental to who we are and who we evolve to be as homo sapiens, I suppose is what I’m saying, which is why this book is for anyone who feels like, and I say this without having read the book, so I’m taking a leap here, but I feel like based on this conversation, please correct me if I’m wrong, it seems like it’s for anyone who feels like maybe something isn’t quite right or there’s maybe something that is missing or perhaps the mode of living that feels divorced from nature is producing some eerie sense of incompleteness or unease that this is a guide to finding ways to reintegrate that feeling of completeness, which is available. It is available, it’s not magical, it is not out of reach. It is within reach, but it does take some changes of perception and behavior and interaction. Is that fair to say?

Craig Foster: Absolutely. Spot on, Tim. I think you described it better than I can. So it’s very much the case. And I don’t always feel that wonderful feeling of not being separate. The tame world pulls me all over the place, but I have had these times where I’ve really felt very connected like that, and I felt that separation drop away and that there rarely feels like there’s no other. And it’s deeply transformative and invigorating, and I try to keep that with me and I try to be very grateful for that. And I think we all, as you say, have access to that. You just have to just try and put in a little bit of that time, and then it comes.

Tim Ferriss: Craig, people can find the book Amphibious Soul: Finding the Wild in a Tame World. I recommend people check this out. I think thematically, it is so deeply important. It has been so transformative for me. So I can’t wait to get my hands on it. People can find Sea Change Project at seachangeproject.com, and we’ll link to everything that we discussed in the show notes. Is there anything else that you would like to talk about? Any additional comments or formal complaints against me or the podcast or anything that you would like to point my audience to? Anything at all that you’d like to add before we wind to a close for this first conversation?

Craig Foster: I’d like to thank you for all your work and your dedication to talking about so many subjects that have certainly helped me and inspired me so much, and for your braveness and openness. I think that’s what attracted me to your podcast is honesty you have and the braveness to say things that are sometimes difficult. And I mean, I think you know you’ve made a difference to a lot of people’s lives. So it’s just a huge privilege. I’ve been wanting to speak to you for a long time and never really had the courage to reach out. So it’s nice that this book was an excuse to do that. It’s just so special talking to you and getting to know you in this more intimate way, not just through the podcast. So that’s been very special.

And to all that amazing big audience that I believe is so supportive of this. And it seems like you’ve got this amazing community that are a kind-hearted sort of giant group that I think inspire all of this. So I’d just like to thank that amazing community for tuning in and listening and putting their time and hearts into this.

And I guess it’s just a very gentle ask to them to just sometimes just feel this enormous, extraordinary mother that is just sitting out there, that original mother that gave birth to us and has nurtured us in this extraordinary way, and to feel her there all the time, and just in the back of our mind just to sense her. And if we can somehow gently begin to look after that mother and to find ways to regenerate her, I think that we’ll do ourselves a great service. I mean, this idea of saving the planet is โ€” the planet’s fine without us. She’ll last easily without us. She’s as tough as nails and can handle anything. We are the fragile ones. So we almost need to look at our place and all the other animals that are sharing the space with us and just feel at least that gratefulness for this amazing planet that has looked after us so beautifully. So that’s really the only thing. And just absolutely wonderful talking to you, Tim, and very special for me, a real privilege.

Tim Ferriss: Likewise, Craig. Thanks so much for saying that. And I’ve admired you and your work for a long time. I’ve been meaning to connect. Also, glad to have the book as a wonderful excuse to have this conversation, and hope to meet in person. Maybe I’ll have a chance to graze my fingertips across some kelp with you at some point. I would enjoy that.

Craig Foster: I would love to take you diving. It’d be incredible.

Tim Ferriss: I would absolutely love to do that. So I will put that on the to-do list. And once again, thank you for the time. Thank you for being so open about your experiences and capturing them in the book, which is Amphibious Soul: Finding the Wild in a Tame World, and Sea Change Project at seachangeproject.com. Everybody listening, we will link to everything that we discussed in the show notes as per usual at tim.blog/podcast. Just search Craig or Foster and he will pop right up.

And until next time, be just a bit kinder than as necessary to others, but don’t forget to yourselves, and now maybe to that squirrel outside, maybe that oak tree, go take a look, sip a cup of coffee outside, maybe it’s just an insect mound, but you can really study the macro through the micro. So take a small step. Enjoy, and thanks for tuning in.

Are You Hunting Antelope or Field Mice?

Am I hunting antelope or field mice?

I often ask myself this, and I lifted it from the most unlikely of sources: former Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, Newt Gingrich.

Now, I donโ€™t know Newt, and I strongly disagree with a lot of his politics and deliberate hyper-polarization, but he had periods of nearly unbelievable effectiveness. He is considered by some to be one the most influential conservative leaders in the history of the Republican Party. How did he do it? And how did he even cross my radar?

Around 2012, I wandered into a used bookstore and chanced upon Buck Up, Suck Upโ€ฆ and Come Back When You Foul Up: 12 Winning Secrets from the War Room, written by James Carville and Paul Begala, the political strategists behind Bill Clintonโ€™s presidential campaign war room. At the time, I was thinking a lot about strategy, and, first and foremost, this is a book about strategy.

Itโ€™s worth noting that Newt didnโ€™t always have the nicest things to say about Clinton, to put it mildly. Nonetheless, James and Paul felt it important to include a story about him in their book.

Hereโ€™s the excerpt that most stuck with me:

Newt Gingrich is one of the most successful political leaders of our time. Yes, we disagreed with virtually everything he did, but this is a book about strategy, not ideology. And weโ€™ve got to give Newt his due. His strategic abilityโ€”his relentless focus on capturing the House of Representatives for the Republicansโ€”led to one of the biggest political landslides in American history.

Now that heโ€™s in the private sector, Newt uses a brilliant illustration to explain the need to focus on the big things and let the little stuff slide: the analogy of the field mice and the antelope.

A lion is fully capable of capturing, killing, and eating a field mouse. But it turns out that the energy required to do so exceeds the caloric content of the mouse itself. So a lion that spent its day hunting and eating field mice would slowly starve to death. A lion canโ€™t live on field mice. A lion needs antelope. Antelope are big animals. They take more speed and strength to capture and kill, and once killed, they provide a feast for the lion and her pride. A lion can live a long and happy life on a diet of antelope. The distinction is important. Are you spending all your time and exhausting all your energy catching field mice? In the short term it might give you a nice, rewarding feeling. But in the long run youโ€™re going to die. So ask yourself at the end of the day, โ€œDid I spend today chasing mice or hunting antelope?โ€

If you look at your calendar for the last month or your to-do list for next week, or the lack thereof, are you hunting field mice or antelope?

Another way I often approach this is to look at my to-do list and ask: Which one of these, if done, would render all the rest either easier or completely irrelevant?

Separately: Which undone item, if done, would liberate the most energy for me personally?

Reread The 80/20 Principle for good measure.

And if all of that yields no fruit, you might find that the to-do item youโ€™ve been avoiding the longest, punting from week to week or month to month, is precisely the antelope you should be tracking tomorrow morning.

Happy hunting.


This short post was adapted from โ€œTesting The โ€˜Impossibleโ€™: 17 Questions That Changed My Life,โ€ a chapter in my book “Tools of Titans: The Tactics, Routines, and Habits of Billionaires, Icons, and World-Class Performers.” You can read or listen to the chapter for free here.